Selection of technology acquisition mode using the analytic network process

Mathematical and Computer Modelling

Volumn 49, Issue 5-6, 2009, Pages 1274-1282

  Lee, Hakyeon ^a   Lee, Sora ^a   Park, Yongtae ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Analytic network process; Technology acquisition mode; Technology strategy

Indexed keywords

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS; TECHNOLOGY;

ACQUISITION MODES; ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; DECISION ATTRIBUTES; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; FINAL DECISIONS; INFLUENTIAL FACTORS; MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKINGS; SOFTWARE COMPANIES; STRATEGIC DECISIONS; STRATEGIC FACTORS; TECHNOLOGY ACQUISITION MODE; TECHNOLOGY STRATEGY;

TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

EID: 59149092461     PISSN: 08957177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcm.2008.08.010     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Davenport S., Campbell-Hunt C., and Solomon J. The dynamics of technology strategy: An exploratory study. R&D Manage. 33 5 (2003) 481-499
2. Ford D. Develop your technology strategy. Long. Range. Plann. 21 5 (1988) 85-95
3. Chiesa V. R&D Strategy and Organization: Managing Technical Change in Dynamic Contexts (2001), Imperial College Press, London
4. Kurokawa S. Make-or-buy decisions in R&D: Small technology based firms in the United States and Japan. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 44 2 (1997) 124-134
5. Cho D.H., and Yu P.I. Influential factors in the choice of technology acquisition mode: An empirical analysis of small and medium size firms in Korean telecommunication industry. Technovation 20 12 (2000) 691-704
6. Hemmert M. The influence of institutional factors on the technology acquisition performance of high-tech firms: Survey results from Germany and Japan. Res. Policy 33 6-7 (2004) 1019-1039
7. Hung S.W., and Tang R.H. Factors affecting the choice of technology acquisition mode: An empirical analysis of the electronic firms of Japan, Korea and Taiwan. Technovation (2007) 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.10.005
8. Gerdsri N., and Kocaoglu D.F. Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to build a strategic framework for technology roadmapping. Math. Comput. Modelling 46 7-8 (2007) 1071-1080
9. Meade L.M., and Presley A. R&D project selection using the analytic network process. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 49 1 (2002) 59-66
10. Saen R.F. A decision model for selecting technology suppliers in the presence of nondiscretionary factors. Appl. Math. Comput. 181 2 (2006) 1609-1615
11. Kumar V., Persaud A.N.S., and Kumar U. To terminate or not an ongoing R&D project: A managerial dilemma. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 43 3 (1996) 273-284
12. Saaty T.L. Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process (1996), RWS Publications, Pittsburgh
13. Shyur H.J., and Shih H.S. A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection. Math. Comput. Modelling 44 7-8 (2006) 749-761
14. Yuksel I., and Dagdeviren M. Using the analytic network process (ANP) in a SWOT analysis: A case study for a textile firm. Inform. Sci. 177 16 (2007) 3364-3382
15. Raisinghani M.S., Meade L., and Schkade L.L. Strategic e-business decision analysis using the analytic network process. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 54 4 (2007) 673-686
16. Wu W.W., and Lee Y.T. Selecting knowledge management strategies by using the analytic network process. Expert Syst. Appl. 32 3 (2007) 841-847
17. Simunich B. The ANP had shown a better way to deal with Iraq. Math. Comput. Modelling 46 7-8 (2007) 1130-1143
18. Saaty T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (1980), McGraw-Hill, New York
19. Meade L.M., and Sarkis J. Analyzing organizational project alternatives for agile manufacturing processes: An analytic network approach. Int. J. Prod. Res. 37 2 (1999) 241-261
20. H. Lee, H. Seol, N. Sung, Y.S. Hong, Y. Park, An analytic network process approach to measuring design change impacts in modular products. J. Eng. Des., doi:10.1080/09544820802232517
21. Kahraman C., Ertay T., and Büyüközkan G. A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 171 2 (2006) 390-411
22. Leung L.C., Lam K.C., and Cao D. Implementing the balanced scorecard using the analytic hierarchy process & the analytic network process. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 57 6 (2006) 682-691
23. Daǧdeviren M., Yüksel İ., and Kurt M. A fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) model to identify faulty behaviors risk (FBR) in work systems. Safety Sci. 46 5 (2008) 771-783
24. Promentilla M.A.B., Furuichi T., Ishii K., and Tanikawa N. A fuzzy analytic network process for multi-criteria evaluation of contaminated site remedial countermeasures. J. Environ. Manage. 88 3 (2008) 479-495
25. Lee J.W., and Kim S.H. Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection. Comput. Oper. Res. 27 4 (2000) 367-382
