Analytic network process: An overview of applications

Applied Mathematics and Computation

Volumn 367, Issue , 2020, Pages

  Kheybari, Siamak ^a   Rezaie, Fariba Mahdi ^a   Farazmand, Hadis ^a  

^a FERDOWSI UNIVERSITY OF MASHHAD   (Iran)

Author keywords

Analytic network process; ANP; Application areas; Literature review; Multi criteria decision making

Indexed keywords

DECISION THEORY; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; MANUFACTURE; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; WATER MANAGEMENT;

ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; APPLICATION AREA; ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING; HEALTH , SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL; LITERATURE REVIEWS; LOGISTICS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 85072866001     PISSN: 00963003     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2019.124780     Document Type: Article

References (481)

1. M. Behzadian, R.B. Kazemzadeh, A. Albadvi, M. Aghdasi, PROMETHEE: a comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 200 (2010) 198-215.
2. O.S. Vaidya, S. Kumar, Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 169 (2006) 1-29.
3. W. Ho, Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications—a literature review, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 186 (2008) 211-228.
4. A. Emrouznejad, B.R. Parker, G. Tavares, Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: a survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA, Socio-econ. Plann. Sci., 42 (2008) 151-157.
5. A. Hatami-Marbini, A. Emrouznejad, M. Tavana, A taxonomy and review of the fuzzy data envelopment analysis literature: two decades in the making, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 214 (2011) 457-472.
6. E.K. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis, Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview, Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ., 17 (2011) 397-427.
7. M. Behzadian, S.K. Otaghsara, M. Yazdani, J. Ignatius, A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications, Expert Syst. Appl., 39 (2012) 13051-13069.
8. M.-S. Yin, Fifteen years of grey system theory research: a historical review and bibliometric analysis, Expert Syst. Appl., 40 (2013) 2767-2775.
9. T. Baležentis, A. Baležentis, A survey on development and applications of the multi‐criteria decision making method MULTIMOORA, J. Multi‐Criteria Decis. Anal., 21 (2014) 209-222.
10. M. Yazdani, F.R. Graeml, VIKOR and its applications: a state-of-the-art survey, Int. J. Strategic Decis. Sci. (IJSDS), 5 (2014) 56-83.
11. C. Kahraman, S.C. Onar, B. Oztaysi, Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making: a literature review, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst., 8 (2015) 637-666.
12. A. Mardani, A. Jusoh, K.M.D. Nor, Z. Khalifah, N. Zakwan, A. Valipour, Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications—a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014, Econ. Res.-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 28 (2015) 516-571.
13. E. Celik, M. Gul, N. Aydin, A.T. Gumus, A.F. Guneri, A comprehensive review of multi criteria decision making approaches based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets, Knowledge-Based Syst., 85 (2015) 329-341.
14. K. Govindan, M.B. Jepsen, ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 250 (2016) 1-29.
15. M. Gul, E. Celik, N. Aydin, A.T. Gumus, A.F. Guneri, A state of the art literature review of VIKOR and its fuzzy extensions on applications, Appl. Soft Comput., 46 (2016) 60-89.
16. A. Afzali, V.S.J. MOHAMMAD, Landfill site selection for municipal solid waste of Esfahan City using analytic network process considering the importance of water resources protection, (2011).
17. T.L. Saaty, Fundamentals of the analytic network process, in: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 1999, pp. 12-14.
18. M. García-Melón, J. Ferrís-Oñate, J. Aznar-Bellver, P. Aragonés-Beltrán, R. Poveda-Bautista, Farmland appraisal based on the analytic network process, J. Global Optim., 42 (2008) 143-155.
19. E. Akyuz, A hybrid accident analysis method to assess potential navigational contingencies: the case of ship grounding, Saf. Sci., 79 (2015) 268-276.
20. E. Akyuz, A marine accident analysing model to evaluate potential operational causes in cargo ships, Saf. Sci., 92 (2017) 17-25.
21. A.M. Bahurmoz, A strategic model for safety during the Hajj pilgrimage: an ANP application, J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng., 15 (2006) 201-216.
22. S.-C. Chang, C.-F. Lin, W.-M. Wu, The features and marketability of certificates for occupational safety and health management in Taiwan, Saf. Sci., 85 (2016) 77-87.
23. Y.-H. Chang, P.-C. Shao, H.J. Chen, Performance evaluation of airport safety management systems in Taiwan, Saf. Sci., 75 (2015) 72-86.
24. L. Chen, X. Yan, C. Gao, Developing an analytic network process model for identifying critical factors to achieve apparel safety, J. Textile Inst., 107 (2016) 1519-1532.
25. M. Dağdeviren, İ. Yüksel, M. Kurt, A fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) model to identify faulty behavior risk (FBR) in work system, Saf. Sci., 46 (2008) 771-783.
26. Y.-L. Hsu, W.-C. Li, K.-W. Chen, Structuring critical success factors of airline safety management system using a hybrid model, Transport. Res. E: Logist. Transport. Rev., 46 (2010) 222-235.
27. R.-H. Huang, C.-L. Yang, C.-S. Kao, Assessment model for equipment risk management: petrochemical industry cases, Saf. Sci., 50 (2012) 1056-1066.
28. M. Ilangkumaran, M. Karthikeyan, T. Ramachandran, M. Boopathiraja, B. Kirubakaran, Risk analysis and warning rate of hot environment for foundry industry using hybrid MCDM technique, Saf. Sci., 72 (2015) 133-143.
29. J.S.L. Lam, K.-h. Lai, Developing environmental sustainability by ANP-QFD approach: the case of shipping operations, J. Cleaner Prod., 105 (2015) 275-284.
30. J.J. Liou, G.-H. Tzeng, H.-C. Chang, Airline safety measurement using a hybrid model, J. Air Transport Manage., 13 (2007) 243-249.
31. H.-T. Liu, Y.-l. Tsai, A fuzzy risk assessment approach for occupational hazards in the construction industry, Saf. Sci., 50 (2012) 1067-1078.
32. M. Peng, L. Guohui, L. Song, Z. Heping, An analytic network process approach for rapid loss assessment of high casualty fires in China, Fire Technol., 50 (2014) 1163-1179.
33. C.-I. Wu, H.-Y. Kung, C.-H. Chen, L.-C. Kuo, An intelligent slope disaster prediction and monitoring system based on WSN and ANP, Expert Syst. Appl., 41 (2014) 4554-4562.
34. L.-E. Wang, H.-C. Liu, M.-Y. Quan, Evaluating the risk of failure modes with a hybrid MCDM model under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environments, Comput. Ind. Eng., 102 (2016) 175-185.
35. G. Yucel, S. Cebi, B. Hoege, A.F. Ozok, A fuzzy risk assessment model for hospital information system implementation, Expert Syst. Appl., 39 (2012) 1211-1218.
36. Q. Zhan, W. Zheng, B. Zhao, A hybrid human and organizational analysis method for railway accidents based on HFACS-Railway Accidents (HFACS-RAs), Saf. Sci., 91 (2017) 232-250.
37. J.-L. Zhou, Z.-H. Bai, Z.-Y. Sun, A hybrid approach for safety assessment in high-risk hydropower-construction-project work systems, Saf. Sci., 64 (2014) 163-172.
38. A. Afzali, S. Sabri, M. Rashid, J.M.V. Samani, A.N.M. Ludin, Inter-municipal landfill site selection using analytic network process, Water Resources Manage., 28 (2014) 2179-2194.
39. P. Aragonés-Beltrán, J.P. Pastor-Ferrando, F. García-García, A. Pascual-Agulló, An analytic network process approach for siting a municipal solid waste plant in the metropolitan area of Valencia (Spain), J. Environ. Manage., 91 (2010) 1071-1086.
40. M. Bottero, E. Comino, V. Riggio, Application of the analytic hierarchy process and the analytic network process for the assessment of different wastewater treatment systems, Environ. Model. Softw., 26 (2011) 1211-1224.
41. C.-H. Hsu, F.-K. Wang, G.-H. Tzeng, The best vendor selection for conducting the recycled material based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR, Resources Conserv. Recycl., 66 (2012) 95-111.
42. M. Khadivi, S.F. Ghomi, Solid waste facilities location using of analytical network process and data envelopment analysis approaches, Waste Manage., 32 (2012) 1258-1265.
43. S. Khan, M.N. Faisal, An analytic network process model for municipal solid waste disposal options, Waste Manage., 28 (2008) 1500-1508.
44. I.M. Lami, F. Abastante, Decision making for urban solid waste treatment in the context of territorial conflict: can the analytic network process help?, Land Use Policy, 41 (2014) 11-20.
45. Z.K. Motlagh, M.H. Sayadi, Siting MSW landfills using MCE methodology in GIS environment (Case study: Birjand plain, Iran), Waste Manage., 46 (2015) 322-337.
46. M. Promentilla, T. Furuichi, K. Ishii, N. Tanikawa, Evaluation of remedial countermeasures using the analytic network process, Waste Manage., 26 (2006) 1410-1421.
47. X. Ren, R. Yan, H.-C. Wang, Y.-Y. Kou, K.-J. Chae, I.S. Kim, Y.-J. Park, A.-J. Wang, Citric acid and ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid as effective washing agents to treat sewage sludge for agricultural reuse, Waste Manage., 46 (2015) 440-448.
48. G. Tuzkaya, S. Önüt, U.R. Tuzkaya, B. Gülsün, An analytic network process approach for locating undesirable facilities: an example from Istanbul, Turkey, J. Environ. Manage., 88 (2008) 970-983.
49. T. Zhao, Y. Lu, C. Liu, Comprehensive optimization and engineering applications of thick residual coal re-mining methodology, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 32 (2017) 2111-2122.
50. J.J. Liou, Building an effective system for carbon reduction management, J. Cleaner Prod., 103 (2015) 353-361.
51. M.A.B. Promentilla, T. Furuichi, K. Ishii, N. Tanikawa, A fuzzy analytic network process for multi-criteria evaluation of contaminated site remedial countermeasures, J. Environ. Manage., 88 (2008) 479-495.
52. M. Promentilla, J. Tapia, C. Arcilla, N. Dugos, P. Gaspillo, S. Roces, R.R. Tan, Interdependent ranking of sources and sinks in CCS systems using the analytic network process, Environ. Model. Softw., 50 (2013) 21-24.
53. C.-C. Teng, J.-S. Horng, M.-L.M. Hu, L.-H. Chien, Y.-C. Shen, Developing energy conservation and carbon reduction indicators for the hotel industry in Taiwan, Int. J. Hospital. Manage., 31 (2012) 199-208.
54. J. Zhang, Evaluating regional low-carbon tourism strategies using the fuzzy Delphi-analytic network process approach, J. Cleaner Prod., 141 (2017) 409-419.
55. N. Bobylev, Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of selected underground construction technologies using the analytic network process, Autom. Construct., 20 (2011) 1030-1040.
56. M. Celik, Establishing an integrated process management system (IPMS) in ship management companies, Expert Syst. Appl., 36 (2009) 8152-8171.
57. Y.-H. Chang, W.-M. Wey, H.-Y. Tseng, Using ANP priorities with goal programming for revitalization strategies in historic transport: a case study of the Alishan Forest Railway, Expert Syst. Appl., 36 (2009) 8682-8690.
58. S.-P. Chuang, C.-L. Yang, Key success factors when implementing a green-manufacturing system, Prod. Plann. Control, 25 (2014) 923-937.
