Credence and the effect on consumer liking of food - A review

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 32, Issue PC, 2014, Pages 340-353

  Fernqvist, Fredrik ^a   Ekelund, Lena ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Consumer attitudes; Credence cues; Extrinsic characteristics; Hedonic liking; Quality perception

Indexed keywords

EID: 84888061087     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.10.005     Document Type: Review

References (134)

1. Aaron J.I., Mela D.J., Evans R.E. The influence of attitudes, beliefs and label information on perceptions of reduced-fat spread. Appetite 1994, 22:25-37.
2. Aertsens J., Verbeke W., Mondelaers K., Van Huylenbroeck G. Personal determinants of organic food consumption: A review. British Food Journal 2009, 111:1140-1167.
3. Allen M.W., Gupta R., Monnier A. The interactive effect of cultural symbols and human values on taste evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research 2008, 35:294-308.
4. Allison A.-M.A., Gualtieri T., Craig-Petsinger D. Are young teens influenced by increased product description detail and branding during consumer testing?. Food Quality and Preference 2004, 15:819-829.
5. Al-Sulaiti K.I., Baker M.J. Country of origin effects: A literature review. Marketing Intelligence & Planning 1998, 16:150-199.
6. Altintzoglou T., Nøstvold B.H., Carlehög M., Heide M., Østli J., Egeness F.-A. The influence of labelling on consumers' evaluations of fresh and thawed cod fillets in England. British Food Journal 2012, 114:1558-1570.
7. Annett L.E., Muralidharan V., Boxall P.C., Cash S.B., Wismer W.V. Influence of health and environmental information on hedonic evaluation of organic and conventional bread. Journal of Food Science 2008, 73:50-57.
8. Baixauli R., Salvador A., Hough G., Fiszman S.M. How information about fibre (traditional and resistant starch) influences consumer acceptance of muffins. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19:628-635.
9. Bánáti D. Consumer response to food scandals and scares. Trends in Food Science & Technology 2011, 22:56-60.
10. Baron R.M., Kenny D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986, 51:1173-1182.
11. Bayarri S., Carbonell I., Barrios E.X., Costell E. Acceptability of yogurt and yogurt-like products: Influence of product information and consumer characteristics and preferences. Journal of Sensory Studies 2010, 25:171-189.
12. Behrens J.H., Villanueva N.D.M., da Silva M.A.A. Effect of nutrition and health claims on the acceptability of soyamilk beverages. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 2007, 42:50-56.
13. Berg L. Trust in food in the age of mad cow disease: A comparative study of consumers' evaluation of food safety in Belgium, Britain and Norway. Appetite 2004, 42:21-32.
14. Bernués A., Olaizola A., Corcoran K. Extrinsic attributes of red meat as indicators of quality in Europe: An application for market segmentation. Food Quality and Preference 2003, 14:265-267.
15. Bilkey W.J., Nes E. Country-of-origin effects on product evaluations. Journal of International Business Studies 1982, 13:89-99.
16. Bølling Johansen S., Næs T., Øyaas J., Hersleth M. Acceptance of calorie-reduced yoghurt: Effects of sensory characteristics and product information. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:13-21.
17. Bowen D., Green P., Vizenor N., Vu C., Kreuter P., Rolls B. Effects of fat content on fat hedonics: Cognition or taste?. Physiology & Behaviour 2003, 78:247-253.
18. Bower J.A., Saadat M.A., Whitten C. Effect of liking, information and consumer characteristics on purchase intention and willingness to pay more for a fat spread with a proven health benefit. Food Quality and Preference 2003, 14:65-74.
19. Brochetti D., Mason P.S., Ball J.A., Duncan S.E. Hedonic ratings of nutrient-modified foods: Effects of nutrition information on ratings from college students. Journal of Nutrition in Recipe & Menu Development 1998, 3:3-16.
20. Caporale G., Monteleone E. Influence of information about manufacturing process on beer acceptability. Food Quality and Preference 2004, 15:271-278.
21. Caporale G., Policastro S., Carlucci A., Monteleone E. Consumer expectations for sensory properties in virgin olive oils. Food Quality and Preference 2006, 17:116-125.
22. Cardello A.V. Consumer concerns and expectations about novel food processing technologies: Effects on product liking. Appetite 2003, 40:217-233.
