The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective

The Language of Schooling: A Functional Linguistics Perspective

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 1-190

  Schleppegrell, Mary J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909116620     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410610317     Document Type: Book

References (256)

1. Albrechtsen, D., Evensen, L. S., Lindeberg, A. C., & Linnarud, M. (1991). Analysing developing discourse structure: The NORDWRITE Project. In R. Phillipson, E. Kellerman, L. Selinker, M. Sharwood Smith, & M. Swain (Eds.), Foreign/second language pedagogy research (pp. 79-91). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
2. Anderson, S. J. (1989). Deafness and the social meaning of language: A systemic perspective. Word, 40(1-2), 819-7.
3. Applebee, A. N. (1984a). Conclusion. In A. N. Applebee (Ed.), Contexts for learning to write: Studies of secondary school instruction (pp. 183-189). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
4. Applebee, A. N. (1984b). The students and their writing. In A. N. Applebee (Ed.), Contexts for learning to write: Studies of secondary school instruction (pp. 37-54). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
5. Applebee, A. N., Durst, R. K., & Newell, G. E. (1984). The demands of school writing. In A. N. Applebee (Ed.), Contexts for learning to write: Studies of secondary school instruction (pp. 55-77). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
6. Appleby, J., Brinkley, A., & McPherson, J. M. (2000). The American journey: Building a nation. Columbus, OH: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill.
7. Au, K. H., & Kawahami, A. (1994). Cultural congruence in instruction. In E. R. Hollins, J. E. King, & W. C. Hayman (Eds.), Teaching diverse populations: Formulating a knowledge base (pp. 5-23). New York: State University of New York Press.
8. Beaman, K. (1984). Coordination and subordination revisited: Syntactic complexity in spoken and written narrative discourse. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Coherence in spoken and written discourse (pp. 45-80). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
9. Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Gromoll, E. W. (1989). Learning from social studies texts. Cognition and Instruction, 6(2), 99-158.
10. Bernstein, B. (1972). A critique of the concept of compensatory education. In C. Cazden, V. John, & D. Hymes (Eds.), Functions of language in the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
11. Bernstein, B. (1977). Foreword. In P. R. Hawkins (Ed.), Social class, the nominal group and verbal strategies (pp. ix-xii). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
12. Bernstein, B. (1990). Class, codes and control, Vol. 4: The structuring of pedagogic discourse. London: Routledge.
13. Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
14. Berry, W. (1981). The gift of good land: Further essays cultural and agricultural. San Francisco, CA: North Point Press.
15. Besnier, N. (1988). The linguistic relationships of spoken and written Nikulaelae registers. Language, 64, 707-736.
16. Biber, D. (1986). Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: Resolving the contradictory findings. Language, 62(2), 384-414.
17. Biber, D. (1991). Oral and literate characteristics of selected primary school reading materials. Text, 11(1), 73-96.
18. Biber, D. (1995). Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
19. Bloom, B. S., Engleheart, M. B., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.
20. Bloome, D. (1987). Reading as a social process in a middle school classroom. In D. Bloome (Ed.), Literacy and schooling (pp. 123-149). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
21. Bloor, T., & Bloor, M. (1995). The functional analysis of English: A Hallidayan approach. London: Arnold.
22. Butt, D., Fahey, R., Feez, S., Spinks, S., & Yallop, C. (2000). Using functional grammar: An explorer's guide (2nd ed.). Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Macquarie University.
23. Callaghan, M., Knapp, P., & Noble, G. (1993). Genre in practice. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), The powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing (pp. 179-202). London: The Falmer Press.
24. Cazden, C. B. (1986). Classroom discourse. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 432-463). New York: Macmillan.
25. Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
26. Cazden, C. B., John, V. P., & Hymes, D. (1972). Functions of language in the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
27. Cazden, C. B., Michaels, S., & Tabors, P. (1985). Spontaneous repairs in sharing time narratives: The intersection of metalinguistic awareness, speech event, and narrative style. In S. W. Freedman (Ed.), The acquisition of written language: Response and revision (pp. 51-64). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
28. Chafe, W. (1985). Linguistic differences produced by differences between speaking and writing. In D. R. Olson, N. Torrance, & A. Hildyard (Eds.), Literacy, language, and learning: The nature and consequences of reading and writing (pp. 105-123). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
29. Chafe, W. (1986). Writing in the perspective of speaking. In C. C. Cooper & S. Greenbaum (Eds.), Studying writing: Linguistic approaches (pp. 12-39). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
30. Chafe, W. (1992). Information flow in speaking and writing. In P. Downing, S. D. Lima, & M. Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (pp. 17-29). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
31. Chamot, A. U., & O'Malley, J. M. (1987). The cognitive academic language learning approach: A bridge to the mainstream. TESOL Quarterly, 21(2), 227-249.
