Exposure, health information and flavour-masking strategies for improving the sensory quality of probiotic juice

Appetite

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 315-323

  Luckow, T ^a   Sheehan, V ^b   Fitzgerald, G ^b   Delahunty, C ^c  

^a PEPSICO INC   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Health claims; Home use test; Orange juice; Probiotic cultures; Sensory exposure

Indexed keywords

PROBIOTIC AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEVERAGE; CONSUMER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FLAVOR; FOOD; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LABORATORY; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; RATING SCALE; SENSORY ANALYSIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BEVERAGES; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; FEMALE; FLAVORING AGENTS; FOOD LABELING; FOOD MICROBIOLOGY; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; IRELAND; LACTOBACILLUS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROBIOTICS; RESEARCH DESIGN; TASTE;

EID: 33750161082     PISSN: 01956663     EISSN: 10958304     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2006.04.006     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Barylko-Pikielna N., Matuszewska I., Jeruszka M., Kozlowska K., Brzozwska A., and Roszkowski W. Discriminability and appropriateness of category scaling versus ranking methods to study sensory preferences in elderly. Food Quality and Preference 15 (2004) 167-175
2. Bertino M.B., Beauchamp G.K., and Engelman K. Increasing dietary salt alters salt taste preference. Physiology and Behaviour 38 (1986) 203-213
3. Birch L.L., and Marlin D.W. I don't like it; I never tried it: Effects of exposure on two-year-old children's food preference. Child Development 55 (1982) 431-439
4. Caporale G., and Monteleone E. Influence of information about manufactering process on beer acceptability. Food Quality and Preference 15 (2004) 271-278
5. Coeuret V., Gueguen M., and Vernoux J.P. Numbers and strains of lactobacilli in some probiotic products. International Journal of Food Microbiology 105 2 (2005) 273
6. Deliza R., Rosenthal A., and Silva A.L.S. Consumer attitude towards information on non conventional technology. Food Science & Technology 14 (2003) 43-49
7. DiMonaco R., Cavella S., Iaccarino T., Mincione A., and Masi P. The role of knowledge of color and brand name on the consumer's hedonic ratings of tomato purees. Journal of Sensory Studies 18 (2003) 391-408
8. Drenowski A., Ahlstrom Henderson S., Hann C.S., Barratt-Fornell A., and Ruffin M. Age and food preferences influence dietary intakes of breast care patients. Health Psychology 18 6 (2002) 570-578
9. Drenowski A., Henderson S.A., and Barratt-Fornell A. Genetic taste markers and food preferences. Drug Metabolism and Disposition 29 4 Part 2 (2001) 535-538
10. D'Souza G., and Rao R.C. Can repeating an advertisement more frequently than the competition affect brand preference in a mature market?. Journal of Marketing (1995) 32-42
11. Duffy V.B., Fast K., Cohen Z., Chodos E., and Bartoshuk L.M. Genetic taste status associates with fat food acceptance and body mass index in adults. Chemical Senses 24 (1999) 604
12. Forde C.G., and Delahunty C.M. Understanding the role cross-modal sensory interactions play in food acceptability in younger and older consumers. Food Quality and Preference 15 7-8 (2004) 715-727
13. Fuller R. Probiotics in man and animals. A review. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 66 (1989) 365
14. Glanzer M. Stimulus satiation: An explanation of spontaneous alternation and related phenomena. Psychological Review 60 (1953) 257-268
15. Grunert K.G., Bech-Larsen T., and Bredahl L. Three issues in consumer quality perception and acceptance of dairy products. International Dairy Journal 10 (2000) 575-584
16. Hetherington M., and Rolls B.J. Sensory-specific satiety in anorexia and bulimia nervosa. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 575 (1989) 387-398
17. ISO (1988). Sensory analysis. General guidance for design of test rooms. Standard no. 8589, Geneva, Switzerland.
18. ISO (1993). Sensorial analysis-General guidance for the selection, training and monitoring of assessors. Standard ISO 8586-1, International organization for standardization.
19. Jaeger S.R., and MacFie H.J.H. The effect of advertising format and means-end information on consumer expectations for apples. Food Quality and Preference 12 (2001) 189-205
20. Juttlestad A. Crafting appetizing nutraceuticals. Food Product Design (1998) 97-106
21. Kähkönen P., and Turoila H. Consumer responses to reduced and regular fat content in different products: Effects of gender, involvement and health concern. Food Quality and Preference 10 (1999) 83-91
22. Kähkönen P., Turoila H., and Rita H. How information enhances acceptability of a low-fat spread. Food Quality and Preference 7 (1995) 87-94
23. Kihlberg I., Johansson L., Langsrud O., and Risvik E. Effects of information on liking of bread. Food Quality and Preference 16 1 (2005) 23-35