23. Carillo E., Varela P., Fiszman S. Effects of food package information and sensory characteristics on the perception of healthiness and the acceptability of enriched biscuits. Food Research International 2012, 48:209-216.
24. Carillo E., Varela P., Fiszman S. Packaging information as a modulator of consumers' perception of enriched and reduced-calorie biscuits in tasting and non-tasting tests. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 25:105-115.
25. Carillo E., Varela P., Salvador A., Fiszman S. Main factors underlying consumers' food choice: A first step for the understanding of attitudes toward "healthy eating". Journal of Sensory Studies 2011, 26:85-95.
26. Caswell J.A., Mojduszka E.M. Using informational labeling to influence the market for quality in food products. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1996, 78:1248-1253.
27. Caswell J.A., Padberg D.I. Toward a more comprehensive theory of food labels. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1992, 74:460-468.
28. Cerjak M., Karolyi D., Kovacic D. Effect of information about pig breed on consumers' acceptability of dry sausage. Journal of Sensory Studies 2011, 26:128-134.
29. Cho H.-Y., Chung S.-J., Kim H.-S., Kim K.-O. Effect of sensory characteristic and non-sensory factors on consumer liking of various canned tea products. Journal of Food Science 2005, 70:532-538.
30. Chung L., Chung S.-J., Kim J.-Y., Kim K.-O., O'Mahony M., Vickers Z., et al. Comparing the liking for Korean style salad dressings and beverages between US and Korean consumers: Effects of sensory and non-sensory factors. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 26:105-118.
31. Cox D.N., Evans G., Lease H.J. The influence of product attributes, consumer attitudes and characteristics on the acceptance of: (1) Novel bread and milk, and dietary supplements and (2) fish and novel meats as dietary vehicles of long chain omega 3 fatty acids. Food Quality and Preference 2011, 22:205-212.
32. Cox D.N., Melo L., Zabaras D., Delahunty C.M. Acceptance of health-promoting Brassica vegetables: The influence of taste perception, information and attitudes. Public Health Nutrition 2012, 15:1474-1482.
33. Darby M.R., Karni E. Free competition and optimal amount of fraud. Journal of Law and Economics 1973, 16:67-88.
34. De Araujo I.E., Rolls E.T., Velazco M.I., Margot C., Cayeaux I. Cognitive modulation of olfactory processing. Neuron 2005, 46:671-679.
35. Dekhili S., d'Hauteville F. Effect of the region of origin on the perceived quality of olive oil: An experimental approach using a control group. Food Quality and Preference 2009, 20:525-532.
36. Deliza R., MacFie H.J.H. The generation of sensory expectation by external cues and its effect on sensory perception and hedonic ratings: A review. Journal of Sensory Studies 1996, 11:103-128.
37. Deliza R., MacFie H., Hedderley Use of computer-generated images and conjoint analysis to investigate sensory expectations. Journal of Sensory Studies 2003, 18:465-486.
38. Di Monaco R., Cavella S., Di Marzo S., Masi P. The effect of expectaions generated by brand name on the acceptability of dried semolina pasta. Food Quality and Preference 2004, 15:429-437.
39. Di Monaco R., Cavella S., Iaccarino T., Mincione A., Masi P. The role of the knowledge of color and brand name on the consumer's hedonic ratings of tomato purees. Journal of Sensory Studies 2003, 18:391-408.
40. Di Monaco R., Cavella S., Torrieri E., Masi P. Consumer acceptability of vegetable soups. Journal of Sensory Studies 2007, 22:81-98.
41. Di Monaco R., Ollila S., Tuorila H. Effect of price on pleasantness ratings and use intentions for a chocolate bar in the presence and absence of a health claim. Journal of Sensory Studies 2005, 20:1-16.
42. Dimara E., Skuras D. Consumer demand for informative labeling of quality food and drink products: A European union case study. Journal of Consumer Marketing 2005, 22(2):90-100.
43. Dransfield E., Ngapo T.M., Nielsen N.A., Bredahl L., Sjödén P.O., Magnusson M., et al. Consumer choice and suggested price for pork as influenced by its appearance, taste and information concerning country of origin and organic pig production. Meat Science 2005, 69:61-70.