32. Chenhansa, S., & Schleppegrell, M. (1998). Linguistic features of middle school EE texts. Environmental Education Research, 4(1), 53-66.
33. Christie, F. (1985). Language and schooling. In S. Tchudi (Ed.), Language, schooling and society (pp. 21-40). Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook.
34. Christie, F. (1986). Writing in schools: Generic structures as ways of meaning. In B. Couture (Ed.), Functional approaches to writing: Research perspectives (pp. 221-239). London: Frances Pinter.
35. Christie, F. (1989). Language development in education. In R. Hasan & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Language development: Learning language, learning culture (pp. 152-198). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
36. Christie, F. (1991). First- and second-order registers in education. In E. Ventola (Ed.), Functional and systemic linguistics (pp. 235-256). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
37. Christie, F. (1997). Curriculum macrogenres as forms of initiation into a culture. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school (pp. 134-160). London: Cassell.
38. Christie, F. (1998a). Learning the literacies of primary and secondary schooling. In F. Christie & R. Misson (Eds.), Literacy and schooling (pp. 47-73). London: Routledge.
39. Christie, F. (1998b). Science and apprenticeship: The pedagogic discourse. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 152-177). London: Routledge.
40. Christie, F. (1999a). The pedagogic device and the teaching of English. In F. Christie (Ed.), Pedagogy and the shaping of consciousness: Linguistic and social processes (pp. 156-184). London: Continuum.
41. Christie, F. (Ed.). (1999b). Pedagogy and the shaping of consciousness: Linguistic and social processes. London: Continuum.
42. Christie, F. (2002a). Classroom discourse analysis: A functional perspective. London: Continuum.
43. Christie, F. (2002b). The development of abstraction in adolescence in subject English. In M. Schleppegrell & M. C. Colombi (Eds.), Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages: Meaning with power (pp. 45-66). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
44. Christie, F., & Martin, J. R. (Eds.). (1997). Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school. London: Cassell.
45. Christie, F., & Misson, R. (Eds.). (1998). Literacy and schooling. London: Routledge.
46. Clark, H. H. (1977). Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning. In P. N. Johnson-Laird & P. C. Wason (Eds.), Thinking: Readings in cognitive science (pp. 98-113). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
47. Coffin, C. (1997). Constructing and giving value to the past: An investigation into secondary school history. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school (pp. 196-230). London: Cassell.
48. Collins, J. (1982). Discourse style, classroom interaction and differential treatment. Journal of Reading Behavior, 14(4), 429-437.
49. Collins, J. (1987). Using cohesion analysis to understand access to knowledge. In D. Bloome (Ed.), Literacy and schooling (pp. 67-97). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
50. Collins, J., & Michaels, S. (1986). Speaking and writing: Discourse strategies and the acquisition of literacy. In J. Cook-Gumperz (Ed.), The social construction of literacy (pp. 207-222). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
51. Colombi, M. C., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2002). Theory and practice in the development of advanced literacy. In M. J. Schleppegrell & M. C. Colombi (Eds.), Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages (pp. 1-19). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
52. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (1993). The powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing. London: The Falmer Press.
53. Corson, D. (1997). The learning and use of academic English words. Language Learning, 47(4), 671-718.
54. Cox, B. E., Fang, Z., & Otto, B. W. (1997). Preschoolers' developing ownership of the literate register. Reading Research Quarterly, 32(1), 34-53.
55. Crowhurst, M. (1980). Syntactic complexity and teachers' quality ratings of narrations and arguments. Research in the Teaching of English, 14, 223-231.
56. Crowhurst, M. (1987). Cohesion in argument and narration at three grade levels. Research in the Teaching of English, 21(2), 185-201.
57. Crowhurst, M. (1990). The development of persuasive/argumentative writing. In R. Beach & S. Hynds (Eds.), Developing discourse practices in adolescence and adulthood (pp. 200-223). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
58. Cummins, J. (1980). The entry and exit fallacy in bilingual education. NABE Journal, IV(3), 25-59.
59. Cummins, J. (1984). Wanted: A theoretical framework for relating language proficiency to academic achievement among bilingual students. In C. Rivera (Ed.), Language proficiency and academic achievement (pp. 2-19). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
60. Cummins, J. (1992). Language proficiency, bilingualism, and academic achievement. In P. A. Richard-Amato & M. A. Snow (Eds.), The multicultural classroom (pp. 16-26). New York: Longman.
