Stem cells and genome editing: Approaches to tissue regeneration and regenerative medicine review-article

Journal of Human Genetics

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 165-178

  Takata, Nozomu ^a,b   Eiraku, Mototsugu ^b,c  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research   (Japan)

^c KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT STEM CELL; CELL FATE; CELL STRUCTURE; GENE EDITING; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; NONHUMAN; ORGAN; ORGAN GROWTH; ORGANOID; REGENERATIVE MEDICINE; REVIEW; STEM CELL; TISSUE REGENERATION; VASCULARIZATION; ANIMAL; PROCEDURES; REGENERATION;

ANIMALS; GENE EDITING; HUMANS; REGENERATION; REGENERATIVE MEDICINE; STEM CELLS;

EID: 85035813643     PISSN: 14345161     EISSN: 1435232X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s10038-017-0348-0     Document Type: Review

References (209)

1. Self-formation of layered neural structures in three-dimensional culture of ES cells. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2012; 22: 768-77. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. conb. 2012. 02. 005 2 Sasai Y. Next-generation regenerative medicine: organogenesis from stem cells in 3D culture. Cell Stem Cell. 2013; 12: 520-30. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. stem. 2013. 04. 009
2. Sato T, Clevers H. SnapShot: growing organoids from stem cells. Cell. 2015; 161: 1700-1700. e1. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. cell. 2015. 06. 028
3. Murphy SV, Atala A. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol. 2014; 32: 773-85. https://doi. org/10. 1038/nbt. 2958
4. Song JJ, Ott HC. Organ engineering based on decellularized matrix scaffolds. Trends Mol Med. 2011; 17: 424-32. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. molmed. 2011. 03. 005
5. Soto-Gutierrez A, Wertheim JA, Ott HC, Gilbert TW. Perspectives on whole-organ assembly: moving toward transplantation on demand. J Clin Invest. 2012; 122: 3817-23. https://doi. org/10. 1172/Jci61974
6. Badylak SF, Taylor D, Uygun K. Whole-Organ Tissue Engineering: Decellularization and Recellularization of Three-Dimensional Matrix Scaffolds. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2011; 13: 27-53. https://doi. org/10. 1146/annurev-bioeng-071910-124743
7. Ekser B, Ezzelarab M, Hara H, van der Windt DJ, Wijkstrom M, Bottino R, et al. Clinical xenotransplantation: the next medical revolution? Lancet. 2012; 379: 672-83. https://doi. org/10. 1016/S0140-6736(11)61091-X
8. Sgroi A, Buhler LH, Morel P, Sykes M, Noel L. International human xenotransplantation inventory. Transplantation. 2010; 90: 597-603. https://doi. org/10. 1097/TP. 0b013e3181eb2e8c
9. Cooper, D. K. A brief history of cross-species organ transplantation. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2012; 25: 49-57.
10. Peng Y, Clark KJ, Campbell JM, Panetta MR, Guo Y, Ekker SC. Making designer mutants in model organisms. Development. 2014; 141: 4042-54. https://doi. org/10. 1242/dev. 102186
11. Cornu TI, Mussolino C, Cathomen T. Refining strategies to translate genome editing to the clinic. Nat Med. 2017; 23: 415-23. https://doi. org/10. 1038/nm. 4313
12. Blasco RB, Karaca E, Ambrogio C, Cheong TC, Karayol E, Minero VG, et al. Simple and rapid in vivo generation of chromosomal rearrangements using CRISPR/Cas9 technology. Cell Reports. 2014; 9: 1219-27. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. celrep. 2014. 10. 051
13. Li Y, Park AI, Mou H, Colpan C, Bizhanova A, Akama-Garren E, et al. A versatile reporter system for CRISPR-mediated chromosomal rearrangements. Genome Biol. 2015; 16: 111. https://doi. org/10. 1186/s13059-015-0680-7
14. Jiang J, Zhang L, Zhou X, Chen X, Huang G, Li F, et al. Induction of site-specific chromosomal translocations in embryonic stem cells by CRISPR/Cas9. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 21918. https://doi. org/10. 1038/srep21918
15. Liu XS, Wu H, Ji X, Stelzer Y, Wu X, Czauderna S, et al. Editing DNA methylation in the mammalian genome. Cell. 2016; 167: 233-47. e217. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. cell. 2016. 08. 056
16. Epigenetics: CRISPR edits gene methylation. Nature 2016; 537: 588, https://doi. org/10. 1038/537588c.
17. Hilton IB, D'Ippolito AM, Vockley CM, Thakore PI, Crawford GE, Reddy TE, et al. Epigenome editing by a CRISPR-Cas9-based acetyltransferase activates genes from promoters and enhancers. Nat Biotechnol. 2015; 33: 510-7. https://doi. org/10. 1038/nbt. 3199
18. Thakore PI, Black JB, Hilton IB, Gersbach CA. Editing the epigenome: technologies for programmable transcription and epigenetic modulation. Nat Methods. 2016; 13: 127-37. https://doi. org/10. 1038/nmeth. 3733
19. Xu T, Li Y, Van Nostrand JD, He Z, Zhou J. Cas9-based tools for targeted genome editing and transcriptional control. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014; 80: 1544-52. https://doi. org/10. 1128/AEM. 03786-13
20. Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science. 2012; 337: 816-21. https://doi. org/10. 1126/science. 1225829
21. Ledford H. CRISPR, the disruptor. Nature. 2015; 522: 20-4. https://doi. org/10. 1038/522020a
22. Travis J. Making the cut. Science. 2015; 350: 1456-7. https://doi. org/10. 1126/science. 350. 6267. 1456
23. Ishino Y, Shinagawa H, Makino K, Amemura M, Nakata A. Nucleotide-sequence of the iap gene, responsible for alkalinephosphatase isozyme conversion in Escherichia coli, and identification of the gene-product. J Bacteriol. 1987; 169: 5429-33.