44. Ekelund L. Looking for the organic consumer: A review of 25 Swedish consumer research studies in the field of food, ecological agriculture 39 2003, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Centre for Sustainable Agriculture (CUL), Uppsala.
45. Ekelund L., Fernqvist F., Tjärnemo H. Consumer preferences for domestic and organically labelled vegetables in Sweden. Food Economics - Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica C 2007, 4:229-236.
46. Ford G.T., Smith D.B., Swasy J.L. An empirical test of the search, experience and credence attributes framework. Advances in Consumer Research 1988, 15:239-244.
47. Furst T., Connors M., Bisogni C.A., Sobal J., Falk L.W. Food choice: A conceptual model of the process. Appetite 1996, 26:247-266.
48. Goerlitz C.D., Delwiche J.F. Impact of label information on consumer assessment of soy-enhanced tomato juice. Journal of Food Science 2004, 69:376-379.
49. Grankvist G., Lekedal H., Marmendal M. Values and eco- and fairtrade labelled products. British Food Journal 2007, 109:169-181.
50. Grunert K.G. What's in a steak? A cross-cultural study on the quality perception of beef. Food Quality and Preference 1997, 8:157-173.
51. Grunert K.G. Current issues in the understanding of consumer food choice. Trends in Food Science & Technology 2002, 13:275-285.
52. Grunert K.G., Bech-Larsen T., Bredahl L. Three issues in consumer quality perception and acceptance of dairy products. International Dairy Journal 2000, 10:575-584.
53. Grunert K.G., Larsen H.H., Madsen T.K., Baadsgaard A. Market orientation in food and agriculture 1995, Kluwer Academic, Norwell, Massachusetts.
54. Guinard J.-X., Uotani B., Schlich P. Internal and external mapping of preferences for commercial lager beers: Comparison of hedonic ratings by consumers blind versus with knowledge of brand and price. Food Quality and Preference 2001, 12:243-255.
55. Herdenstam A.P.F., Hammarén M., Ahlström R., Wiktorsson P.-A. The professional language of wine: Perception, training and dialogue. Journal of Wine Research 2009, 20:53-84.
56. Hoppert K., Mai R., Zahn S., Hoffmann S., Rohm H. Integrating sensory evaluation in adaptive conjoint analysis to elaborate the conflicting influence of intrinsic and extrinsic attributes on food choice. Appetite 2012, 59:949-955.
57. Hughner R.S., McDonagh P., Prothero A., Shultz C.J., Stanton J. Who are organic food consumers' A compilation and review of why people purchase organic food. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 2007, 6:94-110.
58. Iaccarino T., Di Monaco R., Mincione A., Cavella S., Masi P. Influence of information on origin and technology on the consumer response: The case of soppressata salami. Food Quality and Preference 2006, 17:76-84.
59. Johansson L., Haglund Å., Berglund L., Lea P., Risvik E. Preference for tomatoes, affected by sensory attributes and information about growth conditions. Food Quality and Preference 1999, 10:289-298.
60. Kähkönen P., Tuorila H. Effect of reduced-fat information on expected and actual hedonic and sensory ratings of sausage. Appetite 1998, 30:13-23.
61. Kähkönen P., Tuorila H., Lawless H. Lack of effect of taste and nutrition claims on sensory and hedonic responses to a fat-free yogurt. Food Quality and Preference 1997, 8:125-130.
62. Kähkönen P., Tuorila H., Rita H. How information enhances acceptability of a low-fat spread. Food Quality and Preference 1996, 7:87-94.
63. Kapferer J.-N. The new strategic brand management 2004, Kogan Page, London. 3rd ed.
64. Keller K.L. Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing 1993, 57:1-22.
65. Kihlberg I., Johansson L., Langsrud Ø., Risvik E. Effects of information on liking of bread. Food Quality and Preference 2005, 16:25-35.
66. Köster E.P. Diversity in the determinants of food choice: A psychological perspective. Food Quality and Preference 2009, 20:70-82.
67. Kuenzel J., Blanchette I., Zandstra E.H., Thomas A., El-Deredy W. Awareness changes placebo effects for feeling relaxed, but not for liking. Journal of Marketing Communications 2012, 18:379-396.
