Development of a risk assessment selection methodology for asset maintenance decision making: An analytic network process (ANP) approach

International Journal of Production Economics

Volumn 170, Issue , 2015, Pages 663-676

  Chemweno, Peter ^a   Pintelon, Liliane ^a   Van Horenbeek, Adriaan ^a   Muchiri, Peter ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b DEDAN KIMATHI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Kenya)

Author keywords

ANP; Asset maintenance; Risk assessment; Selection methodology

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; DECISION THEORY; FAULT TREE ANALYSIS; MAINTENANCE;

ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; ANP; ASSET MAINTENANCES; FAILURE MODE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS; FAULT TREE ANALYSES (FTA); MAINTENANCE DECISION MAKING; ORGANIZATIONAL COMPETENCIES; SELECTION METHODOLOGY;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84959193057     PISSN: 09255273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.03.017     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. J. Aczél, and T.L. Saaty Procedures for synthesizing ratio judgements J. Math. Psychol. 27 1983 93 102
2. N. Arunraj, and J. Maiti Risk-based maintenance policy selection using AHP and goal programming Saf. Sci. 48 2010 238 247
3. C.A. Bana e Costa, and J.C. Vansnick A critical analysis of the eigenvalue method used to derive priorities in AHP Eur. J. Oper. Res. 187 2008 1422 1428
4. Barberá, L., González-Prida, V., Parra, C., Crespo, A., 2012. Framework to assess RCM software tools, In: Proceedings of the ESREL Conference.
5. H.-P. Berg Risk management: procedures, methods and experiences Reliab., Theory Appl. 1 2010 79 95
6. N. Bloom Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM): Implementation Made Simple 2005 McGraw-Hill Education New York
7. A. Braaksma, W. Klingenberg, and J. Veldman Failure mode and effect analysis in asset maintenance: a multiple case study in the process industry Int. J. Prod. Res. 51 2013 1055 1071
8. A. Braaksma, A. Meesters, W. Klingenberg, and C. Hicks A quantitative method for failure mode and effects analysis Int. J. Prod. Res. 50 2012 6904 6917
9. G. Büyüközkan, G. Çifçi, and S. Güleryüz Strategic analysis of healthcare service quality using fuzzy AHP methodology Expert. Syst. Appl. 38 2011 9407 9424
10. B. Cai, Y. Liu, Y. Zhang, Q. Fan, Z. Liu, and X. Tian A dynamic Bayesian networks modeling of human factors on offshore blowouts J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 26 2013 639 649
11. G. Celeux, F. Corset, A. Lannoy, and B. Ricard Designing a Bayesian network for preventive maintenance from expert opinions in a rapid and reliable way Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 91 2006 849 856
12. M. Čepin, and B. Mavko A dynamic fault tree Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 75 2002 83 91
13. I. Chamodrakas, D. Batis, and D. Martakos Supplier selection in electronic marketplaces using satisficing and fuzzy AHP Expert. Syst. Appl. 37 2010 490 498
14. Z. Cheng, X. Jia, P. Gao, S. Wu, and J. Wang A framework for intelligent reliability centered maintenance analysis Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 93 2008 806 814
15. F. Chiacchio, L. Compagno, D. D'Urso, G. Manno, and N. Trapani Dynamic fault trees resolution: a conscious trade-off between analytical and simulative approaches Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 96 2011 1515 1526
16. J. Crocker, and U. Kumar Age-related maintenance versus reliability centred maintenance: a case study on aero-engines Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 67 2000 113 118
17. P.K. Dey, and S.O. Ogunlana Selection and application of risk management tools and techniques for build-operate-transfer projects Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 104 2004 334 346
18. I. Dikmen, M. Birgonul, C. Anac, J. Tah, and G. Aouad Learning from risks: a tool for post-project risk assessment Autom. Constr. 18 2008 42 50
19. R.F. Dyer, and E.H. Forman Group decision support with the analytic hierarchy process Decis. Support. Syst. 8 1992 99 124
20. Echeverry, J.A., Leverette, J., 2004. NAVAIR Reliability Centered Maintenance Compliance with SAE JA1011. Anteon Corporation.
21. M.H. Faber, and M.G. Stewart Risk assessment for civil engineering facilities: critical overview and discussion Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 80 2003 173 184
22. International Electrotechnical Commision, 2009. IEC/ISO 31010:2009, Risk Management - Risk Assessment Techniques.
23. A. Ishizaka, and A. Labib Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process Expert. Syst. Appl. 38 2011 14336 14345
24. S. Jajimoggala, V. Rao, and B. Satyanarayana Maintenance strategy evaluation using ANP and goal programming Int. J. Strateg. Decis. Sci. 2 2011 56 77
