Mathematical Literacy: Developing Identities of Inclusion

Mathematical Literacy: Developing Identities of Inclusion

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-239

  Solomon, Yvette ^a  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145514938     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203889275     Document Type: Book

References (368)

1. AAUW. (1995). How schools shortchange girls. Washington: American Association of University Women Educational Foundation.
2. Adler, J. (1997). A participatory-inquiry approach and the mediation of mathematical knowledge in a multilingual classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33, 235-258.
3. Alexander, P., and Dochy, P. (1995). Conceptions of knowledge and beliefs: A comparison across varying cultural and educational communities. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 413-442.
4. Alibert, D., and Thomas, M. (1991). Research on mathematical proof. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
5. Almeida, D. (2000). A survey of mathematics undergraduates’ interaction with proof: Some implications for mathematics education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 31(6), 869-890.
6. Anderson, J. (1996). The legacy of school-attempts at justifying and proving among new undergraduates. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 15(3), 129-134.
7. Augustine, D. (1977). On Order II, 9.26. In V. Bourke (Ed.), The essential Augustine. Indianapolis: Hackett.
8. Back, J., and Pratt, N. (2007). Spaces to discuss mathematics: Communities of practice on an online discussion board. Paper presented at the 2nd Socio-cultural Theory in Educational Research and Practice Conference: Theory, Identity and Learning, Manchester University, September.
9. Baker, D., Clay, J., and Fox, C. (1996). Challenging ways of knowing in English, Maths and Science. London: Falmer.
10. Ball, D. L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 373-397.
11. Ball, S. J. (1981). Beachside Comprehensive: A case-study of secondary schooling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Barnes, D. (1976). From communication to curriculum. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
13. Barnes, D. (2008). Exploratory talk for learning. In N. Mercer and S. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Exploring talk in school: Inspired by the work of Douglas Barnes.London: Sage.
14. Barnes, D., and Sheeran, Y. (1992). Oracy and genre: speech styles in the classroom. In K. Norman (Ed.), Thinking voices. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
15. Barnes, D., and Todd, F. (1977). Communication and learning in small groups. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
16. Barrs, M. (1994). Genre theory: What’s it all about? In B. Stierer and J. Maybin (Eds.), Language, literacy and learning in educational practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
17. Bartholomew, H. (1999). Setting in stone? How ability grouping practices structure and constrain achievement in mathematics. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association, University of Sussex, Brighton.
18. Bartholomew, H. (2000). Negotiating identity in the community of the mathematics classroom. Paper presented at the British Education Research Association, Cardiff, Wales.
19. Bartholomew, H., and Rodd, M. (2003). A fiercely held modesty: the experiences of women studying mathematics. New Zealand Journal of Mathematics, 32(3), 9-13.
20. Barton, D., and Hamilton, M. (1998). Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community. New York: Routledge.
21. Barton, D., Hamilton, M., and Ivanic, R. (Eds.). (2000). Situated literacies: Reading and writing. London: Routledge
22. Barton, D., and Padmore, S. (1994). Roles, networks and values in everyday writing. In D. Graddol, J. Maybin and B. Steirer (Eds.), Researching language and literacy in social context. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
23. Barwell, R. (2004). What is numeracy? [Communication] For the Learning of Mathematics, 24(1), 20-22.
24. Barwell, R. (2005). Ambiguity in the mathematics classroom. Language and Education, 19(2), 118-126.
25. Bauersfeld, H. (1995). The structuring of structures: Development and function of mathematizing as a social practice. In L. Steffe and J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 137-158). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Baxter, J. (2002). Jokers in the pack: Why boys are more adept than girls at speaking in public settings. Language and Education, 16(2), 81-96.
27. Baxter Magolda, M. (2002). Epistemological reflection: the evolution of epistemological assumptions from age 18 to 30. In B. Hofer and P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Becker, J. R. (1995). Women’s ways of knowing in mathematics. In G. Kaiser and P. Rogers (Eds.), Equity in mathematics education: Influences of feminism and culture (pp. 163-174). London: Falmer.
29. Belenky, M., Clinchy, B., Goldberger, N., and Tarule, J. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice and mind. New York: Basic Books.
30. Bendixen, L. D. (2002). A process model of epistemic belief change. In B. Hofer and P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31. Bernstein, B. (1990). The structuring of pedagogic discourse, Volume IV: Class, codes and control. London: Routledge.
32. Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity. London: Taylor and Francis.
33. Bernstein, B. B. (1971-75). Class, codes and control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
34. Berry, M. (1981). Systemic linguistics and discourse analysis: A multi-layered approach to exchange structure. In M. Coulthard and M. Montgomery (Eds.), Studies in discourse analysis (pp. 120-145). London; Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
35. Bibby, T. (2002). Shame: An emotional response to doing mathematics as an adult and a teacher. British Educational Research Journal, 28(5), 705-721.
36. Bibby, T. (2006, November). Mathematical relationships: identities and participation-A psychoanalytic perspective? Paper presented at the ESRC seminar: Mathematical relationships, Manchester University.
37. Bibby, T. (forthcoming). In L. Black, H. Mendick and Y. Solomon (Eds.) Mathematical relationships in education: Identities and participation. New York: Routledge
38. Biggs, A., and Edwards, V. (1991). I treat them all the same: Teacher-pupil talk in multiethnic classrooms. Language and Education, 5(1), 161-176.
39. Black, L. (2002a). The guided construction of educational inequality: How socially disadvantaged children are marginalized in classroom interactions. Unpublished PhD thesis, Lancaster University, Lancaster.
40. Black, L. (2002b). Classroom interaction. Unpublished raw data.
41. Black, L. (2004a). Differential participation in whole-class discussions and the construction of marginalised identities. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 5(1), 34-54.
42. Black, L. (2004b, September). Girls’ and boys’ participation in whole class discussions and the construction of learner identities in classroom learning processes. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association, Manchester.
43. Black, L. (2004c). Teacher-pupil talk in whole-class discussions and processes of social positioning within the primary school classroom. Language and Education, 18(5), 347-360.
44. Black, L. (2005, September). “She’s not in my head or in my body”: pupil participation in teacher-pupil interactions in the primary school classroom. Paper presented at the Conference on Sociocultural Theory in Educational Research and Practice, Manchester University, Manchester, UK.