26. Ustun O., and Demirtas E.A. An integrated multi-objective decision-making process for multi-period lot-sizing with supplier selection. Omega 36 4 (2008) 509-521
27. Lee H., Kim C., Cho H., and Park Y. An ANP-based technology network for identification of core technologies: A case of telecommunication technologies. Expert Syst. Appl. (2007) 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.10.026
28. Roberts E.B., and Berry C.A. Entering new business: Selecting strategies for success. Sloan Manage. Rev. 26 3 (1985) 3-17
29. Moenaert R.K., Desschoolmeester D., de Meyer A., and Barbe J. Organizational strategy and resource allocation for technological turnaround. R&D Manage. 20 4 (1990) 291-303
30. Tyler B.B., and Steensma H.K. Evaluating technological collaborative opportunities: A cognitive modeling perspective. Strategic Manage. J. 16 (1995) 43-70
31. Lowe J., and Taylor P. R&D and technology purchase through license agreements: Complementary strategies and complementary assets. R&D Manage. 28 4 (1998) 263-278
32. Nelson R.R., and Winter S.G. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982), Harvard University Press, Cambridge
33. Pisano G.P. The R&D boundaries of the firm: An empirical analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35 1 (1990) 153-176
34. Poon J., and MacPherson A. Asian firms' technology acquisition strategies in the United States. J. Eng. Technolog. Manage. 42 (2005) 321-342
35. Allred B.B., and Swan K.S. Contextual influences on international subsidiaries' product technology strategy. J. Int. Manage. 10 2 (2004) 259-286
36. Baines T. An integrated process for forming manufacturing technology acquisition decisions. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Man. 24 5 (2004) 447-467
37. Teece D.J. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy 15 6 (1986) 285-305
38. Kogut B. Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Manage. J. 9 4 (1988) 319-332
39. Auster E.R. The relationship of industry evolution to patterns of technological linkages, joint ventures, and direct investment between U.S. and Japan. Manage. Sci. 38 6 (1992) 778-792
40. Cainarca G.C., Colombo M.G., and Mariotti S. Agreements between firms and the technological life cycle model: Evidence from information technologies. Res. Policy 21 1 (1992) 45-62
41. Madhok A. Cost, value and foreign market entry mode: The transaction and the firm. Strategic Manage. J. 18 1 (1997) 39-61
42. Croisier B. The governance of external research: Empirical test of some transaction-cost related factors. R&D Manage. 28 4 (1998) 289-298
43. L. Canez, D. Probert, Technology sourcing: The link to make-or-buy, in: Proceedings of Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology, 1999 pp. 47-52
44. Hamel G., Doz Y.L., and Prahalad C.K. Collaborate with your competitors and win. Harvard Bus. Rev. 89 1 (1989) 133-139
45. Dodgson M. The strategic management of R&D collaboration. Technol. Anal. Strateg. 3 (1992) 227-244
46. Steensma H.K., and Corley K.G. On the performance of technology-sourcing partnerships: The interaction between partner interdependence and technology attributes. Acad. Manage. J 43 6 (2000) 1045-1067
47. Walker G., and Webber D. Supplier competition, uncertainty, and Make-or-Buy decisions. Acad. Manage. J 30 3 (1987) 589-596
48. Baughn C.C., and Osborn R.N. The role of technology in the formation and form of multinational cooperative arrangements. J. High Technol. Manage. Res. 1 2 (1990) 181-192
49. Mahoney J.T. The choice of organizational form: Vertical financial ownership versus other methods of vertical integration. Strategic Manage. J. 13 8 (1992) 559-584
50. Llerena P., and Wolf S. Inter-firm agreements in telecommunications: Elements of an analytical framework. In: Pogoral G. (Ed). Global Telecommunications Strategies and Technical Changes (1994), Elsevier Science, Amsterdam 257-276
51. Veugelers R. Internal R&D expenditures and external technology sourcing. Res. Policy 26 3 (1997) 303-315
52. Chiesa V., and Manzini R. Organizing for technological collaborations: A managerial perspective. R&D Manage. 28 3 (1998) 199-212
53. Rosenbloom R.S., and Cusumano M.A. Technological pioneering and competitive advantage: The birth of VCR industry. Calif. Manage. Rev. 29 4 (1987) 51-76
54. Perrino A.C., and Tipping J.W. Global management of technology. Res. Technol. Mange. 32 3 (1989) 12-19
55. Shan W. An empirical analysis of organizational strategies by entrepreneurial high technology firms. Strategic Manage. J. 11 2 (1990) 129-139
56. Spence M. Cost reduction, competition and industry performance. Econometrica 52 1 (1984) 101-122
57. Veugelers R., and Cassiman B. Make and buy in innovation strategies: Evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms. Res. Policy 28 1 (1999) 63-80
58. Agarwal A., and Shankar R. On-line trust building in e-enabled supply chain. Supply Chain Manage. 8 4 (2003) 324-334
59. Jharkharia S., and Shankar R. Selection of logistics service provider: An analytic network process (ANP). Omega 35 3 (2007) 274-289