Mathematical and scientific forms of knowledge: a systemic functional multimodal grammatical approach

Language, Knowledge and Pedagogy: Functional Linguistic and Sociological Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 205-236

  O’halloran, Kay ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85186963386     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (91)

1. Baldry, A.P. (ed.) (2000), Multimodality and Multimediality in the Distance Learning Age. Cam-pobasso, Italy: Palladino Editore.
2. Baldry, A.P. and Thibault, P.J. (2006), Multimodal Transcription and Text Analysis. London: Equinox.
3. Barry, J. (1996), Measures of Science: Theological and Technical Impulses in Early Modern Thought. Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
4. Bell, E.T. (1987), Mathematics: Queen and Servant of Science (first published 1951). Redmond, WA: Tempus Books of Microsoft Press.
5. Bernstein, B. (1990), Class, Codes and Control, Volume IV: The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. London: Routledge.
6. Bernstein, B. (2000), Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research and Critique. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
7. Bourne, J. (2003), ‘Vertical discourse: the role of the teacher in the transmission and acquisition of decontextualized language’, in European Educational Research Journal 2(4), pp. 496-521.
8. Cheong, Y.Y. (2004), ‘The construal of ideational meaning in print advertisements’, in O’Halloran, K.L. (ed.), Multimodal Discourse Analysis. London and New York: Continuum, pp. 163-95.
9. Christie, F. (ed.) (1999), Pedagogy and the Shaping of Consciousness: Linguistic and Social Processes. London and New York: Continuum.
10. Christie, F. (2002), Classroom Discourse Analysis: A Functional Perspective. London and New York: Continuum.
11. Christie, F. and Martin, J.R. (eds) (1997), Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School. London and New York: Continuum.
12. Coffin, C. (1997), ‘Constructing and giving value to the past: an investigation into second school history’, in Christie, F. and Martin, J.R. (eds), Genre and Institutions - Social Processes in the Workplace and School. London: Continuum, pp. 196-230.
13. Davies, D., Bathurst, D. and Bathurst, R. (1990), The Telling Images: The Changing Balance between Pictures and Words in a Technological Age. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
14. Davis, P.J. (1974), ‘Visual geometry, computer graphics and theorems of perceived type’, in Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics 20, pp. 113-27.
15. Descartes, R. (1683), Geometria, anno 1673 GalliceEdita /Postea Cum Notis Fl. de Beaune in Latinam Linguam Versa / et Commentariis Illustrata Opera Francisci a Schooten: Volume 1. Amsterdam.
16. Descartes, R. (1952), Descartes' Philosophical Writings (ed. and tr. Norman Kemp Smith). London: Macmillan.
17. Descartes, R. (1954), The Geometry of Rene Descartes. New York: Dover.
18. Descartes, R. (1985), The Philosophical Writings of Descartes: Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Eisenstein, E.L. (1979), The Printing Press as an Agent of Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Elkins, J. (1999), The Domain of Images. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
21. Foucault, M. (1991), Discipline and Punish. London: Penguin.
22. Funkenstein, A. (1986), Theology and the Scientific Imagination from the Middle Ages to the Seventeenth Century. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
23. Galison, P. (2002), ‘Images scatter into data, data gathers into images’, in Latour, B. and Weibel, P. (eds), Iconoclash: Beyond the Image Wars in Science, Religion, and Art. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 300-23.
24. Galvani, L. (1792), ‘Electrophysiology: experiments with frogs’, in De ViribusElectrìcitatis. Plate 1.
25. Golovin, A.A., Matkowsky, B.J. and Nepomnyashchy, A.A. (2003), ‘A complex Swift-Hohenberg equation coupled to the Goldstone Mode in the non-linear dynamics of flames’, in Physica D 179, pp. 183-210.
26. Guo, L. (2004), ‘Multimodality in a Biology textbook’, in O’Halloran, K. L. (ed.), Multimodal Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum, pp. 196-219.
27. Habermas, J. (1974), Theory and Practice. Boston: Beacon Press.
28. Halliday, M.A.K. (1978), Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
29. Halliday, M.A.K. (1993), ‘Some grammatical problems in scientific english’, in Halliday, M.A.K. and Martin, J.R. (eds), Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: Falmer Press, pp. 69-85.
30. Halliday, M.A.K. (2004a), Introduction to Functional Grammar. (third edn revised by C.M.I.M. Matthiessen; first edn 1985, second edn 1994). London: Arnold.
31. Halliday, M.A.K. (2004b), ‘The Language of Science’, in Collected Works of M.A.K Halliday, edited by J. Webster. London and New York: Continuum.
