Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach

Expert Systems with Applications

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 828-835

  Wu, Wei Wen ^a  

^a TA HWA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Analytic network process (ANP); Decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL); Knowledge management strategy; Mu1tiple criteria decision making (MCDM)

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE DATA PROCESSING; COMPETITION; COMPUTER NETWORKS; DATA MINING; DECISION MAKING; FLOW INTERACTIONS; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION SCIENCE; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS; MODEL STRUCTURES; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; NUMERICAL METHODS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS (ANP); COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES; COMPLEX FACTORS; EFFECTIVE SOLUTION; ELSEVIER (CO); EMPIRICAL STUDIES; EVALUATION CRITERIONS; IN ORDER; KM STRATEGY; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT (KM); MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES; MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING (MCDM) PROBLEM; STRUCTURAL MODEL (SM);

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

EID: 44949142132     PISSN: 09574174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.07.025     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Agarwal A., and Shankar R. Analyzing alternatives for improvement in supply chain performance. Work Study 51 1 (2002) 32-38
2. Benbya H., Passiante G., and Belbaly N.A. Corporate portal: A tool for knowledge management synchronization. International Journal of Information Management 24 3 (2004) 201-220
3. Bierly P., and Chakrabarti A. Generic knowledge strategies in the US pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal 17 4 (1996) 123-135
4. Chung S.H., Lee A.H.I., and Pearn W.L. Analytic network process (ANP) approach for product mix planning in semiconductor fabricator. International Journal of Production Economics 96 1 (2005) 15-36
5. Coulter K., and Sarkis J. Development of a media selection model using the analytic network process. International Journal of Advertising. 24 2 (2005) 193-216
6. Desouza K.C. Strategic contributions of game rooms to knowledge management: Some prelimenary insights. Information and Management 41 1 (2003) 63-74
7. Fontela E., and Gabus A. The DEMATEL observer, DEMATEL 1976 Report (1976), Battelle Geneva Research Center, Switzerland Geneva
8. Gabus A., and Fontela E. World problems an invitation to further thought within the framework of DEMATEL (1972), Battelle Geneva Research Centre, Switzerland Geneva
9. Gabus A., and Fontela E. Perceptions of the World problematique: Communication procedure, communicating with those bearing collective responsibility (DEMATEL Report No. 1) (1973), Battelle Geneva Research Centre, Switzerland Geneva
10. Hansen M.T., Nohria N., and Tierney T. What's your strategy for managing knowledge?. Harvard Business Review 77 2 (1999) 106-126
11. Hess P., and Siciliano J. Management: Responsibility for performance (1996), McGraw-Hill, New York
12. Hori S., and Shimizu Y. Designing methods of human interface for supervisory control systems. Control Engineering Practice 7 11 (1999) 1413-1419
13. Jordan J., and Jones P. Assessing your company's knowledge management style. Long Range Planning 30 3 (1997) 392-398
14. Kahraman C., Ertay T., and Buyukozkan G. A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach. European Journal of Operational Research 171 2 (2006) 390-411
15. Kamara J.M., Anumba C.J., and Carrillo P.M. A CLEVER approach to selecting a knowledge management strategy. International Journal of Project Management 20 3 (2002) 205-211
16. Karsak E.E., Sozer S., and Alptekin S.E. Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach. Computers and Industrial Engineering 44 1 (2003) 171-190
17. Kinosita E. From AHP to ANP. Operations Research of Japan 48 9 (2003) 677-683
18. Lee J.W., and Kim S.H. An integrated approach for interdependent information system project selection. International Journal of Project Management 19 2 (2001) 111-118
19. Leung L.C., Hui Y.V., and Zheng M. Analysis of compatibility between interdependent matrices in ANP. Journal of the Operational Research Society 54 7 (2003) 758-768
20. Maier R., and Remus U. Implementing process-oriented knowledge management strategies. Journal of Knowledge Management 7 4 (2003) 62-74
21. Martensson M. A critical review of knowledge management as a management tool. Journal of Knowledge Management 4 3 (2000) 204-216
22. Massey A.P., Montoya-Weiss M.M., and Holcom K. Re-engineering the customer relationship: Leveraging knowledge assets at IBM. Decision Support Systems 32 2 (2001) 155-170
23. Meade L.M., and Presley A. R&D project selection using the analytic network process. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 49 1 (2002) 59-66
24. Niemira M.P., and Saaty T.L. An analytic network process model for financial-crisis forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting 20 4 (2004) 573-587
25. Opricovic S., and Tzeng G.H. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research 156 2 (2004) 445-455
26. Partovi F.Y. An analytic model to quantify strategic service vision. International Journal of Service Industry Management 12 5 (2001) 476-500
27. Partovi F.Y., and Corredoira R.A. Quality function deployment for the good of soccer. European Journal of Operational Research 137 3 (2002) 642-656
28. Partovi F.Y. An analytic model for locating facilities strategically. Omega 34 1 (2006) 41-55
29. People Management. The people factor. People Management 4 2 (1998) 38
30. Plessis M. Drivers of knowledge management in the corporate environment. International Journal of Information Management 25 3 (2005) 193-202
31. Saaty R.W. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for decision making and the analytic network process (ANP) for decision making with dependence and feedback. Creative Decisions Foundation (2003)
32. Saaty T.L. The analytic network process-decision making with dependence and feedback (1996), RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA
33. Saaty, T. L. 1999. Fundamentals of the analytic network process. The International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Kobe, Japan.
34. Saaty, T. L. 2004. The analytic network process: Dependence and feedback in decision making (Part 1): Theory and validation examples, SESSION 4B: Theory and development of the analytic hierarchy process/analytic network process, In The 17th International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making, August 6-11, 2004 at The Whistler Conference Centre, Whistler, British Columbia, Canada.
35. Sarkis J. A methodological framework for evaluating environmentally conscious manufacturing programs. Computers and Industrial Engineering 36 4 (1999) 793-810
36. Sekitani K., and Takahashi I. A unified model and analysis for AHP and ANP. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan 44 1 (2001) 67-89
37. Shang J.S., Tjader Y., and Ding Y. A unified framework for multicriteria evaluation of transportation projects. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 51 3 (2004) 300-313
38. Shee D.Y., Tzeng G.H., and Tang T.I. AHP, fuzzy measure and fuzzy integral approaches for the appraisal of information service providers in Taiwan. Journal of Global Information Technology Management 6 1 (2003) 8-30
39. Sung T.K., and Gibson D.V. Knowledge and technology transfer grid: Empirical assessment. International Journal of Technology Management 29 3/4 (2005) 216-230
40. Tesfamariam D., and Lindberg B. Aggregate analysis of manufacturing systems using system dynamics and ANP. Computers and Industrial Engineering 49 1 (2005) 98-117
41. Yurdakul M. AHP as a strategic decision-making tool to justify machine tool selection. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 146 3 (2004) 365-376
42. Zack M.H. Developing a knowledge strategy. California Management Review 41 3 (1999) 125-145