24. Sorek R, Kunin V, Hugenholtz P. CRISPR-a widespread system that provides acquired resistance against phages in bacteria and archaea. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008; 6: 181-6. https://doi. org/10. 1038/nrmicro1793
25. Garneau JE, Dupuis ME, Villion M, Romero DA, Barrangou R, Boyaval P, et al. The CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system cleaves bacteriophage and plasmid DNA. Nature. 2010; 468: 67-+. https://doi. org/10. 1038/nature09523
26. Sander JD, Joung JK. CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes. Nat Biotechnol. 2014; 32: 347-55. https://doi. org/10. 1038/nbt. 2842
27. Doudna JA, Charpentier E. Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science. 2014; 346: 1258096 https://doi. org/10. 1126/science. 1258096
28. DiCarlo JE, Norville JE, Mali P, Rios X, Aach J, Church GM. Genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 41: 4336-43. https://doi. org/10. 1093/nar/gkt135
29. Bortesi L, Fischer R. The CRISPR/Cas9 system for plant genome editing and beyond. Biotechnol Adv. 2015; 33: 41-52. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. biotechadv. 2014. 12. 006
30. Dickinson DJ, Ward JD, Reiner DJ, Goldstein B. Engineering the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using Cas9-triggered homologous recombination. Nat Methods. 2013; 10: 1028-+. https://doi. org/10. 1038/Nmeth. 2641
31. Bassett AR, Tibbit C, Ponting CP, Liu JL. Highly efficient targeted mutagenesis of Drosophila with the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Cell Rep. 2013; 4: 220-8. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. celrep. 2013. 06. 020
32. Awata H, Watanabe T, Hamanaka Y, Mito T, Noji S, Mizunami M. Knockout crickets for the study of learning and memory: dopamine receptor Dop1 mediates aversive but not appetitive reinforcement in crickets. Sci Rep. 2015; 5: 15885. https://doi. org/10. 1038/srep15885
33. Chang N, Sun C, Gao L, Zhu D, Xu X, Zhu X, et al. Genome editing with RNA-guided Cas9 nuclease in zebrafish embryos. Cell Res. 2013; 23: 465-72. https://doi. org/10. 1038/cr. 2013. 45
34. Guo X, Zhang T, Hu Z, Zhang Y, Shi Z, Wang Q, et al. Efficient RNA/Cas9-mediated genome editing in Xenopus tropicalis. Development. 2014; 141: 707-14. https://doi. org/10. 1242/dev. 099853
35. Wang HY, Yang H, Shivalila CS, Dawlaty MM, Cheng AW, Zhang F, et al. One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell. 2013; 153: 910-8. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. cell. 2013. 04. 025
36. Yang H, Wang HY, Shivalila CS, Cheng AW, Shi LY, Jaenisch R. One-Step generation of mice carrying reporter and conditional alleles by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell. 2013; 154: 1370-9. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. cell. 2013. 08. 022
37. Yang H, Wang HY, Jaenisch R. Generating genetically modified mice using CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Nat Protoc. 2014; 9: 1956-68. https://doi. org/10. 1038/nprot. 2014. 134
38. Cong L, Ran FA, Cox D, Lin SL, Barretto R, Habib N, et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science. 2013; 339: 819-23. https://doi. org/10. 1126/science. 1231143
39. Mali P, Yang LH, Esvelt KM, Aach J, Guell M, DiCarlo JE, et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science. 2013; 339: 823-6. https://doi. org/10. 1126/science. 1232033
40. Karl MO, Reh TA. Regenerative medicine for retinal diseases: activating endogenous repair mechanisms. Trends Mol Med. 2010; 16: 193-202. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. molmed. 2010. 02. 003
41. Ramachandran R, Zhao XF, Goldman D. Insm1a-mediated gene repression is essential for the formation and differentiation of Müller glia-derived progenitors in the injured retina. Nat Cell Biol. 2012; 14: 1013-+. https://doi. org/10. 1038/ncb2586
42. Wan J, Ramachandran R, Goldman D. HB-EGF is necessary and sufficient for Müller Glia dedifferentiation and retina regeneration. Dev Cell. 2012; 22: 334-47. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. devcel. 2011. 11. 020
43. Nagashima M, Barthel LK, Raymond PA. A self-renewing division of zebrafish Müller glial cells generates neuronal progenitors that require N-cadherin to regenerate retinal neurons. Development. 2013; 140: 4510-21. https://doi. org/10. 1242/dev. 090738
44. Jopling C, Sleep E, Raya M, Marti M, Raya A, Belmonte JCI. Zebrafish heart regeneration occurs by cardiomyocyte dedifferentiation and proliferation. Nature. 2010; 464: 606-9. https://doi. org/10. 1038/nature08899
45. Kikuchi K. Dedifferentiation, transdifferentiation, and proliferation: mechanisms underlying cardiac muscle regeneration in zebrafish. Curr Pathobiol Rep. 2015; 3: 81-8. https://doi. org/10. 1007/s40139-015-0063-5
46. Kikuchi K, Poss KD. Cardiac regenerative capacity and mechanisms. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2012; 28: 719-41. https://doi. org/10. 1146/annurev-cellbio-101011-155739
47. Gemberling M, Bailey TJ, Hyde DR, Poss KD. The zebrafish as a model for complex tissue regeneration. Trends Genet. 2013; 29: 611-20. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. Tig. 2013. 07. 003
48. Hata S, Namae M, Nishina H. Liver development and regeneration: From laboratory study to clinical therapy. Dev Growth Differ. 2007; 49: 163-70. https://doi. org/10. 1111/j. 1440-169x. 2007. 00910. x
49. Porrello ER, Mahmoud AI, Simpson E, Hill JA, Richardson JA, Olson EN, et al. Transient regenerative potential of the neonatal mouse heart. Science. 2011; 331: 1078-80. https://doi. org/10. 1126/science. 1200708
50. Michalopoulos GK, DeFrances MC. Liver regeneration. Science. 1997; 276: 60-6.
51. Kang J, Hu J, Karra R, Dickson AL, Tornini VA, Nachtrab G, et al. Modulation of tissue repair by regeneration enhancer elements. Nature. 2016; 532: 201-6. https://doi. org/10. 1038/na ture17644
52. Seeger T, Porteus M, Wu JC. Genome editing in cardiovascular biology. Circ Res. 2017; 120: 778-80. https://doi. org/10. 1161/CIRCRESAHA. 116. 310197
53. Ail D, Perron M. Retinal degeneration and regeneration-lessons from fishes and amphibians. Curr Pathobiol Rep. 2017; 5: 67-78. https://doi. org/10. 1007/s40139-017-0127-9
54. Locker M, Borday C, Perron M. Stemness or not stemness? Current status and perspectives of adult retinal stem cells. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2009; 4: 118-30.
