An integrated DEMATEL-ANP approach for renewable energy resources selection in Turkey

International Journal of Production Economics

Volumn 182, Issue , 2016, Pages 435-448

  Büyüközkan, Gülçin ^a   Güleryüz, Sezin ^a  

^a GALATASARAY UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

ANP; DEMATEL; MCDM; Renewable energy resources

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ENERGY RESOURCES; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FOSSIL FUELS; PROVEN RESERVES; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; DECISION MAKING TRIAL AND EVALUATION LABORATORIES; DEMATEL; EVALUATION MODELING; INTEGRATED FRAMEWORKS; MCDM; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCE (RER);

RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES;

EID: 84989154463     PISSN: 09255273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.09.015     Document Type: Article

References (114)

1. Abdollahi, M., Arvan, M., Razmi, J., An integrated approach for supplier portfolio selection: lean or agile. Expert Syst. Appl. 42 (2015), 679–690.
2. Abu-Taha R. 2011. Multi-criteria applications in renewable energy analysis: a literature review. Technology Management in the Energy Smart World (PICMET), Proceedings of PICMET '11, p.1–8.
3. Adali Aytaç, E., Isik Tuş, A., Integration of DEMATEL, ANP and DEA methods for third party logistics providers' selection. Manag. Sci. Lett. 6:5 (2016), 325–340.
4. Ahmadi, H., Nilashi, M., Ibrahim, O., Organizational decision to adopt hospital information system: an empirical investigation in the case of Malaysian public hospitals. Int. J. Med. Inform. 84:3 (2015), 166–188.
5. Alonso, S., Herrera-Viedma, E., Chiclana, E., Herrera, F., Individual and social strategies to deal with ignorance situations in multi-person decision making. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 8:2 (2009), 313–333.
6. Amer, M., Daim, T., U., Selection of renewable energy technologies for a developing country: a case of Pakistan. Energy Sustain. Dev. 15 (2011), 420–435.
7. Atmaca, E., Başar, H.B., Evaluation of power plants in turkey using Analytic Network Process (ANP). Energy 44 (2012), 555–563.
8. Aras, H., Erdogmus, S., Koc, E., Multi-criteria selection for a wind observation station location using Analytic Hierarchy Process. Renew. Energy 29 (2004), 1383–1392.
9. Azizi, A., Malekmohammadi, B., Jafari, H.R., Nasiri, H., Parsa, V.A., Land suitability assessment for wind power plant site selection using ANP-DEMATEL in a GIS environment: case study of Ardabil province, Iran. Environ. Monit. Assess., 186(10), 2014 6695-670.
10. Bayazit, O., Karpak, B., An analytical network process-based framework for successful total quality management (TQM): an assessment of Turkish manufacturing industry readiness. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 105 (2007), 79–96.
11. Baykasoglu, A., Durmusoglu, Z.D.U., A hybrid MCDM for private primary school assessment using DEMATEL based on ANP and Fuzzy cognitive map. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 7 (2014), 615–635.
12. Bürer, M.J., Wüsstenhagen, R., Which renewable energy policy is a venture capitalist's best friend? Empirical evidence from a survey of international clean tech investors. Energy Policy 37 (2009), 4997–5006.
13. Büyüközkan, G., Feyzioğlu, O., A fuzzy logic based decision-making approach for new product development. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 90 (2004), 27–45.
14. Büyüközkan, G., Öztürkcan, D., An integrated analytic approach for Six Sigma project selection. Expert Syst. Appl. 37:8 (2010), 5835–5847.
15. Büyüközkan, G., Çifçi, G., A novel fuzzy multi-criteria decision framework for sustainable supplier selection with incomplete information. Comput. Ind. 62 (2011), 164–174.
16. Büyüközkan, G., Çifçi, G., A combined fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS based strategic analysis of electronic service quality in healthcare industry. Expert Syst. Appl. 39 (2012), 2341–2354.
17. Chatzimouratidis, A.I., Pilavachi, P.A., Technological, economic and sustainability evaluation of power plants using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Energy Policy 37 (2009), 778–787.
18. Cavallaroa, F., Ciraolo, F., A multicriteria approach to evaluate wind energy plants on an Italian island. Energy Policy 33 (2005), 235–244.
