Integrated approach for interdependent information system project selection

International Journal of Project Management

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 111-118

  Lee, Jin Woo ^a   Kim, Soung Hie ^a  

^a Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING;

MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING (MCDM); ZERO-ONE GOAL PROGRAMMING;

PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0035254107     PISSN: 02637863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00053-8     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Aaker DA, Tyebjee TT. A model for the selection of interdependent R&D projects. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 1978;25(2):30-6.
2. Anadalingam G, Olsson CE. A multi-stage multi-attribute decision model for project selection. European Journal of Operational Research 1989;43:271-83.
3. Apte U, Sankar CS, Thakur M, Turner JE. Reusability-based strategy for development of information systems: implementation experience of a bank. MIS Quarterly 1990;14(4):421-33.
4. Cochrane J.L., Zeleny M., editors. Multiple criteria decision making. Columbia, SC: University South Carolina Press, 1973.
5. Baker NR. R&D project selection models: an assessment. IEEE Trans Engineering Management 1974;21:165-1716.
6. Banker RD, Kauffman RJ. Reuse and productivity in integrated computer aided software engineering: an empirical study. MIS Quarterly 1991;15(3):375-401.
7. Buss MD. How to rank computer projects. Harvard Business Review 1983;61(1):118-25.
8. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Ferguson RO. Optimal estimation of executive compensation by linear programming. Management Science 1955;1(2):138-51.
9. Czajkowski AF, Jones S. Selecting interrelated R&D projects in space technology planning. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 1986;33(1):17-24.
10. Dantzig GB. On integer and partial linear programming problems. The RAND Corporation, June 1958, Paper P-1410
11. Glover F, Woolsey RE. Converting the 0-1 polynimial programming problem to a 0-1 linear problem. Operations Research 1974;22(1):180-2.
12. Dalkey NC. The Delphi method: an experimental study of group opinion. Rand Corp., Res. Pap. RM-5888-PR, June 1969
13. Fahrni P, Spatig M. An application-oriented guide to R&D project selection and evaluation methods. R&D Management 1990;20(2):155-71.
14. Helmer O. Social technology. New York: Basic Books, 1966.
15. King JL, Scherem EL. Cost-benefit analysis in information system development and operation. Comput Surv 1978;10(1):20-34.
16. Keeney RL, Raiffa H. Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value trade-offs. New York: Wiley, 1976.
17. Reza K, Hossein A, Yvon G. An integrated approach to project evaluation and selection. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 1988;35(4):265-70.
18. Linston HA, Turoff M. The Delphi method-techniques and applications. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1975.
19. Lootsma FA, Mensch TCA, Vos FA. Multi-criteria analysis and budget reallocation in long-term research planning. European Journal of Operational Research 1990;47(3):293-305.
20. Lucas HC, Moor JR Jr. A multiple-criterion scoring approach to information system project selection. Infor 1976;14(1):1-12.
21. Muralidhar K, Santhnanm R, Wilson RL. Using the analytic hierarchy process for information system project selection. Information and Management 1990;18(1):87-95.
22. Schneiderjans MJ, Wilson RL. Using the analytic hierarchy process and goal programming for information system project selection. Information and Management 1991;20:333-42.
23. McFarlan FW. Portfolio approach to information systems. Harv Bus Rev 1981;59(5):142-50.
24. Nemhauser GL, Ullman Z. Discrete dynamic programming and capital allocation. Management Sciences 1969;15(9):494-505.
25. Reiter S. Choosing an investment program among interdependent projects. Review of Economic Studies 1963;30(2):32-6.
26. Reiter S, Rice DB. Discrete optimizing solution procedures for linear and nonlinear integer programming problems. Management Science 1966;12(11):829-50.
27. Ringuest JL, Graves SB. The linear multi-objective R&D project selection problem. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 1989;36(1):54-7.
28. Roper-Low GC, Sharp JA. The analytic hierarchy process and its application to an information technology decision. J Opl Res Soc 1990;41(1):49-59.
29. Sanathanam R, Kyparisis GJ. A decision model for interdependent information system project selection. European Journal of Operational Research 1996;89:380-99.
30. Sanathanam R, Kyparisis GJ. A multiple criteria decision model for information system project selection. Computers Ops Res 1995;22(8):807-18.
31. Santhanam R, Muralidhar K, Schniederjans M. A zero-one goal programming approach for information system project selection. Omega 1989;17(6):583-93.
32. Sanathanam R, Schniederjans MJ. A model and formulation system for information system project selection. Computers Operations Research 1993;20(7):755-67.
33. Schniederjans MJ, Sanathanam R. A multi-objective constrained resource information system project selection method. European Journal of Operational Research 1993;70:244-53.
34. Schniederjans MJ, Fowler K. Strategic acquisition analysis: a multi-objective approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society 1989;40(4):333-45.
35. Schniederjans MJ, Kim GY. A goal programming model to optimize departmental preferences in course assignment. Computers and Operational Research 1987;14(2):87-96.
36. Saaty TL, Takizawa M. Dependence and independence: from linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks. European Journal of Operational Research 1986;26:229-37.
37. Shoval P, Luhasi Y. Models for computer system evaluation and selection. Information and Management 1987;12(2):117-29.
38. Sharda R. Linear programming software for personal computers: survey. OR/MS Today 1992;17(6):44-54.
39. Lee SM. Linear programming for decision analysis. Philadelphia, PA: Auerbach Publishers, 1972.
40. Saaty TL. The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
41. Saaty TL. The analytic network process. RWS Publications, 1996
42. Weber R, Werners B, Zimmerman HJ. Planing models for research and development. European Journal of Operational Research 1990;48:175-88.
43. Weingarther HM. Capital budgeting of interrelated projects: survey and synthesis. Management Science 1966;12(7):485-516.
44. Zeleney M. Multiple criteria decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1982.