61. Danielewicz, J. M. (1984). The interaction between text and context: A study of how adults and children use spoken and written language in four contexts. In A. D. Pellegrini & T. D. Yawkey (Eds.), The development of oral and written language in social contexts (pp. 243-260). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
62. Delpit, L. (1995). Other people's children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York: The New Press.
63. De Temple, J. M., Wu, H.-F., & Snow, C. E. (1991). Papa pig just left for pigtown: Children's oral and written picture descriptions under varying instructions. Discourse Processes, 14, 469-495.
64. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (Eds.). (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
65. Downing, A., & Locke, P. (1992). A university course in English grammar. New York and London: Prentice Hall.
66. Droga, L., & Humphrey, S. (2002). Getting started with functional grammar. Berry, NSW, Australia: Target Texts.
67. Drury, H. (1991). The use of systemic linguistics to describe student summaries at university level. In E. Ventola (Ed.), Functional and systemic linguistics (pp. 431-456). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
68. Drury, H., & Webb, C. (1991). Teaching academic writing at the tertiary level. Prospect, 7(1), 7-27.
69. Durst, R. K. (1987). Cognitive and linguistic demands of analytic writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 21(4), 347-376.
70. Ediger, A. (2001). Teaching children literacy skills in a second language. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 153-169). Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.
71. Eggins, S. (1994). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: Pinter.
72. Eggins, S., Wignell, P., & Martin, J. R. (1993). The discourse of history: Distancing the recoverable past. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Register analysis: Theory and practice (pp. 75-109). Lon - don: Pinter.
73. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
74. Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Preemptive focus on form in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 35(3), 407-432.
75. Finegan, E., & Biber, D. (1986). Two dimensions of linguistic complexity in English. In J. Connor-Linton, C. J. Hall, & M. McGinnis (Eds.), Social and cognitive perspectives on language (Vol. 11, pp. 1-24). Los Angeles: University of Southern California.
76. Fries, P. H. (1981). On the status of theme in English: Arguments from discourse. Forum Linguisticum, 6(1), 1-38.
77. Gadda, G. (1991). Writing and language socialization across cultures: Some implications for the classroom. In F. Petzman & G. Gadda (Eds.), With different eyes: Insights into teaching language minority students across the disciplines (pp. 55-74). Los Angeles: UCLA Publishing.
78. Gadda, G. (1995). The Universitywide Subject A Examination Book. University of California. Available online at: http://www.ucop.edu/sas/sub-a/index.html
79. Geisler, C. (1990). The artful conversation: Characterizing the development of advanced literacy. In R. Beach & S. Hynds (Eds.), Developing discourse practices in adolescence and adulthood (pp. 93-109). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
80. Ghadessy, M. (Ed.). (1995). Thematic development in English texts. London: Pinter.
81. Giora, R. (1983). Segmentation and segment cohesion: On the thematic organization of the text. Text, 3(2), 155-181.
82. Goldman, S. R., & Murray, J. D. (1992). Knowledge of connectors as cohesion devices in text: A comparative study of native-English and English-as-a-second-language speakers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 504-519.
83. Gumperz, J. J., Kaltman, H., & O'Connor, M. C. (1984). Cohesion in spoken and written discourse: Ethnic style and the transition to literacy. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Coherence in spoken and written discourse (pp. 3-19). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
84. Halliday, M. A. K. (1964). The users and uses of language. In M. A. K. Halliday, A. MacIntosh, & P. Strevens (Eds.), The linguistic sciences and language teaching (pp. 75-100). London: Longman.
85. Halliday, M. A. K. (1973). Explorations in the functions of language. New York: Elsevier.
86. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.
87. Halliday, M. A. K. (1982). How is a text like a clause? In S. Allen (Ed.), Text processing: Text analysis and generation, text typology and attribution (pp. 209-248). Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell International.
88. Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar (1st ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
89. Halliday, M. A. K. (1987). Spoken and written modes of meaning. In R. Horowitz & J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 55-82). San Diego: Academic Press.
90. Halliday, M. A. K. (1989). Spoken and written language. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
91. Halliday, M. A. K. (1993a). The analysis of scientific texts in English and Chinese. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power (pp. 124-132). Pennsylvania: University of Pittsburgh Press.
92. Halliday, M. A. K. (1993b). The construction of knowledge and value in the grammar of scientific discourse: Charles Darwin's The origin of the species. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power (pp. 86-105). Pennsylvania: University of Pittsburgh Press.
93. Halliday, M. A. K. (1993c). Language and the order of nature. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power (pp. 106-123). Pennsylvania: University of Pittsburgh Press.
94. Halliday, M. A. K. (1993d). Literacy in science: Learning to handle text as technology. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power (pp. 69-85). Pennsylvania: University of Pittsburgh Press.