19. Chen, H.-C., Yu, Y.-W., Using a strategic approach to analysis the location selection for high-tech firms in Taiwan. Manag. Res. News 31:4 (2008), 228–244.
20. Chen, J.-K., Chen, I.-S., Using a novel conjunctive MCDM approach based on DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP, and TOPSIS as an innovation support system for Taiwanese higher education. Expert Syst. Appl. 37 (2010), 1981–1990.
21. Chen, Y.-C., Lien, H.-P., Tzeng, G.-H., Measures and evaluation for environment watershed plans using a novel hybrid MCDM model. Expert Syst. Appl. 37:2 (2010), 926–938.
22. Chen, F.-H., Hsu, T.S., Tzeng, G.W., A balanced scorecard approach to establish a performance evaluation and relationship model for hot spring hotels based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DEMATEL and ANP. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 30 (2011), 908–932.
23. Chen, C.-A., Lee, M.-H., Yang, Y.-H., Branding Taiwan for tourism using ‘Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory’ and ‘Analytic Network Process’ methods. Serv. Ind. J. 32:8 (2012), 1355–1373.
24. Chen, F.H., Application of a hybrid dynamic MCDM to explore the key factors for the internal control of procurement circulation. Int. J. Prod. Res. 53:10 (2014), 2951–2969.
25. Chiu, W.-Y., Tzeng, G.-H., Li, H.-L., A new hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR to improve e-store business. Knowl.-Based Syst. 37 (2013), 48–61.
26. Daim, T., Yates, D., Peng, Y., Jimenez, B., Technology assessment for clean energy technologies: the case of the Pacific Northwest. Technol. Soc. 31 (2009), 232–243.
27. Dinica, V., Support systems for the diffusion of renewable energy technologies- an investor perspective. Energy Policy 34 (2012), 461–480.
28. Erdoğmuş, Ş., Aras, H., Koç, E., Evaluation of alternative fuels for residential heating in Turkey using analytical network process (ANP) with group decision making. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 10 (2006), 269–279.
29. Fazli, S., Mavi, R.K., Vosooghidizaji, M., Crude oil supply chain risk management with DEMATEL–ANP. Oper. Res. 15 (2015), 453–480.
30. Gabus, A.Fontela, E. 1972. World problems, an invitation to further thought within the framework of DEMATEL. Switzerland, Geneva: Battelle Geneva Research Centre.
31. Goletsis, Y., Psarras, J., Samouilidis, J.E., Project ranking in the Armenian energy sector using a multicriteria method for groups. Ann. Oper. Res. 120 (2003), 135–157.
32. Govindan, K., Kannan, D., Shankar, M., Evaluation of green manufacturing practices using a hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with PROMETHEE. Int. J. Prod. Res. 53:21 (2015), 6344–6371.
33. Govindan, Shankar, K.M., Kannan, D., Sustainable material selection for construction industry – a hybrid multi criteria decision making approach. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 55 (2016), 1274–1288.
34. Gölcük, I., Baykasoğlu, A., An analysis of DEMATEL approaches for criteria interaction handling within ANP. Expert Syst. Appl. 46 (2016), 346–366.
35. Hepbasli, A., A key review on exergetic analysis and assessment of renewable energy resources for a sustainable future. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 12 (2008), 593–661.
36. Ho, W.-R., Tsai, C.-L., Tzeng, G.-H., Fang, S.-K., Combined DEMATEL technique with a novel MCDM model for exploring portfolio selection based on CAPM. Expert Syst. Appl. 38:1 (2011), 16–25.
37. Horng, J.-S., Liu, C.-H., Chou, S.-F., Yin, Y.-S., Tsai, C.-Y., Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 19:9 (2014), 1044–1069.
38. Hu, S.-K., Lu, M.-T., Tzeng, G.-H., Exploring smart phone improvements based on a hybrid MCDM model. Expert Syst. Appl. 41 (2014), 4401–4413.
39. Huang, C.Y., Shyu, J.Z., Tzeng, G., H., Reconfiguring the innovation portfolios for Taiwan's SIP mall industry. Technovation 27:12 (2007), 744–765.
40. Huang, K.-W., Huang, J.-H., Tzeng, G.-H., New hybrid multiple attribute decision-making model for improving competence sets: enhancing a company's core competitiveness. Sustainability, 8, 2016, 175, 10.3390/su8020175.
41. Hsu, C.-H., Wang, F.K., Tzeng, G.H., The best vendor selection for conducting the recycled material based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 66 (2012), 95–111.