32. Halliday, M.A.K. and Martin, J.R. (1993), Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: Falmer.
33. Halliday, M.A.K. and Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (1999), Construing Experience through Meaning: A Language Based Approach to Cognition. London: Cassell.
34. Horkheimer, M. (1972), Critical Theory. New York: The Seabury Press.
35. Horkheimer, M. and Adorno, T.W. (1972), Dialectic of Enlightenment. New York: The Seabury Press.
36. Iedema, R. (2001), ‘Resemioticization’, in Semiotica 137, 1/4, pp. 23-39.
37. Iedema, R. (2003), ‘Multimodality, resemioticization: extending the analysis of discourse as a multisemiotic practice’, in Visual Communication 2(1), pp. 29-57.
38. Koenderink, J. (1993), ‘Foreword’, in Ellis, S.R. (ed.), Pictorial Communication in Virtual and Real Environments. London: Taylor & Francis, pp. viii-ix.
39. Koestler, A. (1959), The Sleepwalkers: A History of Man’s Changing Vision of the Universe. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
40. Kress, G. (2003), Literacy in the New Media Age. London: Routledge.
41. Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J. and Tsatsarelis, C. (2001), Multimodal Teaching and Learning: The Rhetorics of the Science Classroom. London: Continuum.
42. Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (1996), Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
43. Kuhn, T.S. (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44. Latour, B. and Weibel, P. (eds) (2002), Iconoclash: Beyond the Image Wars in Science, Religion, and Art. Karlsruhe: ZKM.
45. Lemke, J.L. (1998), ‘Multiplying meaning: visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text’, in Martin, J.R. and Veel, R. (eds), Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science. London: Routledge, pp. 87-113.
46. Lemke, J.L. (2002), ‘Travels in Hypermodality’, in Visual Communication 1(3), pp. 299-325.
47. Lemke, J.L. (2003), ‘Mathematics in the middle: measure, picture, gesture, sign, and word’, in Anderson, M., Sáenz-Ludlow, A., Zellweger, S. and Cifarelli, V.V. (eds), Educational Perspectives on Mathematics as Semiosis: From Thinking to Interpreting to Knowing. Ottawa: Legas, pp. 215-34.
48. Lester, P.M. (2000), Visual Communication: Images with Messages. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.
49. Martin, J.R. (1992), English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
50. Martin, J.R. (2002), ‘Fair trade: negotiating meaning in multimodal texts’, in Coppock, P. (ed.), The Semiotics of Writing: Transdisciplinary Perspectives on the Technology of Writing. Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols, pp. 311-38.
51. Martin, J.R. and Rose, D. (2003), Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause. London and New York: Continuum.
52. Martin, J.R. and Veel, R. (eds) (1998), Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science. London: Routledge.
53. Martinec, R. (2000), ‘Types of processes in action’, in Semiotica 130-3/4, pp. 243-68.
54. Martinec, R. (2001), ‘Interpersonal resources in action’, in Semiotica 135-1/4, pp. 117-45.
55. Martinec, R. (2004), ‘Gestures that co-concur with speech as a systematic resource: the realization of experiential meanings in indexes’, in Social Semiotics 14 (2), pp. 193-213.
56. Miller, A.I. (1984), Imagery in Scientific Thought: Creating Twentieth-Century Physics. Boston: Birkhäuser.
57. Muller, J. (2000), Reclaiming Knowledge: Social Theory, Curriculum and Educational Policy. London: Routledge.
58. Muller, J. (2004), ‘On the shoulders of giants: a digression on knowledge, curriculum, and finally, the teacher’. Plenary paper at Reclaiming Knowledge Conference. Faculty of Education, University of Sydney, 13-15 December 2004.
59. Newton, I. (1736), The Method of Fluxions and Infinite Series; with its Application to the Geometry of Curve-Lines; With Comments by John Colson. London: printed by Henry Woodfall and sold by John Nourse.
60. Newton, I. (1968), Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. London: Dawson.
61. O’Halloran, K.L. (1999), ‘Towards a systemic functional analysis of multisemiotic mathematics texts’, in Semiotica 124-1/2, pp. 1-29.
62. O’Halloran, K.L. (2000), ‘Classroom discourse in mathematics: a multisemiotic analysis’, in Linguistics and Education 10(3), pp. 359-88.
