The influence of information about organic production and fair trade on preferences for and perception of pineapple

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 114-121

  Poelman, Astrid ^a   Mojet, Jos ^a   Lyon, David ^b   Sefa Dedeh, Samuel ^c,d  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b CAMPDEN BRI   (United Kingdom)

^c Ghana Private Public Partnership Food Industry Development Program   (Ghana)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GHANA   (Ghana)

Author keywords

Affective; Cognitive; Conjoint analysis; Indirectly measured attitudes

Indexed keywords

ANANAS COMOSUS;

EID: 34648834398     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Aaron J.I., Mela D.J., and Evans R.E. The influences of attitudes, beliefs and label information on perceptions of reduced-fat spread. Appetite 22 (1994) 25-37
2. Biologica (2004). Eko-monitor cijfers en trends, jaarrapport 2003 (Eco-monitor Trends & Figures, Annual Report 2003).
3. Bourn D., and Prescott J. A comparison of the nutritional value, sensory qualities, and food safety of organically and conventionally produced foods. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 1 (2002) 1-34
4. Caporale G., and Monteleone E. Influence of information about manufacturing process on beer acceptability. Food Quality and Preference 15 (2004) 271-278
5. Caporale G., Policastro S., Carlucci A., and Monteleone E. Consumer expectations for sensory properties in virgin olive oils. Food Quality and Preference 17 (2006) 116-125
6. Deliza R., and MacFie H.J.H. The generation of sensory expectation by external cues and its effect on sensory perception and hedonic ratings: A review. Journal of Sensory Studies 11 (1996) 103-128
7. EFTA. Fair trade in Europe 2001 - Facts and figures on the fair trade sector in 18 European countries (2001), European Fair Trade Association, Brussels
8. Fairtrade Foundation. (2004). Fairtrade facts and figures. Fairtrade Resources, SP6, April 2004.
9. Hair J.F., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L., and Black W.C. Conjoint analysis. In: Hair J.F., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L., and Black W.C. (Eds). Multivariate data analysis (1998), Prentice Hall, New Jersey 387-441
10. Johansson L., Haglund Å., Berglund L., Lea P., and Risvik E. Preference for tomatoes, affected by sensory attributes and information about growth conditions. Food Quality and Preference 10 (1999) 289-298
11. Kähkönen P., and Tuorila H. Effect of reduced-fat information on expected and actual hedonic and sensory ratings of sausage. Appetite 30 (1998) 13-23
12. Kihlberg I., Johansson L., Langsrud Ø., and Risvik E. Effects of information on liking of bread. Food Quality and Preference 16 (2005) 25-35
13. Köster E.P. The psychology of food choice: Some often encountered fallacies. Food Quality and Preference 14 (2003) 359-373
14. Köster E.P., Beckers A.W.J.M., and Houben J.H. The influence of health information on the acceptance of a snack in a canteen test. In: Martens M., Dalen G.A., and Russwurm H. (Eds). Flavour science and technology (1987), John Wiley & Sons, New York 391-398
15. Oude Ophuis P.A.M., and Van Trijp H.C.M. Perceived quality: A market driven and consumer oriented approach. Food Quality and Preference 6 (1995) 177-183
16. Schifferstein H.N.J., Kole A.P.W., and Mojet J. Asymmetry in the disconfirmation of expectations of natural yogurt. Appetite 32 (1999) 307-329
17. Schifferstein H.N.J., and Oude Ophuis P.A.M. Health-related determinants of organic food consumption in the Netherlands. Food Quality and Preference 9 (1998) 119-133
18. Schutz H.G., and Lorenz O.A. Consumer preferences for vegetables grown under "commercial" and "organic" conditions. Journal of Food Science 41 (1976) 70-73
19. Siret F., and Issanchou S. Traditional process: Influence on sensory properties and on consumers' expectations and liking - Application to 'pâté de campagne'. Food Quality and Preference 11 (2000) 217-228
20. Spence A., and Townsend E. Implicit attitudes towards genetically modified (GM) foods: A comparison of context-free and context dependent evaluations. Appetite 46 (2006) 67-74
21. Taylor Nelson Sofre. (2003). Organic food: Understanding the consumer and increasing sales. Report commissioned by the Soil Association (online), available from http://www.wda.co.uk.
22. Tuorila H., Andersson Å., Martikainen A., and Salovaara H. Effect of product formula, information and consumer characteristics on the acceptance of a new snack food. Food Quality and Preference 9 (1998) 313-320
23. Tuorila H., Cardello A.V., and Lesher L.L. Antecedents and consequences of expectations related to fat-free and regular-fat foods. Appetite 23 (1994) 247-263
24. Willer, H., & Yussefi, M. (2004). The world of organic agriculture - Statistics and emerging trends 2004. Bonn: International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements.
25. Woese K., Lange D., Boess C., and Bögl K.W. A comparison of organically and conventionally grown foods - Results of a review of the relevant literature. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 74 (1997) 281-293
26. Zajonc R.B., and Markus H. Affective and cognitive factors in preferences. Journal of Consumer Research 9 (1982) 123-131