A model for strategic selection of feeder management systems: A case study

International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 421-427

  Chen, Hsing Hung ^a   Lee, Amy H I ^b   Kang, He Yau ^c  

^a MACAU UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Macao)

^b CHUNG HUA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL CHIN YI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Analytic network process; Distribution management system; Energy management system; Feeder management system

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; ENERGY MANAGEMENT; FEEDING;

ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; DISTRIBUTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY; EXISTING ENERGIES; MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; POWER COMPANY; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 77949915376     PISSN: 01420615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2009.09.023     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Kokai Y., Masuda F., Horiike S., and Sekine Y. Recent development in open systems for EMS/SCADA. Int J Electrical Power Energy Syst 20 2 (1997) 111-123
2. Su C.L., Lu C.N., and Lin M.C. Wide area network performance study of a distribution management system. Int J Electrical Power Energy Syst 21 1 (2000) 9-14
3. Crowley L.G., and Hancher D.E. Evaluation of competitive bids. J Construct Eng Manage 121 2 (1995) 238-245
4. Tzeng W.L., Li J.C.C., and Chang T.Y. A study on the effectiveness of the most advantageous tendering method in the public works of Taiwan. Int J Proj Manage 24 (2006) 431-437
5. Makeechev V.A. Hierarchical algorithm of functional modeling for solution of optimal operation. Int J Electrical Power Energy Syst 30 6/7 (2008) 414-427
6. Liang R.H., and Wang Y.S. Fuzzy-based reactive power and voltage control in a distributed system. IEEE Trans on Power Delivery 18 2 (2003) 610-618
7. Bingi P., Sharma M.K., and Godla J.K. Critical issues affecting an SCADA implementation. Inform Syst Manage 16 3 (1999) 7-14
8. Yusuf Y., Gunasekaran A., and Wu C. Implementation of enterprise resource planning in China. Technovation 26 (2006) 1324-1336
9. Nabona N., and Pages A. A three-stage electric power planning procedure for a generation company. Int J Electrical Power Energy Syst 29 5 (2007) 408-421
10. Sarkis J., and Sundarraj R.P. Evaluating componentized enterprise information technologies: a multi-attribute modeling approach. Inform Syst Front 5 3 (2003) 303-319
11. Mulebeke J.A.W., Zhang L., and Analytic network process for software selection in product development: A case s. J Eng Technol Manage 23 (2006) 337-352
12. Saaty T.L. Decision making with dependence and feedback: the analytic network process (1996), RWS Publications, Pittsburgh
13. Lee A.H.I., Chen H.H., and Kang H.Y. Operations management of new project development: innovation, efficient, effective aspects. J Oper Res Soc 60 6 (2009) 797-809
14. Lee AHI, Chang HJ, Lin CY. An evaluation model of buyer-supplier relationships in high-tech industry - the case of an electronic components manufacturer in Taiwan, Comput Ind Eng, in press.
15. Saaty T.L. Fundamentals of the analytic network process-multiple networks with benefits, opportunities, costs and risks. J Syst Sci Syst Eng 13 3 (2004) 348-379
16. Erdogmus S., Kapanoglu M., and Koc E. Evaluating high-tech alternatives by using analytic network process with BOCR and multiactors. Eval Program Plann 28 (2005) 391-399
17. Erdogmus S., Aras H., and Koc E. Evaluation of alternative fuels for residential heating in Turkey using analytic network process (ANP) with group decision-making. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 10 (2006) 269-279
18. Saaty RW. Decision making in complex environment: the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for decision making and the analytic network process (ANP) for decision making with dependence and feedback. Pittsburgh: Super Decisions; 2003.
19. Saaty T.L. The analytic hierarchy process (1980), McGraw-Hill, New York