The role of the knowledge of color and brand name on the consumer's hedonic ratings of tomato purees

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 391-408

  Di Monaco, R ^a   Cavella, S ^a   Iaccarino, T ^a   Mincione, A ^b   Masi, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

^b Universita degli Studi Mediterranea di Reggio   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; DATA REDUCTION; MARKETING; PACKAGING; SENSORY PERCEPTION;

CONSUMER RESPONSE; PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PARAMETERS;

FOOD PRODUCTS;

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 0346342570     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459x.2003.tb00396.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. ANDERSON, R.E. 1973. Consumer dissatisfaction: the effect of disconfirmed expectancy on perceived product performance. J. Marketing Res. 10, 38-44.
2. CAPORALE, G. and MONTELEONE, E. 2001. Effect of expectations induced by information on origin and its guarantee on the acceptability of a traditional food: olive oil. Sci. Alim. 21(3), 243-253.
3. CARDELLO, A.V. 1994. Consumer expectations and their role in food acceptance. In Measurement of Food Preference, Chapt. 10, (H.J.H. MacFie and D.M.H. Thomson, eds.) Elsevier Appl. Sci., London.
4. CASEY, M.A. and KRUEGER, R.A. 1994. Focus group interviewing. In Measurement of Food Preference, Chapt. 4, (H.J.H. MacFie and D.M.H. Thomson, eds.) Elsevier Appl. Sci., London.
5. DELIZA, R. and MACFIE, J.H.J. 1996. The generation of sensory expectations by external cues and its effects on sensory perception and hedonic ratings: a review. J. Sensory Studies 11, 103-128.
6. DRANSFIELD, E., ZAMORE, F. and BAYLE, M.C. 1998. Consumer selection of steaks as influenced by information and price index. Food Qual. Pref. 9(5), 321-326.
7. GUINARD, J-X. and MARTY, C. 1997. Acceptability of fat-modified foods to children, adolescents and their parents: effect of sensory properties, nutritional information and price. Food Qual. Pref. 8(3), 223-231.
8. GUINARD, J-X., UOTANI, B. and SCHLICH, P. 2001. Internal and external mapping of preferences for commercial lager beers: comparison of hedonic ratings by consumers blind versus with knowledge of brand and price. Food Qual. Pref. 72, 243-255.
9. INRAM, N. 1999. The role of visual cues in consumer perception and acceptance of a food product. Nutr. Food Sci. 5, 224-228.
10. KRUEGER, R.A. 1994. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, 2nd Ed., Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
11. MOORTHY, S.K. 1991. Measuring overall judgments and attribute evaluations: overall first vs. attribute first, Report n. 91-120. In MSI Report Summary: Technical Working Paper Report. Marketing Sci. Inst., Cambridge, MA.
12. MURRAY, J.M. and DELAHUNTY, C.M. 2000. Mapping consumer preference for the sensory and packaging attributes of Cheddar cheese. Food Qual. Pref. 11, 419-435.
13. TUORILA, H., ANDERSSON, A., MARTIKAINEN, A. and SALOVAARA, H. 1998. Effect of product formula, information and consumer characteristics on the acceptance of a new snack food. Food Qual. Pref. 9(5), 313-320.
14. TUORILA, H., CARDELLO, A.V. and LESHER, L.L. 1994. Antecedents and consequences of expectations related to fat-free and regular-fat foods. Appetite 23, 247-263.
15. VICKERS, Z.M. 1993. Incorporating tasting into a conjoint analysis of taste, health claim, price and brand for purchasing strawberry yogurt. J. Sensory Studies 8, 341-352.