55. Lamba D, Karl M, Reh T. Neural regeneration and cell replacement: a view from the eye. Cell Stem Cell. 2008; 2: 538-49. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. stem. 2008. 05. 002
56. Stone LS, Steinitz H. Regeneration of neural retina and lens from retina pigment cell grafts in adult newts. J Exp Zool. 1957; 135: 301-17.
57. Moshiri A, Close J, Reh TA. Retinal stem cells and regeneration. Int J Dev Biol. 2004; 48: 1003-14. https://doi. org/10. 1387/ijdb. 041870am
58. Yasumuro H, Sakurai K, Toyama F, Maruo F, Chiba C. Implications of a multi-step trigger of retinal regeneration in the adult Newt. Biomedicines. 2017; 5. https://doi. org/10. 3390/biomedicines5020025.
59. Merrell AJ, Stanger BZ. Adult cell plasticity in vivo: dedifferentiation and transdifferentiation are back in style. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016; 17: 413-25. https://doi. org/10. 1038/nrm. 2016. 24
60. Fischer AJ, Bosse JL, El-Hodiri HM. The ciliary marginal zone (CMZ) in development and regeneration of the vertebrate eye. Exp Eye Res. 2013; 116: 199-204. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. exer. 2013. 08. 018
61. Centanin L, Hoeckendorf B, Wittbrodt J. Fate restriction and multipotency in retinal stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2011; 9: 553-62. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. stem. 2011. 11. 004
62. Tropepe V, Coles BL, Chiasson BJ, Horsford DJ, Elia AJ, McInnes RR, et al. Retinal stem cells in the adult mammalian eye. Science. 2000; 287: 2032-6.
63. Coles BL, Angenieux B, Inoue T, Del Rio-Tsonis K, Spence JR, McInnes RR, et al. Facile isolation and the characterization of human retinal stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004; 101: 15772-7. https://doi. org/10. 1073/pnas. 0401596101
64. Kuwahara A, Ozone C, Nakano T, Saito K, Eiraku M, Sasai Y. Generation of a ciliary margin-like stem cell niche from selforganizing human retinal tissue. Nat Commun. 2015; 6: 6286 https://doi. org/10. 1038/ncomms7286
65. Mitashov VI. Retinal regeneration in amphibians. Int J Dev Biol. 1997; 41: 893-905.
66. Goldman D. Müller glial cell reprogramming and retina regeneration. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014; 15: 431-42. https://doi. org/10. 1038/nrn3723
67. Young RW. Cell differentiation in the retina of the mouse. Anat Rec. 1985; 212: 199-205. https://doi. org/10. 1002/ar. 1092120215
68. Ooto S, Akagi T, Kageyama R, Akita J, Mandai M, Honda Y, et al. Potential for neural regeneration after neurotoxic injury in the adult mammalian retina. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004; 101: 13654-9. https://doi. org/10. 1073/pnas. 0402129101
69. Chohan A, Singh U, Kumar A, Kaur J. Müller stem cell dependent retinal regeneration. Clin Chim Acta. 2017; 464: 160-4. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. cca. 2016. 11. 030
70. Osakada F, Ooto S, Akagi T, Mandai M, Akaike A, Takahashi M. Wnt signaling promotes regeneration in the retina of adult mammals. J Neurosci. 2007; 27: 4210-9. https://doi. org/10. 1523/JNEUROSCI. 4193-06. 2007
71. Suga A, Sadamoto K, Fujii M, Mandai M, Takahashi M. Proliferation potential of Müller glia after retinal damage varies between mouse strains. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9: e94556. https://doi. org/10. 1371/journal. pone. 0094556
72. Hamon A, Roger JE, Yang XJ, Perron M. Müller glial celldependent regeneration of the neural retina: an overview across vertebrate model systems. Dev Dyn. 2016; 245: 727-38. https://doi. org/10. 1002/dvdy. 24375
73. Lust K, Sinn R, Perez Saturnino A, Centanin L, Wittbrodt J. De novo neurogenesis by targeted expression of atoh7 to Müller glia cells. Development. 2016; 143: 1874-83. https://doi. org/10. 1242/dev. 135905
74. Nelson BR, Ueki Y, Reardon S, Karl MO, Georgi S, Hartman BH et al. Genome-wide analysis of Müller glial differentiation reveals a requirement for notch signaling in postmitotic cells to maintain the glial Fate. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6. https://doi. org/10. 1371/journa l. pone. 0022817
75. Zelinka CP, Volkov L, Goodman ZA, Todd L, Palazzo I, Bishop WA, et al. mTor signaling is required for the formation of proliferating Müller glia-derived progenitor cells in the chick retina. Development. 2016; 143: 1859-73. https://doi. org/10. 1242/dev. 133215
76. Powell C, Grant AR, Cornblath E, Goldman D. Analysis of DNA methylation reveals a partial reprogramming of the Müller glia genome during retina regeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013; 110: 19814-9. https://doi. org/10. 1073/pnas. 1312009110
77. Jorstad NL, Wilken MS, Grimes WN, Wohl SG, VandenBosch LS, Yoshimatsu T, et al. Stimulation of functional neuronal regeneration from Müller glia in adult mice. Nature. 2017; 548: 103-7. https://doi. org/10. 1038/nature23283
78. Roesch K, Jadhav AP, Trimarchi JM, Stadler MB, Roska B, Sun BB, et al. The transcriptome of retinal Müller glial cells. J Comp Neurol. 2008; 509: 225-38. https://doi. org/10. 1002/cne. 21730
79. Suzuki K, Tsunekawa Y, Hernandez-Benitez R, Wu J, Zhu J, Kim EJ, et al. In vivo genome editing via CRISPR/Cas9 mediated homology-independent targeted integration. Nature. 2016; 540: 144-9. https://doi. org/10. 1038/nature20565
80. Krikorian AD, Berquam DL. Plant cell and tissue cultures-role of Haberlandt. Bot Rev. 1969; 35: 59-+. https://doi. org/10. 1007/Bf02859888
81. Thorpe TA. History of plant tissue culture. Mol Biotechnol. 2007; 37: 169-80.
82. Sugiyama M. Historical review of research on plant cell dedifferentiation. J Plant Res. 2015; 128: 349-59. https://doi. org/10. 1007/s10265-015-0706-y
83. Wilson HV. A new method by which sponges may be artificially reared. Science. 1907; 25: 912-5. https://doi. org/10. 1126/science. 25. 649. 912
84. Weiss P, Taylor AC. Reconstitution of complete organs from single-cell suspensions of chick embryos in advanced stages of differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1960; 46: 1177-85.