95. Halliday, M. A. K. (1993e). On the language of physical science. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power (pp. 54-68). Pennsylvania: Uni - versity of Pittsburgh Press.
96. Halliday, M. A. K. (1993f). Some grammatical problems in scientific English. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power (pp. 69-85). Pennsylvania: University of Pittsburgh Press.
97. Halliday, M. A. K. (1993g). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5(2), 93-116.
98. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
99. Halliday, M. A. K. (1998). Things and relations: Regrammaticising experience as technical knowledge. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 185-235). London: Routledge.
100. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
101. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social- semiotic perspective (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
102. Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (Eds.). (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Pennsylvania: University of Pittsburgh Press.
103. Harvey, N. (1993). Text analysis for specific purposes. Prospect, 8(3), 25-41.
104. Hasan, R. (1984). Coherence and cohesive harmony. In J. Flood (Ed.), Understanding reading comprehension: Cognition, language, and the structure of prose (pp. 181-219). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
105. Hasan, R. (1992). Meaning in sociolinguistic theory. In K. Bolton & H. Kwok (Eds.), Sociolinguistics today: International perspectives (pp. 80-119). London: Routledge.
106. Hasan, R. (1996). What kind of resource is language? In C. Cloran, D. Butt, & G. Williams (Eds.), Ways of saying: Ways of meaning (pp. 13-36). London: Cassell.
107. Hasan, R. (1999). Society, language and the mind: The meta-dialogism of Basil Bernstein's theory. In F. Christie (Ed.), Pedagogy and the shaping of consciousness: Linguistic and social processes (pp. 10-30). London: Continuum.
108. Hasan, R., & Perrett, G. (1994). Learning to function with the other tongue: A systemic functional perspective on second language teaching. In T. Odlin (Ed.), Perspectives on pedagogical grammar (pp. 179-226). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
109. Hasan, R., & Williams, G. (Eds.). (1996). Literacy in society. Harlow, Essex: Addison Wesley Longman.
110. Hawkins, P. R. (1977). Social class, the nominal group and verbal strategies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
111. Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
112. Hinkel, E. (1995). The use of modal verbs as a reflection of cultural values. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 325-341.
113. Hinkel, E. (2002). Second language writers' text: Linguistic and rhetorical features. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
114. Horowitz, R., & Samuels, J. (1987). Comprehending oral and written language: Critical contrasts for literacy and schooling. In R. Horowitz & J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 1-52). San Diego: Academic Press.
115. Hunston, S. (1993). Evaluation and ideology in scientific writing. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Register analysis: Theory and practice (pp. 57-73). London: Pinter.
116. Hunt, K. W. (1965). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
117. Hunt, K. W. (1977). Early blooming and late blooming syntactic structures. In C. R. Cooper & L. Odell (Eds.), Evaluating writing: Describing, measuring, judging (pp. 91-106). Buffalo, NY: National Council of Teachers of English.
118. Hyland, K., & Milton, J. (1997). Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students' writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6(2), 183-205.
119. Hymes, D. (1972). Introduction. In C. B. Cazden, V. P. John, & D. Hymes (Eds.), Functions of language in the classroom (pp. xi-lvii). New York: Teachers College Press.
120. Jones, J., Gollin, S., Drury, H., & Economou, D. (1989). Systemic-functional linguistics and its application to the TESOL curriculum. In R. Hasan & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Language development: Learning language, learning culture (pp. 257-328). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
121. Kalmar, I. (1985). Are there really no primitive languages? In D. O. Olson, N. Torrance, & A. Hildyard (Eds.), Literacy, language, and learning (pp. 148-166). Cambridge, England: Cam - bridge University Press.
122. Khisty, L. L. (1993). A naturalistic look at language factors in mathematics teaching in bilingual classrooms. In Proceedings of the Third National Symposium on Limited English Proficient Student Issues: Focus on Middle and High School Students. USDOE/OBEMLA.
123. Kinneavy, J. L. (1971). A theory of discourse. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
124. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
125. Kress, G. (1994). Learning to write (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
126. Kroll, B. (2001). Considerations for teaching an ESL/EFL writing course. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 219-232). Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.
127. Kutz, E. (1986). Between students' language and academic discourse: Interlanguage as middle ground. College English, 48(4), 385-396.
128. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. H. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.
129. Lazaraton, A. (1992). Linking ideas with AND in spoken and written discourse. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 30(3), 191-206.