68. Kuenzel J., Zandstra E.H., El-Deredy W., Blanchette I., Thomas A. Expecting yoghurt drinks to taste sweet or pleasant increases liking. Appetite 2011, 56:122-127.
69. Kuznesof S., Tregear A., Moxey A. Regional food: A consumer perspective. British Food Journal 1997, 99:199-206.
70. Lähteenmäki L., Grunert K., Ueland Ø., Åström A., Arvola A., Bech-Larsen T. Acceptability of genetically modified cheese presented as real product alternative. Food Quality and Preference 2002, 13:523-533.
71. Lange C., Martin C., Chabanet C., Combris P., Issanchou S. Impact of the information provided to consumers on their willingness to pay for Champagne: Comparison with hedonic scores. Food Quality and Preference 2002, 13:597-608.
72. Lange C., Rousseau F., Issanchou S. Expectation, liking and purchase behaviour under economical constraint. Food Quality and Preference 1998, 10:31-39.
73. Lawless H.T., Heymann H. Sensory evaluation of food 2010, Springer, New York. 2nd ed.
74. Lee L., Frederick S., Ariely D. The influence of expectation, consumption, and revelation on preferences for beer. Psychological Science 2006, 17:1054-1058.
75. Liem D.G., Miremadi F., Zandstra E.H., Keast R.S.J. Health labelling can influence taste perceptions and use of table salt for reduced-sodium products. Public Health Nutrition 2012, 15:2340-2347.
76. Liem D.G., Toraman Aydin N., Zandstra E.H. Effects if health labels on expected and actual taste perception of soup. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 25:192-197.
77. Light A., Heymann H., Holt D.L. Hedonic responses to dairy products: Effects of fat levels, label information and risk perception. Food Technology 1992, 46:54-57.
78. Lobb A.E., Mazzocchi M. Quality farm food in Europe: A possible alternative to the industrialised food market and to current agri-environmental policies: Lessons from France. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica C - Food Economics 2007, 4:3-12.
79. Luckow T., Sheehan V., Fitzgerald G., Delahunty C. Exposure, health information ond flavour-masking strategies for improving the sensory quality of probiotic juice. Appetite 2006, 47:315-323.
80. Maiorano G., Kowaliszyn B., D'Alessandro A.G.D., Martemucci G. The effect of production system information on consumer expectation and acceptability of Leccese lamb meat. Annals of Food Science and Technology 2010, 11:1-5.
81. McClure S.M., Li J., Tomlin D., Cypert K.S., Montague L.M., Montague P.R. Neural correlates of behavioural preference for culturally familiar drinks. Neuron 2004, 44:379-387.
82. Meillon S., Urbano C., Guillot G., Schlich P. Acceptability of partially dealcoholized wines - Measuring the impact of sensory and information cues on overall liking in real-life settings. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:763-773.
83. Miele N.A., Di Monaco R., Cavella S., Masi P. Effect of meal accompaniments on the acceptability of a walnut oil-enriched mayonnaise with and without a health claim. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:470-477.
84. Moser R., Raffaelli R., Thilmany-McFadden D. Consumer preferences for fruit and vegetables with credence-based attributes: A review. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 2011, 14:121-141.
85. Murdoch J., Miele M. 'Back to nature': Changing 'worlds of production' in the food sector. European Society for Rural Sociology Sociologia Ruralis 1999, 39:465-483.
86. Napolitano F., Braghieri A., Caroprese M., Marino R., Girolami A., Sevi A. Effect of information about animal welfare, expressed in terms of rearing conditions, on lamb acceptability. Meat Science 2007, 77:431-436.
87. Napolitano F., Braghieri A., Piasentier E., Favotto S., Naspetti S., Zanoli R. Effect of information about organic production on beef liking and consumer willingness to pay. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:207-212.
88. Napolitano F., Caporale G., Carlucci A., Monteleone E. Effect of information about animal welfare and product nutritional properties on acceptability of meat from Podolian cattle. Food Quality and Preference 2007, 18:305-312.
89. Napolitano F., Pacelli C., Girolami A., Braghieri A. Effect of information about animal welfare on consumer willingness to pay for yogurt. Journal of Dairy Science 2008, 91:910-917.