85. Pierce GB Jr, Dixon FJ Jr, Verney EL. Teratocarcinogenic and tissue-forming potentials of the cell types comprising neoplastic embryoid bodies. Lab Invest. 1960; 9: 583-602.
86. Rheinwald JG, Green H. Serial cultivation of strains of human epidermal keratinocytes: the formation of keratinizing colonies from single cells. Cell. 1975; 6: 331-43.
87. Rheinwald JG, Green H. Formation of a keratinizing epithelium in culture by a cloned cell line derived from a teratoma. Cell. 1975; 6: 317-30.
88. Lancaster MA, Knoblich JA. Organogenesis in a dish: modeling development and disease using organoid technologies. Science. 2014; 345. https://doi. org/10. 1126/science. 1247125
89. Clevers H. Modeling development and disease with organoids. Cell. 2016; 165: 1586-97. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. cell. 2016. 05. 082
90. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell. 2006; 126: 663-76. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. cell. 2006. 07. 024
91. Shi Y, Inoue H, Wu JC, Yamanaka S. Induced pluripotent stem cell technology: a decade of progress. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017; 16: 115-30. https://doi. org/10. 1038/nrd. 2016. 245
92. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, Tomoda K, et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell. 2007; 131: 861-72. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. cell. 2007. 11. 019
93. Zhou H, Martinez H, Sun B, Li A, Zimmer M, Katsanis N, et al. Rapid and efficient generation of transgene-free iPSC from a small volume of cryopreserved blood. Stem Cell Rev. 2015; 11: 652-65. https://doi. org/10. 1007/s12015-015-9586-8
94. Agu CA, Soares FAC, Alderton A, Patel M, Ansari R, Patel S, et al. Successful generation of human induced pluripotent stem cell lines from blood samples held at room temperature for up to
95. hr. Stem Cell Rep. 2015; 5: 660-71. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. stemcr. 2015. 08. 012
96. Hu Q, Friedrich AM, Johnson LV, Clegg DO. Memory in induced pluripotent stem cells: reprogrammed human retinalpigmented epithelial cells show tendency for spontaneous redifferentiation. Stem Cells. 2010; 28: 1981-91. https://doi. org/10. 1002/stem. 531
97. Hiler D, Chen X, Hazen J, Kupriyanov S, Carroll PA, Qu C, et al. Quantification of Retinogenesis in 3D cultures reveals epigenetic memory and higher efficiency in iPSCs derived from rod photoreceptors. Cell Stem Cell. 2015; 17: 101-15. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. stem. 2015. 05. 015
98. Hiler DJ, Barabas ME, Griffiths LM, Dyer MA. Reprogramming of mouse retinal neurons and standardized quantification of their differentiation in 3D retinal cultures. Nat Protoc. 2016; 11: 1955-76. https://doi. org/10. 1038/nprot. 2016. 109
99. Yamanaka S. A fresh look at iPS cells. Cell. 2009; 137: 13-7. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. cell. 2009. 03. 034
100. Mandai M, Fujii M, Hashiguchi T, Sunagawa GA, Ito S, Sun JN, et al. iPSC-derived retina transplants improve vision in rd1 endstage retinal-degeneration mice (vol 8, pg 69, 2017). Stem Cell Rep. 2017; 8: 1112-3. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. stemcr. 2017. 03.024
101. Schwartz SD, Regillo CD, Lam BL, Eliott D, Rosenfeld PJ, Gregori NZ, et al. Human embryonic stem cell-derived retinal pigment epithelium in patients with age-related macular degeneration and Stargardt's macular dystrophy: follow-up of two open-label phase 1/2 studies. Lancet. 2015; 385: 509-16. https://doi. org/10. 1016/S0140-6736(14)61376-3
102. Schwartz SD, Tan G, Hosseini H, Nagiel A. Subretinal transplantation of embryonic stem cell-derived retinal pigment epithelium for the treatment of macular degeneration: an assessment at 4 years. Invest Ophth Vis Sci. 2016; 57. https://doi. org/10. 1167/iovs. 15-18681.
