Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach: The case of Railside school

Teachers College Record

Volumn 110, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 608-645

  Boaler, Jo ^a   Staples, Megan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 41449103553     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: 14679620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Becker, J., & Jacob, B. (2000). California school mathematics politics: The anti-reform of 1997-1999. Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 529-537.
2. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 139-148.
3. Boaler, J. (1997). Experiencing school mathematics: Teaching styles, sex and setting. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
4. Boaler, J. (2000). Mathematics from another world: Traditional communities and the alienation of learners. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(4), 379-397.
5. Boaler, J. (2002a). Experiencing school mathematics: Traditional and reform approaches to teaching and their impact on student learning. (Revised and expanded edition.) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Boaler, J. (2002b). Learning from teaching: Exploring the relationship between reform curriculum and equity. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33, 239-258.
7. Boaler, J. (2002c). The development of disciplinary relationships: Knowledge, practice and identity in mathematics classrooms. For the Learning of Mathematics, 22( 1), 42-47.
8. Boaler, J. (2006). Promoting respectful learning. Educational Leadership, 63(b), 74-78.
9. Boaler, J., & Brodie, K. (2004). The importance of depth and breadth in the analysis of teaching: A framework for analysing teacher questions. In the Proceedings of the 26th Meeting of the North America Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Toronto, Ontario.
10. Boaler, J., & Gresalfi, M. S. (in preparation). What is learning? The importance and nature of disciplinary relationships in mathematics.
11. Briars, D., & Resnick, L. (2000). Standards, assessments - and what eke? The essential elements of standards-based school improvement. Unpublished manuscript.
12. Chazan, D. (2000). Beyond formulas in mathematics and teaching: Dynamics of the high school algebra classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
13. Cohen, D. & Ball, D. L. (2001). Making change: Instruction and its improvement. Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 73-77.
14. Cohen, E. (1994). Designing groupwork. New York: Teachers College Press.
15. Cohen, E., & Lotan, R. (Eds.). (1997). Working for equity in heterogeneous classrooms: Sociological theory in practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
16. Corbett, D., & Wilson, B. (1995). Make a difference with, not for, students. Educational Researcher, 24, 12-17.
17. Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Teachers and teaching: Testing policy hypotheses from a National Commission Report. Educational Researcher, 27(1), 5-15.
18. Delpit, L. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in education other people's children. Harvard Educational Review, 58(3), 280-298.
19. Eisenhart, K. (2002) Building theories from case study research. In Huberman, A. M. & Miles, M. (Eds.). The qualitative researcher's companion, (pp. 3-36). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
20. Fendel, D., Resek, D., Alper, L., & Fraser, S. (1997). Interactive mathematics program- Year 1. Berkeley, CA: Key Curriculum Press.
21. th Meeting of the North America Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Toronto, Ontario.
22. Freedman, S. W., Delp, V., & Crawford, S.M. (2005). Teaching English in untracked classrooms. Research in the teaching of English, 40(1), 62-126.
23. Geertz, C. (2000). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
24. Glesne, C., & Peshkin, A. (1992). Becoming qualitative researchers. White Plains, NY: Longman.
25. Greeno, J. G., & MMAP (1997). Theories and practices of thinking and learning to think. American Journal of Education, 106, 85-126.
26. Gutiérrez, K. (1995). Unpacking academic discourse. Discourse Processes, 19(1), 21-37.
27. Gutiérrez, K., Larson, J., & Kreuter, B. (1995). Cultural tensions in the scripted classroom: The value of the subjugated perspective. Urban Education, 29(4), 410-442.
28. Gutiérrez, K., Baquedano-Lopez, P., & Tejeda, C. (1999). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, & Activity: An International Journal, 6(4), 286-303.
29. Gutiérrez, R. (1996). Practices, beliefs and cultures of high school mathematics departments: Understanding their influence on student advancement. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28(5), 495-529.
30. Gutiérrez, R. (1999). Advancing urban Latina/o youth in mathematics: Lessons from an effective high school mathematics department. Urban Review, 31(3), 263-281.