45. Black, L., Mendick, H. and Solomon, Y. (Eds.) (forthcoming) Mathematical relationships in education: Identities and participation. New York: Routledge
46. Boaler, J. (1997a). Experiencing school mathematics: Teaching styles, sex and setting. Buckingham: Open University Press.
47. Boaler, J. (1997b). When even the winners are losers: Evaluating the experiences of “top set” students. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 29(2), 65-182.
48. Boaler, J. (1999). Participation, knowledge and beliefs: A community perspective on mathematics learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40(3), 259-281.
49. Boaler, J. (2000). Mathematics from another world: Traditional communities and the alienation of learners. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(4), 379-397.
50. Boaler, J. (2002). Experiencing school mathematics: Traditional and reform approaches to teaching. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
51. Boaler, J. (2006). Urban success. A multidimensional mathematics approach with equitable outcomes. Phi Delta Kappan (January), 364-369.
52. Boaler, J. (2007). Paying the price for sugar and spice. In N. S. Nasir and P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics. New York: Teachers College.
53. Boaler, J. (2008). Promoting “relational equity” and high mathematics achievement through an innovative mixed-ability approach. British Educational Research Journal, 34(2) 167-194.
54. Boaler, J., and Greeno, J. G. (2000). Identity, agency, and knowing in mathematics worlds. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 171-200). Westport, CT: Ablex.
55. Boaler, J., and Staples, M. (2008). Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach: The case of Railside School. Teachers’ College Record, 110(3), 608-645.
56. Boaler, J., and Wiliam, D. (2001). “We’ve still got to learn!" Students’ perspectives on ability grouping and mathematics achievement. In P. Gates (Ed.), Issues in mathematics teaching.London: RoutledgeFalmer.
57. Boaler, J., Wiliam, D., and Brown, M. (2000). Students’ experiences of ability grouping-disaffection, polarisation and the construction of failure. British Educational Research Journal, 26(5), 631-648.
58. Bourdieu, P., and Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Cambridge: Polity.
59. Bousted, M. (1989). Who talks? English in Education, 23(3), 41-51.
60. Breen, C. (2000). Becoming more aware: Psychoanalytic insights concerning fear and relationship in the mathematics classroom. Paper presented at the 24th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Hiroshima, Japan.
61. Brenner, M. E. (1994). A communication framework for mathematics: Exemplary instruction for culturally and linguistically diverse students. In B. McLeod (Ed.), Language and learning: Educating linguistically diverse students. (pp. 233-267). New York: SUNY Press.
62. Brown, M., and Macrae, S. (2005). Students’ experiences of undergraduate mathematics: Final report. Retrieved November 24, 2006 from http://www.esrcsocietytoday.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/.
63. Brown, M., and Rodd, M. (2004). Successful undergraduate mathematicians: A study of students in two universities. Paper presented at the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Bergen, Norway.
64. Burton, L. (1995). Moving towards a feminist epistemology of mathematics. In G. Kaiser and P. Rogers (Eds.), Equity in mathematics education: Influences of feminism and culture (pp. 209-225). London: Falmer.
65. Burton, L. (1996). Mathematics, and its learning, as narrative-a literacy for the twenty-first century. In D. Baker, J. Clay and C. Fox (Eds.), Challenging ways of knowing in English, Maths and Science. Sussex: Falmer.
66. Burton, L. (1999a). The implications of a narrative approach to the learning of mathematics. In L. Burton (Ed.), Learning mathematics: From hierarchies to networks (pp. 21-35). London: Falmer.
67. Burton, L. (1999b). Learning mathematics: From hierarchies to networks. London: Falmer.
68. Buxton, L. (1981). Do you panic about maths? Coping with maths anxiety. London: Heinemann.
69. Carraher, D., and Schliemann, A. (2002). Is everyday mathematics truly relevant to mathematics education? In M. E. Brenner and J. N. Moschkovich (Eds.), Everyday and academic mathematics in the classroom (pp. 131-153). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
70. Cazden, C. B. (1988/2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
71. Chapman, A. (1995). Intertextuality in school mathematics: The case of functions. Linguistics and Education, 7(3), 243-362.
72. Chouliaraki, L. (1998). Regulation in “progressivist” pedagogic discourse: Individualized teacher-pupil talk. Discourse and Society, 9(1), 5-32.
73. Christie, F. (1998). Learning the literacies of primary and secondary schooling. In F. Christie and R. Misson (Eds.), Literacy and schooling (pp. 47-73). London: Routledge.
74. Christie, F. (2003). Classroom discourse analysis: A functional perspective. London: Continuum.
75. Clewell, B. C., and Campbell, P. B. (2002). Taking stock: Where we’ve been, where we are, where we’re going. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 8, 255-284.
76. Coates, J. (1997). One-at-a-time: The organization of men’s talk. In S. Johnson and U. H. Meinhoff (Eds.), Language and masculinity. Oxford: Blackwell.
77. Cobb, P., and Hodge, L. (2002). A relational perspective on issues of cultural diversity and equity as they play out in the mathematics classroom. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2and3), 249-284.
78. Cobb, P., and Yackel, E. (1993, October 11-15). A constructivist perspective on the culture of the mathematics classroom. Paper presented at The Culture of the Mathematics Classroom, Osnabruck, Germany.
79. Cobb, P., and Yackel, E. (1998). A constructivist perspective on the culture of the mathematics classroom. In F. Seeger, J. Voigt and U. Waschescio (Eds.), The culture of the mathematics classroom (pp. 158-190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
80. Cobb, P., Yackel, E., and Wood, T. (1993). Discourse, mathematical thinking, and classroom practice. In E. Forman, N. Minick and C. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children’s development (pp. 91-119). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
81. Cooper, B. (2001). Social class and “real-life” mathematics assessments. In P. Gates (Ed.), Issues in mathematics teaching. London: Routledge.
82. Cooper, B., and Dunne, M. (2000). Assessing children’s mathematical knowledge. Buckingham: Open University Press.
83. Corson, D. (1992). Language, gender and education: A critical review linking social justice and power. Gender and Education 4(3), 229-255.
84. Cox, W. (2001). On the expectations of the mathematical knowledge of first-year undergraduates. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 32(6), 847-861.
85. Crawford, K., Gordon, S., Nicholas, J., and Prosser, M. (1994). Conceptions of mathematics and how it is learned: The perspectives of students entering university. Learning and Instruction, 4, 331-345.
86. Creese, A., Leonard, D., Daniels, H., and Hey, V. (2004). Pedagogic discourses, learning and gender identification. Language and Education, 18(3), 191-206.