130. Lemke, J. (1987). Social semiotics: A new model for literacy education. In D. Bloome (Ed.), Classrooms and literacy (pp. 289-309). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
131. Lemke, J. (1988). Genres, semantics, and classroom education. Linguistics and Education, 1(1), 81-99.
132. Lemke, J. L. (1989). Semantics and social values. Word, 40(1-2), 375-0.
133. Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
134. Lemke, J. L. (1998). Resources for attitudinal meaning: Evaluative orientations in text semantics. Functions of Language, 5(1), 33-56.
135. Lindfors, J. W. (1987). Children's language and learning (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
136. Loban, W. D. (1963). The language of elementary school children (NCTE Research Report No. 1). Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
137. Loban, W. (1986). Research currents: The somewhat stingy story of research into children's language. Language Arts, 63(6), 608-615.
138. Lock, G. (1996). Functional English grammar: An introduction for second language teachers. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
139. Lotfipour-Saedi, K., & Rezai-Tajani, F. (1996). Exploration in thematization strategies and their discoursal values in English. Text, 16(2), 225-249.
140. MacDonald, S. P. (1994). Professional academic writing in the humanities and social sciences. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
141. Mann, W. C., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., & Thompson, S. A. (1992). Rhetorical structure theory and text analysis. In W. C. Mann & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text (pp. 39-78). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
142. Martin, J. R. (1983). Conjunction: The logic of English text. In J. S. Petofi & E. Sozer (Eds.), Micro and macro connexity of texts (pp. 1-72). Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.
143. Martin, J. R. (1989a). Factual writing. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
144. Martin, J. R. (1989b). Technicality and abstraction: Language for the creation of specialised texts. In F. Christie (Ed.), Writing in schools (pp. 36-44). Geelong, Victoria: Deakin Univer - sity Press.
145. Martin, J. R. (1991). Nominalization in science and humanities: Distilling knowledge and scaffolding text. In E. Ventola (Ed.), Functional and systemic linguistics (pp. 307-337). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
146. Martin, J. R. (1992). English text. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
147. Martin, J. R. (1993a). Genre and literacy-Modeling context in educational linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 141-172.
148. Martin, J. R. (1993b). Life as a noun: Arresting the universe in science and humanities. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power (pp. 221-267). Pennsylvania: University of Pittsburgh Press.
149. Martin, J. R. (1993c). Literacy in science: Learning to handle text as technology. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power (pp. 166-202). Pennsylvania: University of Pittsburgh Press.
150. Martin, J. R. (1995). Interpersonal meaning, persuasion and public discourse: Packing semiotic punch. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 15(1), 33-67.
151. Martin, J. R. (1996). Waves of abstraction: Organizing exposition. The Journal of TESOL France, 3(1), 87-104.
152. Martin, J. R. (1999). Mentoring semogenesis: 'Genre-based' literacy pedagogy. In F. Christie (Ed.), Pedagogy and the shaping of consciousness: Linguistic and social processes (pp. 123-155). London: Continuum.
153. Martin, J. R. (2000). Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 142-175). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
154. Martin, J. R. (2002). Writing history: Construing time and value in discourses of the past. In M. J. Schleppegrell & M. C. Colombi (Eds.), Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages: Meaning with power (pp. 87-118). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
155. Martin, J. R., Christie, F., & Rothery, J. (1987). Social processes in education. In I. Reid (Ed.), The place of genre in learning: Current debates (pp. 58-82). Geelong, Victoria: Deakin Uni - versity Press.
156. Martin, J. R., & Rothery, J. (1986). What a functional approach to the writing task can show teachers about 'good writing'. In B. Couture (Ed.), Functional approaches to writing: Research perspectives (pp. 241-265). London: Frances Pinter.
157. Martin, J. R., & Veel, R. (Eds.). (1998). Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science. London: Routledge.
158. Matthiessen, C. (1995). Lexicogrammatical cartography: English systems. Tokyo: International Language Sciences Publishers.
159. Matthiessen, C., & Thompson, S. A. (1987). The structure of discourse and "subordination." Marina del Rey, CA: Information Sciences Institute.
160. Mauranen, A. (1996). Discourse competence-Evidence from thematic development in native and non-native texts. In E. Ventola & A. Mauranen (Eds.), Academic writing: Intercultural and textual issues (pp. 195-230). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
161. McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (1994). Language as discourse: Perspectives for language teaching. London: Longman.
162. McCreedy, L., & Simich-Dudgeon, C. (1990). An educology of classroom discourse: How teachers produce coherence in classroom discourse through managing topics, interactive tasks and students. International Journal of Educology, 4(2), 122-147.
163. McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. L., Sinatra, G. M., & Loxterman, J. A. (1992). The contribution of prior knowledge and coherent text to comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 27(1), 79-93.
