Internal and external mapping of preferences for commercial lager beers: Comparison of hedonic ratings by consumers blind versus with knowledge of brand and price

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 243-255

  Guinard, Jean Xavier ^a   Uotani, Bunsaku ^a   Schlich, Pascal ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Beer; Consumer testing; Preference mapping

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000682808     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0950-3293(01)00011-8     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Arditti S. Preference mapping: a case study. Food Quality and Preference. 8(5):1997;323-326.
2. Belin-Batard E., Huon de Kermadec F., Barthélémy J. Méthodes statistiques multidimensionnelles d'analyses de données sensorielles. Psychologie Française. 41(3):1996;301-306.
3. Dalliant-Spinnler B., MacFie H.J.H., Beyts P.K., Hedderley D. Relationships between perceived sensory properties and major preference directions of 12 varieties of apples from the southern hemisphere. Food Quality and Preference. 7(2):1996;113-126.
4. Deliza R., MacFie H.J.H. The generation of sensory expectation by external cues and its effect on sensory perception and hedonic ratings: a review. Journal of Sensory Studies. 11(2):1996;103-128.
5. Dransfield E., Zamora F., Bayle M.-C. Consumer selection of steaks as influenced by information and price index. Food Quality and Preference. 9(5):1998;321-326.
6. Escofier B., Pagès J. Analyses factorielles simples et multiples, objectifs, méthodes et interprétation. 1990;Bordas, Paris.
7. Giovanni M. Response surface methodology and product optimization. Food Technology. 37(11):1983;41-45, 83.
8. Greenhoff K., MacFie H.J.H. Preference mapping in practice. MacFie H.J.H., Thompson D.M.H. Measurement of food preferences. 1994;137-166 Blackie Academic & Professional, London.
9. Guinard J.-X., Marty C. Acceptability of fat-modified foods to children, adolescents and their parents: effect of sensory properties, nutritional information and price. Food Quality and Preference. 8(3):1997;223-231.
10. Guinard J.-X., Zoumas-Morse C., Dietz J., Goldberg S., Holz M., Heck B., Amoros A. Does consumption of beer, alcohol and bitter substances affect perception of bitterness? Physiology & Behavior. 59(4):1996;625-631.
11. Guinard J.-X., Yip D., Cubero E., Mazzucchelli R. Quality ratings by experts, and relation with descriptive analysis ratings: a case study with beer. Food Quality and Preference. 10(1):1999;59-68.
12. Guinard J.-X., Sechevich P., Meaker K., Jonnalagadda S.S., Kris-Etherton P. Sensory responses to fat are not affected by varying dietary energy intake from fat and saturated fat over ranges common in the American diet. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 99(6):1999;690-696.
13. Guinard, J.-X., Uotani, B., Tagushi, A., Masuoka, S. and Fujino, S. (2000). Consumer testing of commercial lager beers: relation with descriptive analysis and expert quality ratings. Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 106(1), 11-13.
14. Hough G., Sanchez R. Descriptive analysis and external preference mapping of powdered chocolate milk. Food Quality and Preference. 9(4):1998;197-204.
15. Huon de Kermadec F., Durand J.F., Sabatier R. Comparison between linear and nonlinear PLS methods to explain overall liking from sensory characteristics. Food Quality and Preference. 8(5):1997;395-400.
16. Jaeger S.R., Andani Z., Wakeling I.N., MacFie H.J.H. Consumer preferences for fresh and aged apples: a cross-cultural comparison. Food Quality and Preference. 9(5):1998;355-366.
17. MacFie H.J.H., Hedderley D. Current practices in relating sensory perception to instrumental measurements. Food Quality and Preference. 4(1):1993;41-49.
18. McEwan J.A. Preference mapping for product optimization. Naes T., Risvik E. Multivariate analysis of data in sensory science. 1996;71-102 Elsevier, Amsterdam.
19. Meilgaard M., Civille G.V., Carr B.T. Sensory evaluation techniques. 2nd Ed:1991;CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
20. Monteleone E., Frewer L., Wakeling I., Mela D.J. Individual differences in starchy food consumption: the application of preference mapping. Food Quality and Preference. 9(4):1998;211-220.
21. Murray J.M., Delahunty C.M. Mapping consumer preference for the sensory and packaging attributes of cheddar cheese. Food Quality and Preference. 11(5):2000;419-435.
22. Peryam D.R., Pilgrim F.J. Hedonic scale method of measuring food preferences. Food Technology. 11(9):1957;9-14.
23. SAS® User's Guide: Statistics (Version 6.07). 4th ed:1991;SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
24. Schlich, P. 1995. Preference mapping: relating consumer preferences to sensory or instrumental measurements. In Bioflavour' 95. Analysis/precursor studies/biotechnology, eds. P. Etiévant and P. Schreier (pp. 135-150), INRA Editions, Versailles.
25. Schutz H. Multiple regression approach to optimization. Food Technology. 37(11):1983;46-48, 62.
26. Solheim R. Consumer liking for sausages affected by sensory quality and information on fat content. Appetite. 19:1992;285-292.
27. Solheim R., Lawless H.T. Consumer purchase probability affected by attitude towards low-fat foods: liking, private body consciousness and information on fat and price. Food Quality and Preference. 7(2):1996;137-143.
28. Stone H., Sidel J.L. Sensory evaluation practices. 2nd ed:1993;Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
29. Tuorila H., Andersson A., Martikainen A., Salovaara H. Effect of product formula, information and consumer characteristics on the acceptance of a new snack food. Food Quality and Preference. 9(5):1998;313-320.
30. Vickers Z.M. Incorporating tasting into a conjoint analysis of ste, health claim, price and brand for purchasing strawberry yoghurt. Journal of Sensory Studies. 8(4):1993;341-352.