Siting MSW landfills using MCE methodology in GIS environment (Case study: Birjand plain, Iran)

Waste Management

Volumn 46, Issue , 2015, Pages 322-337

  Motlagh, Zeynab Karimzadeh ^a   Sayadi, Mohammad Hossein ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRJAND   (Iran)

Author keywords

Analytical Network Process; Municipal solid waste landfill; Ordered Weighted Averaging; Site selection; Weighted Linear Combination

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION; DECISION MAKING; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; LAND FILL; SITE SELECTION; STATISTICAL METHODS; WATER RESOURCES;

ANALYTICAL NETWORK PROCESS; ANALYTICAL NETWORK PROCESSES (ANP); FUZZY LINGUISTIC QUANTIFIERS; MULTI-CRITERIA EVALUATION; MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILLS; ORDERED WEIGHTED AVERAGING; SOCIO-ECONOMIC CRITERION; WEIGHTED LINEAR COMBINATIONS;

MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE;

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; GIS; LANDFILL; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE; NUMERICAL MODEL; SITE SELECTION; SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

AIRPORT; ARTICLE; CASE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM; INDUSTRIAL AREA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; IRAN; LAND USE; LANDFILL; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIOECONOMICS; SOIL PROPERTY; SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT; URBAN AREA; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; THEORETICAL MODEL; WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITY;

BIRJAND; IRAN; SOUTH KHORASAN;

DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; IRAN; MODELS, THEORETICAL; WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES;