59. H. Eakin, L.A. Bojórquez-Tapia, R.M. Diaz, E. Castellanos, J. Haggar, Adaptive capacity and social-environmental change: theoretical and operational modeling of smallholder coffee systems response in Mesoamerican Pacific Rim, Environ. Manag., 47 (2011) 352-367.
60. G. Gopinath, A.G. Nair, G. Ambili, T. Swetha, Watershed prioritization based on morphometric analysis coupled with multi criteria decision making, Arab. J. Geosci., 9 (2016) 129.
61. K. Govindan, D. Kannan, M. Shankar, Evaluation of green manufacturing practices using a hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with PROMETHEE, Int. J. Prod. Res., 53 (2015) 6344-6371.
62. P. Grošelj, L.Z. Stirn, The environmental management problem of Pohorje, Slovenia: a new group approach within ANP–SWOT framework, J. Environ. Manage., 161 (2015) 106-112.
63. A. Kengpol, P. Boonkanit, The decision support framework for developing Ecodesign at conceptual phase based upon ISO/TR 14062, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 131 (2011) 4-14.
64. S.M. Khoshnava, R. Rostami, A. Valipour, M. Ismail, A.R. Rahmat, Rank of green building material criteria based on the three pillars of sustainability using the hybrid multi criteria decision making method, J. Cleaner Prod., (2016).
65. K.F. Liu, J.-H. Lai, Decision-support for environmental impact assessment: a hybrid approach using fuzzy logic and fuzzy analytic network process, Expert Syst. Appl., 36 (2009) 5119-5136.
66. I. Mohammadfam, M. Kamalinia, M. Momeni, R. Golmohammadi, Y. Hamidi, A. Soltanian, Developing an integrated decision making approach to assess and promote the effectiveness of occupational health and safety management systems, J. Cleaner Prod., 127 (2016) 119-133.
67. O. Nekhay, M. Arriaza, L. Boerboom, Evaluation of soil erosion risk using analytic network process and GIS: a case study from Spanish mountain olive plantations, J. Environ. Manage., 90 (2009) 3091-3104.
68. M. Nilashi, H. Ahmadi, A. Ahani, R. Ravangard, O. bin Ibrahim, Determining the importance of hospital information system adoption factors using fuzzy analytic network process (ANP), Technol. Forecast. Social Change, 111 (2016) 244-264.
69. L. Shi, K.-J. Wu, M.-L. Tseng, Improving corporate sustainable development by using an interdependent closed-loop hierarchical structure, Resources Conserv. Recycl., 119 (2017) 24-35.
70. H. Topaloglu, C.A. Gumussoy, A.E. Bayraktaroglu, F. Calisir, The Relative Importance of Usability and Functionality Factors for E‐Health Web Sites, Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. Serv. Ind., 23 (2013) 336-345.
71. M.-L. Tseng, Using a hybrid MCDM model to evaluate firm environmental knowledge management in uncertainty, Appl. Soft Comput., 11 (2011) 1340-1352.
72. M.-L. Tseng, R. Wang, A.S. Chiu, Y. Geng, Y.H. Lin, Improving performance of green innovation practices under uncertainty, J. Cleaner Prod., 40 (2013) 71-82.
73. B. Wolfslehner, H. Vacik, Evaluating sustainable forest management strategies with the analytic network process in a pressure-state-response framework, J. Environ. Manage., 88 (2008) 1-10.
74. X. Wang, H. Chan, L. White, A comprehensive decision support model for the evaluation of eco-designs, J. Oper. Res. Soc., 65 (2014) 917-934.
75. A. Abed-Elmdoust, R. Kerachian, Evaluating the relative power of water users in inter-basin water transfer systems, Water Resources Manage., 28 (2014) 495-509.
76. Y.-C. Chen, H.-P. Lien, G.-H. Tzeng, Measures and evaluation for environment watershed plans using a novel hybrid MCDM model, Expert Syst. Appl., 37 (2010) 926-938.
77. S.L. RazaviToosi, J.M.V. Samani, Evaluating water management strategies in watersheds by new hybrid Fuzzy Analytical Network Process (FANP) methods, J. Hydrol., 534 (2016) 364-376.
78. S.L. Razavi Toosi, J.M.V. Samani, A New Integrated MADM Technique combined with ANP, FTOPSIS and fuzzy max-min set method for evaluating water transfer projects, Water Resources Manage., 28 (2014) 4257-4272.
79. S.L. Razavi Toosi, J.M.V. Samani, Prioritizing watersheds using a novel hybrid decision model based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy VIKOR, Water Resources Manage., 31 (2017) 2853-2867.
80. S.L.R. Toosi, J.M.V. Samani, Evaluating water transfer projects using analytic network process (ANP), Water Resources Manage., 26 (2012) 1999-2014.
81. C. Zhang, X. Liu, J.-G. Jin, Y. Liu, A Stochastic ANP-GCE approach for vulnerability assessment in the water supply system with uncertainties, IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 63 (2016) 78-90.
82. S.H. Chen, H.T. Lee, Performance evaluation model for project managers using managerial practices, Int. J. Project Manage., 25 (2007) 543-551.
83. M.-Y. Chen, M.-J. Huang, Y.-C. Cheng, Measuring knowledge management performance using a competitive perspective: an empirical study, Expert Syst. Appl., 36 (2009) 8449-8459.
84. H. Dinçer, Ü. Hacıoğlu, S. Yüksel, Balanced scorecard based performance measurement of European airlines using a hybrid multicriteria decision making approach under the fuzzy environment, J. Air Transport Manage., 63 (2017) 17-33.
85. C.-W. Hsu, A.H. Hu, C.-Y. Chiou, T.-C. Chen, Using the FDM and ANP to construct a sustainability balanced scorecard for the semiconductor industry, Expert Syst. Appl., 38 (2011) 12891-12899.
86. Y.-H. Hung, T.-L. Huang, J.-C. Hsieh, H.-J. Tsuei, C.-C. Cheng, G.-H. Tzeng, Online reputation management for improving marketing by using a hybrid MCDM model, Knowledge-Based Syst., 35 (2012) 87-93.
87. S.N. Isfahani, A.A. Haddad, E. Roghanian, M. Rezayi, Customer relationship management performance measurement using balanced scorecard and fuzzy analytic network process: the case of MAPNA group, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 27 (2014) 377-389.
88. C. Jatoth, G. Gangadharan, U. Fiore, Evaluating the efficiency of cloud services using modified data envelopment analysis and modified super-efficiency data envelopment analysis, Soft Comput., (2016) 1-14.
89. U.A. Kahraman, Analysis of interactions between performance indicators with fuzzy decision making approach in healthcare management, J. Intell. Manuf., (2015) 1-16.
90. Y.-Y. Lin, N.-H. Pan, Multi period performance assessment model for the site property management, Int. J. Strategic Property Manage., 18 (2014) 332-343.
91. Y.-H. Lin, K.-M. Tsai, W.-J. Shiang, T.-C. Kuo, C.-H. Tsai, Research on using ANP to establish a performance assessment model for business intelligence systems, Expert Syst. Appl., 36 (2009) 4135-4146.
92. Z.-m. Luo, J.-z. Zhou, L.-p. Zheng, L. Mo, Y.-y. He, A TFN–ANP based approach to evaluate Virtual Research Center comprehensive performance, Expert Syst. Appl., 37 (2010) 8379-8386.
93. B. Öztayşi, T. Kaya, C. Kahraman, Performance comparison based on customer relationship management using analytic network process, Expert Syst. Appl., 38 (2011) 9788-9798.
94. M. Piltan, T. Sowlati, A multi-criteria decision support model for evaluating the performance of partnerships, Expert Syst. Appl., 45 (2016) 373-384.
95. R. Poveda-Bautista, D.C. Baptista, M. García-Melón, Setting competitiveness indicators using BSC and ANP, Int. J. Prod. Res., 50 (2012) 4738-4752.
96. P. Rashvand, M.Z.A. Majid, J.K. Pinto, Contractor management performance evaluation model at prequalification stage, Expert Syst. Appl., 42 (2015) 5087-5101.
97. K.-Y. Shen, G.-H. Tzeng, A decision rule-based soft computing model for supporting financial performance improvement of the banking industry, Soft Comput., 19 (2015) 859-874.
98. Z. Tohumcu, E. Karasakal, R&D project performance evaluation with multiple and interdependent criteria, IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 57 (2010) 620-633.
99. M. Varmazyar, M. Dehghanbaghi, M. Afkhami, A novel hybrid MCDM model for performance evaluation of research and technology organizations based on BSC approach, Eval. Program Plann., 58 (2016) 125-140.
100. W.H. Wu, C.T. Lin, K.H. Peng, Determination of a hospital management policy using conjoint analysis in the analytic network process, Qual. Quant., 43 (2009) 145-154.
101. C.-L. Yang, S.-P. Chuang, R.-H. Huang, Manufacturing evaluation system based on AHP/ANP approach for wafer fabricating industry, Expert Syst. Appl., 36 (2009) 11369-11377.
102. M. Yurdakul, Measuring long-term performance of a manufacturing firm using the Analytic Network Process (ANP) approach, Int. J. Prod. Res., 41 (2003) 2501-2529.
103. S. Altuntas, T. Dereli, An evaluation index system for prediction of technology commercialization of investment projects, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 23 (2012) 327-343.
104. G. Büyüközkan, D. Öztürkcan, An integrated analytic approach for Six Sigma project selection, Expert Syst. Appl., 37 (2010) 5835-5847.
105. H.H. Chen, A.H. Lee, H.-Y. Kang, A model for strategic selection of feeder management systems: a case study, Int. J. Electrical Power Energy Syst., 32 (2010) 421-427.
106. S. Ebrahimnejad, S. Mousavi, R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, H. Hashemi, B. Vahdani, A novel two-phase group decision making approach for construction project selection in a fuzzy environment, Appl. Math. Model., 36 (2012) 4197-4217.
107. M. García-Melón, R. Poveda-Bautista, Using the strategic relative alignment index for the selection of portfolio projects application to a public Venezuelan Power Corporation, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 170 (2015) 54-66.
108. C.A. Grady, X. He, S. Peeta, Integrating social network analysis with analytic network process for international development project selection, Expert Syst. Appl., 42 (2015) 5128-5138.
109. D.J.-F. Jeng, K.-H. Huang, Strategic project portfolio selection for national research institutes, J. Bus. Res., 68 (2015) 2305-2311.
110. J.W. Lee, S.H. Kim, Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection, Comput. Oper. Res., 27 (2000) 367-382.
111. J.W. Lee, S.H. Kim, An integrated approach for interdependent information system project selection, Int. J. Project Manage., 19 (2001) 111-118.
112. C. Liang, Q. Li, Enterprise information system project selection with regard to BOCR, Int. J. Project Manage., 26 (2008) 810-820.
113. L.M. Meade, A. Presley, R&D project selection using the analytic network process, IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 49 (2002) 59-66.
114. R. Mohanty, R. Agarwal, A. Choudhury, M. Tiwari, A fuzzy ANP-based approach to R&D project selection: a case study, Int. J. Prod. Res., 43 (2005) 5199-5216.
115. A. Šimelytė, K. Peleckis, R. Korsakienė, Analytical network process based on BOCR analysis as an approach for designing a foreign direct investment policy, J. Bus. Econ. Manage., 15 (2014) 833-852.
116. M. Tavana, K. Khalili-Damghani, A.-R. Abtahi, A hybrid fuzzy group decision support framework for advanced-technology prioritization at NASA, Expert Syst. Appl., 40 (2013) 480-491.
117. K.K. Yuen, H.C. Lau, A linguistic possibility-probability aggregation model for decision analysis with imperfect knowledge, Appl. Soft Comput., 9 (2009) 575-589.
