Integrating sensory evaluation in adaptive conjoint analysis to elaborate the conflicting influence of intrinsic and extrinsic attributes on food choice

Appetite

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 949-955

  Hoppert, Karin ^a   Mai, Robert ^a   Zahn, Susann ^a   Hoffmann, Stefan ^a,b   Rohm, Harald ^a  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROSTOCK   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adaptive conjoint analysis; Extrinsic attributes; Food choice; Intrinsic attributes; Preference

Indexed keywords

FAT; SUGAR; YOGHURT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CONSUMER; FAT CONTENT; FEMALE; FLAVOR; FOOD; FOOD CHOICE; FOOD PREFERENCE; HUMAN; MALE; SENSORY EVALUATION; VANILLA;

ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); DIET; DIETARY FATS; DIETARY SUCROSE; ENERGY INTAKE; FEMALE; FLAVORING AGENTS; FOOD LABELING; FOOD PREFERENCES; HUMANS; MALE; RESEARCH DESIGN; TASTE; YOGURT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84867034068     PISSN: 01956663     EISSN: 10958304     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ares G., Besio M., Gimenez A., Deliza R. Relationship between involvement and functional milk desserts intention to purchase. Influence on attitude towards packaging characteristics. Appetite 2010, 55:298-304.
2. Ares G., Giménez A., Deliza R. Influence of three non-sensory factors on consumer choice of functional yogurts over regular ones. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:361-367.
3. Block L.G., Grier S.A., Childers T.L., Davis B., Ebert J.E.J., Kumanyika S., et al. From nutrients to nurturance. A conceptual introduction to well-being. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 2011, 30:5-13.
4. Carroll J.D., Green P.E. Psychometric methods in marketing research. 1. Conjoint analysis. Journal of Marketing Research 1995, 32:385-391.
5. Childs J.L., Drake M. Consumer perception of fat reduction in cheese. Journal of Sensory Studies 2009, 24:902-921.
6. Chung H.S., Hong H.D., Kim K., Cho C.W., Moskowitz H.R., Lee S.Y. Consumer attitudes and expectations of Ginseng food products assessed by focus groups and conjoint analysis. Journal of Sensory Studies 2011, 26:346-357.
7. Drake S.L., Lopetcharat K., Drake M.A. Comparison of two methods to explore consumer preferences for cottage cheese. Journal of Dairy Science 2009, 92:5883-5897.
8. Enneking U., Neumann C., Henneberg S. How important intrinsic and extrinsic product attributes affect purchase decision. Food Quality and Preference 2007, 18:133-138.
9. Garcia-Bailo B., Toguri C., Eny K.M., El-Sohemy A. Genetic variation in taste and its influence on food selection. Omics 2009, 13:69-80.
10. Grunert K.G. Purchase and consumption. The interdisciplinary nature of analysing food choice. Food Quality and Preference 2003, 14:39-40.
11. Haddad Y., Haddad J., Olabi A., Shuayto N., Haddad T., Toufeili I. Mapping determinants of purchase intent of concentrated yogurt (Labneh) by conjoint analysis. Food Quality and Preference 2007, 18:795-802.
12. Hasselbalch A.L., Heitmann B.L., Kyvik K.O., Sorensen T.I. Studies of twins indicate that genetics influence dietary intake. Journal of Nutrition 2008, 138:2406-2412.
13. Hayes J.E., Duffy V.B. Oral sensory phenotype identifies level of sugar and fat required for maximal liking. Physiology and Behavior 2008, 95:77-87.
14. Helgesen H., Solheim R., Naes T. Consumer purchase probability of dry fermented lamb sausages. Food Quality and Preference 1998, 9:295-301.
15. Hoppert K., Zahn S., Puschmann A., Ullmann I., Rohm H. Quantification of sensory difference thresholds for fat and sweetness in dairy-based emulsions. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 26:52-57.
16. Jaeger S.R. Uncovering cultural differences in choice behaviour between Samoan and New Zealand consumers. A case study with apples. Food Quality and Preference 2000, 11:405-417.
17. Jaeger S.R., Axten L.G., Wohlers M.W., Sun-Waterhouse D. Polyphenol-rich beverages. Insights from sensory and consumer science. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2009, 89:2356-2363.