87. Czerniewska, P. (1992). Learning about writing. Oxford: Blackwell.
88. Dalton, B., Ingels, S. J., Downing, J., and Bozick, R. (2007). Advanced mathematics and science coursetaking in the Spring High School senior classes of 1982, 1992, and 2004 (NCES 2007-312). Retrieved February 11, 2008 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2007/2007312.pdf.
89. Dart, B., and Clarke, J. (1988). Sexism in schools: A new look. Educational Review, 40, 41-49.
90. Davies, B. (1990). Agency as a form of discursive practice: A classroom scene observed. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 11(3), 341-361.
91. Davis, F., West, M. M., Greeno, J. G., Gresalfi, M., and Martin, H. T. (2007). Transactions of mathematical knowledge in the Algebra Project. In N. S. Nasir and P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics (pp. 69-88). New York: Teachers College Press.
92. DCSF. (2007a). National Curriculum assessments at Key Stage 2 in England, 2007 (Provisional). Retrieved from http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s000737/index.shtml.
93. DCSF. (2007b). Primary Framework for literacy and mathematics. Retrieved from http://www. standards.dfes.gov.uk/primaryframeworks/.
94. de Abreu, G., Bishop, A., and Pompeu, G. (1997). What children and teachers count as mathematics. In T. Nunes and P. Bryant (Eds.), Learning and teaching mathematics: An international perspective (pp. 233-264). Hove: Psychology Press.
95. de Abreu, G., and Cline, T. (2003). Schooled mathematics and cultural knowledge. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 11(1), 11-30.
96. de Abreu, G., and Cline, T. (2007). Social valorization of mathematical practices: The implications for learners in multicultural schools. In N. S. Nasir and P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics. New York: Teachers College Press.
97. De Corte, E., Op’t Eynde, P., and Verschaffel, L. (2002). “Knowing what to believe”: the relevance of students’ mathematical beliefs for mathematics education. In B. Hofer and P. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
98. Delamont, S. (1990). Sex roles and the school. London: Methuen.
99. DfES. (2000). The National Numeracy Strategy: Mathematical vocabulary. London: Department for Education and Skills.
100. DfES. (2005). Standards Unit Newsletter [Electronic Version], Autumn from http://www.dfes. gov.uk/successforall/downloads/sunewsletterautumn2005-194-318.pdf.
101. Dillon, J. T. (1982). The multidisciplinary study of questioning. Journal of Education Psychology, 74, 147-165.
102. Dowling, P. (1998). The sociology of maths education: Mathematical myths/pedagogic texts.London: Falmer.
103. Dowling, P. (2001). Reading mathematics texts. In P. Gates (Ed.), Issues in mathematics teaching. London: Routledge.
104. Dreyfus, T. (1999). Why Johnny can’t prove. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38(1-3), 23-44.
105. Durkin, K., and Shire, B. (1991). Lexical ambiguity in mathematical contexts. In K. Durkin and B. Shire (Eds.), Language in mathematical education (pp. 71-84). Buckingham: Open University Press.
106. Dweck, C. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040-1048.
107. Eccles, J. (1989). Bringing young women to math and science. In M. Crawford and M. Gentry (Eds.), Gender and thought: Psychological perspectives (pp. 36-58). New York: Springer-Verlag.
108. Edwards, D., and Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge. London: Routledge.
109. Ernest, P. (1991). The philosophy of mathematics education. Basingstoke: Falmer.
110. Ernest, P. (1998). The relation between personal and public knowledge from an epistemological perspective. In F. Seeger and J. W. Voigt, (Eds.), The culture of the mathematics classroom (pp. 245-268). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
111. Ernest, P. (1999). Forms of knowledge in mathematics and mathematics education: Philosophical and rhetorical perspectives. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38(1-3), 67-83.
112. Esterhuysen, P. (1996). “Focusing on the frames”: Using comic books to challenge dominant literacies in South Africa. In D. Baker, J. Clay and C. Fox (Eds.), Challenging ways of knowing in English, Maths and Science. Sussex: Falmer.
113. Evans, J. (2000). Adults’ mathematical thinking and emotions: A study of numerate practices.London: RoutledgeFalmer.
114. Fennema, E., and Leder, C. (Eds.). (1990). Mathematics and gender: Influences on teachers and students. New York: Teachers College.
115. Fennema, E., and Romberg, T. A. (1999). Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding. New Jersey: LEA.
116. Fischbein, E., and Kedem, I. (1982). Proof and certitude in the development of mathematical thinking. Paper presented at the Sixth Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Antwerp.
117. Forman, E. A., Larreamendy-Joerns, J., Stein, M., and Brown, C. A. (1998). “You’re going to want to find out which and prove it”: Collective argumentation in a mathematics classroom. Learning and Instruction, 8(6), 527-548.
118. Fortescue, C. M. (1994). Using oral and written language to increase understanding of math concepts. Language Arts, 71(8), 576-580.
119. Franke, M., Kazemi, E. and Battey, D. (2007) Mathematics teaching and classroom practice. In F. Lester (Ed.) Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 225-256). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
120. Frankenstein, M. (1995). Equity in mathematics education: Class in the world outside the class. In W. G. Secada, E. Fennema and L. B. Adajian (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 165-190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
121. French, J., and French, P. (1984). Gender imbalances in the primary classroom: An interactional account. Educational Research, 26(2), 127-136.
122. Gallego, M., and Hollingsworth, S. (Eds.). (2000). What counts as literacy. New York: Teachers College Press.
123. Gee, J. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. New York: Routledge Falmer.
124. Gee, J. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York: Routledge.
125. Gee, J. (2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99-125.
126. Gilbert, P. (1994). Authorising disadvantage: Authorship and creativity in the language classroom. In B. Steirer and J. Maybin (Eds.), Language, literacy and learning in educational practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
127. Gillborn, D., and Mirza, H. S. (2000). Educational inequality: Mapping race, class and gender. London: Ofsted.
128. Gillborn, D., and Youdell, D. (2000). Rationing education: Policy, practice, reform, and equity. Buckingham: Open University Press.
129. Gilligan, C. (1993). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
130. Good, T., Sikes, N., and Brophy, J. (1973). Effects of teacher sex, student sex on classroom interaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 74-87.
131. Government Statistical Service. (2007). Statistics of education: The characteristics of high attainers. London: HMSO.