118. R. Azimi, A. Yazdani-Chamzini, M.M. Fouladgar, E.K. Zavadskas, M.H. Basiri, Ranking the strategies of mining sector through ANP and TOPSIS in a SWOT framework, J. Bus. Econ. Manage., 12 (2011) 670-689.
119. P.-T. Chen, J.Z. Cheng, Unlocking the promise of mobile value-added services by applying new collaborative business models, Technol. Forecast. Social Change, 77 (2010) 678-693.
120. W.-Y. Chiu, G.-H. Tzeng, H.-L. Li, A new hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR to improve e-store business, Knowledge-Based Syst., 37 (2013) 48-61.
121. Y.-H. Lee, Y.-H. Lee, Integrated assessment of competitive-strategy selection with an analytical network process, J. Bus. Econ. Manage., 13 (2012) 801-831.
122. C.-T. Lin, C. Lee, C.-S. Wu, Optimizing a marketing expert decision process for the private hotel, Expert Syst. Appl., 36 (2009) 5613-5619.
123. M.S. Raisinghani, L. Meade, L.L. Schkade, Strategic e-business decision analysis using the analytic network process, IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 54 (2007) 673-686.
124. A. Valipour, N. Yahaya, N. Md Noor, A. Mardani, J. Antuchevičienė, A new hybrid fuzzy cybernetic analytic network process model to identify shared risks in PPP projects, Int. J. Strategic Property Manage., 20 (2016) 409-426.
125. W.-W. Wu, Y.-T. Lee, Selecting knowledge management strategies by using the analytic network process, Expert Syst. Appl., 32 (2007) 841-847.
126. W.-W. Wu, Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach, Expert Syst. Appl., 35 (2008) 828-835.
127. C.-S. Wu, C.-T. Lin, C. Lee, Optimal marketing strategy: a decision-making with ANP and TOPSIS, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 127 (2010) 190-196.
128. C.-L. Yang, R.-H. Huang, Key success factors for online auctions: analysis of auctions of fashion clothing, Expert Syst. Appl., 38 (2011) 7774-7783.
129. İ. Yüksel, M. Dagdeviren, Using the analytic network process (ANP) in a SWOT analysis–a case study for a textile firm, Inform. Sci., 177 (2007) 3364-3382.
130. J. Cao, W. Song, Risk assessment of co-creating value with customers: a rough group analytic network process approach, Expert Syst. Appl., 55 (2016) 145-156.
131. B. Chang, C. Kuo, C.-H. Wu, G.-H. Tzeng, Using Fuzzy Analytic Network Process to assess the risks in enterprise resource planning system implementation, Appl. Soft Comput., 28 (2015) 196-207.
132. P. Chemweno, L. Pintelon, A. Van Horenbeek, P. Muchiri, Development of a risk assessment selection methodology for asset maintenance decision making: An analytic network process (ANP) approach, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 170 (2015) 663-676.
133. J.K. Chen, Prioritization of corrective actions from utility viewpoint in FMEA application, Qual. Reliabil. Eng. Int., 33 (2017) 883-894.
134. Z. Chen, H. Li, H. Ren, Q. Xu, J. Hong, A total environmental risk assessment model for international hub airports, Int. J. Project Manage., 29 (2011) 856-866.
135. G. Jia, X. Ni, Z. Chen, B. Hong, Y. Chen, F. Yang, C. Lin, Measuring the maturity of risk management in large-scale construction projects, Autom. Construct., 34 (2013) 56-66.
136. J. Liu, Q. Li, Y. Wang, Risk analysis in ultra deep scientific drilling project—A fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach, Int. J. Project Manage., 31 (2013) 449-458.
137. C.-C. Lo, W.-J. Chen, A hybrid information security risk assessment procedure considering interdependences between controls, Expert Syst. Appl., 39 (2012) 247-257.
138. A. Silvestri, F. De Felice, A. Petrillo, Multi-criteria risk analysis to improve safety in manufacturing systems, Int. J. Prod. Res., 50 (2012) 4806-4821.
139. Y.-P.O. Yang, H.-M. Shieh, G.-H. Tzeng, A VIKOR technique based on DEMATEL and ANP for information security risk control assessment, Inform. Sci., 232 (2013) 482-500.
140. P. Aragonés-Beltrán, J. Aznar, J. Ferrís-Oñate, M. García-Melón, Valuation of urban industrial land: An analytic network process approach, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 185 (2008) 322-339.
141. U. Asan, A. Soyer, Identifying strategic management concepts: an analytic network process approach, Comput. Ind. Eng., 56 (2009) 600-615.
142. D. Carlucci, G. Schiuma, Applying the analytic network process to disclose knowledge assets value creation dynamics, Expert Syst. Appl., 36 (2009) 7687-7694.
143. C.-W. Chang, D.-J. Horng, H.-L. Lin, A measurement model for experts knowledge-based systems algorithm using fuzzy analytic network process, Expert Syst. Appl., 38 (2011) 12009-12017.
144. F.-H. Chen, Application of a hybrid dynamic MCDM to explore the key factors for the internal control of procurement circulation, Int. J. Prod. Res., 53 (2015) 2951-2969.
145. I.S. Chen, A combined MCDM model based on DEMATEL and ANP for the selection of airline service quality improvement criteria: a study based on the Taiwanese airline industry, J. Air Transport Manage., 57 (2016) 7-18.
146. Y.-M. Chiang, W.-L. Chen, C.-H. Ho, Application of analytic network process and two-dimensional matrix evaluating decision for design strategy, Comput. Ind. Eng., 98 (2016) 237-245.
147. W.-C. Chou, Y.-P. Cheng, A hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating website quality of professional accounting firms, Expert Syst. Appl., 39 (2012) 2783-2793.
148. M. Dağdeviren, İ. Yüksel, A fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) model for measurement of the sectoral competition level (SCL), Expert Syst. Appl., 37 (2010) 1005-1014.
149. R. Dangol, M. Bahl, B. Karpak, Timing cooperative relationships with sequential capability development process to reduce capability development trade-offs, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 169 (2015) 179-189.
150. Ş. Erdoğmuş, M. Kapanoglu, E. Koc, Evaluating high-tech alternatives by using analytic network process with BOCR and multiactors, Eval. Program Plann., 28 (2005) 391-399.
151. T. Feglar, J.K. Levy, T. Feglar, T. Feglar, Advances in decision analysis and systems engineering for managing large-scale enterprises in a volatile world: Integrating benefits, opportunities, costs and risks (BOCR) with the business motivation model (BMM), J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng., 15 (2006) 141-153.
152. P. Fiala, An ANP/DNP analysis of economic elements in today's world network economy, J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng., 15 (2006) 131-140.
153. A. Grilo, A. Zutshi, R. Jardim-Goncalves, A. Steiger-Garcao, Construction collaborative networks: the case study of a building information modelling-based office building project, Int. J. Comput. Integrated Manuf., 26 (2013) 152-165.
154. Q. He, L. Luo, Y. Hu, A.P. Chan, Measuring the complexity of mega construction projects in China—a fuzzy analytic network process analysis, Int. J. Project Manage., 33 (2015) 549-563.
155. S.-K. Hu, M.-T. Lu, G.-H. Tzeng, Exploring smart phone improvements based on a hybrid MCDM model, Expert Syst. Applic., 41 (2014) 4401-4413.
156. C.-N. Huang, J.J. Liou, Y.-C. Chuang, A method for exploring the interdependencies and importance of critical infrastructures, Knowledge-Based Syst., 55 (2014) 66-74.
157. D.W. Hsu, Y.-C. Shen, B.J. Yuan, C.J. Chou, Toward successful commercialization of university technology: Performance drivers of university technology transfer in Taiwan, Technol. Forecast. Social Change, 92 (2015) 25-39.
158. S. Jun, D. Lee, J. Park, Determining business models in bottom-of-the-pyramid markets, Ind. Manage. Data Syst., 113 (2013) 1064-1082.
159. B. Karpak, I. Topcu, Small medium manufacturing enterprises in Turkey: An analytic network process framework for prioritizing factors affecting success, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 125 (2010) 60-70.
160. A. Kengpol, M. Tuominen, A framework for group decision support systems: an application in the evaluation of information technology for logistics firms, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 101 (2006) 159-171.
161. A. Keramati, M. Salehi, Website success comparison in the context of e-recruitment: an analytic network process (ANP) approach, Appl. Soft Comput., 13 (2013) 173-180.
162. C. Kim, H. Lee, H. Seol, C. Lee, Identifying core technologies based on technological cross-impacts: an association rule mining (ARM) and analytic network process (ANP) approach, Expert Syst. Appl., 38 (2011) 12559-12564.
163. G. Koyuncu, E. Kurt, Y.C. Erensal, Work system design in macroergonomics: a case study related to prioritization of major sociotechnical system components by using the fuzzy analytic network process, Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. Serv. Ind., 21 (2011) 89-103.
164. F.P. Kumar, D. Claudio, Implications of estimating confidence intervals on group fuzzy decision making scores, Expert Syst. Appl., 65 (2016) 152-163.
165. T.H. Kwon, J.H. Kwak, K. Kim, A study on the establishment of policies for the activation of a big data industry and prioritization of policies: lessons from Korea, Technol. Forecast. Social Change, 96 (2015) 144-152.
166. W.-S. Lee, W.-S. Tu, Combined MCDM techniques for exploring company value based on Modigliani–Miller theorem, Expert Syst. Appl., 38 (2011) 8037-8044.
167. C. Lee, J. Kim, S. Lee, Towards robust technology roadmapping: How to diagnose the vulnerability of organisational plans, Technol. Forecast. Social Change, 111 (2016) 164-175.
168. H. Lee, C. Kim, Y. Park, Evaluation and management of new service concepts: an ANP-based portfolio approach, Comput. Ind. Eng., 58 (2010) 535-543.
169. H. Lee, M.-S. Kim, Y. Park, An analytic network process approach to operationalization of five forces model, Appl. Math. Model., 36 (2012) 1783-1795.
170. S. Lee, Y. Geum, S. Lee, Y. Park, Evaluating new concepts of PSS based on the customer value: application of ANP and niche theory, Expert Syst. Appl., 42 (2015) 4556-4566.
171. W.-S. Lee, A.Y. Huang, Y.-Y. Chang, C.-M. Cheng, Analysis of decision making factors for equity investment by DEMATEL and Analytic Network Process, Expert Syst. Appl., 38 (2011) 8375-8383.
172. W.-S. Lee, G.-H. Tzeng, J.-L. Guan, K.-T. Chien, J.-M. Huang, Combined MCDM techniques for exploring stock selection based on Gordon model, Expert Syst. Appl., 36 (2009) 6421-6430.
173. J.K. Levy, K. Taji, Group decision support for hazards planning and emergency management: a Group Analytic Network Process (GANP) approach, Math. Comput. Model., 46 (2007) 906-917.
174. L.-Z. Lin, T.-H. Hsu, Designing a model of FANP in brand image decision-making, Appl. Soft Comput., 11 (2011) 561-573.
175. C.-L. Lin, Y.-H. Shih, G.-H. Tzeng, H.-C. Yu, A service selection model for digital music service platforms using a hybrid MCDM approach, Appl. Soft Comput., 48 (2016) 385-403.
176. S.-W. Lin, S.-W. Lin, M.A. Jerusalem, M.A. Jerusalem, Integrated MCDM for evaluating fashion design schemes, Int. J. Clothing Sci. Technol., 28 (2016) 880-892.