103. Chiba C. The retinal pigment epithelium: an important player of retinal disorders and regeneration. Exp Eye Res. 2014; 123: 107-14. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. exer. 2013. 07. 009
104. Mandai M, Watanabe A, Kurimoto Y, Hirami Y, Morinaga C, Daimon T, et al. Autologous induced stem-cell-derived retinal cells for macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2017; 376: 1038-46. https://doi. org/10. 1056/NEJMoa1608368
105. Galdos FX, Guo YX, Paige SL, VanDusen NJ, Wu SM, Pu WT. Cardiac regeneration lessons from development. Circ Res. 2017; 120: 941-59. https://doi. org/10. 1161/Circresaha. 116. 309040
106. Doppler SA, Deutsch MA, Serpooshan V, Li G, Dzilic E, Lange R, et al. Mammalian heart regeneration the race to the finish line. Circ Res. 2017; 120: 630-2. https://doi. org/10. 1161/Circresaha. 116. 310051
107. Matsuo T, Masumoto H, Tajima S, Ikuno T, Katayama S, Minakata K, et al. Efficient long-term survival of cell grafts after myocardial infarction with thick viable cardiac tissue entirely from pluripotent stem cells. Sci Rep. 2015; 5: 16842. https://doi. org/10. 1038/srep16842
108. Nakane T, Masumoto H, Tinney JP, Yuan F, Kowalski WJ, Ye F, et al. Impact of cell composition and geometry on human induced pluripotent stem cells-derived engineered cardiac tissue. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 45641. https://doi. org/10. 1038/srep45641
109. Yamashita JK. ES and iPS cell research for cardiovascular regeneration. Exp Cell Res. 2010; 316: 2555-9. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. yexcr. 2010. 04. 004
110. Masumoto H, Yamashita JK. Human iPS cell-derived cardiac tissue sheets: a platform for cardiac regeneration. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2016; 18: 65 https://doi. org/10. 1007/s11936-016-0489-z
111. Shkumatov A, Baek K, Kong H. Matrix rigidity-modulated cardiovascular organoid formation from embryoid bodies. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9: e94764. https://doi. org/10. 1371/journal. pone. 0094764
112. McCracken KW, Cata EM, Crawford CM, Sinagoga KL, Schumacher M, Rockich BE, et al. Modelling human development and disease in pluripotent stem-cell-derived gastric organoids. Nature. 2014; 516: 400-4. https://doi. org/10. 1038/nature13863
113. Qian XY, Nguyen HN, Song MM, Hadiono C, Ogden SC, Hammack C, et al. Brain-region-specific organoids using mini-bioreactors for modeling ZIKV exposure. Cell. 2016; 165: 1238-54. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. cell. 2016. 04. 032
114. Lancaster MA, Renner M, Martin CA, Wenzel D, Bicknell LS, Hurles ME, et al. Cerebral organoids model human brain development and microcephaly. Nature. 2013; 501: 373-+. https://doi. org/10. 1038/nature12517
115. Drost J, van Jaarsveld RH, Ponsioen B, Zimberlin C, van Boxtel R, Buijs A, et al. Sequential cancer mutations in cultured human intestinal stem cells. Nature. 2015; 521: 43-7. https://doi. org/10. 1038/nature14415
116. Soldatow VY, Lecluyse EL, Griffith LG, Rusyn I. In vitro models for liver toxicity testing. Toxicol Res. 2013; 2: 23-39. https://doi. org/10. 1039/C2TX20051A
117. Nantasanti S, de Bruin A, Rothuizen J, Penning LC, Schotanus BA. Concise review: organoids are a powerful tool for the study of liver disease and personalized treatment design in humans and animals. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2016; 5: 325-30. https://doi. org/10. 5966/sctm. 2015-0152
118. Avior Y, Sagi I, Benvenisty N. Pluripotent stem cells in disease modelling and drug discovery. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016; 17: 170-82. https://doi. org/10. 1038/nrm. 2015. 27
119. Nakano T, Ando S, Takata N, Kawada M, Muguruma K, Sekiguchi K, et al. Self-formation of optic cups and storable stratified neural retina from human ESCs. Cell Stem Cell. 2012; 10: 771-85. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. stem. 2012. 05. 009
120. Takasato M, Er PX, Chiu HS, Maier B, Baillie GJ, Ferguson C, et al. Kidney organoids from human iPS cells contain multiple lineages and model human nephrogenesis. Nature. 2015; 526: 564-8. https://doi. org/10. 1038/nature15695
121. McCauley HA, Wells JM. Pluripotent stem cell-derived organoids: using principles of developmental biology to grow human tissues in a dish. Development. 2017; 144: 958-62. https://doi. org/10. 1242/dev. 140731
122. Fietz SA, Kelava I, Vogt J, Wilsch-Brauninger M, Stenzel D, Fish JL, et al. OSVZ progenitors of human and ferret neocortex are epithelial-like and expand by integrin signaling. Nat Neurosci. 2010; 13: 690-9. https://doi. org/10. 1038/nn. 2553
123. Hansen DV, Lui JH, Parker PR, Kriegstein AR. Neurogenic radial glia in the outer subventricular zone of human neocortex. Nature. 2010; 464: 554-61. https://doi. org/10. 1038/nature08845
124. Smart IH, Dehay C, Giroud P, Berland M, Kennedy H. Unique morphological features of the proliferative zones and postmitotic compartments of the neural epithelium giving rise to striate and extrastriate cortex in the monkey. Cereb Cortex. 2002; 12: 37-53.
125. Shitamukai A, Konno D, Matsuzaki F. Oblique radial glial divisions in the developing mouse neocortex induce selfrenewing progenitors outside the germinal zone that resemble primate outer subventricular zone progenitors. J Neurosci. 2011; 31: 3683-95. https://doi. org/10. 1523/JNEUROSCI. 4773-10. 2011
126. Eiraku M, Watanabe K, Matsuo-Takasaki M, Kawada M, Yonemura S, Matsumura M, et al. Self-organized formation of polarized cortical tissues from ESCs and its active manipulation by extrinsic signals. Cell Stem Cell. 2008; 3: 519-32. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. stem. 2008. 09. 002
127. Kadoshima T, Sakaguchi H, Nakano T, Soen M, Ando S, Eiraku M, et al. Self-organization of axial polarity, inside-out layer pattern, and species-specific progenitor dynamics in human ES cell-derived neocortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013; 110: 20284-9. https://doi. org/10. 1073/pnas. 1315710110
128. Nasu M, Takata N, Danjo T, Sakaguchi H, Kadoshima T, Futaki S, et al. Robust formation and maintenance of continuous stratified cortical neuroepithelium by laminin-containing matrix in mouse ES cell culture. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7: e53024. https://doi. org/10. 1371/journal. pone. 0053024
129. Kelava I, Lancaster MA. Dishing out mini-brains: current progress and future prospects in brain organoid research. Dev Biol. 2016; 420: 199-209. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. ydbio. 2016. 06. 037
130. Savic N, Schwank G. Advances in therapeutic CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing. Transl Res. 2016; 168: 15-21. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. Trsl. 2015. 09. 008
131. Hockemeyer D, Jaenisch R. Induced pluripotent stem cells meet genome editing. Cell Stem Cell. 2016; 18: 573-86. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. stem. 2016. 04. 013
132. Wataya T, Ando S, Muguruma K, Ikeda H, Watanabe K, Eiraku M, et al. Minimization of exogenous signals in ES cell culture induces rostral hypothalamic differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008; 105: 11796-801. https://doi. org/10. 1073/pnas. 0803078105
133. Eiraku M, Takata N, Ishibashi H, Kawada M, Sakakura E, Okuda S, et al. Self-organizing optic-cup morphogenesis in threedimensional culture. Nature. 2011; 472: 51-6. https://doi. org/10. 1038/nature09941
134. Sasai Y. Grow your own eye: biologists have coaxed cells to form a retina, a step toward growing replacement organs outside the body. Sci Am. 2012; 307: 44-9.
