Contingent involuntary motoric inhibition: The involuntary inhibition of a motor response contingent on top-down goals

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1348-1352

  Anderson, Brian A ^a   Folk, Charles L ^b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Automaticity; Cognitive control; Inhibition; Motor response

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOMATISM; COGNITION; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MOTIVATION; REACTION TIME; UNITED STATES;

AUTOMATISM; COGNITION; GOALS; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); REACTION TIME; UNITED STATES; VOLITION;

EID: 84874728104     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0030514     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Alderson, R. M., Rapport, M. D., & Kofler, M. J. (2007). Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and behavioral inhibition: A meta-analytic review of the stop signal paradigm. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 745-758. doi:10.1007/s10802-007-9131-6
2. Anderson, B. A., & Folk, C. L. (2012). Dissociating location-specific inhibition and attention shifts: Evidence against the disengagement account of contingent capture. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 1183-1198. doi:10.3758/s13414-012-0325-9
3. Aron, A. R., Fletcher, P. C., Bullmore, E. T., Sahakian, B. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2003). Stop signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 115-116. doi:10.1038/nn1003
4. Aron, A. R., & Poldrack, R. A. (2006). Cortical and subcortical contributions to stop signal response inhibition: Role of the subthalamic nucleus. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 2424-2433. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4682-05.2006
5. Aron, A. R., Robbins, T. W., & Poldrack, R. A. (2004). Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 170-177. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.010
6. Baddeley, A. (1996). Exploring the central executive. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 49, 5-28.
7. Chambers, C. D., Bellgrove, M. A., Stokes, M. G., Henderson, T. R., Garavan, H., Robertson, I. H.,...Mattingley, J. B. (2006). Executive "brake failure" following deactivation of human frontal lobe. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 444-455.
8. Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1737-1747. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.6.1737
9. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149. doi:10.3758/BF03203267
10. Flowers, J. H., & Wilcox, N. (1982). The effect of flanking context on visual classification: The joint contribution of interactions at different processing levels. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 32, 581-591. doi:10.3758/BF03204214
11. Folk, C. L., & Anderson, B. A. (2010). Target uncertainty and attentional capture: Color singleton set or multiple top-down control settings? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 421-426. doi:10.3758/PBR.17.3.421
12. Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 847-858. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.847
13. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030-1044. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1030
14. Fuentes, L. J., Vivas, A. B., & Humphreys, G. W. (1999). Inhibitory tagging of stimulus properties in inhibition of return: Effects on semantic priming and flanker interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, 149-164.
15. Garavan, H., Ross, T. J., & Stein, E. A. (1999). Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: An event-related functional MRI study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 96, 8301-8306. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.14.8301
16. Jaskowski, P. (2009). Negative compatibility effect: The object-updating hypothesis revisited. Experimental Brain Research, 193, 157-160. doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1700-6
17. Lenartowicz, A., Verbruggen, F., Logan, G. D., & Poldrack, R. A. (2011). Inhibition-related activation in the right inferior frontal gyrus in the absence of inhibitory cues. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 3388-3399. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00031
18. Logan, G. D. (1983). On the ability to inhibit simple thoughts and actions: I. Stop signal studies of decision and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 585-606. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.9.4.585
19. Logan, G. D. (1985). Executive control of thought and action. Acta Psychologica, 60, 193-210. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(85)90055-1
20. Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91, 295-327. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.295
21. Ridderinkhof, K. R., Band, G. P. H., & Logan, G. D. (1999). A study of adaptive behavior: Effects of age and irrelevant information on the ability to inhibit one's actions. Acta Psychologica, 101, 315-337. doi:10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00010-4
22. Schlaghecken, F., & Eimer, M. (2002). Motor activation with and without inhibition: Evidence for a threshold mechanism in motor control. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 64, 148-162. doi:10.3758/BF03194564
23. van Gaal, S., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Scholte, H. S., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2010). Unconscious activation of the prefrontal no-go network. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 4143-4150. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2992-09.2010
24. van Gaal, S., Ridderinkhof, K. R., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2009). Dissociating consciousness from inhibitory control: Evidence for unconsciously triggered response inhibition in the stop-signal task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1129-1139. doi:10.1037/a0013551
25. Verbruggen, F., Liefooghe, B., & Vandierendonck, A. (2004). The interaction between stop signal inhibition and distractor interference in the flanker and Stroop task. Acta Psychologica, 116, 21-37. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.12.011
26. Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2008). Automatic and controlled response inhibition: Associative learning in the go/no-go and stop signal paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 649-672. doi:10.1037/a0013170
27. Vivas, A. B., Fuentes, L. J., Estevez, A. F., & Humphreys, G. W. (2007). Inhibitory tagging in inhibition of return: Evidence from flanker interference with multiple distractor features. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 320-326. doi:10.3758/BF03194071