177. Y. Lin, M.-L. Tseng, C.-C. Chen, A.S. Chiu, Positioning strategic competitiveness of green business innovation capabilities using hybrid method, Expert Syst. Applic., 38 (2011) 1839-1849.
178. S. Monarko, K. Lambert, M. Sigmund, Should a new arena be built in the city of Pittsburgh?, Math. Comput. Model., 46 (2007) 1160-1182.
179. E. Mu, A unified framework for site selection and business forecasting using ANP, J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng., 15 (2006) 178-188.
180. M.P. Niemira, T.L. Saaty, An analytic network process model for financial-crisis forecasting, Int. J. Forecast., 20 (2004) 573-587.
181. G.O. Palmisano, R.V. Loisi, G. Ruggiero, L. Rocchi, A. Boggia, R. Roma, P. Dal Sasso, Using analytic network process and dominance-based rough set approach for sustainable requalification of traditional farm buildings in Southern Italy, Land Use Policy, 59 (2016) 95-110.
182. J. Peris, M. García‐Melón, T. Gómez‐Navarro, C. Calabuig, Prioritizing Local Agenda 21 programmes using analytic network process: a Spanish case study, Sustainable Dev., 21 (2013) 338-352.
183. M. Piltan, T. Sowlati, Multi-criteria assessment of partnership components, Expert Syst. Appl., 64 (2016) 605-617.
184. J. Sarkis, R. Sundarraj, Evaluation of enterprise information technologies: a decision model for high-level consideration of strategic and operational issues, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. C (Applic. Rev.), 36 (2006) 260-273.
185. J. Sarkis, L.M. Meade, A.R. Presley, Incorporating sustainability into contractor evaluation and team formation in the built environment, J. Cleaner Prod., 31 (2012) 40-53.
186. K.-Y. Shen, M.-R. Yan, G.-H. Tzeng, Combining VIKOR-DANP model for glamor stock selection and stock performance improvement, Knowledge-Based Syst., 58 (2014) 86-97.
187. H.-S. Shih, E.S. Lee, S.-H. Chuang, C.-C. Chen, A forecasting decision on the sales volume of printers in Taiwan: an exploitation of the Analytic Network Process, Comput. Math. Appl., 64 (2012) 1545-1556.
188. H. Taşkin, Ü.A. Kahraman, C. Kubat, Evaluation of the hospital service in Turkey using fuzzy decision making approach, J. Intell. Manuf., 1-12.
189. M. Tavana, E. Momeni, N. Rezaeiniya, S.M. Mirhedayatian, H. Rezaeiniya, A novel hybrid social media platform selection model using fuzzy ANP and COPRAS-G, Expert Syst. Applic., 40 (2013) 5694-5702.
190. O.K. Tosun, A. Gungor, Y.I. Topcu, ANP application for evaluating Turkish mobile communication operators, J. Global Optim., 42 (2008) 313-324.
191. W.-H. Tsai, W.-C. Chou, Selecting management systems for sustainable development in SMEs: a novel hybrid model based on DEMATEL, ANP, and ZOGP, Expert Syst. Appl., 36 (2009) 1444-1458.
192. W.-H. Tsai, W.-C. Chou, J.-D. Leu, An effectiveness evaluation model for the web-based marketing of the airline industry, Expert Syst. Appl., 38 (2011) 15499-15516.
193. W.-H. Tsai, J.-L. Hsu, Corporate social responsibility programs choice and costs assessment in the airline industry—a hybrid model, J. Air Transport Manage., 14 (2008) 188-196.
194. W.-H. Tsai, J.-L. Hsu, C.-H. Chen, W.-R. Lin, S.-P. Chen, An integrated approach for selecting corporate social responsibility programs and costs evaluation in the international tourist hotel, Int. J. Hospital. Manage., 29 (2010) 385-396.
195. W.-H. Tsai, H.-C. Kuo, Entrepreneurship policy evaluation and decision analysis for SMEs, Expert Syst. Appl., 38 (2011) 8343-8351.
196. W.-H. Tsai, P.-L. Lee, Y.-S. Shen, E.T. Hwang, A combined evaluation model for encouraging entrepreneurship policies, Ann. Oper. Res., 221 (2014) 449-468.
197. W.-H. Tsai, J.-D. Leu, J.-Y. Liu, S.-J. Lin, M.J. Shaw, A MCDM approach for sourcing strategy mix decision in IT projects, Expert Syst. Appl., 37 (2010) 3870-3886.
198. W.-H. Tsai, C.-C. Yang, J.-D. Leu, Y.-F. Lee, C.-H. Yang, An integrated group decision making support model for corporate financing decisions, Group Decis. Negotiat., (2013) 1-25.
199. M.-L. Tseng, L. Divinagracia, R. Divinagracia, Evaluating firm's sustainable production indicators in uncertainty, Comput. Ind. Eng., 57 (2009) 1393-1403.
200. Ö. Uygun, T.C. Kahveci, H. Taşkın, B. Piriştine, Readiness assessment model for institutionalization of SMEs using fuzzy hybrid MCDM techniques, Comput. Ind. Eng., 88 (2015) 217-228.
201. C. Valmohammadi, S. Dashti, Using interpretive structural modeling and fuzzy analytical process to identify and prioritize the interactive barriers of e-commerce implementation, Inform. Manage., 53 (2016) 157-168.
202. M.-J. Verdecho, J.-J. Alfaro-Saiz, R. Rodríguez-Rodríguez, A. Ortiz-Bas, RETRACTED: The analytic network process for managing inter-enterprise collaboration: A case study in a collaborative enterprise network, Expert Syst. Appl., 39 (2012) 626-637.
203. Y.-L. Wang, G.-H. Tzeng, Brand marketing for creating brand value based on a MCDM model combining DEMATEL with ANP and VIKOR methods, Expert Syst. Appl., 39 (2012) 5600-5615.
204. L. Wenbo, Comprehensive evaluation research on circular economic performance of eco-industrial parks, Energy Procedia, 5 (2011) 1682-1688.
205. C.R. Wu, C.T. Lin, Y.F. Lin, Identifying the preferable bancassurance alliance structure from the bank's executive management perspective: analytic network process application, Can. J. Admin. Sci., 27 (2010) 188-198.
206. İ. Yüksel, M. Dağdeviren, Using the fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) for Balanced Scorecard (BSC): a case study for a manufacturing firm, Expert Syst. Appl., 37 (2010) 1270-1278.
207. F. Zammori, The analytic hierarchy and network processes: Applications to the US presidential election and to the market share of ski equipment in Italy, Appl. Soft Comput., 10 (2010) 1001-1012.
208. A. Zutshi, A. Grilo, R. Jardim-Goncalves, The business interoperability quotient measurement model, Comput. Ind., 63 (2012) 389-404.
209. W. Bies, L. Zacharia, Medical tourism: Outsourcing surgery, Math. Comput. Model., 46 (2007) 1144-1159.
210. F.-H. Chen, T.-S. Hsu, G.-H. Tzeng, A balanced scorecard approach to establish a performance evaluation and relationship model for hot spring hotels based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DEMATEL and ANP, Int. J. Hospital. Manage., 30 (2011) 908-932.
211. J.-S. Horng, S.-F. Chou, C.-H. Liu, C.-Y. Tsai, Creativity, aesthetics and eco-friendliness: A physical dining environment design synthetic assessment model of innovative restaurants, Tourism Manage., 36 (2013) 15-25.
212. L.-F. Hsieh, L.-H. Lin, Y.-Y. Lin, A service quality measurement architecture for hot spring hotels in Taiwan, Tourism Manage., 29 (2008) 429-438.
213. T.-H. Hsu, L.-C. Hung, J.-W. Tang, A hybrid ANP evaluation model for electronic service quality, Appl. Soft Comput., 12 (2012) 72-81.
214. H.-F. Lin, Y.-W. Huang, Factors affecting passenger choice of low cost carriers: an analytic network process approach, Tourism Manage. Perspect., 16 (2015) 1-10.
215. C.-H.S. Liu, S.-F. Chou, Tourism strategy development and facilitation of integrative processes among brand equity, marketing and motivation, Tourism Manage., 54 (2016) 298-308.
216. L.-Z. Lin, C.-F. Lu, Fuzzy group decision-making in the measurement of ecotourism sustainability potential, Group Decis. Negotiat., (2013) 1-29.
217. C.-T. Lin, C. Lee, W.-Y. Chen, An expert system approach to assess service performance of travel intermediary, Expert Syst. Appl., 36 (2009) 2987-2996.
218. L.-Z. Lin, H.-R. Yeh, T.-H. Hsu, Multi-dimensions of experiential values in the Taipei International Flora Exposition, Tourism Manage. Perspect., 9 (2014) 36-50.
219. C.-H. Liu, G.-H. Tzeng, M.-H. Lee, Improving tourism policy implementation–the use of hybrid MCDM models, Tourism Manage., 33 (2012) 413-426.
220. C.-H. Liu, G.-H. Tzeng, M.-H. Lee, P.-Y. Lee, Improving metro–airport connection service for tourism development: using hybrid MCDM models, Tourism Manage. Perspect., 6 (2013) 95-107.
221. S.S. Padhi, V. Aggarwal, Competitive revenue management for fixing quota and price of hotel commodities under uncertainty, Int. J. Hospital. Manage., 30 (2011) 725-734.
222. K.-H. Peng, G.-H. Tzeng, Exploring heritage tourism performance improvement for making sustainable development strategies using the hybrid-modified MADM model, Curr. Issues Tourism, (2017) 1-27.
223. W.-H. Tsai, W.-C. Chou, C.-W. Lai, An effective evaluation model and improvement analysis for national park websites: a case study of Taiwan, Tourism Manage., 31 (2010) 936-952.
224. M. Abdollahi, M. Arvan, J. Razmi, An integrated approach for supplier portfolio selection: lean or agile?, Expert Syst. Appl., 42 (2015) 679-690.
225. Z. Ayağ, F. Samanlioglu, An intelligent approach to supplier evaluation in automotive sector, J. Intell. Manuf., 27 (2016) 889-903.
226. E.A. Bakeshlou, A.A. Khamseh, M.A.G. Asl, J. Sadeghi, M. Abbaszadeh, Evaluating a green supplier selection problem using a hybrid MODM algorithm, J. Intell. Manuf., 28 (2017) 913-927.
227. S. Boran, K. Goztepe, Development of a fuzzy decision support system for commodity acquisition using fuzzy analytic network process, Expert Syst. Appl., 37 (2010) 1939-1945.
228. G. Büyüközkan, G. Çifçi, A novel fuzzy multi-criteria decision framework for sustainable supplier selection with incomplete information, Comput. Ind., 62 (2011) 164-174.
229. S.H. Chen, H.T. Lee, Analytic network approach for selecting suppliers considering different cooperation patterns, Int. Trans. Oper. Res., 13 (2006) 549-560.
230. E.A. Demirtas, Ö. Üstün, An integrated multiobjective decision making process for supplier selection and order allocation, Omega, 36 (2008) 76-90.
231. C. Gencer, D. Gürpinar, Analytic network process in supplier selection: A case study in an electronic firm, Appl. Math. Model., 31 (2007) 2475-2486.
232. X. Geng, Q. Liu, A hybrid service supplier selection approach based on variable precision rough set and VIKOR for developing product service system, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 28 (2015) 1063-1076.
233. K. Govindan, M. Shankar, D. Kannan, Supplier selection based on corporate social responsibility practices, Int. J. Prod. Econ., (2016).