135. Suga H, Kadoshima T, Minaguchi M, Ohgushi M, Soen M, Nakano T, et al. Self-formation of functional adenohypophysis in three-dimensional culture. Nature. 2011; 480: 57-62. https://doi. org/10. 1038/nature10637
136. Sakaguchi H, Kadoshima T, Soen M, Narii N, Ishida Y, Ohgushi M, et al. Generation of functional hippocampal neurons from selforganizing human embryonic stem cell-derived dorsomedial telencephalic tissue. Nat Commun. 2015; 6: 8896 https://doi. org/10. 1038/ncomms9896
137. Ozone C, Suga H, Eiraku M, Kadoshima T, Yonemura S, Takata N, et al. Functional anterior pituitary generated in self-organizing culture of human embryonic stem cells. Nat Commun. 2016; 7: 10351. https://doi. org/10. 1038/ncomms10351
138. Takata N, Sakakura E, Kasukawa T, Sakuma T, Yamamoto T, Sasai Y. Establishment of functional genomics pipeline in mouse epiblast-like tissue by combining transcriptomic analysis and gene knockdown/knockin/knockout, using RNA interference and CRISPR/Cas9. Hum Gene Ther. 2016; 27: 436-50. https://doi. org/10. 1089/hum. 2015. 148
139. Takata N, Sakakura E, Sasai Y. IGF-2/IGF-1R signaling has distinct effects on Sox1, Irx3, and Six3 expressions during ES cell derived-neuroectoderm development in vitro. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2016; 52: 607-15. https://doi. org/10. 1007/s11626-016-0012-6
140. Nie J, Hashino E. Organoid technologies meet genome engineering. EMBO Rep. 2017; 18: 367-76. https://doi. org/10. 15252/embr. 201643732
141. Brookhouser N, Raman S, Potts C, Brafman DA. May I cut in gene editing approaches in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Cells. 2017; 6. https://doi. org/10. 3390/cells6010005.
142. Verma N, Zhu Z, Huangfu D. CRISPR/cas-mediated knockin in human pluripotent stem cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2017; 1513: 119-40. https://doi. org/10. 1007/978-1-4939-6539-7-9
143. Blair JD, Bateup HS, Hockemeyer DF. Establishment of genomeedited human pluripotent stem cell lines: from targeting to isolation. J Vis Exp. 2016; e53583. https://doi. org/10. 3791/53583.
144. Sluch VM, Davis CHO, Ranganathan V, Kerr JM, Krick K, Martin R et al. Differentiation of human ESCs to retinal ganglion cells using a CRISPR engineered reporter cell line. Sci Rep. 2015; 5. https://doi. org/10. 1038/srep16595
145. Homma K, Usui S, Kaneda M. Knock-in strategy at 3'-end of Crx gene by CRISPR/Cas9 system shows the gene expression profiles during human photoreceptor differentiation. Genes Cells. 2017; 22: 250-64. https://doi. org/10. 1111/gtc. 12472
146. Sasai Y. Cytosystems dynamics in self-organization of tissue architecture. Nature. 2013; 493: 318-26. https://doi. org/10. 1038/nature11859
147. Sasai Y, Eiraku M, Suga H. In vitro organogenesis in three dimensions: self-organising stem cells. Development. 2012; 139: 4111-21. https://doi. org/10. 1242/dev. 079590
148. Sakakura E, Eiraku M, Takata N. Specification of embryonic stem cell-derived tissues into eye fields by Wnt signaling using rostral diencephalic tissue-inducing culture. Mech Develop. 2016; 141: 90-9. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. mod. 2016. 05. 001
149. Eiraku M, Adachi T, Sasai Y. Relaxation-expansion model for self-driven retinal morphogenesis: a hypothesis from the perspective of biosystems dynamics at the multi-cellular level. Bioessays. 2012; 34: 17-25. https://doi. org/10. 1002/bies. 201100070
150. Hasegawa Y, Takata N, Okuda S, Kawada M, Eiraku M, Sasai Y. Emergence of dorsal-ventral polarity in ESC-derived retinal tissue. Development. 2016; 143: 3895-906. https://doi. org/10. 1242/dev. 134601
151. Andrabi M, Kuraku S, Takata N, Sasai Y, Love NR. Comparative, transcriptome analysis of self-organizing optic tissues. Sci Data. 2015; 2. https://doi. org/10. 1038/sdata. 2015. 30.
152. Drost J, Clevers H. Translational applications of adult stem cellderived organoids. Development. 2017; 144: 968-75. https://doi. org/10. 1242/dev. 140566
153. Huch M, Boj SF, Clevers H. Lgr5(+) liver stem cells, hepatic organoids and regenerative medicine. Regen Med. 2013; 8: 385-7. https://doi. org/10. 2217/rme. 13. 39
154. Huch M, Koo BK. Modeling mouse and human development using organoid cultures. Development. 2015; 142: 3113-25. https://doi. org/10. 1242/dev. 118570
155. Boj SF, Hwang CI, Baker LA, Chio IIC, Engle DD, Corbo V, et al. Organoid models of human and mouse ductal pancreatic. Cancer Cell. 2015; 160: 324-38. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. cell. 2014. 12. 021
156. Huch M, Bonfanti P, Boj SF, Sato T, Loomans CJM, van de Wetering M, et al. Unlimited in vitro expansion of adult bi-potent pancreas progenitors through the Lgr5/R-spondin axis. EMBO J. 2013; 32: 2708-21. https://doi. org/10. 1038/emboj. 2013. 204
157. Barker N, Huch M, Kujala P, van de Wetering M, Snippert HJ, van Es JH, et al. Lgr5(+ve) stem cells drive self-renewal in the stomach and build long-lived gastric units in vitro. Cell Stem Cell. 2010; 6: 25-36. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. stem. 2009. 11. 013
158. Bartfeld S, Bayram T, van de Wetering M, Huch M, Begthel H, Kujala P, et al. In vitro expansion of human gastric epithelial stem cells and their responses to bacterial infection. Gastroenterology. 2015; 148: 126-136. e6. https://doi. org/10. 1053/j. gastro. 2014. 09. 042
159. Kessler M, Hoffmann K, Brinkmann V, Thieck O, Jackisch S, Toelle B et al. The Notch and Wnt pathways regulate stemness and differentiation in human fallopian tube organoids. Nat Commun. 2015; 6. https://doi. org/10. 1038/ncomms9989
160. Chua CW, Shibata M, Lei M, Toivanen R, Barlow LJ, Bergren SK, et al. Single luminal epithelial progenitors can generate prostate organoids in culture. Nat Cell Biol. 2014; 16: 951-61. https://doi. org/10. 1038/ncb3047
161. Karthaus WR, Iaquinta PJ, Drost J, Gracanin A, van Boxtel R, Wongvipat J, et al. Identification of multipotent luminal progenitor cells in human prostate organoid cultures. Cell. 2014; 159: 163-75. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. cell. 2014. 08. 017
162. Ren W, Lewandowski BC, Watson J, Aihara E, Iwatsuki K, Bachmanov AA, et al. Single Lgr5-or Lgr6-expressing taste stem/progenitor cells generate taste bud cells ex vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014; 111: 16401-6. https://doi. org/10. 1073/pnas. 1409064111
163. Maimets M, Rocchi C, Bron R, Pringle S, Kuipers J, Giepmans BN, et al. Long-term in vitro expansion of salivary gland stem cells driven by Wnt signals. Stem Cell Rep. 2016; 6: 150-62. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. stemcr. 2015. 11. 009
164. Clevers H. What is an adult stem cell? Science. 2015; 350: 1319-20. https://doi. org/10. 1126/science. aad7016
165. Dutta D, Heo I, Clevers H. Disease modeling in stem cell-derived 3D organoid systems. Trends Mol Med. 2017. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. molmed. 2017. 02. 007.
