Learning what to expect: Context-specific control over intertrial priming effects in singleton search

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 533-546

  Thomson, David R ^a   D'Ascenzo, Michael ^a   Milliken, Bruce ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Attention; Memory; Visual search

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REPETITION PRIMING; YOUNG ADULT; ARTICLE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; HUMANS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; REPETITION PRIMING; RESEARCH DESIGN; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84876181680     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: 15325946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-012-0278-1     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Brascamp, J. W., Pels, E., & Kristjansson, A. (2011). Priming of pop-out on multiple time scales during visual search. Vision Research, 51(17), 1972-1978.
2. Bravo, M., & Nakayama, K. (1992). The role of attention in different visual search tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 465-472.
3. Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subjects designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1, 42-45.
4. Crump, M. J. C., Gong, Z., & Milliken, B. (2006). The context-specific proportion congruent Stroop effect: Location as a contextual cue. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 316-321.
5. Crump, M. J. C., & Milliken, B. (2009). The flexibility of context-specific control: Evidence for context-driven generalization of item-specific control settings. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1523-1532.
6. Fecteau, J. H. (2007). Priming of pop-out depends upon the current goals of observers. Journal of Vision, 7, 1-11.
7. Fiacconi, C. M., & Milliken, B. (2012). Contingency blindness: Location-identity binding mismatches obscure awareness of spatial contingencies and produce profound interference in visual working memory. Memory & Cognition. Advance online publication. doi: 10. 3758/s13421-012-0193-5.
8. Geyer, T., & Muller, H. J. (2009). Distinct, but top-down modulable color and positional priming mechanisms in visual pop-out search. Psychological Research, 73, 167-176.
9. Hillstrom, A. P. (2000). Repetition effects in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 800-817.
10. Huang, L., Holcombe, A. O., & Pashler, H. (2004). Repetition priming in visual search: Episodic retrieval, not feature priming. Memory & Cognition, 32, 12-20.
11. Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183-216.
12. Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494-500.
13. Jacoby, L. L., Lindsay, D. S., & Hessels, S. (2003). Item-specific control of automatic processes: Stroop process dissociations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 638-644.
14. Jones, M., & Sieck, W. R. (2003). Learning myopia: An adaptive recency effect in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 626-640.
15. Lamy, D., Yashar, A., & Ruderman, L. (2010). A dual-stage account of inter-trial priming effects. Vision Research, 50, 1396-1401.
16. Lee, H., Mozer, M. C., & Vecera, S. P. (2009). Mechanisms of priming of pop-out: Stored representations or feature-gain modulations? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 1059-1071.
17. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.
18. Logan, G. D. (1990). Repetition priming and automaticity: Common underlying mechanisms? Cognitive Psychology, 22, 1-35.
19. Malkjovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition, 22, 657-672.
20. Malkjovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1996). Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 977-991.
21. Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (2000). Priming of pop-out: III. A short-term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection. Visual Cognition, 7, 571-595.
22. Martini, P. (2010). System identification in priming of pop-out. Vision Research, 50, 2110-2115.
23. Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1-32.
24. Thomson, D. R., & Milliken, B. (2011). A switch in task affects priming of pop-out: Evidence for the role of episodes. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 318-333.
25. Thomson, D. R., & Milliken, B. (2012). Perceptual distinctiveness produces long-lasting priming of pop-out. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 170-176.
26. Thomson, D. R., & Milliken, B. (in press). Contextual distinctiveness produces long-lasting priming of pop-out. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. Advance online publication. doi: 10. 1037/a0028069.
27. van Selst, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 631-650.
28. Vaquero, J. M. M., Fiacconi, C. M., & Milliken, B. (2010). Attention, awareness of contingencies, and control in spatial localization: A qualitative difference approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1342-1357.
29. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2. 0 A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.
30. Wolfe, J. M., Butcher, S. J., Lee, C., & Hyle, M. (2003). Changing your mind: On the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 29, 483-502.
31. Yashar, A., & Lamy, D. (2011). Refining the dual-stage account of intertrial feature priming: Does motor response or response feature matter? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 2160-2167.