90. Nelson P. Information and consumer behaviour. Journal of Political Economy 1970, 78:311-329.
91. Ngapo T.M., Riendeau L., Laberge C., Fortin J. "Chilled" pork - part II. Consumer perception of sensory quality. Meat Science 2012, 92:338-345.
92. Okamoto M., Wada Y., Yamaguchi Y., Kimura A., Dan H., Masuda T., et al. Influences of food-name labels on perceived tastes. Chemical Senses 2008, 16:187-194.
93. Olson J.C. Price as an informational cue: Effects on product evaluations. Consumer and industrial buying behavior 1977, 267-286. Elseveir North-Holland, New York. A.G. Woodside, J.N. Sheth, P.D. Bennett (Eds.).
94. Oude Ophuis P.A.M. Sensory evaluation of 'free range' and regular pork meat under different conditions of experience and awareness. Food Quality and Preference 1994, 5:173-178.
95. Paasovaara R., Luomala H.T., Pohjanheimo T., Sandell M. Understanding consumers' brand-induced food taste perception: A comparison of 'brand familiarity' - and 'consumer value - brand symbolism (in)congruity' - accounts. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 2012, 11:11-20.
96. Parker A.R., Penfield M.P. Labeling of vanilla type affects consumer perception of vanilla ice cream. Journal of Food Science 2005, 70:553-557.
97. Plassmann H., O'Doherty J., Shiv B., Rangel A. Marketing actions can modulate neural representations of experienced pleasantness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 2008, 105:1050-1054.
98. Poelman A., Mojet M., Lyon D., Seda-Dedeh S. The influence of information about organic production and fair trade on preferences for and perception of pineapple. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19:114-121.
99. Prescott J., Young O., Zhang S., Cummings T. Effects of added "flavour principles" on liking and familiarity of a sheepmeat product: A comparison of Singaporean and New Zealand consumers. Food Quality and Preference 2004, 15:187-194.
100. Resano H., Sanjuán A.I., Albisu L.M. Consumers' acceptability of cured ham in Spain and the influence of information. Food Quality and Preference 2007, 18:1064-1076.
101. Roberto C.A., Shivaram M., Martinez O., Boles C., Harris J.L., Brownell K.D. The smart choices front-of-package nutrition label: Influence on perceptions and intake of cereal. Appetite 2012, 58:651-657.
102. Roininen K., Lähteenmäki L., Tuorila H. Quantification of consumer attitudes to health and hedonic characteristics of food. Appetite 1999, 33:71-88.
103. Roosen J., Marette S., Blanchemanche S., Verger P. The effect of product health information on liking and choice. Food Quality and Preference 2007, 18:759-770.
104. Sabbe S., Verbeke W., Deliza R., Matta V., Van Damme P. Effect of a health claim and personal characteristics on consumer acceptance of fruit juices with different concentrations of acaí (Euterpe oleracea Mart.). Appetite 2009, 53:84-92.
105. Shankar M.U., Levitan C.A., Prescott J., Spence C. The influence of color and label information on flavor perception. Chemosensory Perception 2009, 2:53-58.
106. Shepherd R. Factors influencing food preferences and choice. Handbook of the psychophysiology of human eating 1989, 3-24. Wiley, Chichester, West Sussex. R. Shepherd (Ed.).
107. Siret F., Issanchou S. Traditional process: Influence on sensory properties and on consumers' expectation and liking. Application to 'pâté de champagne'. Food Quality and Preference 2000, 11:217-228.
108. Sosa M., Hough G. Sensory expectations of children from different household incomes for a branded confectionary product. Journal of Sensory Studies 2006, 21:155-164.
109. Steenkamp J.-B.E.M. Conceptual model of the quality perception process. Journal of Business Research 1990, 21:309-333.
110. Steenkamp J.-B.E.M., Van Trijp H.C.M. Quality guidance: A consumer-based approach to food quality improvement using partial least squares. European Review of Agricultural Economics 1996, 23:195-215.
111. Stefani G., Romano D., Cavicchi A. Consumer expectations, liking and willingness to pay for speciality foods: Do sensory characteristics tell the whole story?. Food Quality and Preference 2006, 17:53-62.
112. Stein L.J., Nagai H., Nakagawa M., Beauchamp G.K. Effects of repeated exposure and health-related information on hedonic evaluation and acceptance of a bitter beverage. Appetite 2003, 40:119-129.
