Effect of nutrition and health claims on the acceptability of soyamilk beverages

International Journal of Food Science and Technology

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 50-56

  Behrens, Jorge H ^a   Villanueva, Nilda D M ^b   Da Silva, Maria A A P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Expectation; Liking; Soyamilk

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846015470     PISSN: 09505423     EISSN: 13652621     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2006.01206.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Asp, E. (1999). Factors affecting food decisions made by individual consumers. Food Policy, 24, 287-294.
2. Behrens, J.H. & Silva, M.A.A.P. (2004). Atitude do consumidor em relação à soja e produtos derivados. Ciência e Tecnohgia de Alimentos, 24, 431-439.
3. Behrens, J.H., Roig, S.M. & Silva, M.A.A.P. (2004). Fermentation of soyamilk by commercial lactic cultures: development of products with market potential. Acta Alimentaria, 33, 101-109.
4. Cardello, A.V. & Sawyer, P.M. (1992). Effects of disconfirmed consumer expectations on food acceptability. Journal of Sensory Studies, 7, 253-277.
5. Deliza, R. (1996). The effects of expectation on sensory perception and acceptance. Doctor of Philosophy Thesis. UK: University of Reading.
6. Deliza, R. & Mac Fie, H.J.H. (1996). The generation of sensory expectation by external cues and its effect on sensory perception and hedonic ratings: a review. Journal of Sensory Studies, 11, 103-128.
7. Deliza, R., Mac Fie, H.J.H. & Hedderley, D. (1999). Evaluation of Consumer Expectation. In: Avanços em Análise Sensorial (edited by T.C. Almeida, G. Hough, M.H. Damasio & M.H.M.A.A.P. Silva). Pp. 111-119. São Paulo, Brazil: Varela Editora e Livraria Ltda.
8. Monaco, R., Cavella, S., Di Marzo, S. & Masi, P. (2004). The effect of expectations generated by brand name on the acceptability of dried semolina pasta. Food Quality and Preference, 15, 429-437.
9. Kähkönen, P., Tuorila, H. & Rita, H. (1996). How information enhances acceptability of a low-fat spread. Food Quality and Preference, 10, 31-39.
10. Kähkönen, P., Tuorila, H. & Lawless, H. (1997). Lack of effect of taste and nutrition claims on sensory and hedonic responses to a fat-free yoghurt. Food Quality and Preference, 8, 125-130.
11. Katou, Y., Mori, T. & Ikawa, Y. (2005). Effect of age and gender on attitudes towards sweet foods among Japanese. Food Quality and Preference, 16, 171-179.
12. Lange, C., Rousseau, F. & Issanchou, S. (1999). Expectation, liking and purchase behavior under economical constraint. Food Quality and Preference, 7, 87-94.
13. Lappalainen, R., Kearney, J. & Gibney, M. (1998). A pan EU survey of consumer attitudes to food, nutrition and health: an overview. Food Quality and Preference, 9, 467-478.
14. Levin, I.P. & Gaeth, G.J. (1988). How consumers area affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 374-378.
15. Luckow, T. & Delahunty, C. (2004). Which juice is 'healthier'? A consumer study of probiotic non-dairy juice drinks. Food Quality and Preference, 15, 751-759.
16. SAS® Institute Inc. (1992). SAS for Windows, Version 6.08. Cary, USA: The SAS Institute Inc.
17. Shepherd, R. (1988). Consumer attitude and food choice. In: Food Acceptability (edited by D.M.H. Thomson). Pp. 253-266. London, UK: Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd.
18. Siret, F. & Issanchou, S. (2000). Traditional process: influence on sensory properties and on consumers' expectations and liking application to 'påté de campagne'. Food Quality and Preference, 11, 217-228.
19. Statistica (1998). STATISTICS for Windows, Version 4.1. Tulsa, USA: StatSoft Inc.
20. Stone, H.S. & Sidel, J.L. (1993). Sensory Evaluation Practices. Pp. 140-156. Orlando, USA: Academic Press.
21. Tuorila, H. & Cardello, A. (2002). Consumer responses to an off-flavor in juice in the presence of specific health claims. Food Quality and Preference, 13, 561-569.
22. Tuorila, H., Anderson, A., Martikainen, A. & Salovaara, H. (1998). Effect of product formula, information and consumer characteristics on the acceptance of a new snack food. Food Quality and Preference, 9, 313-320.
23. Verbeke, W. (2005). Consumer acceptance of functional foods: sociodemographic, cognitive and attitudinal determinants. Food Quality and Preference, 16, 45-57.
24. Villanueva, N.D.M. (2003). Avaliação do desempenho de quatro métodos de escalonamento em testes sensoriais de aceitação utilizando modelos normals aditivos de análise de variância e mapas internos de preferência. Doctor of Philosophy Thesis. Brazil: Campinas State University.
25. Zandstra, E.H., De Graaf, C. & Van Staveren, W.A. (2001). Influence of taste and health attitudes on consumption of low- and high-fat foods. Food Quality and Preference, 12, 75-82.