234. S.H. Hashemi, A. Karimi, M. Tavana, An integrated green supplier selection approach with analytic network process and improved Grey relational analysis, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 159 (2015) 178-191.
235. C.-W. Hsu, A.H. Hu, Applying hazardous substance management to supplier selection using analytic network process, J. Cleaner Prod., 17 (2009) 255-264.
236. J.-D. Huang, M.H. Hu, Two-stage solution approach for supplier selection: a case study in a Taiwan automotive industry, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 26 (2013) 237-251.
237. H.-Y. Kang, A.H. Lee, C.-Y. Yang, A fuzzy ANP model for supplier selection as applied to IC packaging, J. Intell. Manuf., 23 (2012) 1477-1488.
238. M. Kasirian, R. Yusuff, An integration of a hybrid modified TOPSIS with a PGP model for the supplier selection with interdependent criteria, Int. J. Prod. Res., 51 (2013) 1037-1054.
239. R.J. Kuo, Y.J. Lin, Supplier selection using analytic network process and data envelopment analysis, Int. J. Prod. Res., 50 (2012) 2852-2863.
240. R.J. Kuo, Y.C. Wang, F.C. Tien, Integration of artificial neural network and MADA methods for green supplier selection, J. Cleaner Prod., 18 (2010) 1161-1170.
241. R.-H. Lin, An integrated model for supplier selection under a fuzzy situation, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 138 (2012) 55-61.
242. C. Lin, C.N. Madu, C.-h. Kuei, H.-L. Tsai, K.-n. Wang, Developing an assessment framework for managing sustainability programs: a Analytic Network Process approach, Expert Syst. Appl., 42 (2015) 2488-2501.
243. C.-T. Lin, C.-B. Chen, Y.-C. Ting, An ERP model for supplier selection in electronics industry, Expert Syst. Appl., 38 (2011) 1760-1765.
244. Y.-T. Lin, C.-L. Lin, H.-C. Yu, G.-H. Tzeng, A novel hybrid MCDM approach for outsourcing vendor selection: a case study for a semiconductor company in Taiwan, Expert Syst. Appl., 37 (2010) 4796-4804.
245. J.J. Liou, Y.-C. Chuang, G.-H. Tzeng, A fuzzy integral-based model for supplier evaluation and improvement, Inform. Sci., 266 (2014) 199-217.
246. J.J. Liou, J. Tamošaitienė, E.K. Zavadskas, G.-H. Tzeng, New hybrid COPRAS-G MADM Model for improving and selecting suppliers in green supply chain management, Int. J. Prod. Res., 54 (2016) 114-134.
247. S. Önüt, S.S. Kara, E. Işik, Long term supplier selection using a combined fuzzy MCDM approach: a case study for a telecommunication company, Expert Syst. Appl., 36 (2009) 3887-3895.
248. B. Pang, S. Bai, An integrated fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach for supplier selection based on analytic network process, J. Intell. Manuf., 24 (2013) 163-174.
249. R.N. Rai, N. Bolia, Optimal decision support for air power potential, IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 61 (2014) 310-322.
250. R. Rajesh, V. Ravi, Supplier selection in resilient supply chains: a grey relational analysis approach, J. Cleaner Prod., 86 (2015) 343-359.
251. J. Razmi, H. Rafiei, An integrated analytic network process with mixed-integer non-linear programming to supplier selection and order allocation, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 49 (2010) 1195-1208.
252. J. Razmi, H. Rafiei, M. Hashemi, Designing a decision support system to evaluate and select suppliers using fuzzy analytic network process, Comput. Ind. Eng., 57 (2009) 1282-1290.
253. S. Tadić, S. Zečević, M. Krstić, A novel hybrid MCDM model based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy VIKOR for city logistics concept selection, Expert Syst. Appl., 41 (2014) 8112-8128.
254. M. Tavana, M. Zareinejad, F.J. Santos-Arteaga, M.A. Kaviani, A conceptual analytic network model for evaluating and selecting third-party reverse logistics providers, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 86 (2016) 1705-1721.
255. S. Theißen, S. Spinler, Strategic analysis of manufacturer-supplier partnerships: an ANP model for collaborative CO2 reduction management, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 233 (2014) 383-397.
256. M.-L. Tseng, R.-J. Lin, Y.-H. Lin, R.-H. Chen, K. Tan, Close-loop or open hierarchical structures in green supply chain management under uncertainty, Expert Syst. Appl., 41 (2014) 3250-3260.
257. M.-L. Tseng, J.H. Chiang, L.W. Lan, Selection of optimal supplier in supply chain management strategy with analytic network process and choquet integral, Comput. Ind. Eng., 57 (2009) 330-340.
258. O. Ustun, E.A. Demirtas, Multi-period lot-sizing with supplier selection using achievement scalarizing functions, Comput. Ind. Eng., 54 (2008) 918-931.
259. S. Vinodh, R.A. Ramiya, S. Gautham, Application of fuzzy analytic network process for supplier selection in a manufacturing organisation, Expert Syst. Appl., 38 (2011) 272-280.
260. S.-p. Wan, G.-l. Xu, J.-y. Dong, Supplier selection using ANP and ELECTRE II in interval 2-tuple linguistic environment, Inform. Sci., 385 (2017) 19-38.
261. J.-T. Wong, DSS for 3PL provider selection in global supply chain: combining the multi-objective optimization model with experts’ opinions, J. Intell. Manuf., 23 (2012) 599-614.
262. W.Y. Wu, H.-A. Shih, H.-C. Chan, The analytic network process for partner selection criteria in strategic alliances, Expert Syst. Appl., 36 (2009) 4646-4653.
263. W.-Y. Wu, B.M. Sukoco, C.-Y. Li, S.H. Chen, An integrated multi-objective decision-making process for supplier selection with bundling problem, Expert Syst. Appl., 36 (2009) 2327-2337.
264. Z. Xu, A. Elomri, S. Pokharel, X. Ming, Product-service supplier pre-evaluation with modified fuzzy ANP reducing decision information distortion, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 30 (2017) 738-754.
265. J.L. Yang, G.-H. Tzeng, An integrated MCDM technique combined with DEMATEL for a novel cluster-weighted with ANP method, Expert Syst. Appl., 38 (2011) 1417-1424.
266. G.N. Yücenur, Ö. Vayvay, N.Ç. Demirel, Supplier selection problem in global supply chains by AHP and ANP approaches under fuzzy environment, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 56 (2011) 823-833.
267. Q. Zhu, Y. Dou, J. Sarkis, A portfolio-based analysis for green supplier management using the analytical network process, Supply Chain Manage., 15 (2010) 306-319.
268. K. Govindan, J. Sarkis, M. Palaniappan, An analytic network process-based multicriteria decision making model for a reverse supply chain, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 68 (2013) 863-880.
269. C.-C. Hsu, J.J. Liou, An outsourcing provider decision model for the airline industry, J. Air Transport Manage., 28 (2013) 40-46.
270. C.-C. Hsu, J.J. Liou, Y.-C. Chuang, Integrating DANP and modified grey relation theory for the selection of an outsourcing provider, Expert Syst. Appl., 40 (2013) 2297-2304.
271. G. Kayakutlu, G. Buyukozkan, Assessing performance factors for a 3PL in a value chain, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 131 (2011) 441-452.
272. J.J. Liou, Y.-T. Chuang, Developing a hybrid multi-criteria model for selection of outsourcing providers, Expert Syst. Appl., 37 (2010) 3755-3761.
273. J.J. Liou, Developing an integrated model for the selection of strategic alliance partners in the airline industry, Knowledge-Based Syst., 28 (2012) 59-67.
274. J.J. Liou, G.-H. Tzeng, C.-Y. Tsai, C.-C. Hsu, A hybrid ANP model in fuzzy environments for strategic alliance partner selection in the airline industry, Appl. Soft Comput., 11 (2011) 3515-3524.
275. J.J. Liou, H. Wang, C. Hsu, S. Yin, A hybrid model for selection of an outsourcing provider, Appl. Math. Model., 35 (2011) 5121-5133.
276. Y. Tjader, J.H. May, J. Shang, L.G. Vargas, N. Gao, Firm-level outsourcing decision making: A balanced scorecard-based analytic network process model, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 147 (2014) 614-623.
277. Ö. Uygun, H. Kaçamak, Ü.A. Kahraman, An integrated DEMATEL and Fuzzy ANP techniques for evaluation and selection of outsourcing provider for a telecommunication company, Comput. Ind. Eng., 86 (2015) 137-146.
278. C. Wu, D. Barnes, An integrated model for green partner selection and supply chain construction, J. Cleaner Prod., 112 (2016) 2114-2132.
279. C. Wu, D. Barnes, A dynamic feedback model for partner selection in agile supply chains, Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage., 32 (2012) 79-103.
280. D. Çelebi, D. Bayraktar, L. Bingöl, Analytical Network Process for logistics management: a case study in a small electronic appliances manufacturer, Comput. Ind. Eng., 58 (2010) 432-441.
281. A.F. Guneri, M. Cengiz, S. Seker, A fuzzy ANP approach to shipyard location selection, Expert Syst. Appl., 36 (2009) 7992-7999.
282. M.-S. Kuo, G.-S. Liang, A novel hybrid decision-making model for selecting locations in a fuzzy environment, Math. Comput. Model., 54 (2011) 88-104.
283. M.-S. Kuo, Optimal location selection for an international distribution center by using a new hybrid method, Expert Syst. Appl., 38 (2011) 7208-7221.
284. C.-T. Lin, M.-C. Tsai, Location choice for direct foreign investment in new hospitals in China by using ANP and TOPSIS, Qual. Quant., 44 (2010) 375-390.
285. C.-T. Lin, M.-C. Tsai, Development of an expert selection system to choose ideal cities for medical service ventures, Expert Syst. Appl., 36 (2009) 2266-2274.
286. C. Neumüller, F. Kellner, J.N. Gupta, R. Lasch, Integrating three-dimensional sustainability in distribution centre selection: the process analysis method-based analytic network process, Int. J. Prod. Res., 53 (2015) 409-434.
287. E. Özceylan, M. Erbaş, M. Tolon, M. Kabak, T. Durğut, Evaluation of freight villages: A GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis, Computers in Industry, 76 (2016) 38-52.
288. A. Özdağoğlu, A multi-criteria decision-making methodology on the selection of facility location: fuzzy ANP, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 59 (2012) 787-803.
289. I. Peker, B. Baki, M. Tanyas, I. Murat Ar, Logistics center site selection by ANP/BOCR analysis: a case study of Turkey, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 30 (2016) 2383-2396.
290. N. Rezaeiniya, S.H. Zolfani, E.K. Zavadskas, Greenhouse locating based on ANP-COPRAS-G methods–an empirical study based on Iran, Int. J. Strategic Property Manage., 16 (2012) 188-200.
291. J. Sarkis, R. Sundarraj, Hub location at Digital Equipment Corporation: A comprehensive analysis of qualitative and quantitative factors, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 137 (2002) 336-347.
292. C.-R. Wu, C.-T. Lin, H.-C. Chen, Integrated environmental assessment of the location selection with fuzzy analytical network process, Qual. Quant., 43 (2009) 351-380.
293. M. Bugarinović, B. Dimitrijević, B. Bošković, The missing component in rail charging modeling—access charges principle selection, Int. Trans. Oper. Res., 22 (2015) 841-859.
294. Y. Ozdemir, H. Basligil, Aircraft selection using fuzzy ANP and the generalized choquet integral method: the Turkish airlines case, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 31 (2016) 589-600.
295. A. Özgen, M. Tanyas, Joint selection of customs broker agencies and international road transportation firms by a fuzzy analytic network process approach, Expert Syst. Appl., 38 (2011) 8251-8258.