31. Gutiérrez, R., (2000). Is the multiculturalization of mathematics doing us more harm than good? In R. Malalingham & C. McCardiy (Eds.), Multicultural Curriculum: New Directions for Social Theory, Practice and Policy (pp. 119-219). New York: Routledge.
32. Haberman, M. (1991) The pedagogy of poverty versus good teaching, Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 290-294.
33. Hand, V. (2003). Reframing participation: Meaningful mathematical activity in diverse classrooms. Unpublished dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
34. Heath, S. B., (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35. Holland, D., Lachiotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36. Horn, I.S. (2002). Learning on the job: Mathematics teachers' professional development in the contexts of high school reform. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
37. Horn, I.S. (2005). Learning on the job: A situated account of teacher learning in two high school mathematics departments. Cognition & Instruction, 23(2), 207-236.
38. Knapp, M.S., Shields, P.M., & Turnbull, B.J. (1992). Academic challenge for the children of poverty. Summary report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
39. Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). Dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African-American children. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
40. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465-491.
41. Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
42. Lee, C. (1995). A culturally based cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching African American high school students skills in literary interpretation. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(4), 608-630.
43. Linchevski, L., & Kutscher, B. (1998). Tell me with whom you're learning, and I'll tell you how much you've learned: Mixed-ability versus same-ability grouping in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(5), 533-554.
44. Lubienski, S. (2000). Problem solving as a means towards mathematics for all: An exploratory look through the class lens. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 454-482.
45. Madison, B. L., & Hart, T. A. (1990). A challenge of numbers: People in the mathematical sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
46. Martino, A., & Maher, C. (1999). Teacher questioning to promote justification and generalization in mathematics: What research practice has taught us. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(1), 52-78.
47. McLaughlin, M., & Talbert,J. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48. Moses, B., & Cobb, C. (2001). Radical equations: Math literacy and civil rights. Boston: Beacon Press.
49. Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
50. Picciotto, H. (1995). Lab gear activities for algebra 1. Aslip, IL: Creative Publications.
51. RAND. (2002, October). Mathematical proficiency for all students: Toward a strategic research and development program in mathematics education (Dru-2773-OERI). Arlington, VA: RAND Education & Science and Technology Policy Institute.
52. Rosen, L. (2001). Myth making and moral order in a debate on mathematics education policy. In M. Sutton & B. A. U. Levinson (Eds.), Policy as practice: Toward a comparative socio cultural analysis of educational policy (Vol. 1, pp. 295-316). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
53. Rosenholtz, S. J., & Wilson, B. (1980). The effect of classroom structure on shared perceptions of ability. American Educational Research Journal, 17, 175-182.
54. Sallee, T., Kysh, J., Kasimatis, E., & Hoey, B. (2000). College preparatory mathematics. Sacramento, CA: CPM Educational Program.
55. Schoenfeld, A. (2002). Making mathematics work for all children: Issues of standards, testing, and equity. Educational Researcher, 31(1), 13-25.
56. Silver, E. A., Smith, M. S., & Nelson, B. S. (1995). The QUASAR project: Equity concerns meet mathematics education reform in the middle school. In E. Fennema, W. Secada & L. B. Adajian (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 9-56). New York: Cambridge University Press.
57. Simpson, C. (1981). Classroom structure and the organization of ability. Sociology of Education, 54, 120-132.
58. Siskin, L. S. (1994). Realms of knowledge: Academic departments in secondary schools. Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
59. Stein, M. K., Smith, M., Henningsen, M., & Silver, E. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A case book for professional development. New York: Teachers College Press.
60. Talbert, J. & McLaughlin, M. (1996). Teacher professionalism in local school contexts. In Goodson & Hargreaves (Eds.), Teachers' professional lives (pp. 127-153). Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
61. Tharp, R. & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. New York: Cambridge University Press.
62. Yackel, E. & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458-477.
63. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.