164. McNamara, J. (1989). The writing in science and history project: The research questions and implications for teachers. In F. Christie (Ed.), Writing in schools (pp. 24-35). Geelong, Vic - toria: Deakin University Press.
165. Mehan, H. (1978). Structuring school structure. Harvard Educational Review, 48(1), 32-64.
166. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
167. Michaels, S. (1981). "Sharing time": Children's narrative styles and differential access to literacy. Language in Society, 10, 423-442.
168. Michaels, S. (1986). Narrative presentations: An oral preparation for literacy with first graders. In J. Cook-Gumperz (Ed.), The social construction of literacy (pp. 94-116). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
169. Michaels, S., & Cazden, C. B. (1986). Teacher/child collaboration as oral preparation for literacy. In B. B. Schieffelin & P. Gilmore (Eds.), The acquisition of literacy: Ethnographic perspectives (pp. 132-154). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
170. Michaels, S., & Collins, J. (1984). Oral discourse styles: Classroom interaction and the acquisition of literacy. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Coherence in spoken and written discourse (pp. 219-244). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
171. Michaels, S., & Cook-Gumperz, J. (1979). A study of sharing time with first grade students: Discourse narratives in the classroom. Paper presented at the Fifth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 647-660). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
172. Michaels, S., & Foster, M. (1985). Peer-peer learning: Evidence from a student-run sharing time. In A. Jaggar & M. T. Smith-Burke (Eds.), Observing the language learner (pp. 143-158). Newark, DE and Urbana, IL: International Reading Association and National Council of Teachers of English.
173. Mohan, B. A. (1986). Language and content. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
174. Mohan, B. (1997). Language as a medium of learning: Academic reading and cause. Ritsumeikan Educational Studies, 10, 208-217.
175. Mohan, B., & Huxur, G. (2001). A functional approach to research on content-based language learning. Canadian Modern Language Review, 58(1), 133-155.
176. Mohan, B., & Van Naerssen, M. (1997). Understanding cause-effect. English Teaching Forum, 35(4), 22-29.
177. Morrison, E. S., Moore, A., Armour, N., Hammond, A., Haysom, J., Nicoll, E., & Smyth, M. (1993). Science plus: Technology and society. Austin, TX: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
178. Nelson, N. W. (1988). Reading and writing. In M. A. Nippold (Ed.), Later language development: Ages 9 through 19 (pp. 97-125). Boston: College-Hill.
179. Nystrand, M., & Wiemelt, J. (1991). When is a text explicit? Formalist and dialogical conceptions. Text, 11(1), 25-41.
180. O'Malley, J. M., & Valdez Pierce, L. (1996). Authentic assessment for English language learners: Practical approaches for teachers. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
181. Olson, D. R. (1977). From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 257-281.
182. Olson, D. R. (1980). Some social aspects of meaning in oral and written language. In D. R. Olson (Ed.), The social foundations of language and thought: Essays in honor of Jerome S. Bruner (pp. 90-108). New York: Norton.
183. Olson, D. R. (1994). The world on paper. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
184. Painter, C. (1996). The development of language as a resource for thinking: A linguistic view of learning. In R. Hasan & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 50-85). Harlow, Essex: Addison Wesley Longman.
185. Painter, C. (1999). Preparing for school: Developing a semantic style for education. In F. Christie (Ed.), Pedagogy and the shaping of consciousness: Linguistic and social processes (pp. 66-87). London: Continuum.
186. Perfetti, C. A., & McCutchen, D. (1987). Schooled language competence: Linguistic abilities in reading and writing. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics (pp. 105-141). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
187. Peterson, C., Jesso, B., & McCabe, A. (1999). Encouraging narratives in preschoolers: An intervention study. Journal of Child Language, 26, 49-67.
188. Philips, S. U. (1972). Participant structures and communicative competence: Warm Springs children in community and classroom. In C. B. Cazden, V. P. John, & D. Hymes (Eds.), Functions of language in the classroom (pp. 370-394). New York: Teachers College Press.
189. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1972). A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.
190. Ramanathan-Abbott, V. (1993). An examination of the relationship between social practices and the comprehension of narratives. Text, 13(1), 117-141.
191. Ravelli, L. (1988). Grammatical metaphor: An initial analysis. In E. H. Steiner & R. Veltman (Eds.), Pragmatics, discourse and text: Some systemically-inspired approaches (pp. 133-147). London: Pinter.
192. Ravelli, L. (1996). Making language accessible: Successful text writing for museum visitors. Linguistics and Education, 8(4), 367-388.
193. Ravelli, L. (2000). Getting started with functional analysis of texts. In L. Unsworth (Ed.), Researching language in schools and communities: Functional linguistic perspectives (pp. 27-64). London: (Continuum) Cassell.