132. Government Statistical Service. (2008). GCE/VCE A/AS and equivalent examination results in England, 2006/07 (Revised) (Vol. 2008). London: HMSO.
133. Graves, R. (1885). Life of Sir William Rowan Hamilton (Vol.2). Dublin: Hodges, Figgis and Co.
134. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic.
135. Griffiths, M. (1995). Feminisms and the self: The web of identity. London: Routledge.
136. Gutiérrez, K. D., Baquedano-López, P., Alvarez, H. H., and Chiu, M. M. (1999). Building a culture of collaboration through hybrid language practices. Theory into Practice, 38(2), 87-93.
137. Gutiérrez, K. D., Rymes, B., and Larson, J. (1995). Script, counterscript, and underlife in the classroom: James Brown versus “Brown v. Board of Education.” Harvard Educational Review, 65(3), 445-471.
138. Gutiérrez, R. (2007). (Re)Defining equity: The importance of a critical perspective. In N. S. Nasir and P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics (pp. 3-50). New York: Teacher College.
139. Gutstein, E. (2006). Reading and writing the world with mathematics: Toward a pedagogy for social justice. New York: Routledge.
140. Gutstein, E. (2007). “So one question leads to another”: Using mathematics to develop a pedagogy of questioning. In N. S. Nasir and P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics (pp. 51-68). New York: Teachers College Press.
141. Gutstein, E., Lipman, P., Hernandez, P., and de los Reyes, R. (1997). Culturally relevant mathematics teaching in a Mexican American context. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(6), 709-737.
142. Hall, N. (1994). The emergence of literacy. In B. Steirer and J. Maybin (Eds.), Language, literacy and learning in educational practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
143. Halliday, M. A. K. (Ed.). (1978). Language as social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.
144. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
145. Hamilton, W. (1843). Quaternions. In H. Halberstam and R. Ingram (Eds.), The mathematical papers of Sir William Rowan Hamilton Vol. 3 (1967) (pp. 103-105). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
146. Hamilton, W. (1844). Letter to Graves on quaternions; or on a new system of imaginaries in algebra. Philosophical Magazine 25, 489-495.
147. Hamilton, W. (1844-50). On quaternions; or on a new system of imaginaries in algebra. Philosophical Magazine Vols. 25-36. In H. Halberstam and R. Ingram (Eds.), The mathematical papers of Sir William Rowan Hamilton Vol.3 (1967) (pp. 227-297). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
148. Hamlyn, D. (1978). Experience and the growth of understanding. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
149. Hammer, D., and Elby, A. (2002). On the form of a personal epistemology. In B. K. Hofer and P. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
150. Hammersley, M. (1990). An evaluation of two studies of gender imbalance in primary classrooms. British Educational Research Journal, 16, 125-143.
151. Hanna, G. (1995). Challenges to the importance of proof. For the Learning of Mathematics, 15(3), 42-49.
152. Hannula, M. (2002). Attitude towards mathematics: Emotions, expectations and values. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 25-46.
153. Hardman, F., Smith, F., and Wall, K.(2003).“Interactive whole class teaching”in the National Literacy Strategy. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(2), 197-215.
154. Hardy, T. (2007). Participation and performance: Keys to confident learning in mathematics? Research in Mathematics Education, 9.(eds. L. Bills, J. Hodgen, H. Povey) British Society for Research into the Learning of Mathematics (BSRLM).
155. Harel, G., and Sowder, L. (1998). Students’ proof schemes: Results from exploratory studies. In A. Schoenfeld, J. Kapput and E. Dubinsky (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education, Vol 3 (pp. 234-283). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
156. Harel, G., and Sowder, L. (2007). Toward comprehensive perspectives on the learning and teaching of proof. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 805-842). Charlotte, NC: NCTM/Information Age Publishing.
157. Hasan, R. (2002). Ways of meaning, ways of learning: Code as an explanatory concept. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(4), 537-548.
158. Healy, L., and Hoyles, C. (1998). Justifying and proving in school mathematics: Summary of the results from a survey of the proof conceptions of students in the UK. London: Institute of Education.
159. Healy, L., and Hoyles, C. (2000). A study of proof conceptions in algebra. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(4), 396-428.
160. Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
161. Heath, S. B. (1996). Good science or good art? or both? In D. Baker, J. Clay and C. Fox (Eds.), Challenging ways of knowing in English, Maths and Science. Sussex: Falmer.
162. Hieronymus, A. N., Lindquist, E. F., and France, N. (1988). Richmond test of basic skills (2nd ed.). London: NFER-Nelson.
163. Higher Education Statistics Agency. (2008). Subject of study 2005-2006. http://www.hesa.ac.uk/index.php?option=com_datatablesandItemid=121, accessed February 11, 2008.
164. Hill, H. C., Schilling, S. G., and Ball, D. L. (2004). Developing measures of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching. Elementary School Journal, 105(1), 12-30.
165. Hofer, B. K. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(4), 378-405.
166. Hofer, B. K., and Pintrich, P. (1997a). The development of epistemological theories; beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 88-140.
167. Hofer, B. K., and Pintrich, P. R. (1997b). Disciplinary ways of knowing: Epistemological beliefs in science and psychology. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
168. Hofer, B. K., and Pintrich, P. R. (Eds.). (2002). Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
169. Holland, D., Lachicotte Jr, W., Skinner, D., and Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
170. Horn, I. S. (2007). Fast kids, slow kids, lazy kids: Framing the mismatch problem in mathematics teachers’ conversations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(1), 37-79.
171. Howe, C. (1997). Gender and classroom interaction. Edinburgh: SCRE.
172. Hull, R. (1985). The language gap. London: Methuen.
173. IES. (2006). The nation’s report card: Trends in average mathematics scale scores by gender. Retrieved December 18, 2006 from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/ltt/results2004/sub-mathgender.asp.
174. Inhelder, B., and Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence; an essay on the construction of formal operational structures. New York: Basic Books.
175. Ireson, J., and Hallam, S. (1999). Raising standards: Is ability grouping the answer? Oxford Review of Education, 25(3), 343-358.
176. Ireson, J., and Hallam, S. (2001). Ability grouping in education. London: Paul Chapman.
177. Ireson, J., Hallam, S., Hack, S., Clark, H., and Plewis, I. (2002). Ability grouping in English secondary schools: Effects on attainment in English, mathematics and science. Educational Research and Evaluation, 8(3), 299-318.
