Validations of proofs considered as texts: Can undergraduates tell whether an argument proves a theorem?

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 4-36

  Selden, Annie ^a   Selden, John ^b  

^a TENNESSEE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Math Education Resources Company   (United States)

Author keywords

Advanced mathematical thinking; College university; Language and mathematics; Proof; Reasoning; Writing communication

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037257290     PISSN: 00218251     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/30034698     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Baddeley, A. (1995). Working memory. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 755-764). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Bagchi, A., & Wells, C. (1998). Varieties of mathematical prose. PRIMUS, 8, 116-136.
3. Barnes, M. (2000). 'Magical' moments in mathematics: Insights into the process of coming to know. For the Learning of Mathematics, 20(1), 33-43.
4. Bogdan, D., & Straw, S. B., (Eds.). (1990). Beyond communication: Reading comprehension and criticism. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
5. Burton, L., & Morgan, C. (2000). Mathematicians writing, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 429-453.
6. Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
7. Cuoco, A. (2001). Mathematics for teaching. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 48, 168-174.
8. De Villiers, M. (1998). To teach definitions in geometry or teach to define? In A. Olivier & K. Newstead (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 248-255). Stellenbosch, South Africa: University of Stellenbosch.
9. Dubinsky, E., & Yiparaki, O. (2000). On student understanding of AE and EA quantification. In E. Dubinsky, A. H. Schoenfeld, & J. Kaput (Eds.), Issues in mathematics education: Vol. 8. Research in collegiate mathematics education. IV (pp. 239-289). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
10. Edwards, B. (1997). An undergraduate student's understanding and use of mathematical definitions in real analysis. In J. A. Dossey, J. O. Swafford, M. Parmantie, & A. E. Dossey (Eds.), Proceedings of the nineteenth annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 17-22). Columbus, OH: The ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
11. Ernest, P. (1998). Social constructivism as a philosophy of mathematics. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
12. Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The case for case. In E. Bach & R. T. Harms (Eds.), Universals of linguistic theory (pp. 1-88). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
13. Freudenthal, H. (1973). Mathematics as an educational task. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel.
14. Halliday, M. A. K. (1977). Explorations in the functions of language. New York: Elsevier.
15. Hanna, G. (1989). Proofs that prove and proofs that explain. In G. Vergnaud, J. Rogalski, & M. Artigue (Eds.), Proceedings of the thirteenth conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 45-51). Paris: CNRS-Paris V.
16. Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (1998). Students' proof schemes: Results from exploratory studies. In A. H. Schoenfeld, J. Kaput, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), Issues in mathematics education: Vol. 7. Research in collegiate mathematics education. III (pp. 234-283). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
17. Kintsch, W. (1974). The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Kurtz, D.C. (1992). Foundations of abstract mathematics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
19. Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20. Leron, U. (1983). Structuring mathematical proofs. The American Mathematical Monthly, 90, 174-184.
21. Morgan, C. (1996). The language of mathematics: Towards a critical analysis of mathematics texts. For the Learning of Mathematics, 16(3), 2-10.
22. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
23. Nystrand, M., Doyle, A., & Himley, M. (1986). A critical examination of the doctrine of autonomous texts. In M. Nystrand with M. Himley & A. Doyle (Eds.), The structure of written communication: Studies in the reciprocity between writers and readers (pp. 81-109). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
24. Olson, D. R. (1977). From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 257-281.
25. Pearson, P. D. (2000). Reading in the twentieth century. In T. L. Good & M. Early (Eds.), American education: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow (Ninety-ninth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 2, pp. 152-208). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26. Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation (J. Wilkinson & P. Weaver, Trans.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. (Original work published 1958)
27. Pimm, D. (1984). Who is 'we'? Mathematics Teaching, 107, 39-42.
28. Rasmussen, C., & Zandieh, M. (2000). Defining as a mathematical activity: A realistic mathematics analysis. In M. L. Fernández (Ed.), Proceedings of the 22nd annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 301-305). Columbus, OH: The ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
29. Rodd, M. (2000). On mathematical warrants: Proof does not always warrant, and a warrant may be other than a proof. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2, 221-244.
30. Rowland, T. (2002). Generic proofs in number theory. In S. R. Campbell & R. Zazkis (Eds.), Learning and teaching number theory: Research in cognition and instruction (pp. 157-183). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
31. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
32. Selden, A., & Selden, J. (1987). Errors and misconceptions in college level theorem proving. In J. D. Novak (Ed.), Proceedings of the second international seminar on misconceptions and educational strategies in science and mathematics (Vol. III, pp. 457-470). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
33. Selden, J., & Selden, A. (1995). Unpacking the logic of mathematical statements. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29, 123-151.
34. Selden, A., Selden, J., Hauk, S., & Mason, A. (2000). Why can't calculus students access their knowledge to solve non-routine problems? In A. H. Schoenfeld., J. Kaput, & E. Dubinsky, (Eds.), Issues in mathematics education: Vol. 8. Research in collegiate mathematics education. IV (pp. 128-153). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
35. Sierpinska, A., Defence, A., Khatcherian, T., & Saldanha, L. (1997). A propos de trois modes de raisonnement en algèbre linéaire [Three modes of reasoning in linear algebra]. In J.-L. Dorier (Ed.), L'enseignement de l'algèbre linéaire en question (pp. 259-268). Grenoble, France: La Pensée Sauvage.
36. Smith, D., Eggen, M., & St. Andre, R. (1990). A transition to advanced mathematics (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
37. Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 151-169.
38. Thompson, D. R. (1996). Learning and teaching indirect proof. Mathematics Teacher, 89, 474-482.
39. Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40. Vachek, J. (1966). The linguistic school of Prague: An introduction to its theory and practice. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
41. Velleman, D. J. (1994). How to prove it: A structured approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42. Vinner, S. (1997). From intuition to inhibition-Mathematics, education, and other endangered species. In E. Pehkonen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21st conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 63-78). Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki, Department of Teacher Education.
43. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44. Yackel, E., Rasmussen, C., & King, K. (2000). Social and sociomathematical norms in an advanced undergraduate mathematics course. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19, 275-287.