42. Hsu, C.C., Liou, J.J.H., An outsourcing provider decision model for the airline industry. J. Air Transp. Manag. 28 (2013), 40–46.
43. Ishizaka, A., Siraj, S., Nemery, P., Which energy mix for the UK (United Kingdom)? An evolutive descriptive mapping with the integrated GAIA (graphical analysis for interactive aid)-AHP (analytic hierarchy process) visualization tool. Energy 95 (2016), 602–611.
44. Iskin, I., Daim, T., Kayakutlu, G., Altuntas, M., Exploring renewable energy pricing with analytic network process-comparing a developed and a developing economy. Energy Econ. 34 (2012), 882–891.
45. Ju, Y., Wang, A., You, T., Emergency alternative evaluation and selection based on ANP, DEMATEL, and TL-TOPSIS. Nat. Hazards 75 (2015), 347–379.
46. Jeng, D.J.F., Huang, K.H., Strategic project portfolio selection for national research institutes. J. Bus. Res. 68 (2015), 2305–2311.
47. Kabak, M., Dağdeviren, M., Prioritization of renewable energy sources for Turkey by using a hybrid MCDM methodology. Energy Convers. Manag. 79 (2014), 25–33.
48. Kahraman, C., Kaya, I., Cebi, S., A comparative analysis for multi attribute selection among renewable energy alternatives using fuzzy axiomatic design and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Energy 34 (2010), 1603–1616.
49. Kahraman, C., Kaya, İ.A., Fuzzy multi criteria methodology for selection among energy alternatives. Expert Syst. Appl. 37:9 (2010), 6270–6281.
50. Kahraman, C., Kaya, İ., Multi criteria decision making in energy planning using a modified fuzzy TOPSIS methodology. Expert Syst. Appl. 38 (2011), 6577–6585.
51. Karpak, B., Topcu, I., Small medium manufacturing enterprises in Turkey: ananalytic network process framework for prioritizing factors affecting success. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 125 (2010), 60–70.
52. Kaya, T., Kahraman, C., Multi-criteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: the case of Istanbul. Energy 35 (2010), 2517–2527.
53. Kaya, T., Kahraman, C., Multi criteria decision making in energy planning using a modified fuzzy TOPSIS methodology. Expert Syst. Appl. 38:6 (2011), 6577–6585.
54. Kuo, T.C., Hsu, C.W., Li, J.Y., Developing a green supplier selection model by using the DANP with VIKOR. Sustainability 7:2 (2015), 1661–1689.
55. Kuleli, Pak B., Albayrak, Y.E., Erensal, Y.-C., Renewable energy perspective for Turkey using sustainability indicators. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 8:1 (2015), 187–197.
56. Lee, W.-S., Huang, A.Y.H., Chang, Y.-Y., Cheng, C.-M., Analysis of decision making factors for equity investment by DEMATEL and analytic network process. Expert Syst. Appl. 38 (2011), 8375–8383.
57. Lee, S.-F., Lee, W.-S., Promoting the quality of hospital service for children with developmental delays. Serv. Ind. J. 33:15–16 (2013), 1514–1526.
58. Lee, W.-S., Merger and acquisition evaluation and decision making model. Serv. Ind. J. 33:15–16 (2013), 1473–1494.
59. Lee, W.-S., A new hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR for the selection of location – real estate brokerage services. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 13:1 (2014), 197–224.
60. Lee, C.W., Zhong, J., Top down strategy for renewable energy investment: conceptual framework and implementation. Renew. Energy 68 (2014), 761–773.
61. Leete, S., Xu, J, I., Wheeler, D., Investment barriers and incentives for marine renewable energy in the UK: an analysis of investor preferences. Energy Policy 60 (2009), 866–875.
62. Lin, C.L., A novel hybrid decision-making model for determining product position under consideration of dependence and feedback. Appl. Math. Model. 39 (2015), 2194–2216.
63. Liou, J.J.H., Tzeng, G.H., Chang, H.C., Airline safety measurement using a hybrid model. J. Air Transp. Manag. 13:4 (2007), 243–249.
64. Liou, J.J.H., Chuang, Y.-T., Developing a hybrid multi-criteria model for selection of outsourcing providers. Expert Syst. Appl. 37:5 (2010), 3755–3761.
65. Liou, J.J.H., Developing an integrated model for the selection of strategic alliance partners in the airline industry. Knowl.-Based Syst. 28 (2012), 59–67.
66. Liou, J.J.H., Chuang, Y.-C., Tzeng, G.-H., A fuzzy integral-based model for supplier evaluation and improvement. Inf. Sci. 266 (2014), 199–217.
67. Liou, J.J.H., Building an effective system for carbon reduction management. J. Clean. Prod. 103 (2015), 353–361.