24. Koskinen S., Kälviäinen N., and Tuorila H. Perception of chemosensory stimuli and related responses to flavoured yogurts in the young and elderly. Food Quality and Preference 14 (2003) 623-635
25. Köster E.P., Couronne T., Léon F., Lévy C., and Marcelino A.S. Repeatability in hedonic sensory measurement: A conceptual exploration. Food Quality and Preference 14 (2002) 165-176
26. Kozlowska K., Jeruszka M., Matuszewska I., Roszkowski W., Barylko-Pikielna N., and Brzozowska A. Hedonic tests in different locations as predictors of apple juice consumption at home in elderly and young subjects. Food Quality and Preference 14 (2003) 653-661
27. Lawless H.T., and Heymann H. Sensory evaluation of food: Principles and practices (1998), Chapman & Hall, New York pp. 341-629
28. Levis P., and Chambers E. Influence of healthy concepts and product acceptance: A study with plain potato chips. Journal of Food Products Marketing 3 4 (1996) 45-63
29. Lévy C.M., and Köster E.P. The relevance of initial hedonic judgments in the prediction of subtle food choices. Food Quality and Preference 10 (1999) 185-200
30. Luckow T., and Delahunty C. Which juice is healthier? A consumer study of probiotic non-dairy juice drinks. Food Quality and Preference 15 7-8 (2004) 751-759
31. Luckow T., Sheehan V., Delahunty C., and Fitzgerald G. Determining the aromatic and flavour characteristics of functional, health-promoting ingredients, and the effects of repeated exposure on consumer acceptance. Journal of Food Science 70 1 (2004) 53-59
32. MacFie H.J.H., Bratchell N., Greenhoff K., and Vallis I.V. Designs to balance the effect of order of presentation and first-order carry-over effects in hall tests. Journal of Sensory Studies 4 (1989) 129-148
33. O'Mahony M. Sensory Evaluation of Food: Statistical Methods and Procedures (1986), Marcel Dekker, New York
34. Pliner P. The effects of mere exposure on liking for edible substances. Appetite 3 (1982) 283-290
35. Prescott J., and Young A. Does information about MSG (monosodium glutamate) content influence consumer ratings of soups with and without added MSG?. Appetite 39 (2002) 25-33
36. Puumalainen T., Nykopp H., and Tuorila H. Old product in a new context: Importance of the type of dish for the acceptance of Grunkern; a spelt-based traditional cereal. Lebensmittel Wissenschaft and Technologie 35 6 (2002) 549-553
37. Raynor H.A., and Epstein L.H. Dietary variety, energy regulation, and obesity. Psychological Bulletin 127 3 (2001) 325-341
38. Reineccius G.A. Flavouring systems for functional foods. In: Schmidl M.K., and Labuza T.B. (Eds). Essentials in functional foods (2000), Aspen Publishing, Gaithersburgh, MD 89-97
39. Rolls B.A. Changing the preference for fat in foods. Nutrition Reviews 52 (1984) 21-23
40. Rozin P. Five potential principles for understanding cultural differences in relation to individual differences. Journal of Research in Personality 37 (2003) 273-283
41. Rozin P., Fischler C., Imada S., Sarubin A., and Wrzesniewski A. Attitudes to food and the role of food in life in the USA, Japan, Flemish Belgium, and France: Possible implications for the diet-health debate. Appetite 33 (1999) 163-180
42. Schutz H., and Cardello A.V. A labeled affective magnitude (LAM) scale for assessing food liking/disliking. Journal of Sensory Studies 16 2 (2001) 117-161
43. Shepherd R. Attitudes and beliefs as determinants of food choice. In: McBride R.L., and MacFie H.J.H. (Eds). Psychological basis of sensory evaluation (1990), Elsevier Applied Science, London 141-158
44. Siegel P.S., and Pilgrim F.J. The effect of monotony on the acceptance of food. American Journal of Psychology 71 (1958) 756-759
45. Stein L.J., Nagai H., Nakagawa M., and Beauchamp G.K. Effects of repeated exposure and health-related information on hedonic evaluation and acceptance of a bitter beverage. Appetite 40 (2003) 119-129
46. Stone H., Sidel J., Oliver S., Woolsey A., and Singelton R.C. Sensory evaluation by quantitative descriptive analysis. Food Technology 11 (1974) 24-34
47. Stubenitsky K., Aarom J.I., Catt S.L., and Mela D.J. Effect of information and extended use on the acceptance of reduced-fat products. Food Quality and Preference 10 (1998) 367-376
48. Tuorila H., and Cardello A.V. Consumer responses to an off-flavour in juice in the presence of specific health claims. Food Quality and Preference 13 (2002) 561-569
49. Tuorila H., Andersson A., Martikainen A., and Salovaara H. Effect of product formula, information, and consumer characteristics on the acceptance of a new snack food. Food Quality and Preference 9 5 (1998) 313-320
50. Urala N., and Lähteenmäki L. Reasons behind consumers' functional food choices. Nutrition and Food Science 33 (2003) 148-158
51. Verbeke W. Consumer acceptance of functional foods: Socio-demographic cognitive and attitudinal determinants. Food Quality and Preference 16 1 (2005) 45-57
52. Verbeke W. Functional foods: Consumer willingness to compromise on taste for health?. Food Quality and Preference 17 (2006) 126-131
53. Wansink B., and Park S.-B. Sensory suggestiveness and labelling: Do soy labels bias taste. Journal of Sensory Studies 17 (2002) 483-491
54. Zajonc R.B. Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph Supplement 9 (1968) 1-27