EID: 84946498064     PISSN: 0956053X     EISSN: 18792456     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.08.013     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Abessi O., Saeedi M. Site selection of a hazardous waste landfill using GIS technique and priority processing, a power plant waste in Qazvin province case example. Environ. Sci. 2009, 6(4):121-134.
2. Akbari V., Rajabi M.A., Chavoshi S.H., Shams R. Landfill site selection by combining GIS and fuzzy multi criteria decision analysis, case study: Bandar Abbas, Iran. World Appl. Sci. J. 2008, 3(Supple 1):39-47.
3. Ajit P., Singh A., Vidyarthi K. Optimal allocation of landfill disposal site: a fuzzy multi-criteria approach, Iran. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2008, 5(1):25-34.
4. Amiri M.J., Mahiny A.S., Hosseini S.M., Jalali S.Gh., Ezadkhasty Z., Karami Sh. OWA analysis for ecological capability assessment in watersheds. Int. J. Environ. Res. 2013, 7(1):241-254.
5. Azizi A., Malekmohammadi B., Jafari H.R., Nasiri H., Amini Parsa V. Land suitability assessment for wind power plant site selection using ANP-DEMATEL in a GIS environment: case study of Ardabil province, Iran. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2014.
6. Beskese A., Handan Demir H., Kurtulus Ozcan H., Eser Okten H. Landfill site selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS: a case study for Istanbul. Environ. Earth Sci. 2014.
7. Bottero M., Comino E., Riggio V. Application of the analytic hierarchy process and the analytic network process for the assessment of different waste water treatment systems. Environ. Model. Softw. 2011, 26:1211-1224.
8. Boroushaki S., Malczewski J. Implementing an extension of the analytical hierarchy process using ordered weighted averaging operators with fuzzy quantifiers in ArcGIS. Comput. Geosci. 2008, 34:399-410.
9. Boroushaki S., Malczewski J. Using the fuzzy majority approach for GIS based multicriteria group decision-making. Comput. Geosci. 2010, 36:302-312.
10. Curcic S., Tadic D., Pavlovic M., Arsovski S., Milunovic S. Fuzzy multi-criteria model for selecting the Best Location for a Regional Landfill. Rev. Chim. (Bucharest) 2011, 62(8):825-831.
11. Davami A.H., Moharamnejad N., Monavari S.M., Shariat M. An urban solid waste landfill site evaluation process incorporating GIS in local scale environment: a case of Ahvaz city, Iran. Int. J. Environ. Res. 2014, 8(4):1011-1018.
12. Demesouka O.E., Vavatsikos A.P., Anagnostopoulos K.P. Suitability analysis for siting MSW landfills and its multicriteria spatial decision support system: method, implementation and case study. Waste Manage. 2013, 33:1190-1206.
13. Eastman J.R. 2012, (Salman Mahini, A., Kamyab, H., Trans.), Mehr Mahdis Publication, Tehran, pp. 233-246. second ed.
14. Eastman J.R. IDRISI for Windows Users Guide Version Kilimanjaro 2003, Clark Labs for Cartographic Technology and Geographic Analysis, Clark University.
15. Ferretti V., Pomarico S. Ecological land suitability analysis through spatial indicators: an application of the analytic network process technique and ordered weighted average approach. Ecol. Ind. 2013, 34:507-519.
16. Isalou A.A., Zamani V., Shahmoradi B., Alizadeh H. Landfill site selection using integrated fuzzy logic and analytic network process (F-ANP). Environ. Earth Sci. 2012.
17. Jafari H.R., Rafii Y., Ramezani Mehrian M., Nasiri H. Urban landfill site selection using AHP and SAW in GIS environment, case study: Kohkiluye-o-Boyer Ahmad Province, Iran. J. Environ. Stud. 2012, 38(61):37-39.
18. Javaheri H., Nasrabadi T., Jafarian M.H., Rowshan G.R., Khoshnam H. Site selection of municipal solid waste landfills using analytical hierarchy process method in a geographical information technology environment in Giroft, Iran. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2006, 3(3):177-184.
19. Karatepe A., Ikiel C. Analyzing land cover changes of Osmancik (Corum, Turkey) basin with landsat TM images. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. 2013, 37A2:141-146.
20. Khan D., Samadder S.R. Municipal solid waste management using geographical information system aided methods: a mini review. Waste Manage. Res. 2014, 32(11):1049-1062.
21. Khan S., Faisal M.N. An analytic network process model for municipal solid waste disposal options. Waste Manage. 2008, 28:1500-1508.
22. Malczewski J. GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis 1999, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
23. Malczewski J. GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2006, 20(7):703-726.
24. Malczewski J. Integrating multicriteria analysis and geographic information systems: the ordered weighted averaging (OWA) approach. Int. J. Environ. Technol. Manage. 2006, 6(1/2):7-19.
25. Malczewski J. Ordered weighted averaging with fuzzy quantifiers: GIS-based multicriteria evaluation for land-use suitability analysis. Int. J. Appl. Earth Observ. Geoinf. 2006, 8(4):270-277.
26. Malczewski J., Rinner Exploring multicriteria decision strategies in GIS with linguistic quantifiers, a case study of residential quality evaluation. J. Geogr. Syst. 2005, 7:249-268.
27. Malczewski, J., Rinner, 2015. Multiattribute Decision Analysis Methods, pp. 81-121 (Chapter 4).
28. Makropoulos C.K., Butler D. Spatial ordered weighted averaging: incorporating spatially variable attitude towards risk in spatial multi-criteria decision-making. Environ. Model. Softw. 2006, 21:69-84.
29. Moeinaddini M., Khorasani N., Danehkar A., Darvishsefat A.A., Zienalyan M. Siting MSW landfill using weighted linear combination and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) methodology in GIS environment, case study: Karaj. Waste Manage. 2010, 30:912-920.
30. Nas B., Cay T., Iscan F., Berktay A. Selection of MSW landfill site for Konya, Turkey using GIS and multi-criteria evaluation. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2010, 160:491-500.
31. Nishanth T., Prakash M.N., Vijith H. Suitable site determination for solid waste disposal using GIS and RS techniques in India. Int. J. Geometr. Geosci. L 2010, 197-210.
32. Pires A., Chang N.B., Martinho G. An AHP-based fuzzy interval TOPSIS assessment for sustainable expansion of the solid waste management system in Setúbal Peninsula, Portugal. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2011, 56:7-21.
33. Rezazadeh M., Sadati Seyedmahalleh E., Mehrdadi N., Golbabaei Kootenaei F. Landfill site selection for Babol using fuzzy logic method. J. Civ. Eng. Urban. 2014, 4(3):261-265.
34. Saaty T.L. Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytical Network Process 1996, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.
35. Salman Mahini A., Gholamalifard M. Siting MSW landfills with a weighted linear combination methodology in a GIS environment. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 3(4):435-445.
36. Sayadi M.H., Rezaei M.R., Rezaei A. Fraction distribution and bioavailability of sediment heavy metals in the environment surrounding MSW landfill: a case study. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2015, 187(4110):1-11.
37. Sayadi M.H., Rezaei M.R., Rezaei A. Sediment toxicity and ecological risk of trace metals from streams surrounding a municipal solid waste landfill. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2015, 94:559-563.
38. Shepard R.B. Quantifying Environmental Impact Assessments Using Fuzzy Logic 2005, Springer.
39. Tseng M.L. Application of ANP and DEMATEL to evaluate the decision-making of municipal solid waste management in Metro Manila. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2009, 156(1-4):181-197.
40. Yager R.R. On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. 1988, 18(1):183-190.
41. Yager R.R. Quantifier guided aggregation using OWA operators. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 1996, 11(1):49-73.
42. Zadeh L. Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 1965, 50:856-865.
43. Zarghami M., Szidarovszky F., Ardakanian R. A fuzzy-stochastic OWA model for robust multi-criteria decision making. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Making 2008, 7:1-15.