113. Swahn J., Mossberg L., Öström Å., Gustafsson I.-B. Sensory description labels for food affect consumer product choice. European Journal of Marketing 2012, 46:1628-1646.
114. Szykman R., Bloom P.N., Levy A.S. A proposed model of the use of package claims and nutrition labels. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 1997, 16:228-241.
115. Teh T., Dougherty M.P., Camire M.E. How do consumer attitudes influence acceptance of a novel wild blueberry-soy product?. Journal of Food Science 2007, 72:516-521.
116. Toontom N., Meenune M., Posri W. Influence of antioxidant information on consumer preference for a Thai chilli paste product. British Food Journal 2010, 112:1252-1265.
117. Torres-Moreno M., Tarrega A., Torrescasana E., Blanch C. Influence of label information on dark chocolate acceptability. Appetite 2012, 58:665-671.
118. Toschi T.G., Bendini A., Barbieri S., Valli E., Cezanne M.L., Buchecker K., et al. Organic and conventional nonflavoured yogurts from the Italian market. Study on sensory profiles and consumer acceptability. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2012, 92:2788-2795.
119. Tuorila H., Andersson Å., Martikainen A., Salovaara H. Effect of product formula, information and consumer characteristics on the acceptance of a new snack food. Food Quality and Preference 1998, 9:313-320.
120. Tuorila H., Cardello A.V., Lesher L.L. Antecedence and consequences of expectations related to fat-free and regular-fat foods. Appetite 1994, 23:247-263.
121. Tuorila H., Meiselman H.L., Bell R., Cardello A.V., Johnson W. Role of sensory and cognitive information in the enhancement of certainty and liking for novel and familiar foods. Appetite 1994, 23:231-246.
122. Van der Lans I.A., Van Ittersum K., De Cicco A., Loseby M. The role of the region of origin in consumer evaluation of food products. European Review of Agricultural Economics 2001, 28:451-477.
123. Van Ittersum K., Candel M.J.J.M., Meulenberg M.T.G. The influence of the image of a product's region of origin on product evaluation. Journal of Business Research 2003, 56:215-226.
124. Van Wezemael L., Ueland Ø., Rødbotten R., De Smet S., Scholderer J., Verbeke W. The effect of technology information on consumer expectations and liking of beef. Meat Science 2012, 90:444-450.
125. Varela P., Ares G., Giménez A., Gámbaro A. Influence of brand information on consumers' expectations and liking of powdered drinks in central location tests. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:873-880.
126. Verlegh P.W.J., Steenkamp J.-B.E.M. A review and meta-analysis of country-of-origin research. Journal of Economic Psychology 1999, 20:521-546.
127. Vidigal M.C.T.R., Minim V.P.R., Carvahlo N.B., Milagres M.P., Gonçalves A.C.A. Effect of a health claim on consumer acceptance of exotic Brazilian fruit juices: Açaí (Euterpe oleracea Mart.), Camu-camu (Myrciara dubia), Cajá (Spondias lutea L.) and Umbu (Spondias tuberosa Arruda). Food Research International 2011, 44:1988-1996.
128. Villegas B., Carbonell I., Costell E. Effects of product information and consumer attitudes on responses to milk and soybean vanilla beverages. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2008, 88:2426-2434.
129. Wansink B., Park S.-B. Sensory suggestiveness and labeling: Do soy labels bias taste?. Journal of Sensory Studies 2002, 17:483-491.
130. Wansink B., van Ittersum K., Painter J.E. How diet and health labels influence taste and satiation. Journal of Food Science 2004, 69:340-346.
131. Wansink B., van Ittersum K., Painter J.E. How descriptive food names bias sensory perceptions in restaurants. Food Quality and Preference 2005, 16:393-400.
132. Wardle J., Solomons W. Naughty but nice: A laboratory study of health information and food preferences in a community sample. Health Psychology 1994, 13:180-183.
133. Westcombe A., Wardle J. Influence of relative fat content information on responses to three foods. Appetite 1997, 28:49-62.
134. Yeomans M.R., Chambers L., Blumenthal H., Blake A. The role of expectancy in sensory and hedonic evaluation: The case of smoked salmon ice-cream. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19:566-573.