194. Romaine, S. (1984). The language of children and adolescents. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
195. Rose, D. (1997). Science, technology and technical literacies. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school (pp. 40-72). London: Cassell.
196. Rose, D. (2001). Some variations in theme across languages. Functions of Language, 8(1), 109-145.
197. Rose, M. (1989). Lives on the boundary. New York: The Free Press.
198. Rothery, J. (1996). Making changes: Developing an educational linguistics. In R. Hasan & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 86-123). Harlow, Essex: Addison Wesley Longman.
199. Rothery, J., & Stenglin, M. (1997). Entertaining and instructing: Exploring experience through story. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school (pp. 231-263). London: Cassell.
200. Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
201. Schleppegrell, M. J. (1989). Functions of because in spoken discourse. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
202. Schleppegrell, M. J. (1991). Paratactic because. Journal of Pragmatics, 16, 121-135.
203. Schleppegrell, M. J. (1992). Subordination and linguistic complexity. Discourse Processes, 15(2), 117-131.
204. Schleppegrell, M. J. (1996a). Conjunction in spoken English and ESL writing. Applied Linguistics, 17(3), 271-285.
205. Schleppegrell, M. J. (1996b). Strategies for discourse cohesion: Because in ESL writing. Functions of Language, 3(2), 235-254.
206. Schleppegrell, M. J. (1997). Agency in environmental education. Linguistics and Education, 9(1), 49-67.
207. Schleppegrell, M. J. (1998). Grammar as resource: Writing a description. Research in the Teaching of English, 32(3), 182-211.
208. Schleppegrell, M. J. (2000). How SFL can inform writing instruction: The grammar of expository essays. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 40, 171-188.
209. Schleppegrell, M. J. (2001). Linguistic features of the language of schooling. Linguistics and Education, 12(4), 431-459.
210. Schleppegrell, M. J. (2002). Challenges of the science register for ESL students: Errors and meaning making. In M. J. Schleppegrell & M. C. Colombi (Eds.), Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages: Meaning with power (pp. 119-142). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
211. Schleppegrell, M., & Achugar, M. (2003). Learning language and learning history: A functional linguistics approach. TESOL Journal, 12(2), 21-27.
212. Schleppegrell, M., Achugar, M., & Oteíza, T. (2004). The grammar of history: Enhancing content- based instruction through a functional focus on language. TESOL Quarterly, 38(1).
213. Schleppegrell, M. J., & Colombi, M. C. (1997). Text organization by bilingual writers: Clause structure as a reflection of discourse structure. Written Communication, 14(4), 481-503.
214. Schleppegrell, M. J., & Colombi, M. C. (Eds.). (2002). Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages: Meaning with power. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
215. Schleppegrell, M. J., & Simich-Dudgeon, C. (1996). What's a good answer? Awareness about behavioral and content features of successful classroom interaction. Language and Education, 10(1), 1-14.
216. Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. (1981). Narrative, literacy and face in interethnic communication. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
217. Scott, C. M. (1988). Spoken and written syntax. In M. A. Nippold (Ed.), Later language development: Ages 9 through 19 (pp. 49-95). Boston: College-Hill.
218. Shaughnessy, M. P. (1977). Errors and expectations: A guide for the teacher of basic writing. New York: Oxford University Press.
219. Silva, T. (1993). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: The ESL research and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 27(4), 657-677.
220. Sinclair, M. (1993). Are academic texts really decontextualized and fully explicit? A pragmatic perspective on the role of context in written communication. Text, 13(4), 529-558.
221. Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
222. Smith, R. N., & Frawley, W. J. (1983). Conjunctive cohesion in four English genres. Text, 3(4), 347-374.
223. Snow, C. E. (1983). Literacy and language: Relationships during the preschool years. Harvard Educational Review, 53, 165-189.
224. Snow, C. E. (1987). Beyond conversation: Second language learners' acquisition of description and explanation. In J. Lantoff & R. DiPietro (Eds.), Second language acquisition in the classroom setting (pp. 3-16). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
225. Snow, C. E. (1990). The development of definitional skill. Journal of Child Language, 17, 697-710.
226. Snow, C., Cancini, H., Gonzalez, P., & Shriberg, E. (1989). Giving formal definitions: An oral language correlate of school literacy. In D. Bloome (Ed.), Classrooms and literacy (pp. 233-249). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
227. Snow, M. A., Met, M., & Genesee, F. (1989). A conceptual framework for the integration of language and content in second/foreign language instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 23(2), 201-219.
228. Solomon, J., & Rhodes, N. (1995). Conceptualizing academic language (Research Report No. 15). Santa Cruz, CA: National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning.