68. Liou, J.J.H., Tamošaitienė, J., Zavadskas, E.K., Tzeng, G.H., New hybrid COPRAS-G MADM Model for improving and selecting suppliers in green supply chain management. Int. J. Prod. Res. 54:1 (2016), 114–134.
69. Lin, C.-L., Hsieh, M.-S., Tzeng, G.-H., Evaluating vehicle telematics system by using a novel MCDM techniques with dependence and feedback. Expert Syst. Appl. 37:10 (2010), 6723–6736.
70. Liu, C.-H., Tzeng, G.-H., Lee, M.-H., Improving tourism policy implementation the use of hybrid MCDM models. Tour. Manag. 3 (2012), 413–426.
71. Liu, H.-C., You, J.-X., Zhen, L., Fan, X.-J., A novel hybrid multiple criteria decision making model for material selection with target-based criteria. Mater. Des. 60 (2014), 380–390.
72. Lu, M.-T., Lin, S.-W., Tzeng, G.-H., Improving RFID adoption in Taiwan's healthcare industry based on a DEMATEL technique with a hybrid MCDM model. Decis. Support Syst. 56 (2013), 259–269.
73. Lu, M.T., Tzeng, G.H., Cheng, H., Hsu, C.C., Exploring mobile banking services for user behavior in intention adoption: using new hybrid MADM model. Serv. Bus. 9:3 (2015), 541–565.
74. Lu, M.T., Hu, S.K., Huang, L.H., Evaluating the implementation of business-to-business m-commerce by SMEs based on a new hybrid MADM model. Manag. Decis. 53:2 (2015), 290–317.
75. Nigim, K., Munier, N., Green, J., Pre-feasibility MCDM tools to aid communities in prioritizing local viable renewable energy sources. Renew. Energy 29 (2004), 1775–1791.
76. Nilashi, M., Zakaria, R., Ibrahim, O., Majid, M.Z.A., Zin, R.M., Farahmand, M., MCPCM: a DEMATEL-ANP-based multi-criteria decision-making approach to evaluate the critical success factors in construction projects. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 40 (2015), 343–361.
77. Önüt, S.R., Tuzkaya, U.R., Saadet, N., Multiple criteria evaluation of current energy sources for Turkish manufacturing industry. Energy Convers. Manag. 49 (2008), 1480–1492.
78. Pai, F.-Y., Analyzing consumers' decisions to select micro- invasive aesthetic service providers using a Hybrid method. Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 8:6 (2014), 3071–3083.
79. Pak, K.B. 2011. Multi-criteria decision making for sustainable energy planning in Turkey. Thesis for the degree of doctor of philosophy in engineering management, Marmara University, The Institute for Graduate Studies in Pure and Applied Sciences.
80. Pan, J.-N., Hung, T.N.N., Achieving customer satisfaction through product-service systems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 247:1 (2015), 179–190.
81. Peng, K.-H., Tzeng, G.-H., A hybrid dynamic MADM model for problem-improvement in economics and business. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 19:4 (2013), 638–660.
82. Pohekar, S.-D., Ramachandran, M., Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning – a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 8 (2004), 365–381.
83. Pomerol, J.C., Barba-Romero, S., Multicriterion Decision in Management: Principles and Practice. 2000, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell.
84. Rahman, S., Subramanian, N., Factors for implementing end-of-life computer recycling operations in reverse supply chains. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 140 (2012), 239–248.
85. Saaty, T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process. 1980, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
86. Saaty, T.L., Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: the Analytic Network Process. 1st ed., 1996, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
87. Shen, Y.C., Lin, G.T.R., Tzeng, G.H., Combined DEMATEL techniques with novel MCDM for the organic light emitting diode technology selection. Expert Syst. Appl. 38 (2011), 1468–1481.
88. Shen, K.Y., Tzeng, G.H., A decision rule-based soft computing model for supporting financial performance improvement of the banking industry. Softw. Comput. 19 (2015), 859–874.
89. Strantzali, E., Aravossis, K., Decision making in renewable energy investments: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 55 (2016), 885–898.
90. Talinlı, I., Topuz, E., Akbay, M.U., Comparative analysis for energy production processes (EPP): sustainable energy futures for Turkey. Energy Policy 38 (2010), 4479–4488.
