Factors in determining wind farm location: Integrating GQM, fuzzyDEMATEL, and ANP

Renewable Energy

Volumn 66, Issue , 2014, Pages 159-169

  Yeh, Tsu Ming ^a   Huang, Yu Lang ^a  

^a DA YEH UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Analytic Network Process (ANP); Fuzzy DEMATEL; Wind power

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; DECISION MAKING TRIAL AND EVALUATION LABORATORIES; EVALUATION CRITERIA; FUZZY DEMATEL; MAJOR FACTORS; PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING; RELATIVE WEIGHTS; RENEWABLE ENERGIES;

DECISION THEORY; ECOLOGY; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ELECTRIC UTILITIES;

WIND POWER;

ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK; DECISION MAKING; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; INSTALLATION; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; WIND FARM; WIND POWER; WIND TURBINE;

EID: 84890873387     PISSN: 09601481     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2013.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Zhao P., Wang J., Xia J., Dai Y., Sheng Y., Yue J. Performance evaluation and accuracy enhancement of a day-ahead wind power forecasting system in China. Renew Energy 2012, 43:234-241.
2. Nadai A. ''Planning'', ''siting'' and the local acceptance of wind power: some lessons from the French case. Energy Policy 2007, 35(5):2715-2726.
3. Wolsink M. Near-shore wind power-protected seascapes, environmentalists' attitudes, and the technocratic planning perspective. Land Use Policy 2010, 27(2):195-203.
4. GWEC Global wind report 2010. Annual market update 2010, 1-60.
5. EWEA Powering the energy debate 2010, 11-54. European Win Energy Association.
6. Lee A.H.I., Chen H.H., Kang H.Y. Mulit-criteria decision making on strategy of wind farms. Renew Energy 2009, 34:120-126.
7. Tegou L.I., Polatidis H., Haralambopoulos D.A. Environmental management framework for wind farm siting: methodology and case study. JEnviron Manag 2010, 91(11):2134-2147.
8. McWilliam M.K., van Kooten G.C., Crawford C. Amethod for optimizing the location of wind farms. Renew Energy 2012, 48:287-299.
9. Groothuis P.A., Groothuis J.D., Whitehead J.C. Green vs. green: measuring the compensation required to site electrical generation windmills in a view shed. Energy Policy 2008, 36:1545-1550.
10. Warren C.R., Lumsden C., O'Down S., Birnie R.V. 'Green On Green': public perceptions of wind power in Scotland and Ireland. JEnviron Plan Manag 2005, 48(6):853-875.
11. Ryunosuke K. Adverse impacts of wind power generation on collision behavior of birds and anti-predator behavior of squirrels. JNat Conserv 2008, 16(1):44-55.
12. Sibille T., Cloquell V.C., Darton R. Development and validation of a multicriteria indicator for the assessment of objective aesthetic impact of wind farms. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2009, 13(1):40-66.
13. Pierpont M.D. Wind turbine syndrome. A report on natural experiment 2010, Pierpont Publication.
14. Kaiser S., Fröhlingsdorf M. The dangers of wind power August 20, 2007, Spiegel Online. http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,%201518,%20500902,00.html.
15. Wallace J.R., Dawson M. O&M safety at the wind farm. Renew Energy Focus 2009, 10(5):28-30.
16. Rodrigues R.B., Mendes V.M. Protection of wind energy systems against the indirect effects of lightning. Renew Energy 2011, 36:2888-2896.
17. Rogers O.G. Siting potentially hazardous facilities: what factors impact perceived and acceptable risk?. Landscape Urban Plan 1998, 39(4):265-281.
18. Berry D. Innovation and the price of wind energy in the US. Energy Policy 2009, 37(11):4493-4499.
19. Chen H.H., Kang H.Y., Lee A.H.I. Strategic selection of suitable project for hybrid solar-wind power generation systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2010, 14(1):413-421.
20. Wolsink M. Wind power implementation: the nature of public attitudes: equity and fairness instead of 'backyard motives'. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2007, 11(6):1188-1207.
21. White paper on Taiwan Industrial Technology 2010, Bureau of Energy, Ministry of Economic Affairs.
22. Jones C.R., Eiser J.R. Understanding 'local' opposition to wind development in the UK: How big is a backyard?. Energy Policy 2010, 38:3106-3117.
23. Basili V., Rombach H. The tame project: towards improvement-oriented software environments. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 1988, 11(6):758-773.
24. Pulford K., Kuntzmann-Combelles A., Shirlaw S. Aquantitative approach to software management: the Ami handbook 1996, Addison-Wesley, Wokingham, England.
25. Macdonell S.G. Deriving relevant functional measures for automated development project. Inform Softw Technol 1997, 35(9):499-512.
26. Khomh F., Vaucher S.P., Gueheneuc Y.G. BDTEX: a GQM-based Bayesian approach for the detection of ant patterns. JSyst Softw 2011, 84:559-572.
27. Tzeng G.H., Chiang C.H., Lin C.W. Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: a novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Syst Appl 2007, 32(4):1028-1044.
28. Tseng M.L. Using the extension of DEMATEL to integrate hotel service quality perceptions into a cause-effect model in uncertainty. Expert Syst Appl 2009, 36(5):9015-9023.
29. Wu W.W., Lee Y.T. Developing global manager's competencies using fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert Syst Appl 2007, 32(2):499-507.
30. Lin C.J., Wu W.W. Acausal analytical method for group decision- making under fuzzy environment. Expert Syst Appl 2008, 34(1):205-213.
31. Wu W.W. Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach. Expert Syst Appl 2008, 35(3):828-835.
32. Hsu C.Y., Chen K.T., Tzeng G.H. FMCDM with fuzzy DEMATEL approach for customers' choice behavior model. Int J Fuzzy Syst 2007, 9(4):236-246.
33. Lin C.L., Tzeng G.H. Avalue-created system of science (technology) park by using DEMATEL. Expert Syst Appl 2009, 36(6):9683-9697.
34. Saaty T.L. Decision making with dependence and feedback: the analytic network process 1996, RWS Publication, Pittsburgh, PA.
35. Ahammeda F., Azeem A. Selection of the most appropriate package of solar home system using analytic hierarchy process model in rural areas of Bangladesh. Renew Energy 2013, 55:6-11.
36. Zheng G., Jing Y., Huang H., Shi G., Zhang X. Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchical process model for building energy conservation assessment. Renew Energy 2010, 35:78-87.
37. Chen F.H., Hsu T.S. Abalanced scorecard approach to establish a performance evaluation and relationship model for hot spring hotels based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DEMATEL and ANP. Int J Hosp Manag 2011, 30:908-932.
38. Liou J.H., Yen L., Tzeng G.H. Building an effective safety management system for airlines. JAir Trans Manag 2008, 14:20-26.
39. Li R.J. Fuzzy method in group decision making. Comput Math Appl 1999, 38(1):91-101.
40. Saaty T.L. The analytic network process 2001, RWS Publication, Pittsburgh, PA.