Expecting yoghurt drinks to taste sweet or pleasant increases liking

Appetite

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 122-127

  Kuenzel, Johanna ^a,b   Zandstra, Elizabeth H ^a   Deredy, Wael El ^b   Blanchette, Isabelle ^b   Thomas, Anna ^a  

^a UNILEVER RESEARCH VLAARDINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Assimilation; Cue; Expectation; Liking; Reward

Indexed keywords

YOGHURT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; DRINKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; REWARD; SWEETNESS; TASK PERFORMANCE; TASTE;

ADOLESCENT; BEVERAGES; CUES; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; FOOD PREFERENCES; HUMANS; PLEASURE; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; TASTE; TASTE PERCEPTION; YOGURT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78650755232     PISSN: 01956663     EISSN: 10958304     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2010.12.009     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bargh J.A., Chartrand T.L. The mind in the middle. A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology 2000, 253-285. Cambridge University Press, New York. H. Reis, C. Judd (Eds.).
2. Berridge K. Food Reward. Brain substrates of wanting and liking. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 1996, 20:1-25.
3. Caporale G., Monteleone E. Influence of information about manufacturing process on beer acceptability. Food Quality and Preference 2004, 15:271-278.
4. Caporale G., Policastro S., Carlucci A., Monteleone E. Consumer expectations for sensory properties in virgine olive oils. Food Quality and Preference 2006, 17:116-125.
5. Cardello A.V. Consumer concerns and expectations about novel food processing technologies. Effects on product liking. Appetite 2003, 40:217-233.
6. Cardello A.V., Bell R., Kramer F.M. Attitudes of consumers toward military and other institutional foods. Food Quality and Preference 1996, 7:6-20.
7. Cardello A.V., Sawyer F.M. Effects of disconfirmed consumer expectations on food acceptability. Journal of Sensory Studies 1992, 7:253-277.
8. de Araujo I.E., Rolls E.T., Velazco M.I., Margot C., Cayeux I. Cognitive modulation of olfactory processing. Neuron 2005, 46:671-679.
9. Deliza R., Macfie H.J.H. The generation of sensory expectation by external cues and its effect on sensory perception and hedonic ratings. A review. Journal of Sensory Studies 1996, 11:103-128.
10. Di Monaco R., Cavella S., Di Marzo S., Masi P. The effect of expectations generated by brand name on the acceptability of dried semolina pasta. Food Quality and Preference 2004, 15:429-437.
11. Festinger L. A theory of cognitive dissonance 1957, Row Peterson, Evanston, IL.
12. Festinger L., Carlsmith J.M. Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1959, 58:203-210.
13. Fischer R., Milfont T. Standardization in psychological research. International Journal of Psychological Research 2010, 3:88-96.
14. Hairston W.D., Maldjian J.A. An adaptive staircase procedure for the E-Prime programming environment. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2009, 93:104-108.
15. Hovland C.I., Harvery O.J., Sherfi M. Assimilation and contrast effects in reactions to communication and attitude change. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1957, 55:244-252.
16. Hurling R., Shepherd R. Eating with your eyes. Effect of appearance on expectations of liking. Appetite 2003, 41:167-174.
17. Iaccarino T., Di Monaco R., Mincione A., Cavella S., Masi P. Influence of information on origin and technology on the consumer response. The case of soppressata salami. Food Quality and Preference 2006, 17:76-84.
18. Kähkönen P., Tuorila H., Lawless H. Lack of effect of taste and nutrition claims on sensory and hedonic responses to a fat-free yogurt. Food Quality and Preference 1997, 8:125-130.
19. Karremans J.C., Stroebe W., Claus J. Beyond Vicary's fantasies. The impact of subliminal priming and brand choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2006, 42:792-798.
20. Lange C., Issanchou S., Combtris P. Expected versus experienced quality. Trade-off with price. Food Quality and Preference 2000, 11:289-297.
21. Lange C., Rousseau F., Issanchou S. Expectation, liking and purchase behaviour under economical constraint. Food Quality and Preference 1999, 10:31-39.
22. Le Berre E., Thomas-Dangui T., Béno N., Coureadu G., Etiévant P., Prescott J. Perceptual processing strategy and exposure influence the perception of odor mixtures. Chemical Senses 2008, 33:193-199.
23. Lee L., Frederick S., Ariely D. Try It, You'll Like It. The influence of expectation consumption, and revelation on preferences for beer. Psychological Science 2006, 17:1054-1058.
24. Light A., Heymann H., Holt D.L. Hedonic responses to dairy products effects of fat levels, label information and risk perception. Food Technology 1992, 47:54-57.
25. Olson J.C., Dover P.A. Cognitive effects of deceptive advertising. Journal of Marketing Research 1978, 15:29-38.
26. Prescott J. Flavour as a psychological construct; implications for perceiving and measuring the sensory qualities of foods. Food Quality and Preference 1999, 10:349-356.
27. Prescott J., Johnstone V., Francis J. Odor-taste interactions; effects of attentional strategies during exposure. Chemical Senses 2004, 29:331-340.
28. Rota L.M., Zellner D.A. The categorization effect in hedonic contrast. Experts differ from novices. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14:179-183.
29. Schifferstein H.N.J., Kole A.P.W., Mojet J. Asymmetry in the disconfirmation of expectations for natural yogurt. Appetite 1999, 32:307-329.
30. Siret F., Issanchou S. Traditional process. Influence on sensory properties and on consumers' expectation and liking. Application to 'pâté de campagne'. Food Quality and Preference 2000, 11:217-228.
31. Stapel D.A., Winkielman P. Assimilation and contrast as a function of context-target similarity, distinctness, and dimensional relevance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1998, 24:634-646.
32. Stefani G., Romano D., Cavicchi A. Consumer expectations, liking and willingness to pay for specialty foods. Do sensory characteristics tell the whole story?. Food Quality and Preference 2006, 17:53-62.
33. Tuorila H., Cardello A.V., Lesher L.L. Antecedents and consequences of expectations related to fat-free and regular-fat foods. Appetite 1994, 23:247-263.
34. Wansink B., Park S.-B. Sensory suggestiveness and labelling. Do soy labels bias taste?. Journal of Sensory Studies 2002, 17:483-491.
35. Wilson T.D., Klaaren K.J. "Expectation whirls me round" The role of affective expectations in affective experience. Review of personality and social psychology. Emotion and social behavior 1992, 14:1-31. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
36. Yeomans M.R., Chambers L., Blumenthal H., Blake A. The role of expectancy in sensory and hedonic evaluation. The case of smoked salmon ice-cream. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19:565-573.
37. Zandstra E.H., de Graaf C., van Trijp H.C.M., van Staveren W.A. Laboratory hedonic ratings as predictors of consumption. Food Quality and Preference 1999, 10:411-418.
38. Zellner D.A. More evidence that hedonic contrast is real and assimilation is artifactual 2001, www.uni-leipzig.de/∼psycho/fechner/generalinfo/PDFs/DZellner.pdf.
39. Zellner D.A., Kern B.B., Parker S. Protection for the good. Subcategorization reduces hedonic contrast. Appetite 2002, 38:175-180.
40. Zellner D.A., Rohm E.A., Bassetti T.L., Parker S. Compared to what? Effects of categorization on hedonic contrast. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2003, 10:468-473.