178. Jay, T. (2003). The psychology of language. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
179. Jenkins, N., and Cheshire, J. (1990). Gender issues in the GCSE oral English examination: Part I. Language and Education, 4, 261-292.
180. Kassem, D. (2001). Ethnicity and mathematics education. In P. Gates (Ed.), Issues in mathematics teaching (pp. 64-76). London: Routledge.
181. Kawanaka, T., and Stigler, J. (1999). Teachers’ use of questions in eighth-grade mathematics classrooms in Germany, Japan and the United States. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(4), 255-278.
182. Kenyon, A., and Kenyon, V. (1996). Evolving shared discourse with teachers to promote literacies for learners in South Africa. In D. Baker, J. Clay and C. Fox (Eds.), Challenging ways of knowing in English, Maths and Science. Sussex: Falmer.
183. Khisty, L. (1995). Making inequality: Issues of language and meaning in mathematics teaching with Hispanic students. In W. G. Secada, E. Fennema and L. Adajian (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 279-297). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
184. King, P. M., and Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgement: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
185. Kitchen, A. (1999). The changing profile of entrants to mathematics at A level and to mathematical subjects in higher education. British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 57-64.
186. Kloosterman, P. (1996). Students’ beliefs about knowing and learning mathematics: Implications for motivation. In M. Carr (Ed.), Motivation in mathematics (pp. 131-156). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
187. Kloosterman, P., and Coughan, M. C. (1994). Students’ beliefs about learning school mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 94, 375-388.
188. Kuhn, D., and Weinstock, M. (2002). What is epistemological thinking and why does it matter? In B. Hofer and P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
189. Kyle, J. (2002). Proof and reasoning. In P. Kahn and J. Kyle (Eds.), Effective learning and teaching in mathematics and its applications. London: Kogan Page.
190. Labov, W. (1969). The logic of non-standard English. In J. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown monograph on languages and linguistics, Vol. 22, pp. 1-44.
191. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Making mathematics meaningful in multicultural contexts. In W. Seccada, E. Fennema and L. Adajian (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
192. Ladson-Billings, G. (1997). It doesn’t add up: African American students’ mathematics achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(6), 697-708.
193. Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
194. Lakoff, G., and Nuñez, R. (2001). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.
195. Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 29-63.
196. Lampert, M. (2001) Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
197. Landau, N. R. (1994). Love, hate and mathematics. Unpublished MA dissertation, King’s College, University of London, London.
198. Lankshear, C., and Knobel, M. (1998). New times! old ways? In F. Christie and R. Misson (Eds.), Literacy and schooling. London: Routledge.
199. Lave, J., Murtaugh, M., and de la Rocha, O. (1984). The dialectic of arithmetic in grocery shopping. In B. Rogoff and J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 67-94). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
200. Lave, J., and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
201. Leder, G. (1995). Equity inside the mathematics classroom: Fact or artifact? In W. G. Secada, E. Fennema and L. Adajian (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 209-224). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
202. Lee, J., Grigg, W., and Dion, G. (2007). The nation’s report card: Mathematics 2007.Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2007494.
203. Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex/Elsevier.
204. Lemke, J. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture and Activity 7(4), 273-290.
205. Lemke, J. L. (2003). Mathematics in the middle: Measure, picture, gesture, sign, and word. In M. Anderson, A. Sáenz-Ludlow, S. Zellwegr and V. V. Cifarelli (Eds.), Educational perspectives on mathematics as semiosis: From thinking to interpreting to knowing (pp. 215-234). Ottawa: Legas.
206. Lerman, S. (2001). Cultural, discursive psychology: A sociocultural approach to studying the teaching and learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46(1/3), 87-113.
207. Lerman, S., and Zevenbergen, R. (2004). The socio-political context of the mathematics classroom: Using Bernstein’s theoretical framework to understand classroom communications. In P. Valero and R. Zevenbergen (Eds.), Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education: Issues of power in theory and methodology (pp. 27-42). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
208. Lonka, K., and Lindblom-Ylanne, S. (1996). Epistemologies, conceptions of learning, and study practices in medicine and psychology. Higher Education Research and Development, 31, 5-24.
209. Lubienski, S. T. (2007). Research, reform, and equity in U.S. mathematics education. In N. S. Nasir and P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics (pp. 10-23). New York: Teachers College Press.
210. Ma, X. (2003). Effects of early acceleration of students in mathematics on attitudes toward mathematics and mathematics anxiety. Teachers College Record, 105(3), 438-464.
211. MacGregor, M. (2002). Using words to explain mathematical ideas. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 25(1), 78-88.
212. Macken-Horarik, M. (1998). Exploring the requirements of critical school literacy. In F. Christie and R. Misson (Eds.), Literacy and schooling (pp. 74-103). London: Routledge.
213. MacLane, S. (1994). Responses to “Theoretical mathematics: toward a cultural synthesis of mathematics and theoretical physics” by A. Jaffe and F. Quinn. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 30, 190-193.
214. MacLure, M., and French, P. (1981). A comparison of talk at home and at school. In G. Wells (Ed.), Learning through interaction Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
215. Macrae, S., Brown, M., Bartholomew, H., and Rodd, M. (2003a). An examination of one group of failing single honours students in one university. MSOR Connections, 3(3), 17-21.
216. Macrae, S., Brown, M., Bartholomew, H., and Rodd, M. (2003b). The tale of the tail: An investigation of failing single honours mathematics students in one university. Paper presented at the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, Oxford.
217. Macrae, S., Brown, M., and Rodd, M. (2001). Maths is gorgeous: First year students’ views of mathematics. Paper presented at the British Education Research Association, Leeds, England.
218. Macrae, S., and Maguire, M. (2002). Getting in and getting on: Choosing the “best”. In A. Hayton and A. Pacazuska (Eds.), Access, participation and higher education: Policy and practice.London: Kogan Page.
219. Maher, C. A. (2005). How students structure their investigations and learn mathematics: Insights from a long-term study. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 24, 1-14.
220. Marks, R., and Mousley, J. (1990). Mathematics education and genre: Dare we make the process writing mistake again? Language and Education 4(2), 117-135.
221. Martin, D. (2007). Mathematics learning and participation in the African American context: The co-construction of identity in two intersecting realms of experience. In N. S. Nasir and P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics. New York: Teachers College Press.
222. Martin, J. R. (1992). English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
223. Martin, J. R., Christie, F., and Rothery, J. (1987). Social processes in education. In I. Reid (Ed.), The place of genre in learning: Current debates (pp. 58-82). Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.