166. Schwank G, Koo BK, Sasselli V, Dekkers JF, Heo I, Demircan T, et al. Functional repair of CFTR by CRISPR/Cas9 in intestinal stem cell organoids of cystic fibrosis patients. Cell Stem Cell. 2013; 13: 653-8. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. stem. 2013. 11. 002
167. Yui S, Nakamura T, Sato T, Nemoto Y, Mizutani T, Zheng X, et al. Functional engraftment of colon epithelium expanded in vitro from a single adult Lgr5(+) stem cell. Nat Med. 2012; 18: 618-23. https://doi. org/10. 1038/nm. 2695
168. Fordham RP, Yui S, Hannan NR, Soendergaard C, Madgwick A, Schweiger PJ, et al. Transplantation of expanded fetal intestinal progenitors contributes to colon regeneration after injury. Cell Stem Cell. 2013; 13: 734-44. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. stem. 2013. 09. 015
169. Fukuda M, Mizutani T, Mochizuki W, Matsumoto T, Nozaki K, Sakamaki Y, et al. Small intestinal stem cell identity is maintained with functional Paneth cells in heterotopically grafted epithelium onto the colon. Gene Dev. 2014; 28: 1752-7. https://doi. org/10. 1101/gad. 245233. 114
170. Nakamura T, Watanabe M. Intestinal stem cell transplantation. J Gastroenterol. 2017; 52: 151-7. https://doi. org/10. 1007/s00535-016-1288-8
171. Takebe T, Sekine K, Enomura M, Koike H, Kimura M, Ogaeri T, et al. Vascularized and functional human liver from an iPSCderived organ bud transplant. Nature. 2013; 499: 481-4. https://doi. org/10. 1038/nature12271
172. Takebe T, Zhang RR, Koike H, Kimura M, Yoshizawa E, Enomura M, et al. Generation of a vascularized and functional human liver from an iPSC-derived organ bud transplant. Nat Protoc. 2014; 9: 396-409. https://doi. org/10. 1038/nprot. 2014. 020
173. Takebe T, Enomura M, Yoshizawa E, Kimura M, Koike H, Ueno Y, et al. Vascularized and complex organ buds from diverse tissues via mesenchymal cell-driven condensation. Cell Stem Cell. 2015; 16: 556-65. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. stem. 2015. 03. 004
174. Ottone C, Krusche B, Whitby A, Clements M, Quadrato G, Pitulescu ME, et al. Direct cell-cell contact with the vascular niche maintains quiescent neural stem cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2014; 16: 1045-+. https://doi. org/10. 1038/ncb3045
175. Goldberg JS, Hirschi KK. Diverse roles of the vasculature within the neural stem cell niche. Regen Med. 2009; 4: 879-97. https://doi. org/10. 2217/Rme. 09. 61
176. Tavazoie M, Van der Veken L, Silva-Vargas V, Louissaint M, Colonna L, Zaidi B, et al. A specialized vascular niche for adult neural stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2008; 3: 279-88. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. stem. 2008. 07. 025
177. Rafii S, Butler JM, Ding BS. Angiocrine functions of organspecific endothelial cells. Nature. 2016; 529: 316-25. https://doi. org/10. 1038/nature17040
178. Whitelaw CB, Sheets TP, Lillico SG, Telugu BP. Engineering large animal models of human disease. J Pathol. 2016; 238: 247-56. https://doi. org/10. 1002/path. 4648
179. Le Douarin NM. The ontogeny of the neural crest in avian embryo chimaeras. Nature. 1980; 286: 663-9.
180. Gardner RL, Johnson MH. Investigation of early mammalian development using interspecific chimaeras between rat and mouse. Nat New Biol. 1973; 246: 86-9.
181. Fehilly CB, Willadsen SM, Tucker EM. Interspecific chimaerism between sheep and goat. Nature. 1984; 307: 634-6. https://doi. org/10. 1038/307634a0
182. Williams TJ, Munro RK, Shelton JN. Production of interspecies chimeric calves by aggregation of Bos indicus and Bos taurus demi-embryos. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1990; 2: 385-94.
183. Rossant J, Frels WI. Interspecific chimeras in mammals-successful production of live chimeras between mus-musculus and mus-caroli. Science. 1980; 208: 419-21. https://doi. org/10. 1126/science. 7367871
184. Rossant J, Croy BA, Chapman VM, Siracusa L, Clark DA. Interspecific chimeras in mammals: a new experimental system. J Anim Sci. 1982; 55: 1241-8.
185. Rossant J, Mauro VM, Croy BA. Importance of trophoblast genotype for survival of interspecific murine chimaeras. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1982; 69: 141-9.