229. Spack, R. (1993). Student meets text, text meets student: Finding a way into academic discourse. In J. G. Carson & I. Leki (Eds.), Reading in the composition classroom (pp. 183-196). Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
230. Street, B. V. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
231. Stuckey, S., & Kerrigan Salvucci, L. (2000). Call to freedom: Beginnings to 1914. Austin: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
232. Thompson, S. (1984). 'Subordination' in formal and informal discourse. In D. Schiffrin (Ed.), Meaning, form, and use in context: Linguistic applications (pp. 85-94). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
233. Thompson, S. A., & Longacre, R. E. (1985). Adverbial clauses. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description (Vol. 2: Complex constructions, pp. 171-234). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
234. Torrance, N., & Olson, D. R. (1984). Oral language competence and the acquisition of literacy. In A. D. Pellegrini & T. D. Yawkey (Eds.), The development of oral and written language in social contexts (pp. 167-182). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
235. Unsworth, L. (1997). "Sound"explanations in school sciences: A functional linguistic perspec - tive on effective apprenticing texts. Linguistics and Education, 9(2), 199-226.
236. Unsworth, L. (1999). Developing critical understanding of the specialised language of school science and history texts: A functional grammatical perspective. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 42(7), 508-521.
237. Unsworth, L. (2000a). Investigating subject-specific literacies in school learning. In L. Unsworth (Ed.), Researching language in schools and communities: Functional linguistic perspectives (pp. 245-274). London: Cassell.
238. Unsworth, L. (Ed.). (2000b). Researching language in schools and communities: Functional linguistic perspectives. London: (Continuum) Cassell.
239. Vande Kopple, W. J. (1992). Noun phrases and the style of scientific discourse. In S. P. Witte, N. Nakadate, & R. D. Cherry (Eds.), A rhetoric of doing: Essays on written discourse in honor of James L. Kinneavy (pp. 328-348). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
240. Veel, R. (1997). Learning how to mean-scientifically speaking: Apprenticeship into scientific discourse in the secondary school. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school (pp. 161-195). London: Cassell.
241. Veel, R. (1999). Language, knowledge and authority in school mathematics. In F. Christie (Ed.), Pedagogy and the shaping of consciousness: Linguistic and social processes (pp. 185-216). London: Continuum.
242. Veel, R., & Coffin, C. (1996). Learning to think like an historian: The language of secondary school history. In R. Hasan & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 191-231). Harlow, Essex: Addison Wesley Longman.
243. Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
244. Wald, B. (1987). The development of writing skills among Hispanic high school students. In S. Goldman & H. Trueba (Eds.), Becoming literate in English as a second language (pp. 155-185). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
245. Watson-Gegeo, K. A., & Boggs, S. T. (1977). From verbal play to talk story: The role of routines in speech events among Hawaiian children. In S. Ervin-Tripp & C. Mitchell-Kernan (Eds.), Child discourse (pp. 67-90). New York: Academic Press.
246. Weaver, C. (1996). Teaching grammar in context. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
247. Wells, G. (1985). Language development in the pre-school years. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
248. Wells, G. (1987). The meaning makers: Children learning language and using language to learn. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
249. Wells, G. (1993). Reevaluating the IRF sequence: A proposal for the articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of learning and teaching in the classroom. Linguistics and Education, 5(1), 1-37.
250. Wells, G. (1994). The complementary contributions of Halliday and Vygotsky to a "Languagebased theory of learning". Linguistics and Education, 6(1), 41-90.
251. White, P. R. R. (2003). Appraisal Outline. http://www.grammatics.com/appraisal/.
252. Whiteman, M. F. (1981). Dialect influence in writing. In M. F. Whiteman (Ed.), Variation in writing: Functional and linguistic-cultural differences (pp. 153-166). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
253. Wignell, P. (1994). Genre across the curriculum. Linguistics and Education, 6(4), 355-372.
254. Williams, G. (1998). Children entering literate worlds: Perspectives from the study of textual practices. In F. Christie & R. Misson (Eds.), Literacy and schooling (pp. 18-46). London: Routledge.
255. Williams, G. (1999). The pedagogic device and the production of pedagogic discourse: A case example in early literacy education. In F. Christie (Ed.), Pedagogy and the shaping of consciousness: Linguistic and social processes (pp. 88-122). London: Continuum.
256. Williams, G. (2001). Literacy pedagogy prior to schooling: Relations between social positioning and semantic variation. In A. Morais, I. Neves, & B. Davies (Eds.), Towards a sociology of pedagogy: The contribution of Basil Bernstein to research. New York: Peter Lang.