224. Martin, J. R., Christie, F., and Rothery, J. (1994). Social processes in education: A reply to Sawyer and Watson (and others). In B. Stierer and J. Maybin (Eds.), Language, literacy and learning in educational practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
225. Martino, A. M., and Maher, C. A. (1999). Teacher questioning to promote justification and generalization in mathematics: What research has taught us. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18, 53-78.
226. Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
227. Mendick, H. (2005a). A beautiful myth? The gendering of being /doing “good at maths”.” Gender and Education, 17(2), 89-105.
228. Mendick, H. (2005b). Mathematical stories: Why do more boys than girls choose to study mathematics at AS-level in England? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(2), 225-241.
229. Mendick, H. (2005c). Only connect: Troubling oppositions in gender and mathematics. International Journal of Inclusive Education 9(2), 161-180.
230. Mendick, H. (2006). Masculinities in mathematics. Berkshire: Open University Press.
231. Mendick, H., Epstein, D., and Moreau, M.-P. (forthcoming). End of award report: Mathematical images and identities: Education, entertainment, social justice. Swindon: Economic and Social Research Council.
232. Mercer, N. (1994). Neo-Vygotskian theory and education. In B. Steirer and J. Maybin (Eds.), Language, literacy and learning in educational practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
233. Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge. Avon: Multilingual Matters.
234. Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think. London: Routledge.
235. Mishler, E. (2000). Storylines: Craftartists’ narratives of identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
236. Moore, R. C. (1994). Making the transition to formal proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27, 249-266.
237. Morgan, C. (1998). Writing mathematically: The discourse of investigation. London: Falmer.
238. Morgan, C. (2005). Words, definitions and concepts in discourses of mathematics teaching and learning. Language and Education, 19(2), 103-117.
239. Morgan, C., Tsatsaroni, A., and Lerman, S. (2002). Mathematics teachers’ positions and practices in discourses of assessment. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(3), 445-461.
240. Morrison, D., and Collins, A. (1996). Epistemic fluency and constructivist learning environments. In B. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments (pp. 107-119). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
241. Moschkovich, J. N. (2002). An introduction to examining everyday and academic mathematical practices. In M. E. Brenner and J. N. Moschkovich (Eds.), Everyday and academic mathematics in the classroom (pp. 1-11). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
242. Moschkovich, J. N. (2007a). Bilingual mathematics learners: How views of language, bilingual learners, and mathematical communication affect instruction. In N. S. Nasir and P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics (pp. 89-104). New York: Teachers College Press.
243. Moschkovich, J. N. (2007b). Examining mathematical discourse practices. For the learning of mathematics, 27(1), 24-30.
244. Moses, R., and Cobb, C. (2002). Radical equations: Civil rights from Mississippi to the Algebra Project. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
245. Myhill, D., and Dunkin, F. (2005). Questioning learning. Language and Education, 19(5), 415-427.
246. Nasir, N. S. (2007). Identity, goals, and learning: The case of basketball mathematics. In N. S. Nasir and P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics (pp. 132-145). New York: Teachers College Press.
247. Nathan, M. J., and Knuth, E. J. (2003). A study of whole classroom mathematical discourse and teacher change. Cognition and Instruction, 21(2), 175-207.
248. NCTM. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
249. NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
250. Nimier, J. (1993). Defence mechanisms against mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 13(1), 30-34.
251. Nolder, R. (1991). Mixing metaphor and mathematics in the secondary classroom. In K. Durkin and B. Shire (Eds.), Language in mathematical education (pp. 105-113). Buckingham: Open University Press.
252. Norman, K. (1992). Thinking voices. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
253. Noyes, A. (2007). Mathematical marginalisation and meritocracy: Inequity in an English classroom. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, Monograph 1, 35-48.
254. Nunes, T., Schliemann, A. D., and Carraher, D. W. (1993). Street mathematics and school mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
255. O’Halloran, K. (2000). Classroom discourse in mathematics: A multisemiotic analysis. Linguistics and Education, 10(3), 359-388.
256. O’Halloran, K. (2003). Educational implications of mathematics as a multisemiotic discourse. In A. Anderson, A. Sáenz-Ludlow, S. Zellweger and V. V. Cifarelli (Eds.), Educational perspectives on mathematics as semiosis: From thinking to interpreting to knowing (pp. 185-214). Legas.
257. O’Halloran, K. (2005). Mathematical discourse. London: Continuum.
258. O’Halloran, K. (2007). Mathematical and scientific forms of knowledge: A systemic functional multimodal grammatical approach. In F. Christie and J. Martin (Eds.), Language, knowledge and pedagogy: Functional linguistic and sociological perspectives (pp. 205-236). London and New York: Continuum.
259. O’Neill, J. (1993). Intertextual reference in nineteenth-century mathematics. Science in Context, 6, 435-468.
260. Oakes, J. (1990). Multiplying inequalities: The effects of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn mathematics and science. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
261. Paechter, C. (2001). Gender, reason and emotion in secondary mathematics classrooms. In P. Gates (Ed.), Issues in mathematics teaching. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
262. Perelman, C. (1963). The idea of justice and the problem of argument. London: Routledge.
263. Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
264. Perry, W. G. (1999). Forms of ethical and intellectual development in the college years. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
265. Picker, S. H., and Berry, J. S. (2000). Investigating pupils’ images of mathematicians. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 43, 65-94.
266. Piggott, J. (2004). Mathematics enrichment: What is it and who is it for? Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association, Manchester.
267. Pimm, D. (1987). Speaking mathematically: Communication in mathematics classrooms.London: Routledge.
268. Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R., and Boyle, R. (1993). Beyond “cold” conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167-199.
269. Plowden, B. (1967). Children and their primary schools. London: Central Advisory Council for Education.
270. Polanyi, M., and Prosch, H. (1975). Meaning. London: University of Chicago Press.
271. Povey, H., Burton, L., Angier, C., and Boylan, M. (1999). Learners as authors in the mathematics classroom. In L. Burton (Ed.), Learning mathematics: From hierarchies to networks.London: Falmer.
272. Povey, H., Elliott, S., and Lingard, D. (2001). The study of the history of mathematics and the development of an inclusive mathematics: Connections explored. Mathematics Education Review 14(September).
273. Pratt, N., and Kelly, P. (2007). Mapping mathematical communities: Classrooms, research communities and masterclasses. For the Learning of Mathematics, 27(3), 34-39.
