Conflict adaptation in time: Foreperiods as contextual cues for attentional adjustment

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 910-916

  Wendt, Mike ^a   Kiesel, Andrea ^b  

^a HELMUT SCHMIDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Attention; Cognitive and attentional control; Executive control

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053123923     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0119-4     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bertelson, P., & Tisseyre, F. (1968). The time-course of preparation with regular and irregular foreperiods. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 297-300. doi: 10. 1080/14640746808400165.
2. Blais, C., Robidoux, S., Risko, E. F., & Besner, D. (2007). Item-specific adaptation and the conflict-monitoring hypothesis: A computational model. Psychological Review, 114, 1076-1086.
3. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652.
4. Corballis, P. M., & Gratton, G. (2003). Independent control of processing strategies for different locations in the visual field. Biological Psychology, 64, 191-209.
5. Correa, Á., Cappucci, P., Nobre, A. C., & Lupiáñez, J. (2010). The two sides of temporal orienting: Facilitating perceptual selection, disrupting response selection. Experimental Psychology, 57, 142-148. doi: 10. 1027/1618-3169/a000018.
6. Crump, M. J. C., Gong, Z., & Milliken, B. (2006). The context-specific proportion congruent Stroop effect: Location as a contextual cue. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 316-321.
7. Crump, M. J. C., & Milliken, B. (2009). The flexibility of context-specific control: Evidence for context-driven generalization of item-specific control settings. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1523-1532.
8. Crump, M. J. C., Vaquero, J. M. M., & Milliken, B. (2008). Context-specific learning and control: The roles of awareness, task relevance, and relative salience. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 22-36.
9. Eriksen, C. W. (1995). The flanker task and response competition: A useful tool for investigating a variety of cognitive problems. Visual Cognition, 2, 101-118.
10. Fernandez-Duque, D., & Knight, M. B. (2008). Cognitive control: Dynamic, sustained, and voluntary influences. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 34, 340-355.
11. Fischer, R., Plessow, F., & Kiesel, A. (2010). Auditory warning signals affect mechanisms of response selection: Evidence from a Simon task. Experimental Psychology, 57, 89-97.
12. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 121, 480-506.
13. Heinemann, A., Kunde, W., & Kiesel, A. (2009). Context-specific prime-congruency effects: On the role of conscious stimulus representations for cognitive control. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 966-976.
14. Hommel, B. (1994). Spontaneous decay of response code activation. Psychological Research, 56, 261-268.
15. Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183-216. doi: 10. 1080/713756773.
16. Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68, 1-17.
17. Jacoby, L. L., Lindsay, D. S., & Hessels, S. (2003). Item-specific control of automatic processes: Stroop process dissiociations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 638-644.
18. Lehle, C., & Hübner, R. (2008). On-the-fly adaptation of selectivity in the flanker task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 814-818.
19. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user's guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.
20. Tzelgov, J., Henik, A., & Berger, J. (1992). Controlling Stroop effects by manipulating expectations for color words. Memory & Cognition, 20, 727-735. doi: 10. 3758/BF03202722.
21. Verguts, T., & Notebaert, W. (2008). Hebbian learning of cognitive control: Dealing with specific and nonspecific adaptation. Psychological Review, 115, 518-525.
22. Vietze, I., & Wendt, M. (2009). Context-specificity of conflict frequency-dependent control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1391-1400.
23. Wendt, M., Kluwe, R. H., & Vietze, I. (2008). Location-specific versus hemisphere-specific adaptation of processing selectivity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 135-140. doi: 10. 3758/PBR. 15. 1. 135.
24. Wendt, M., & Luna-Rodriguez, A. (2009). Conflict-frequency affects flanker interference: Role of stimulus-ensemble-specific practice and flanker-response contingencies. Experimental Psychology, 56, 206-217. doi: 10. 1027/1618-3169. 56. 3. 206.
25. Wühr, P., & Kunde, W. (2008). Pre-cueing spatial S-R correspondence: Is there regulation of expected response conflict? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 34, 872-883.