296. J.S. Shang, Y. Tjader, Y. Ding, A unified framework for multicriteria evaluation of transportation projects, IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 51 (2004) 300-313.
297. X. Su, S. Mahadevan, P. Xu, Y. Deng, Handling of dependence in Dempster–Shafer theory, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 30 (2015) 441-467.
298. U.R. Tuzkaya, S. Önüt, A fuzzy analytic network process based approach to transportation-mode selection between Turkey and Germany: a case study, Inform. Sci., 178 (2008) 3133-3146.
299. W.-M. Wey, K.-Y. Wu, Using ANP priorities with goal programming in resource allocation in transportation, Math. Comput. Model., 46 (2007) 985-1000.
300. A. Agarwal, R. Shankar, M. Tiwari, Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: an ANP-based approach, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 173 (2006) 211-225.
301. I. Cabral, A. Grilo, V. Cruz-Machado, A decision-making model for lean, agile, resilient and green supply chain management, Int. J. Prod. Res., 50 (2012) 4830-4845.
302. M. Tseng, M. Lim, W.P. Wong, Sustainable supply chain management: a closed-loop network hierarchical approach, Ind. Manage. Data Syst., 115 (2015) 436-461.
303. M.-L. Tseng, M.K. Lim, W.-P. Wong, Y.-C. Chen, Y. Zhan, A framework for evaluating the performance of sustainable service supply chain management under uncertainty, Int. J. Prod. Econ., (2016).
304. Ö. Uygun, A. Dede, Performance evaluation of green supply chain management using integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision making techniques, Comput. Ind. Eng., 102 (2016) 502-511.
305. A. Agarwal, R. Shankar, On-line trust building in e-enabled supply chain, Supply Chain Manage., 8 (2003) 324-334.
306. G. Büyüközkan, Ç. Berkol, Designing a sustainable supply chain using an integrated analytic network process and goal programming approach in quality function deployment, Expert Syst. Appl., 38 (2011) 13731-13748.
307. G. Büyüközkan, G. Çifçi, Evaluation of the green supply chain management practices: a fuzzy ANP approach, Prod. Plann. Control, 23 (2012) 405-418.
308. G. Büyüközkan, G. Çifçi, A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers, Expert Syst. Appl., 39 (2012) 3000-3011.
309. C.-C. Chen, H.-S. Shih, H.-J. Shyur, K.-S. Wu, A business strategy selection of green supply chain management via an analytic network process, Comput. Math. Appl., 64 (2012) 2544-2557.
310. A. Choudhury, M. Tiwari, S. Mukhopadhyay, Application of an analytical network process to strategic planning problems of a supply chain cell: case study of a pharmaceutical firm, Prod. Plann. Control, 15 (2004) 13-26.
311. E.A. Demirtas, O. Ustun, Analytic network process and multi-period goal programming integration in purchasing decisions, Comput. Ind. Eng., 56 (2009) 677-690.
312. Y. Dou, J. Sarkis, A joint location and outsourcing sustainability analysis for a strategic offshoring decision, Int. J. Prod. Res., 48 (2010) 567-592.
313. Y. Dou, Q. Zhu, J. Sarkis, Evaluating green supplier development programs with a grey-analytical network process-based methodology, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 233 (2014) 420-431.
314. C.T. Hernandez, F.A.S. Marins, J.A.R. Duran, Selection of Reverse Logistics activities using an ANP-BOCR model, IEEE Latin Am. Trans., 14 (2016) 3886-3891.
315. S.-J. Hung, Activity-based divergent supply chain planning for competitive advantage in the risky global environment: a DEMATEL-ANP fuzzy goal programming approach, Expert Syst. Appl., 38 (2011) 9053-9062.
316. M. Hussain, A. Awasthi, M. Tiwari, An ISM-ANP integrated framework for evaluating alternatives for sustainable supply chain management, Appl. Math. Model., 40 (2015) 3671-3687.
317. D. Joshi, B. Nepal, A.P.S. Rathore, D. Sharma, On supply chain competitiveness of Indian automotive component manufacturing industry, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 143 (2013) 151-161.
318. G. Kayakutlu, G. Büyüközkan, Effective supply value chain based on competence success, Supply Chain Manage., 15 (2010) 129-138.
319. K. Kirytopoulos, V. Leopoulos, G. Mavrotas, D. Voulgaridou, Multiple sourcing strategies and order allocation: an ANP-AUGMECON meta-model, Supply Chain Manage., 15 (2010) 263-276.
320. S. Kusi-Sarpong, J. Sarkis, X. Wang, Assessing green supply chain practices in the Ghanaian mining industry: a framework and evaluation, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 181 (2016) 325-341.
321. J.S.L. Lam, J. Dai, Developing supply chain security design of logistics service providers: An analytical network process-quality function deployment approach, Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manage., 45 (2015) 674-690.
322. A.H. Lee, H.-J. Chang, C.-Y. Lin, An evaluation model of buyer–supplier relationships in high-tech industry—the case of an electronic components manufacturer in Taiwan, Comput. Ind. Eng., 57 (2009) 1417-1430.
323. H.-F. Lin, Y.-W. Huang, Using analytic network process to measure the determinants of low cost carriers purchase intentions: a comparison of potential and current customers, J. Air Transport Manage., 49 (2015) 9-16.
324. M.S. Raisinghani, L.L. Meade, Strategic decisions in supply-chain intelligence using knowledge management: an analytic-network-process framework, Supply Chain Manage., 10 (2005) 114-121.
325. M. Ramkumar, M. Jenamani, Sustainability in supply chain through E-procurement—an assessment framework based on DANP and Liberatore score, IEEE Syst. J., 9 (2015) 1554-1564.
326. V. Ravi, R. Shankar, M. Tiwari, Analyzing alternatives in reverse logistics for end-of-life computers: ANP and balanced scorecard approach, Comput. Ind. Eng., 48 (2005) 327-356.
327. V. Ravi, R. Shankar, M. Tiwari, Selection of a reverse logistics project for end-of-life computers: ANP and goal programing approach, Int. J. Prod. Res., 46 (2008) 4849-4870.
328. R.K. Singh, M.K. Sharma, Prioritising the alternatives for flexibility in supply chains, Prod. Plann. Control, 25 (2014) 176-192.
329. T. Supeekit, T. Somboonwiwat, D. Kritchanchai, DEMATEL-modified ANP to evaluate internal hospital supply chain performance, Comput. Ind. Eng., 102 (2016) 318-330.
330. G. Tuzkaya, B. Gülsün, Ş. Önsel, A methodology for the strategic design of reverse logistics networks and its application in the Turkish white goods industry, Int. J. Prod. Res., 49 (2011) 4543-4571.
331. K.-J. Wu, M.-L. Tseng, A.S. Chiu, M.K. Lim, Achieving competitive advantage through supply chain agility under uncertainty: a novel multi-criteria decision-making structure, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 190 (2017) 96-107.
332. D. Xia, B. Chen, A comprehensive decision-making model for risk management of supply chain, Expert Syst. Appl., 38 (2011) 4957-4966.
333. Z. Ayağ, An integrated approach to concept evaluation in a new product development, J. Intell. Manuf., 27 (2016) 991-1005.
334. G. Büyüközkan, T. Ertay, C. Kahraman, D. Ruan, Determining the importance weights for the design requirements in the house of quality using the fuzzy analytic network approach, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 19 (2004) 443-461.
335. H.H. Chen, H.-Y. Kang, X. Xing, A.H. Lee, Y. Tong, Developing new products with knowledge management methods and process development management in a network, Comput. Ind., 59 (2008) 242-253.
336. T. Ertay, C. Kahraman, Evaluation of design requirements using fuzzy outranking methods, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 22 (2007) 1229-1250.
337. T. Ertay, G. Büyüközkan, C. Kahraman, D. Ruan, Quality function deployment implementation based on analytic network process with linguistic data: an application in automotive industry, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 16 (2005) 221-232.
338. X. Geng, X. Chu, D. Xue, Z. Zhang, An integrated approach for rating engineering characteristics’ final importance in product-service system development, Comput. Ind. Eng., 59 (2010) 585-594.
339. Z. Güngör, E.K. Delice, S.E. Kesen, New product design using FDMS and FANP under fuzzy environment, Appl. Soft Comput., 11 (2011) 3347-3356.
340. C. Kahraman, T. Ertay, G. Büyüközkan, A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 171 (2006) 390-411.
341. E.E. Karsak, S. Sozer, S.E. Alptekin, Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach, Comput. Ind. Eng., 44 (2003) 171-190.
342. A.H. Lee, H.H. Chen, Y. Tong, Developing new products in a network with efficiency and innovation, Int. J. Prod. Res., 46 (2008) 4687-4707.
343. A.H. Lee, H.-Y. Kang, C.-Y. Yang, C.-Y. Lin, An evaluation framework for product planning using FANP, QFD and multi-choice goal programming, Int. J. Prod. Res., 48 (2010) 3977-3997.
344. C.-L. Lin, A novel hybrid decision-making model for determining product position under consideration of dependence and feedback, Appl. Math. Model., 39 (2015) 2194-2216.
345. C.-L. Lin, M.-S. Hsieh, G.-H. Tzeng, Evaluating vehicle telematics system by using a novel MCDM techniques with dependence and feedback, Expert Syst. Appl., 37 (2010) 6723-6736.
346. E. Liu, S.-W. Hsiao, ANP-GP approach for product variety design, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 29 (2006) 216-225.
347. H.-T. Liu, C.-H. Wang, An advanced quality function deployment model using fuzzy analytic network process, Appl. Math. Model., 34 (2010) 3333-3351.
348. E. Liu, S.-W. Hsiao, S.-W. Hsiao, A decision support system for product family design, Inform. Sci., 281 (2014) 113-127.
349. H.-T. Liu, An integrated fuzzy decision approach for product design and evaluation, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 25 (2013) 709-721.
350. L.A. Ocampo, R.R. Seva, Using analytic network process for evaluating mobile text entry methods, Appl. Ergon., 52 (2016) 232-241.
351. R. Parameshwaran, C. Baskar, T. Karthik, An integrated framework for mechatronics based product development in a fuzzy environment, Appl. Soft Comput., 27 (2015) 376-390.
352. H. Raharjo, A.C. Brombacher, M. Xie, Dealing with subjectivity in early product design phase: a systematic approach to exploit Quality Function Deployment potentials, Comput. Ind. Eng., 55 (2008) 253-278.
353. H.-J. Shyur, COTS evaluation using modified TOPSIS and ANP, Appl. Math. Comput., 177 (2006) 251-259.
354. M. Younesi, E. Roghanian, A framework for sustainable product design: a hybrid fuzzy approach based on Quality Function Deployment for Environment, J. Cleaner Prod., 108 (2015) 385-394.
355. S. Zaim, M. Sevkli, H. Camgöz-Akdağ, O.F. Demirel, A.Y. Yayla, D. Delen, Use of ANP weighted crisp and fuzzy QFD for product development, Expert Syst. Appl., 41 (2014) 4464-4474.
356. Z. Ayağ, R.G. Özdemir, Evaluating machine tool alternatives through modified TOPSIS and alpha-cut based fuzzy ANP, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 140 (2012) 630-636.
357. C.-W. Chang, C.-R. Wu, H.-C. Chen, Analytic network process decision-making to assess slicing machine in terms of precision and control wafer quality, Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf., 25 (2009) 641-650.