274. QCA. (2006). About mathematics. Retrieved May 30, 2006 from http://www.qca.org.uk/7883.html
275. QCA. (2007a). Mathematics: Programme of study for Key Stage 3 and attainment targets.Retrieved from http://curriculum.qca.org.uk/subjects/mathematics/keystage3/index.aspx.
276. QCA. (2007b). Mathematics: Programme of study for Key Stage 4. Retrieved from http://curriculum.qca.org.uk/subjects/mathematics/keystage4/index.aspx.
277. Raman, M. (2001). Beliefs about proof in collegiate calculus. Paper presented at the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Snowbird, Utah.
278. Raman, M. (2003). Key ideas: What are they and how can they help us understand how people view proof? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(3), 319-325.
279. Raman, M., and Zandieh, M. (submitted). The case of Brandon: The dual nature of key ideas in the classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics.
280. Rav, Y. (1999). Why do we prove theorems? Philosophia Mathematica, 7(3), 5-41.
281. Ravelli, L. (1996). Making language accessible: Successful text writing for museum visitors. Linguistics and Education, 8(4), 367-388.
282. Reay, D., and Wiliam, D.(1999). “I’ll be a nothing”: Structure, agency and the construction of identity through assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 25(3), 343-354.
283. Recio, A., and Godino, J. (2001). Institutional and personal meanings of mathematical proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics 48, 83-99.
284. Reyes, L. H. (1984). Affective variables and mathematics education. The Elementary School Journal, 84(5), 558-581.
285. Rodd, M. (2002, 1-6 July). Hot and abstract: Emotion and learning mathematics. Paper presented at the 2nd Conference on the Teaching of Mathematics, University of Crete, Greece.
286. Rodd, M. (2003). Witness as participation: The lecture theatre as a site for awe and wonder. For the Learning of Mathematics, 23(1), 15-21.
287. Rodd, M., and Bartholomew, H. (2006). Invisible and special: Young women’s experiences as undergraduate mathematics students. Gender and Education, 18(1), 35-50.
288. Rogers, P. (1990). Thoughts on power and pedagogy. In L. Burton (Ed.), Gender and mathematics: An international perspective (pp. 38-46). London: Cassell.
289. Rogers, P. (1995). Putting theory into practice. In P. Rogers and G. Kaiser (Eds.), Equity in mathematics education: Influences of feminism and culture (pp. 175-185). London, UK: Falmer.
290. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
291. Ross, K. (1998). Doing and proving: The place of algorithms and proof in school mathematics. American Mathematical Monthly, 3, 252-255.
292. Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
293. Sadker, M., and Sadker, D. (1985). Is the OK classroom OK? Phi Delta Kappan, 361.
294. Sadker, M., and Sadker, D. (1986). Sexism in the classroom: From grade school to graduate school. Phi Delta Kappan, 68, 513.
295. Schleppegrell, M. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
296. Schleppegrell, M. (2006). The challenges of academic language in school subjects. Retrieved December 5, 2006 from http://www.soe.umich.edu/events/als/downloads/schleppegrellp.html
297. Schleppegrell, M. (2007). The linguistic challenges of mathematics teaching and learning: A research review. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 23(2), 39-159.
298. Schoenfeld, A. (1988). When good teaching leads to bad results: The disasters of “well-taught” mathematics courses. Educational Psychologist 23, 145-166.
299. Schoenfeld, A. (1989). Explorations of students’ mathematical beliefs and behavior. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 338-355.
300. Schoenfeld, A. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem-solving, metacognition and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334-370). New York: Macmillan.
301. Schoenfeld, A. (1994). Reflections on doing and teaching mathematics. In Schoenfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking and problem solving (pp. 53-70). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
302. Schoenfeld, A., and Kilpatrick, A. (2008). Toward a theory of proficiency in teaching mathematics. In D. Tirosh (Ed.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education: Vol. 2. Tools and processes in mathematics teacher education. Rotterdam: Sense.
303. Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002). An evolving theoretical framework for an epistemological belief system. In B. K. Hofer and P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
304. Schommer, M. (1994). An emerging conceptualization of epistemological beliefs and their role in learning. In R. Garner and P. Alexander (Eds.), Beliefs about text and instruction with text. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
305. Seale, C. (2000). Using computers to analyse qualitative data. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook.London: Sage.
306. Secada, W. G. (1995). Social and critical dimensions for equity in mathematics education. In W. G. Secada, E. Fennema and L. Adajian (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
307. Seldon, A., and Seldon, J. (2003). Validations of proofs considered as texts: Can undergraduates tell whether an argument proves a theorem? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34, 4-36.
308. Seymour, E., and Hewitt, N. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
309. Sfard, A. (2000). On reform movement and the limits of mathematical discourse. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2(3), 157-189.
310. Sfard, A. (2006). Participationist discourse on mathematics learning. In J. Maasz and W. Schloeglmann (Eds.), New mathematics education research and practice (pp. 153-170). Rotterdam: Sense.
311. Sfard, A., and Lavie, I. (2005). Why cannot children see as the same what grown-ups cannot see as different? -Early numerical thinking revisited. Cognition and Instruction, 23(2), 237-309.
312. Sfard, A., and Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14-22.
313. Shaw, J. (forthcoming). Appetite and anxiety: The mathematics curriculum and “object relations” theory. In L. Black, H. Mendick and Y. Solomon (Eds.), Mathematical relationships in education: Identities and participation. New York: Routledge.
314. She, H.-C. (2000). The interplay of a Biology teacher’s beliefs, teaching practices and gender-based student-teacher classroom interactions. Educational Research and Evaluation, 42(1), 100-111.
315. Shield, M., and Galbraith, P. (1998). The analysis of student expository writing in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36, 29-52.
316. Sierpinska, A. (1994). Understanding in Mathematics. London: Falmer Press.
317. Silver, E. A., Smith, M. S., and Nelson, B. S. (1995). The QUASAR project: Equity concerns meet mathematics education reform in the middle school. In W. G. Secada, E. Fennema and L. Adajian (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 9-56). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
318. Sinclair, J., and Coulthard, M. (1975). Toward an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
319. Skinner, D., Valsiner, J., and Holland, D. (2001, September). Discerning the dialogical self: A theoretical and methodological examination of a Nepali adolescent’s narrative [Electronic Version]. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2. Retrieved July 31, 2007 from http://www.qualitativeresearch.net/fqs-texte/3-01/3-01skinneretal-e.htm
320. Slavin, R. E. (1990). Achievement effects of ability grouping in secondary schools: A best evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 60, 471-490.
