Impact of the information provided to consumers on their willingness to pay for Champagne: Comparison with hedonic scores

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 13, Issue 7-8, 2002, Pages 597-608

  Lange, C ^a   Martin, C ^b   Chabanet, C ^b   Combris, P ^b   Issanchou, S ^b  

^a CENTRE DES SCIENCES DU GOÛT ET DE L ALIMENTATION   (France)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Champagnes; Effect of information; Expectation; Vickrey auction; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONSUMER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOOD PACKAGING; FOOD PREFERENCE; FOOD QUALITY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MARKETING; MOTIVATION; NORMAL HUMAN; RANDOMIZATION; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSORY ANALYSIS; TASTE DISCRIMINATION; WINE;

EID: 0036799429     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0950-3293(02)00059-9     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Anderson, R. E. (1973). Consumer dissatisfaction: the effect of disconfirmed expectancy on perceived product performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 10, 38-44.
2. Buhr, B. L., Hayes, D. J., Shogren, J. S., & Kliebenstein, J. B. (1993). Valuing ambiguity: the case of genetically engineered growth hormones. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 18, 175-184.
3. Cardello, A. V., & Sawyer, F. M. (1992). Effects of disconfirmed consumer expectations on food acceptability. Journal of Sensory Studies, 7, 253-277.
4. Deliza, R. (1996). The e.ects of expectation on sensory perception and acceptance. Doctor of Philosophy thesis, University of Reading.
5. Hayes, D. J., Shogren, J. F., Shin, S. Y., & Kliebenstein, J. B. (1995). Valuing food safety in experimental auction markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77, 40-53.
6. Lange, C. (2000). Etude de l'effet des caractéristiques sensorielles, des attentes induites par l'information et du prix sur l'acceptabilité et le comportement d'achat du consommateur. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Bourgogne.
7. Lange, C., Issanchou, S., & Combris, P. (2000). Expected or experienced quality: trade-off with price. Food Quality and Preference, 11, 289-297.
8. Lange, C., Rousseau, F., & Issanchou, S. (1999). Expectation, liking and purchase behaviour under economical constraint. Food Quality and Preference, 10, 31-39.
9. Lecocq, S., Magnac, T., Pichery, M.-C., & Visser, M. (1999). The impact of information on wine auction prices: results of an experiment. Document de travail CREST, no. 9936.
10. MacFie, H. J., Bratchell, N., Greenho., K., & Vallis, L. V. (1989). Designs to balance the effect of order of presentation and first-order carry-over effects in Hall Tests. Journal of Sensory Studies, 4, 129-148.
11. Melton, B., Huffman, W., Shogren, J., & Fox, J. (1996). Consumer preferences for fresh food items with multiple quality attributes: evidence from an experimental auction of pork chops. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78, 916-923.
12. Menkhaus, D., Borden, G., Whipple, G., Hoffman, X., & Field, R. (1992). An empirical application of laboratory experimental auctions in marketing research. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 1, 17-44.
13. Moskowitz, H. R., Krieger, B., & Barash, J. (1997). The impacts of product acceptability, brand value and price on responses of food service professionals to bulk turkey. Journal of Food Quality, 20, 533-546.
14. Noussair, C., Robin, S., & Ruffeux, B. (2001). Genetically modified organisms in the food supply: public opinion vs. consumer behavior. Purdue University, Krannert Graduate School of Management, WP #2239.
15. Roosen, J., Hennessy, D., Fox, J., & Schreiber, A. (1998). Consumers' valuation of insecticide use restrictions: an application to apples. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 23, 367-384.
16. Schifferstein, H. N. J., Kole, A. P. M., & Mojet, J. (1999). Asymmetry in the disconfirmation of expectations for natural yogurt. Appetite, 32, 307-329.
17. Shepherd, R., Sparks, P., Bellier, S., & Raats, M. M. (1991/1992). The effects of information on sensory rating and preferences: the importance of attitudes. Food Quality and Preference, 3, 147-155.
18. Siret, F., Issanchou, S. (2000). Traditional process: influence on sensory properties and on consumers' expectation and liking. Application to "patê de campagne". Food Quality and Preference, 11, 217-228.
19. Solheim, R., & Lawless, H. T. (1996). Consumer purchase probability affected by attitude towards low-fat foods, liking, private body consciousness and information on fat and price. Food Quality and Preference, 7, 137-143.
20. Tuorila, H., Cardello, A. V., & Lesher, L. L. (1994). Antecedents and consequences of expectations related to fat-free and regular-fat foods. Appetite, 23, 247-264.
21. Vickers, Z. M. (1993). Incorporating tasting into a conjoint analysis of taste, health claim, price and brand for purchasing strawberry yoghurt. Journal of Sensory Studies, 8, 341-352.
22. Vickrey, W. (1961). Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. Journal of Finance, 16, 8-37.