18. Janhoj T., Frost M.B., Ipsen R. Sensory and rheological characterization of acidified milk drinks. Food Hydrocolloids 2009, 22:798-806.
19. Jervis S.M., Lopetcharat K., Drake M.A. Application of ethnography and conjoint analysis to determine key consumer attributes for latte-style coffee beverages. Journal of Sensory Studies 2012, 27:48-58.
20. Johansen S.B., Næs T., Øyaas J., Hersleth M. Acceptance of calorie-reduced yoghurt. Effects of sensory characteristics and product information. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:13-21.
21. Johnson, R.M. (1987). Adaptive conjoint analysis. In Sawtooth conference proceedings (pp. 253-265). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.
22. Köster E.P. Diversity in the determinants of food choice. A psychological perspective. Food Quality and Preference 2009, 20:70-82.
23. Levis P.A., Chambers E., Johnson D.E. Consumption and liking of a fat modified product during short trial periods. Nutrition Research 2000, 20:791-804.
24. Liebl A. Costs involved in the early and late phases of diabetes mellitus. Internist 2007, 48:708-714.
25. Lindstrom J., Peltonen M., Eriksson J.G., Louheranta A., Fogelholm M., Uusitupa M., et al. High-fibre, low-fat diet predicts long-term weight loss and decreased type 2 diabetes risk. The Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study. Diabetologia 2006, 49:912-920.
26. Louviere J., Islam T. Comparison of importance weights and willingness-to-pay measures derived from choice-based conjoint, constant sum scales and best-worst scaling. Journal of Business Research 2008, 61:903-911.
27. Melles, T., Laumann, R., & Holling, H. (2000). Validity and reliability of online conjoint analysis. In Proceedings of the 8th Sawtooth Software conference (pp. 31-40). Sequim: Sawtooth Software.
28. Orme, B. K., & Johnson, R. M. (1996). Staying out of trouble with ACA. In Sawtooth Software research paper series. Sequim: Sawtooth Software. http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com.
29. Raghunathan R., Naylor R.W., Hoyer W.D. The unhealthy = tasty intuition and its effects on taste inferences, enjoyment, and choice of food products. Journal of Marketing 2006, 70:170-184.
30. Ritvanen T., Lampolahti S., Lilleberg L., Tupasela T., Isoniemi M., Appelbye U., et al. Sensory evaluation, chemical composition and consumer acceptance of full fat and reduced fat cheeses in the Finnish market. Food Quality and Preference 2005, 16:479-492.
31. Roininen K., Tuorila H. Health and taste attitudes in the prediction of use frequency and choice between less healthy and more healthy snacks. Food Quality and Preference 1999, 10:357-365.
32. Schwarz P.E.H., Reimann M., Li J., Bergmann A., Licinio J.M., Wong M.L., et al. The metabolic syndrome - A global challenge for prevention. Hormone and Metabolic Research 2007, 39:777-780.
33. Tuorila H., Cardello A.V. Consumer responses to an off-flavor in juice in the presence of specific health claims. Food Quality and Preference 2002, 13:561-569.
34. Valeeva N.I., Meuwissen M.P.M., Oude Lansink A.G.J.M., Huirne R.B.M.N. Improving food safety within the dairy chain. An application of Conjoint analysis. Journal of Dairy Science 2005, 88:1601-1612.
35. Visschers V.H.M., Siegrist M. Applying the evaluability principle to nutrition table information. How reference information changes people's perception of food products. Appetite 2009, 52:505-512.
36. Von Ferber L., Koster I., Hauner H. Medical costs of diabetic complications total costs and excess costs by age and type of treatment results of the German CoDiM study. Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes 2007, 115:97-104.
37. Wansink B. Response to ''measuring consumer response to food products". Sensory tests that predict consumer acceptance. Food Quality and Preference 2003, 14:23-26.
38. Wansink B., Park S.B. Sensory suggestiveness and labeling. Do soy labels bias taste?. Journal of Sensory Studies 2002, 17:483-491.
39. Yates M.D., Drake M.A. Texture properties of Gouda cheese. Journal of Sensory Studies 2007, 22:493-506.