358. M. Kumru, P.Y. Kumru, A fuzzy ANP model for the selection of 3D coordinate-measuring machine, J. Intell. Manuf., 26 (2015) 999-1010.
359. H.-T. Nguyen, S.Z.M. Dawal, Y. Nukman, H. Aoyama, A hybrid approach for fuzzy multi-attribute decision making in machine tool selection with consideration of the interactions of attributes, Expert Syst. Appl., 41 (2014) 3078-3090.
360. E. Özceylan, M. Kabak, M. Dağdeviren, A fuzzy-based decision making procedure for machine selection problem, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 30 (2016) 1841-1856.
361. D. Pal, B. Ravi, L. Bhargava, Rapid tooling route selection for metal casting using QFD–ANP methodology, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 20 (2007) 338-354.
362. V. Paramasivam, V. Senthil, N.R. Ramasamy, Decision making in equipment selection: an integrated approach with digraph and matrix approach, AHP and ANP, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 54 (2011) 1233-1244.
363. R. Sadeghian, M.R. Sadeghian, A decision support system based on artificial neural network and fuzzy analytic network process for selection of machine tools in a flexible manufacturing system, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 82 (2016) 1795-1803.
364. F. Samanlioglu, Z. Ayağ, Fuzzy ANP-based PROMETHEE II approach for evaluation of machine tool alternatives, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 30 (2016) 2223-2235.
365. M. Yurdakul, AHP as a strategic decision-making tool to justify machine tool selection, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 146 (2004) 365-376.
366. P. Aragonés-Beltrán, M. García-Melón, J. Montesinos-Valera, How to assess stakeholders' influence in project management? A proposal based on the Analytic Network Process, Int. J. Project Manage., 35 (2017) 451-462.
367. Y.-H. Cheng, H.-L. Tsao, Rolling stock maintenance strategy selection, spares parts’ estimation, and replacements’ interval calculation, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 128 (2010) 404-412.
368. G. Kumar, J. Maiti, Modeling risk based maintenance using fuzzy analytic network process, Expert Syst. Appl., 39 (2012) 9946-9954.
369. S.N. Mirabedini, H. Iranmanesh, A scheduling model for serial jobs on parallel machines with different preventive maintenance (PM), Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 70 (2014) 1579-1589.
370. A. Nazeri, R. Naderikia, A new fuzzy approach to identify the critical risk factors in maintenance management, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., (2017) 1-35.
371. A. Van Horenbeek, L. Pintelon, Development of a maintenance performance measurement framework—using the analytic network process (ANP) for maintenance performance indicator selection, Omega, 42 (2014) 33-46.
372. D. Vujanović, V. Momčilović, N. Bojović, V. Papić, Evaluation of vehicle fleet maintenance management indicators by application of DEMATEL and ANP, Expert Syst. Appl., 39 (2012) 10552-10563.
373. M.R. Abdi, Product family formation and selection for reconfigurability using analytical network process, Int. J. Prod. Res., 50 (2012) 4908-4921.
374. M.R. Abdi, A.W. Labib, Performance evaluation of reconfigurable manufacturing systems via holonic architecture and the analytic network process, Int. J. Prod. Res., 49 (2011) 1319-1335.
375. B. Akyildiz, C. Kadaifci, I. Topcu, A decision framework proposal for customer order prioritization: a case study for a structural steel company, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 169 (2015) 21-30.
376. F. Aliakbari Nouri, S. Khalili Esbouei, J. Antucheviciene, A hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS for technology selection, Informatica, 26 (2015) 369-388.
377. Z. Ayağ, R.G. Özdemir, A hybrid approach to concept selection through fuzzy analytic network process, Comput. Ind. Eng., 56 (2009) 368-379.
378. Z. Ayağ, R. Özdemir, An intelligent approach to ERP software selection through fuzzy ANP, Int. J. Prod. Res., 45 (2007) 2169-2194.
379. D. Behnam, A. Ayough, S.H. Mirghaderi, Value stream mapping approach and analytical network process to identify and prioritize production system's Mudas (case study: natural fibre clothing manufacturing company), J. Textile Inst., (2017) 1-9.
380. O. Bayazit, B. Karpak, An analytical network process-based framework for successful total quality management (TQM): an assessment of Turkish manufacturing industry readiness, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 105 (2007) 79-96.
381. A.-Y. Chang, K.-J. Hu, Y.-L. Hong, An ISM-ANP approach to identifying key agile factors in launching a new product into mass production, Int. J. Prod. Res., 51 (2013) 582-597.
382. C.-W. Chang, C.-R. Wu, C.-T. Lin, H.-L. Lin, Evaluating digital video recorder systems using analytic hierarchy and analytic network processes, Inform. Sci., 177 (2007) 3383-3396.
383. J.-K. Chen, I.-S. Chen, TQM measurement model for the biotechnology industry in Taiwan, Expert Syst. Appl., 36 (2009) 8789-8798.
384. S.-H. Chung, A.H. Lee, W. Pearn, Product mix optimization for semiconductor manufacturing based on AHP and ANP analysis, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 25 (2005) 1144-1156.
385. I. Cil, Y.S. Turkan, An ANP-based assessment model for lean enterprise transformation, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., (2013) 1-18.
386. W. Dai, P.G. Maropoulos, Y. Zhao, Reliability modelling and verification of manufacturing processes based on process knowledge management, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 28 (2015) 98-111.
387. K. Govindan, K.M. Shankar, D. Kannan, Application of fuzzy analytic network process for barrier evaluation in automotive parts remanufacturing towards cleaner production–a study in an Indian scenario, J. Cleaner Prod., 114 (2016) 199-213.
388. A. Güngör, Evaluation of connection types in design for disassembly (DFD) using analytic network process, Comput. Ind. Eng., 50 (2006) 35-54.
389. P. Hallikainen, H. Kivijärvi, M. Tuominen, Supporting the module sequencing decision in the ERP implementation process—an application of the ANP method, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 119 (2009) 259-270.
390. M.A. Hasan, J. Sarkis, R. Shankar, Agility and production flow layouts: An analytical decision analysis, Comput. Ind. Eng., 62 (2012) 898-907.
391. S. Hemmati, M. Rabbani, Make-to-order/make-to-stock partitioning decision using the analytic network process, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 48 (2010) 801-813.
392. H.-Y. Kang, A multi-criteria decision-making approach for capacity allocation problem in semiconductor fabrication, Int. J. Prod. Res., 49 (2011) 5893-5916.
393. H.S. Kilic, S. Zaim, D. Delen, Selecting “The Best” ERP system for SMEs using a combination of ANP and PROMETHEE methods, Expert Syst. Appl., 42 (2015) 2343-2352.
394. A.H. Lee, C.-Y. Lin, S.-R. Wang, Y.-M. Tu, The construction of a comprehensive model for production strategy evaluation, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Making, 9 (2010) 187-217.
395. H. Lee, S. Lee, Y. Park, Selection of technology acquisition mode using the analytic network process, Math. Comput. Model., 49 (2009) 1274-1282.
396. Y.-H. Lin, C.-C. Chiu, C.-H. Tsai, The study of applying ANP model to assess dispatching rules for wafer fabrication, Expert Syst. Appl., 34 (2008) 2148-2163.
397. Y. Lin, H.-P. Cheng, M.-L. Tseng, J.C. Tsai, Using QFD and ANP to analyze the environmental production requirements in linguistic preferences, Expert Syst. Appl., 37 (2010) 2186-2196.
398. Y. Mei, J. Ye, Z. Zeng, Entropy-weighted ANP fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of interim product production schemes in one-of-a-kind production, Comput. Ind. Eng., 100 (2016) 144-152.
399. M. Moalagh, A.Z. Ravasan, Developing a practical framework for assessing ERP post-implementation success using fuzzy analytic network process, Int. J. Prod. Res., 51 (2013) 1236-1257.
400. S. Onut, S.S. Kara, S. Mert, Selecting the suitable material handling equipment in the presence of vagueness, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 44 (2009) 818-828.
401. F.Y. Partovi, An analytical model of process choice in the chemical industry, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 105 (2007) 213-227.
402. H. Rafiei, M. Rabbani, Order partitioning and order penetration point location in hybrid make-to-stock/make-to-order production contexts, Comput. Ind. Eng., 61 (2011) 550-560.
403. H. Rafiei, M. Rabbani, Hybrid MTS/MTO order partitioning framework based upon fuzzy analytic network process, Appl. Soft Comput., 19 (2014) 312-321.
404. J. Sarkis, S. Talluri, A. Gunasekaran, A strategic model for agile virtual enterprise partner selection, Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage., 27 (2007) 1213-1234.
405. Y.-C. Shen, G.T. Lin, G.-H. Tzeng, Combined DEMATEL techniques with novel MCDM for the organic light emitting diode technology selection, Expert Syst. Appl., 38 (2011) 1468-1481.
406. D. Tesfamariam, B. Lindberg, Aggregate analysis of manufacturing systems using system dynamics and ANP, Comput. Ind. Eng., 49 (2005) 98-117.
407. T.-N. Tsai, Selection of the optimal configuration for a flexible surface mount assembly system based on the interrelationships among the flexibility elements, Comput. Ind. Eng., 67 (2014) 146-159.
408. G. Tuzkaya, B. Gülsün, C. Kahraman, D. Özgen, An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methodology for material handling equipment selection problem and an application, Expert Syst. Appl., 37 (2010) 2853-2863.
409. G.-H. Tzeng, C.-Y. Huang, Combined DEMATEL technique with hybrid MCDM methods for creating the aspired intelligent global manufacturing & logistics systems, Ann. Oper. Res., 197 (2012) 159-190.
410. S. Vinodh, T.S. Balagi, A. Patil, A hybrid MCDM approach for agile concept selection using fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 83 (2016) 1979-1987.
411. S. Vinodh, S. Gautham, R. Anesh Ramiya, D. Rajanayagam, Application of fuzzy analytic network process for agile concept selection in a manufacturing organisation, Int. J. Prod. Res., 48 (2010) 7243-7264.
412. S. Wadhwa, M. Mishra, F.T. Chan, Organizing a virtual manufacturing enterprise: an analytic network process based approach for enterprise flexibility, Int. J. Prod. Res., 47 (2009) 163-186.
413. W.P. Wong, K.Y. Wong, Synergizing an ecosphere of lean for sustainable operations, J. Cleaner Prod., 85 (2014) 51-66.
414. J. Wong, H. Li, J. Lai, Evaluating the system intelligence of the intelligent building systems. Part 1. Development of key intelligent indicators and conceptual analytical framework, Autom. Construct., 17 (2008) 284-302.
415. J. Wong, H. Li, J. Lai, Evaluating the system intelligence of the intelligent building systems. Part 2. Construction and validation of analytical models, Autom. Construct., 17 (2008) 303-321.
416. W.P. Wong, J. Ignatius, K.L. Soh, What is the leanness level of your organisation in lean transformation implementation? An integrated lean index using ANP approach, Prod. Plann. Control, 25 (2014) 273-287.
417. H.-W. Yang, K.-F. Chang, Combining means-end chain and fuzzy ANP to explore customers’ decision process in selecting bundles, Int. J. Inform. Manage., 32 (2012) 381-395.
418. H.R. Yazgan, Selection of dispatching rules with fuzzy ANP approach, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 52 (2011) 651-667.
419. H.R. Yazgan, S. Boran, K. Goztepe, An ERP software selection process with using artificial neural network based on analytic network process approach, Expert Syst. Appl., 36 (2009) 9214-9222.
420. H.R. Yazgan, S. Boran, K. Goztepe, Selection of dispatching rules in FMS: ANP model based on BOCR with choquet integral, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 49 (2010) 785-801.