91. Tjader, Y., May, J., H., Shang, J., Vargas, L., Gao, N., Firm-level outsourcing decision making: a balanced scorecard-based analytic network process model. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 147 (2014), 614–623.
92. Trappey, A.J.C., Trappey, C.V., Liu, P.H.Y., Lin, L.C., Ou, J.J.R., A hierarchical cost learning model for developing wind energy infrastructures. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 146 (2013), 386–391.
93. Tsai, W.-H., Chou, W.-C., Selecting management systems for sustainable development in SMEs: a novel hybrid mode l based on DEMATEL, ANP, and ZOGP. Expert Syst. Appl. 36:2 (2009), 1444–1458.
94. Tsai, W.-H., Leu, J.-D., Liu, J.-Y., Lin, S.-J., Shaw, M.J., A MCDM approach for sourcing strategy mix decision in IT projects. Expert Syst. Appl. 37:5 (2010), 3870–3886.
95. Tsai, W.-H., Chou, Y.-W., Lee, K.-C., Lin, W.-R., Hwang, E.T.Y., Combining decision making trial and evaluation laboratory with analytic network process to perform an investigation of information technology auditing and risk control in an enterprise resource planning environment. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 30 (2013), 176–193.
96. Tsai, W.-H., Yang, C.-C., Leu, J.-D., Lee, Y.-F., Yang, C.-H., An integrated group decision making support model for corporate financing decisions. Group Decis. Negot. 22:6 (2013), 1103–1127.
97. Tseng, M.L., Application of ANP and DEMATEL to evaluate the decision making of municipal solid waste management in Metro Manila. Environ. Monit. Assess. 156 (2009), 181–197.
98. Tseng, M.L., Using a hybrid MCDM model to evaluate firm environmental knowledge management in uncertainty. Appl. Softw. Comput. 11 (2010), 1340–1352.
99. Tzeng, G.H., Chiang, C.H., Li, C.W., Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: a novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Syst. Appl. 32:4 (2007), 1028–1044.
100. Tuzkaya, U.R., Yilmazer, K.B., Tuzkaya, G., An integrated methodology for the emergency logistics centers location selection problem and its application for the Turkey case. J. Homel. Secur. Emerg. Manag. 12:1 (2015), 121–144.
101. Ulutaş, B.-H., Determination of the appropriate energy policy for Turkey. Energy 30:7 (2005), 1146–1161.
102. Vujanovic´, D., Momcˇilovic´, V., Bojovic´, N., Papic´, V., Evaluation of vehicle fleet maintenance management indicators by application of DEMATEL and ANP. Expert Syst. Appl. 39 (2012), 10552–10563.
103. Wang, J., Jing, Y., Zhang, C., Zhao, J., Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 13 (2009), 2263–2278.
104. Wang, T.C., The interactive trade decision-making research: an application case of novel hybrid MCDM model. Econ. Model. 29:3 (2012), 926–935.
105. Wang, Y.-L., Tzeng, G.-H., Brand marketing for creating brand value based on a MCDM model combining DEMATEL with ANP and VIKOR methods. Expert Syst. Appl. 39:5 (2012), 5600–5615.
106. Wang, F.-K., Hsu, C.-H., Tzeng, G.-H., Applying a hybrid MCDM model for six sigma project selection. Hindawi Publ. Corp. Math. Probl. Eng. Article ID, 730934, 2014, 13.
107. Wu, W.-W., Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 35:3 (2008), 828–835.
108. Wu, L., Xu, G., Wang, X., Identifying critical factors influencing the disposal of dead pigs by farmers in China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 23 (2016), 661–672.
109. Xydis, G., A techno-economic and spatial analysis for the optimal planning of wind energy in Kythira Island, Greece. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 146 (2013), 440–452.
110. Yang, J.L., Tzeng, G.-H., An integrated MCDM technique combined with DEMATEL for a novel cluster-weighted with ANP method. Expert Syst. Appl. 38:3 (2011), 1417–1424.
111. Yang, Y.-P.O., Shieh, H.-M., Tzeng, G.H., A VIKOR technique based on DEMATEL and ANP for information security risk control assessment. Inf. Sci. 232 (2013), 482–500.
112. Yeh, T.M., Huang, Y.L., Factors in determining wind farm location: integrating GQM, fuzzy DEMATEL, and ANP. Renew. Energy 66 (2014), 159–169.
113. Zolfani, S.H., Ghadikolaei, A.S., Performance evaluation of private universities based on balanced scorecard: empirical study based on Iran. J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 14:4 (2013), 696–714.
114. Zhou, J.-L., Bai, Z.-H., Sun, Z.-Y., A hybrid approach for safety assessment in high-risk hydropower-construction-project work systems. Saf. Sci. 64 (2014), 163–172.