63. O’Halloran, K.L. (2003a), ‘Educational implications of mathematics as a multisemiotic discourse’, in Anderson, M., Sáenz-Ludlow, A., Zellweger, S. and Cifarelli, V. V. (eds), Educational Perspectives on Mathematics as Semiosis: From Thinking to Interpreting to Knowing. Ottawa: Legas, pp. 185-214.
64. O’Halloran, K.L. (2003b), ‘Intersemiosis in mathematics and science: grammatical metaphor and semiotic metaphor’, in Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M., Taverniers, M. and Ravelli, L. (eds), Grammatical Metaphor: Views from Systemic Functional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 337-65.
65. O’Halloran, K.L. (2004), ‘Discourses in secondary school mathematics classrooms according to social class and gender’, in Foley, J. A. (ed.), Language, Education and Discourse: Functional Approaches. London and New York: Continuum, pp. 191-225.
66. O’Halloran, K.L. (2005), Mathematical Discourse: Language, Symbolism and Visual Images. London and New York: Continuum.
67. O’Halloran, K.L. (forthcoming), A Multimodal Approach to Classroom Discourse. London: Equinox.
68. O’Toole, M. (1994), The Language of Displayed Art. London: Leicester University Press.
69. Peirce, C.S. (1991), ‘Prolegomena to an apology for pragmaticism’, in Hoopes, J. (ed.), Peirce on Signs: Writings on Semiotic by Charles Sanders Peirce. Chapell Hill: University of North Carolina Press, pp. 249-52.
70. Prigent, A., Gregoroire, G., Chate, H. and Dauchot, O. (2003), ‘Long-wavelength modulation of turbulent shear flows’, in Physica D 174, pp. 100-13.
71. Rotman, B. (1995), ‘Thinking dia-grams: mathematics, writing and virtual reality’, in South Atlantic Quarterly 94(2), pp. 389-415.
72. Royce, T. and Bowcher, W. (eds) (in press), New Directions in the Analysis of Multimodal Discourse. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
73. Saint-Martin, F. (1990), Semiotics of Visual Language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
74. Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M., Taverniers, M. and Ravelli, L. (eds) (2003), Grammatical Metaphor: Views from Systemic Functional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
75. Stafford, B. M. (1989), ‘The new immaterialism: Kenneth Snelson imagines the atom’, in Kenneth Snelson: The Nature of Structure (Exhibition Catalogue). New York: New York Academy of Sciences, pp. 51-7.
76. Stafford, B.M. (1996), GGood Looking: Essays on the Virtue of Images. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
77. Swetz, F.J. (1987), Capitalism and Arithmetic. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
78. Thibault, P. (2000), ‘The multimodal transcription of a television advertisement: theory and practice’, in Baldry, A. P. (ed.), Multimodality and Multimediality in the Distance Learning Age. Campobasso, Italy: Palladino Editore, pp. 311-85.
79. Thibault, P. (2001), ‘Multimodality and the school science textbook’, in Carol Taylor Torsello, G.B., and Nicoletta Penello (eds), Corpora Testuali per Ricerca, Traduzione e Apprendimento Linguistico. Padua: Unipress, pp. 293-335.
80. Tufte, E.R. (1990), Envisioning Information. Cheshire: Graphics Press.
81. Unsworth, L. (2000), ‘Investigating subject-specific literacies in school learning’, in Unsworth, L. (ed.), Researching Language in Schools and Communities. London and New York: Cassell, pp. 245-74.
82. Unsworth, L. (2001), Teaching Multiliteracies across the Curriculum: Changing Contexts of Text and Image in Classroom Practice. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
83. van Leeuwen, T. (1999), Speech, Music, Sound. London: Macmillan.
84. van Leeuwen, T. (2005), Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.
85. Veel, R. (1999), ‘Language, knowledge and authority in school mathematics’, in Christie, F. (ed.), Pedagogy and the Shaping of Consciousness: Linguistic and Social Processes. London: Cassell, pp. 185-216.
86. Ventola, E., Charles, C. and Kaltenbacher, M. (eds) (2004), Perspectives on Multimodality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
87. Virilio, P. (1994), The Vision Machine. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
88. Waldrop, M.M. (1992), Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos. New York: Simon & Schuster.
89. Wigner, E.P. (1960), ‘The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences’, in Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 13, pp. 1-14 (reprinted in Mickens, R. E. (1990), Mathematics and Science. Singapore: World Scientific, pp. 291-306).
90. Wildbur, P. (1989), Information Graphics: A Survey of Typographic, Diagrammatic and Cartographic Communication. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
91. Wildbur, P. and Burke, M. (1998), Information Graphics: Innovative Solutions in Contemporary Design. London: Thames and Hudson.