An integrated approach to concept evaluation in a new product development

Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 991-1005

  Ayağ, Zeki ^a  

^a KADIR HAS UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Analytic network process (ANP); Concept selection; Hot runner systems; Modified TOPSIS; Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM)

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; DESIGN; INTEGRATED CONTROL; PROBLEM SOLVING; PRODUCT DESIGN;

ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; CONCEPT SELECTION; HOT-RUNNER SYSTEMS; MODIFIED TOPSIS; MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING;

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84901739697     PISSN: 09565515     EISSN: 15728145     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-014-0930-7     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Akao, Y. (1990). Quality function deployment: Integrating customer requirements into product design. Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press.
2. Agarwal, A., & Shankar, R. (2003). On-line trust building in e-enabled supply chain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 8(4), 324–334.
3. Ayag, Z. (2002). An analytic-hierarchy-process simulation model for implementation and analysis of computer-aided systems. International Journal of Production Research, 40(13), 3053–3073.
4. Ayag, Z. (2005a). An integrated approach to evaluating conceptual design alternatives in a new product development environment. International Journal of Production Research, 43(4), 687–713.
5. Ayag, Z. (2005b). A fuzzy AHP-based simulation approach to concept evaluation in a NPD environment. IIE Transactions, 37, 827–842.
6. Ayag, Z., & Ozdemir, R. G. (2007). An ANP-based approach to concept evaluation in a new product development (NPD) environment. Journal of Engineering Design, 18(3), 209–226.
7. Ayag, Z., & Ozdemir, R. G. (2011). An intelligent approach to machine tool selection through fuzzy analytic network process. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 22(2), 163–177.
8. Behzadian, M., Kazemzadeh, R. B., Albadvi, A., & Aghdasi, M. (2010). PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 200, 198–215.
9. Briand, L. C. (1998). COTS evaluation and selection. In Proceedings of the international conference on software maintenance, pp. 222–223.
10. Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). Product development: Past research, present findings and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 4, 343–378.
11. Chesbrough, H. W., & Teece, D. J. (2002). Organizing for innovation: When is virtual virtuous? Harvard Business Review, 80, 127–135.
12. Dagdeviren, M. (2008). Decision making in equipment selection: An integrated approach with AHP and PROMETHEE. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 19(4), 397–406.
13. Duffy, A. H. B., Andreasen, M. M., Maccallum, K. J., & Reijers, L. N. (1993). Design co-ordination for concurrent engineering. Journal of Engineering Design, 4, 251–261.
14. Ertugrul, I., & Karakasoglu, N. (2009). Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 702–715.
15. Finger, S., & Dixon, J. R. (1989a). A review of research in mechanical engineering design, part I: Descriptive, prescriptive and computer-based models of design processes. Research Engineering Design, 1, 51–68.
16. Finger, S., & Dixon, J. R. (1989b). A review of research in mechanical engineering design, part II: Representations, analysis, and design for the life cycle. Research Engineering Design, 1, 121–137.
17. Fitzsimmons, J. A., Kouvelis, P., & Mallick, D. N. (1991). Design strategy and its interface with manufacturing and marketing strategy: A conceptual framework. Journal of Operations Management, 10, 398–415.
18. Gates, W. (1999). Business@the speed of sound. Grand Central Publishing.
19. Gorener, A. (2012). Comparing AHP and ANP: An application of strategic decisions making in a manufacturing company. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3, 194–208.
20. Griffin, A., & Hauser, J. R. (1996). Integrating R&D and marketing: A review and analysis of the literature. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13, 191–215.
21. Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple-criteria decision making: Methods and applications, a state of art survey. New York: Springer.
22. Işıklar, G., & Buyukozkan, G. (2007). Using a multi-criteria decision making approach to evaluate mobile phone alternatives. Computer Standards and Interfaces, 29, 265–274.
23. Kahraman, C., Buyukozkan, G., & Ates, N. Y. (2007). A two phase multi-attribute decision-making approach for new product introduction. Information Sciences, 177, 1567–1582.