321. Smith, C. (2006). eNRICH mathematics project evaluation interim report. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
322. Snyder, I., and Lankshear, C. (2000). Teachers and technoliteracy: Managing literacy, technology and learning in schools. St Leonard’s, NSW: Allen and Unwin.
323. Solomon, Y. (1989). The practice of mathematics. London: Routledge.
324. Solomon, Y., and Black, L. (2008). Talking to learn and learning to talk in the mathematics classroom. In N. Mercer and S. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Exploring talk in school: Inspired by the work of Douglas Barnes.London: Sage.
325. Sowder, L., and Harel, G. (2003). Case studies of mathematics majors’ proof understanding, production and appreciation. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 3(2), 251-267.
326. Spender, D. (1980). Man-made language. London: Pandora Press.
327. Spender, D., and Sarah, E. (1980). Learning to lose: Sexism and education. London: Women’s Press.
328. Stanley, J. (1993). Sex and the quiet schoolgirl. In P. Woods and M. Hammersley (Eds.), Gender and ethnicity in schools: Ethnographic accounts. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
329. Stanworth, M. (1983). Gender and schooling: A study of sexual divisions in the classroom.London: Hutchinson.
330. Star, S. L., and Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387-420.
331. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air. American Psychologist, 52(6), 613-629.
332. Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M. A., and Silver, E. A. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. New York: Teacher College Press.
333. Steinbring, H. (2005). Analyzing mathematical teaching-learning situations-the interplay of communicational and epistemological constraints. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 59, 313-324.
334. Stetsenko, A., and Arievitch, I. M. (2004). The self in cultural-historical activity theory: Reclaiming the unity of social and individual dimensions of human development. Theory and Psychology, 14(4), 475-503.
335. Steward, S., and Nardi, E. (2002). I could be the best mathematician in the world…if I actually enjoyed it. Mathematics Teaching(180), 4-9.
336. Stinson, D. W. (2006). African American male adolescents, schooling (and mathematics): Deficiency, rejection, and achievement. Review of Research in Education, 76(4), 447-506.
337. Street, B. (2003). What’s “new” in New Literacy Studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 77-91.
338. Strutchens, M. E. (2000). Confronting beliefs and stereotypes that impede the mathematical empowerment of African American students. In M. E. Strutchens, M. L. Johnson and W. F. Tate (Eds.), Changing the faces of mathematics: Perspectives of African Americans (pp. 7-14). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
339. Swain, J., Newmarch, B., Baker, E., Holder, D., and Coben, D. (2004, July 4-11). Changing adult learners’ identities through learning numeracy. Paper presented at the International Conference on Mathematics Education 10, Copenhagen, Denmark.
340. Swann, J. (1994). What do we do about gender? In B. Steirer and J. Maybin (Eds.), Language, literacy and learning in educational practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
341. Swann, J., and Graddol, D. (1988). Gender inequalities in classroom talk. English in Education, 22, 48-65.
342. Tharp, R., and Gallimore, R. (1991). A theory of teaching as assisted performance. In P. Light, S. Sheldon and M. Woodhead (Eds.), Learning to think. London: Routledge.
343. Tizard, B., and Hughes, M. (1984). Young children learning. London: Methuen.
344. Van Zoest, L. R., and Bohl, J. V. (2005). Mathematics teacher identity: A framework for understanding secondary school mathematics teachers’ learning through practice. Teacher Development, 9(3), 315-345.
345. van Zoest, L. R., Ziebarth, S. W., and Breyfogle, M. L. (2002). Self-perceived and observed practices of secondary school mathematics teachers. Teacher Development, 6(2), 245-268.
346. Veel, R. (1999). Language, knowledge and authority in school mathematics. In F. Christie (Ed.), Pedagogy and the shaping of consciousness: Linguistic and social processes (pp. 185-216). London: Continuum.
347. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
348. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech (N. Minick, Trans.). In R. W. Rieber and A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Volume 1: Problems of general psychology (pp. 39-285). New York: Plenum.
349. Walkerdine, V. (1988). The mastery of reason: Cognitive development and the production of rationality. London: Routledge.
350. Walkerdine, V. (1997). Difference, cognition and mathematics education. In A. Powell and M. Frankenstein (Eds.), Ethnomathematics (pp. 201-214). New York: State University of New York.
351. Walkerdine, V. (1998). Counting girls out (2nd ed.). London: Falmer.
352. Weber, K. (2001). Student difficulty in constructing proofs: The need for strategic knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48(1), 101-119.
353. Wells, G. (1987). The meaning makers. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
354. Wells, G. (1992). The centrality of talk in education. In K. Norman (Ed.), Thinking Voices: The work of the National Oracy Project. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
355. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
356. Wells, G., and Arauz, R. M. (2006). Dialogue in the classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(3), 379-428.
357. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
358. White, D. (2003). Promoting productive mathematical classroom discourse with diverse students. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22, 37-53.
359. White, J. (1987). The language of science: Making and interpreting observations. London: Assessment of Performance Unit, Department of Education and Science (in collaboration with G. Welford).
360. Wiliam, D., and Bartholomew, H. (2004). It’s not which school but which set you’re in that matters: The influence of ability grouping practices on student progress in mathematics. British Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 279-293.
361. Williams, G. (1998). Children entering literate worlds: Perspectives from the study of textual practices. In F. Christie and R. Misson (Eds.), Literacy and schooling. London: Routledge.
362. Williams, S., and Baxter, J. (1996). Dilemmas of discourse-oriented teaching in one middle school mathematics classroom. The Elementary School Journal, 97, 21-38.
363. Wood, D. (1986). Aspects of teaching and learning. In M. Richards and P. Light (Eds.), Children of social worlds. Cambridge: Polity Press.
364. Wood, D., Bruner, J., and Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.
365. Yackel, E., and Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458-477.
366. Zevenbergen, R. (2000). “Cracking the code” of mathematics classrooms: School success as a function of linguistic, social and cultural background. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 201-223). Westport, CT: Ablex.
367. Zevenbergen, R. (2001). Language, social class and underachievement in mathematics. In P. Gates (Ed.), Issues in mathematics teaching. London: Routledge.
368. Zevenbergen, R. (2005). The construction of a mathematical habitus: Implications of ability grouping in the middle years. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(5), 607-619.