186. Suchy F, Nakauchi H. Lessons from interspecies mammalian chimeras. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2017. https://doi. org/10. 1146/annurev-cellbio-100616-060654.
187. Aigner B, Renner S, Kessler B, Klymiuk N, Kurome M, Wunsch A, et al. Transgenic pigs as models for translational biomedical research. J Mol Med. 2010; 88: 653-64. https://doi. org/10. 1007/s00109-010-0610-9
188. Prather RS, Lorson M, Ross JW, Whyte JJ, Walters E. Genetically engineered pig models for human diseases. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2013; 1: 203-19. https://doi. org/10. 1146/annurev-animal-031412-103715
189. Flisikowska T, Kind A, Schnieke A. Genetically modified pigs to model human diseases. J Appl Genet. 2014; 55: 53-64. https://doi. org/10. 1007/s13353-013-0182-9
190. Feng W, Dai Y, Mou L, Cooper DK, Shi D, Cai Z. The potential of the combination of CRISPR/Cas9 and pluripotent stem cells to provide human organs from chimaeric pigs. Int J Mol Sci. 2015; 16: 6545-56. https://doi. org/10. 3390/ijms16036545
191. Kobayashi T, Yamaguchi T, Hamanaka S, Kato-Itoh M, Yamazaki Y, Ibata M, et al. Generation of rat pancreas in mouse by interspecific blastocyst injection of pluripotent stem cells. Cell. 2010; 142: 787-99. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. cell. 2010. 07. 039
192. Usui J, Kobayashi T, Yamaguchi T, Knisely AS, Nishinakamura R, Nakauchi H. Generation of kidney from pluripotent stem cells via blastocyst complementation. Am J Pathol. 2012; 180: 2417-26. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. ajpath. 2012. 03. 007
193. Yamaguchi T, Sato H, Kato-Itoh M, Goto T, Hara H, Sanbo M, et al. Interspecies organogenesis generates autologous functional islets. Nature. 2017; 542: 191-6. https://doi. org/10. 1038/na ture21070
194. Matsunari H, Nagashima H, Watanabe M, Umeyama K, Nakano K, Nagaya M, et al. Blastocyst complementation generates exogenic pancreas in vivo in apancreatic cloned pigs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013; 110: 4557-62. https://doi. org/10. 1073/pnas. 1222902110
195. Wu J, Platero-Luengo A, Sakurai M, Sugawara A, Gil MA, Yamauchi T, et al. Interspecies chimerism with mammalian pluripotent stem cells. Cell. 2017; 168: 473-486. e415. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. cell. 2016. 12. 036
196. Lee K, Kwon DN, Ezashi T, Choi YJ, Park C, Ericsson AC, et al. Engraftment of human iPS cells and allogeneic porcine cells into pigs with inactivated RAG2 and accompanying severe combined immunodeficiency. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014; 111: 7260-5. https://doi. org/10. 1073/pnas. 1406376111
197. Rashid T, Kobayashi T, Nakauchi H. Revisiting the flight of Icarus: making human organs from PSCs with large animal chimeras. Cell Stem Cell. 2014; 15: 406-9. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. stem. 2014. 09. 013
198. Sheets TP, Park CH, Park KE, Powell A, Donovan DM, Telugu BP. Somatic cell nuclear transfer followed by CRIPSR/Cas9 microinjection results in highly efficient genome editing in cloned pigs. Int J Mol Sci. 2016; 17. https://doi. org/10. 3390/ijms17122031.
199. Hai T, Teng F, Guo R, Li W, Zhou Q. One-step generation of knockout pigs by zygote injection of CRISPR/Cas system. Cell Res. 2014; 24: 372-5. https://doi. org/10. 1038/cr. 2014. 11
200. Whitworth KM, Lee K, Benne JA, Beaton BP, Spate LD, Murphy SL, et al. Use of the CRISPR/Cas9 system to produce genetically engineered pigs from in vitro-derived oocytes and embryos. Biol Reprod. 2014; 91. https://doi. org/10. 1095/biolreprod. 114. 121723 doi: ARTN 7810. 1095/biolreprod. 114. 121723.
201. Casal M, Haskins M. Large animal models and gene therapy. Eur J Hum Genet. 2006; 14: 266-72. https://doi. org/10. 1038/sj. ejhg. 5201535
202. Camus S, Ko WK, Pioli E, Bezard E. Why bother using nonhuman primate models of cognitive disorders in translational research? Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2015; 124: 123-9. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. nlm. 2015. 06. 012
203. Yao J, Huang J, Zhao J. Genome editing revolutionize the creation of genetically modified pigs for modeling human diseases. Hum Genet. 2016; 135: 1093-105. https://doi. org/10. 1007/s00439-016-1710-6
204. Yum SY, Yoon KY, Lee CI, Lee BC, Jang G. Transgenesis for pig models. J Vet Sci. 2016; 17: 261-8. https://doi. org/10. 4142/jvs. 2016. 17. 3. 261
205. Butler JR, Ladowski JM, Martens GR, Tector M, Tector AJ. Recent advances in genome editing and creation of genetically modified pigs. Int J Surg. 2015; 23: 217-22. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. ijsu. 2015. 07. 684
206. Zhou X, Xin J, Fan N, Zou Q, Huang J, Ouyang Z, et al. Generation of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene-targeted pigs via somatic cell nuclear transfer. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2015; 72: 1175-84. https://doi. org/10. 1007/s00018-014-1744-7
207. Tan WS, Carlson DF, Walton MW, Fahrenkrug SC, Hackett PB. Precision editing of large animal genomes. Adv Genet. 2012; 80: 37-97. https://doi. org/10. 1016/B978-0-12-404742-6. 00002-8
208. Tanihara F, Takemoto T, Kitagawa E, Rao S, Do LT, Onishi A, et al. Somatic cell reprogramming-free generation of genetically modified pigs. Sci Adv. 2016; 2: e1600803. https://doi. org/10. 1126/sciadv. 1600803
209. Shaw D, Dondorp W, Geijsen N, de Wert G. Creating human organs in chimaera pigs: an ethical source of immunocompatible organs? J Med Ethics. 2015; 41: 970-4. https://doi. org/10. 1136/medethics-2014-102224