421. G. Büyüközkan, S. Güleryüz, An integrated DEMATEL-ANP approach for renewable energy resources selection in Turkey, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 182 (2016) 435-448.
422. M. Cannemi, M. García-Melón, P. Aragonés-Beltrán, T. Gómez-Navarro, Modeling decision making as a support tool for policy making on renewable energy development, Energy Policy, 67 (2014) 127-137.
423. H.H. Chen, C. Pang, Organizational forms for knowledge management in photovoltaic solar energy industry, Knowledge-Based Syst., 23 (2010) 924-933.
424. L. Gigović, D. Pamučar, D. Božanić, S. Ljubojević, Application of the GIS-DANP-MABAC multi-criteria model for selecting the location of wind farms: a case study of Vojvodina, Serbia, Renewable Energy, 103 (2017) 501-521.
425. S. Hu, F. Liu, C. Tang, X. Wang, H. Zhou, Assessing Chinese campus building energy performance using fuzzy analytic network approach, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 29 (2015) 2629-2638.
426. M. Kabak, M. Dağdeviren, S. Burmaoğlu, A hybrid SWOT-FANP model for energy policy making in Turkey, Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Plann. Policy, 11 (2016) 487-495.
427. A.Ç. Köne, T. Büke, An Analytical Network Process (ANP) evaluation of alternative fuels for electricity generation in Turkey, Energy Policy, 35 (2007) 5220-5228.
428. J.A. Momoh, J. Zhu, Optimal generation scheduling based on AHP/ANP, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet B (Cybernetics), 33 (2003) 531-535.
429. M.A.B. Promentilla, K.B. Aviso, R.R. Tan, A group fuzzy analytic network process to prioritize low carbon energy systems in the Philippines, Energy Procedia, 61 (2014) 808-811.
430. A. Rabbani, M. Zamani, A. Yazdani-Chamzini, E.K. Zavadskas, Proposing a new integrated model based on sustainability balanced scorecard (SBSC) and MCDM approaches by using linguistic variables for the performance evaluation of oil producing companies, Expert Syst. Appl., 41 (2014) 7316-7327.
431. G. Sakthivel, M. Ilangkumaran, B.W. Ikua, Selection of optimum fish oil fuel blend to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions in an IC engine—A hybrid multiple criteria decision aid approach, Int. J. Green Energy, 13 (2016) 1517-1533.
432. M. Shafiee, A fuzzy analytic network process model to mitigate the risks associated with offshore wind farms, Expert Syst. Appl., 42 (2015) 2143-2152.
433. S. Sittikruear, A. Bangviwat, Energy efficiency improvement in community–scale whisky factories of thailand by various multi-criteria decision making methods, Energy Procedia, 52 (2014) 173-178.
434. S. Tahseen, B. Karney, Opportunities for increased hydropower diversion at Niagara: an sSWOT analysis, Renewable Energy, 101 (2017) 757-770.
435. M. Tavana, M.A. Sodenkamp, M. Pirdashti, A fuzzy opportunity and threat aggregation approach in multicriteria decision analysis, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Making, 9 (2010) 455-492.
436. P. Xu, E.H. Chan, H.J. Visscher, X. Zhang, Z. Wu, Sustainable building energy efficiency retrofit for hotel buildings using EPC mechanism in China: analytic network process (ANP) approach, J. Cleaner Prod., 107 (2015) 378-388.
437. T.-M. Yeh, Y.-L. Huang, Factors in determining wind farm location: integrating GQM, fuzzy DEMATEL, and ANP, Renewable Energy, 66 (2014) 159-169.
438. M. Celik, I.D. Er, Y.I. Topcu, Computer-based systematic execution model on human resources management in maritime transportation industry: The case of master selection for embarking on board merchant ships, Expert Syst. Appl., 36 (2009) 1048-1060.
439. A. Certa, M. Enea, G. Galante, C. Manuela La Fata, Multi-objective human resources allocation in R&D projects planning, Int. J. Prod. Res., 47 (2010) 3503-3523.
440. K.-L. Chang, The use of a hybrid MCDM model for public relations personnel selection, Informatica, 26 (2015) 389-406.
441. H.-C. Chen, C.-H. Wang, K.-S. Chen, T.-L. Chang, Analysis and construction of stress relief model for healthy indoor environments, Qual. Quant., 48 (2013) 2053-2067.
442. S.H. Chen, P.W. Wang, H.T. Lee, Performance measurement considering the interdependence of evaluators and criteria, Qual. Quant., 46 (2010) 103-115.
443. M. Dağdeviren, A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model for personnel selection in manufacturing systems, J. Intell. Manuf., 21 (2008) 451-460.
444. F.C. Hor, L.-C. Huang, H.-S. Shih, Y.-H. Lee, E. Stanley Lee, Establishing talent management for company's succession planning through analytic network process: Application to an MNC semiconductor company in Taiwan, Comput. Math. Appl., 60 (2010) 528-540.
445. M. Kabak, S. Burmaoğlu, Y. Kazançoğlu, A fuzzy hybrid MCDM approach for professional selection, Expert Syst. Appl., 39 (2012) 3516-3525.
446. H.-T. Lin, Personnel selection using analytic network process and fuzzy data envelopment analysis approaches, Comput. Ind. Eng., 59 (2010) 937-944.
447. H.-J. Shyur, H.-S. Shih, A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection, Math. Comput. Model., 44 (2006) 749-761.
448. J.-K. Chen, I.-S. Chen, A Pro-performance appraisal system for the university, Expert Syst. Appl., 37 (2010) 2108-2116.
449. J.-K. Chen, I.-S. Chen, Using a novel conjunctive MCDM approach based on DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP, and TOPSIS as an innovation support system for Taiwanese higher education, Expert Syst. Appl., 37 (2010) 1981-1990.
450. J.-K. Chen, I.-S. Chen, Critical creativity criteria for students in higher education: taking the interrelationship effect among dimensions into account, Qual. Quant., 46 (2012) 1057-1075.
451. J.-K. Chen, I.-S. Chen, A network hierarchical feedback system for Taiwanese universities based on the integration of total quality management and innovation, Appl. Soft Comput., 12 (2012) 2394-2408.
452. T. Chen, K.-S. Sun, Exploring the strategy to improve senior citizens’ participations on recreational sports, Knowledge-Based Syst., 26 (2012) 86-92.
453. C.-H. Chen, G.-H. Tzeng, Creating the aspired intelligent assessment systems for teaching materials, Expert Syst. Appl., 38 (2011) 12168-12179.
454. O. Cooper, Q. Dong, Bilateral relations between China and the United States: Policy prioritization with the ANP, J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng., 22 (2013) 202-226.
455. S. Crowe, J. Lucas-Vergona, What should be done about the illegal immigration from Mexico to the United States?, Math. Comput. Model., 46 (2007) 1115-1129.
456. T. Gürbüz, Y.E. Albayrak, An engineering approach to human resources performance evaluation: hybrid MCDM application with interactions, Appl. Soft Comput., 21 (2014) 365-375.
457. P.-F. Hsu, Selection model based on ANP and GRA for independent media agencies, Qual. Quant., 46 (2012) 1-17.
458. M.-L.M. Hu, Developing a core competency model of innovative culinary development, Int. J. Hospital. Manage., 29 (2010) 582-590.
459. S. Hua Chen, H. Tso Lin, H. Tau Lee, Enterprise partner selection for vocational education: analytical network process approach, Int. J. Manpower, 25 (2004) 643-655.
460. N.A. Ismayilova, M. SağIr, R.N. Gasimov, A multiobjective faculty–course–time slot assignment problem with preferences, Math. Comput. Model., 46 (2007) 1017-1029.
461. M.-H. Lin, J. Hu, M.-L. Tseng, A.S. Chiu, C. Lin, Sustainable development in technological and vocational higher education: balanced scorecard measures with uncertainty, J. Cleaner Prod., 120 (2016) 1-12.
462. M.G. Ölçer, D.E. Akyol, A MADM based decision support system for international contractor rating, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 27 (2014) 2163-2175.
463. F.Y. Partovi, R.A. Corredoira, Quality function deployment for the good of soccer, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 137 (2002) 642-656.
464. M. Sagir, Z.K. Ozturk, Exam scheduling: Mathematical modeling and parameter estimation with the Analytic Network Process approach, Math. Comput. Model., 52 (2010) 930-941.
465. B. Simunich, In the Fall of 2002, the ANP had shown a better way to deal with Iraq, Math. Comput. Model., 46 (2007) 1130-1143.
466. P.F. Tafreshi, M.H. Aghdaie, M. Behzadian, M.G. Abadi, Developing a group decision support system for advertising media evaluation: a case in the Middle East, Group Decis. Negotiat., 25 (2016) 1021-1048.
467. H.-W.V. Tang, K. Chang, M.-S. Yin, R.-S. Sheu, Critical factors for implementing a programme for international MICE professionals: a hybrid MCDM model combining DEMATEL and ANP, Curr. Issues Tourism, (2015) 1-24.
468. M. Tavana, K. Khalili-Damghani, R. Rahmatian, A hybrid fuzzy MCDM method for measuring the performance of publicly held pharmaceutical companies, Ann. Oper. Res., 226 (2015) 589-621.
469. M. Tavana, F. Zandi, M.N. Katehakis, A hybrid fuzzy group ANP–TOPSIS framework for assessment of e-government readiness from a CiRM perspective, Inform. Manage., 50 (2013) 383-397.
470. M.-L. Tseng, R.-J. Lin, H.-P. Chen, Evaluating the effectiveness of e-learning system in uncertainty, Ind. Manage. Data Syst., 111 (2011) 869-889.
471. A. Villanueva, J. Gómez-Limón, M. Arriaza, O. Nekhay, Analysing the provision of agricultural public goods: the case of irrigated olive groves in southern Spain, Land Use Policy, 38 (2014) 300-313.
472. H.-J. Wang, Z.-T. Zeng, A multi-objective decision-making process for reuse selection of historic buildings, Expert Syst. Appl., 37 (2010) 1241-1249.
473. H.-Y. Wu, Y.-K. Lin, C.-H. Chang, Performance evaluation of extension education centers in universities based on the balanced scorecard, Eval. Program Plann., 34 (2011) 37-50.
474. D. Ergu, G. Kou, Y. Peng, Y. Shi, A simple method to improve the consistency ratio of the pair-wise comparison matrix in ANP, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 213 (2011) 246-259.
475. E.R. Jalao, T. Wu, D. Shunk, An intelligent decomposition of pairwise comparison matrices for large-scale decisions, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 238 (2014) 270-280.
476. M.S. Ozdemir, Validity and inconsistency in the analytic hierarchy process, Appl. Math. Comput., 161 (2005) 707-720.
477. O. Cooper, I. Yavuz, Linking validation: a search for coherency within the Supermatrix, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 252 (2016) 232-245.
478. K. Kirytopoulos, D. Voulgaridou, A. Platis, V. Leopoulos, An effective Markov based approach for calculating the Limit Matrix in the analytic network process, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 214 (2011) 85-90.
479. L. Mikhailov, M.G. Singh, Fuzzy analytic network process and its application to the development of decision support systems, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. C (Applic. Rev.), 33 (2003) 33-41.
480. G. Dede, T. Kamalakis, T. Sphicopoulos, Theoretical estimation of the probability of weight rank reversal in pairwise comparisons, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 252 (2016) 587-600.
481. B. Zhu, Z. Xu, R. Zhang, M. Hong, Generalized analytic network process, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 244 (2015) 277-288.