25. I.L. Janis Crucial decisions: leadership in policymaking and crisis management Simon Schuster 1989
26. B. Jones, I. Jenkinson, Z. Yang, and J. Wang The use of Bayesian network modeling for maintenance planning in a manufacturing industry Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 95 2010 267 277
27. A. KarimiAzari, N. Mousavi, S.F. Mousavi, and S. Hosseini Risk assessment model selection in construction industry Expert. Syst. Appl. 38 2011 9105 9111
28. N. Khakzad, F. Khan, and P. Amyotte Risk-based design of process systems using discrete-time Bayesian networks Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 109 2013 5 17
29. F.I. Khan, and M.M. Haddara Risk-based maintenance (RBM): a quantitative approach for maintenance/inspection scheduling and planning J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 16 2003 561 573
30. Koronios, A., Nastasie, D., Chanana, V., Haider, A., 2007. Integration through standards-an overview of international standards for engineering asset management, In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Condition Monitoring, Harrogate, United Kingdom.
31. H. Langseth, and L. Portinale Bayesian networks in reliability Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 92 2007 92 108
32. S. Lichtenstein Factors in the selection of a risk assessment method Inf. Manag. Comput. Secur. 4 1996 20 25
33. H.-C. Liu, L. Liu, and N. Liu Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: a literature review Expert. Syst. Appl. 40 2013 828 838
34. T. Lupo A fuzzy ServQual based method for reliable measurements of education quality in Italian higher education area Expert. Syst. Appl. 40 2013 7096 7110
35. P.-K. Marhavilas, D. Koulouriotis, and V. Gemeni Risk analysis and assessment methodologies in the work sites: On a review, classification and comparative study of the scientific literature of the period 2000-2009 J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 24 2011 477 523
36. MIL-STD-1629A, 1980. Procedures for performing a failure mode, effect and criticality analysis.
37. J. Moubray Reliability Centered Maintenance 1997 Industrial Press Inc. New York
38. P.N. Muchiri, L. Pintelon, H. Martin, and A.-M. De Meyer Empirical analysis of maintenance performance measurement in Belgian industries Int. J. Prod. Res. 48 2010 5905 5924
39. S.K. Pinjala, L. Pintelon, and A. Vereecke An empirical investigation on the relationship between business and maintenance strategies Int. J. Prod. Econ. 104 2006 214 229
40. L. Pintelon, and F. Van Puyvelde Asset management: the maintenance perspective 2013 Acco Leuven
41. F. Relex FMEA software Reliab. Stud. 2010 2009
42. T.L. Saaty How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process Eur. J. Oper. Res. 48 1990 9 26
43. Saaty, T.L., 1996. Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process.
44. T.L. Saaty Fundamentals of the analytic network process - multiple networks with benefits, costs, opportunities and risks J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 13 2004 348 379
45. J. Tixier, G. Dusserre, O. Salvi, and D. Gaston Review of 62 risk analysis methodologies of industrial plants J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 15 2002 291 303
46. Y. Tjader, J.H. May, J. Shang, L.G. Vargas, and N. Gao Firm-level outsourcing decision making: a balanced scorecard-based analytic network process model Int. J. Prod. Econ. 147 2014 614 623
47. G.-H. Tzeng, and J.-J. Huang Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications 2011 CRC Press Boca Raton, Florida
48. A. Van Horenbeek, and L. Pintelon Development of a maintenance performance measurement framework - using the analytic network process (ANP) for maintenance performance indicator selection Omega 42 2014 33 46
49. A. Van Horenbeek, L. Pintelon, and P. Muchiri Maintenance optimization models and criteria Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. 1 2010 189 200
50. J. Veldman, W. Klingenberg, and H. Wortmann Managing condition-based maintenance technology: A multiple case study in the process industry J. Qual. Maint. Eng. 17 2011 40 62
51. A. Volkanovski, M. Čepin, and B. Mavko Application of the fault tree analysis for assessment of power system reliability Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94 2009 1116 1127
52. Y.-M. Wang, K.-S. Chin, and Y. Luo Aggregation of direct and indirect judgments in pairwise comparison matrices with a re-examination of the criticisms by Bana e Costa and Vansnick Inf. Sci. 179 2009 329 337
53. P. Weber, G. Medina-Oliva, C. Simon, and B. Iung Overview on Bayesian networks applications for dependability, risk analysis and maintenance areas Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 25 2012 671 682