24. Kang, H. Y., Lee, A. H. I., & Yang, C. Y. (2012). A fuzzy ANP model for supplier selection as applied to IC packaging. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(5), 1477–1488.
25. King, A. M., & Sivaloganathan, S. (1999). Development of a methodology for concept selection in flexible design strategies. Journal of Engineering Design, 10, 329–349.
26. Krishnan, V., & Ulrich, K. T. (2001). Product development decisions: A review of the literature. Management Science, 47, 1–21.
27. Lee, J. W., & Kim, S. H. (2000). Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection. Computers and Operations Research, 27, 367–382.
28. Lin, M. C., Wang, C. C., Chen, M. S., & Chang, C. A. (2008). Using AHP and TOPSIS approaches in customer-driven product design process. Computers in Industry, 59, 17–31.
29. Marsh, S., Moran, J. V., Nakui, S., & Hoffherr, G. (1991). Facilitating and training in quality function deployment. Methuen, MA: GOAL/QPC.
30. Meade, L., & Sarkis, J. (1999). Analyzing organizational project alternatives for agile manufacturing process: An analytical network approach. International Journal of Production Research, 37, 241–261.
31. Okudan, G. E., & Tauhid, S. (2008). Concept selection methods—a literature review from 1980 to 2008. International Journal of Design Engineering, 1, 243–277.
32. Okudan, G. E., & Shirwaiker, R. A. (2012). A multi-stage problem formulation for concept selection for improved product design. In PICMET 2006 proceedings, 9–13 July, Istanbul, Turkey.
33. Onut, S., & Soner, S. (2008). Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment. Waste Management, 28, 1552–1559.
34. Ozaki, T., Lo, M. C., Kinoshita, E., & Tzeng, G. H. (2012). Decision making for the best selection of suppliers by using minor ANP. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(6), 2171–2178.
35. Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (1984). Engineering Design (pp. 119–138). Springer Verlag.
36. Pugh, S. (1991). Total design (pp. 67–85). Reading: Addison-Wesley.
37. Reddy, R., & Mistree, F. (1992). Modeling uncertainly in selection using exact interval arithmetic, DE-Vol. 24, DTM, ASME, Scottsdale, AZ, pp. 193–201.
38. Saaty, T. L. (1981). The analytical hierarchy process. New York: McGraw Hill.
39. Saaty, T. L. (1989). Decision making, scaling, and number crunching. Decision Science, 20, 404–409.
40. Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publication.
41. Saaty, T. L., & Takizawa, M. (1986). Dependence and independence—from linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks. European Journal of Operational Research, 26, 229–237.
42. Scott, M. (2002). Quantifying certainty in design decisions: Examining AHP. In Proceedings of the DETC2002 /DTM-34020, Montreal, Canada.
43. Sheu, J. B. (2007). A hybrid neuro-fuzzy analytical approach to mode choice of global logistics management. European Journal of Operational Research, 189, 971–986.
44. Sharma, S., & Balan, S. (2013). An integrative supplier selection model using Taguchi loss function, TOPSIS and multi criteria goal programming. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24(6), 1123–1130.
45. Shyur, H. J. (2006). COTS evaluation using modified TOPSIS and ANP. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 177, 251–259.
46. Shyur, H. J., & Shih, H. S. (2006). A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 44, 749–761.
47. Taha, Z., & Rostam, S. (2012). A hybrid fuzzy AHP-PROMETHEE decision support system for machine tool selection in flexible manufacturing cell. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(6), 2137–2149.
48. Thurston, D., Carnahan, J., & Liu, T. (1991). Optimization of design utility, DTM-Vol. 31, ASME, Miami, pp. 173–180.
49. Thurston, D. L., & Carnahan, J. V. (1992). Fuzzy ratings and utility analysis in preliminary design evaluation of multiple attributes. Journal of Mechanical Design, 114, 648–658.
50. Triantaphyllou, E. (2000). Multiple-criteria decision making methods: A comparative study. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
51. Tsaur, S. H., Chang, T. Y., & Yen, C. H. (2002). The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM. Tourism Management, 23, 107–115.
52. Ulrich, K. T., & Eppinger, S. D. (2000). Product design and development (2nd ed.). Irwin: McGraw-Hill.
53. Welch, D., & Kerwin, K. (2003). Rick Wagoner’s game plan. Business Week, 52–60.
54. Whitney, D. T. (1988). Manufacturing by design. Harvard Business Review, 66, 83–91.
55. Yurdakul, M. (2003). Measuring long-term performance of a manufacturing firm using analytic network process (ANP) approach. International Journal of Production Research, 41(11), 2501–2529.
56. Zahedi, F. (1986). The analytic hierarchy process: A survey of the method and its application. Interfaces, 16, 96–108.