The decision support framework for developing Ecodesign at conceptual phase based upon ISO/TR 14062

International Journal of Production Economics

Volumn 131, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 4-14

  Kengpol, Athakorn ^a   Boonkanit, Prin ^a  

^a KING MONGKUT'S UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY NORTH BANGKOK   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Analytic network process; Decision support framework; Distance to target; Ecodesign; ISO TR 14062; Sustainable design

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; DECISION SUPPORT FRAMEWORK; DISTANCE-TO-TARGET; ECODESIGN; ISO/TR 14062; SUSTAINABLE DESIGN;

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN; DECISION MAKING; RESEARCH; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

EID: 79952626216     PISSN: 09255273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. G. Altshuller 40 Principles Extended Edition: TRIZ keys to Technical Innovation 2005 Technical Innovation Center, Inc. USA
2. Aoe, T.; 2003a. Development of a factor X (eco-efficiency) tool - study of how to calculate product function. In: Proceedings of Ecodesign 2003, Third International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, Tokyo, Japan, December 811.
3. Aoe, T.; 2003b. Introduction and development of a Factor X (Eco-efficiency) Tool. IEEE on Electronics and Environment & the IAER Electronics Recycling Summit, Electronics Going Green.
4. C. Boks The soft side of Ecodesign Journal of Cleaner Production 14 2006 1346 1356 (Pubitemid 43975775)
5. Boonkanit, P.; Apikajornsin, A.; 2005. The methodology for selected product at conceptual design. Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, International Symposium on Ecodesign, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 242243. (Pubitemid 46402627)
6. H. Brezet, and V. Hemel Ecodesign - A Promising Approach to Sustainable Production and Consumption 1997 Delft University of Technology Delft, Netherlands
7. M. Charter, and M.J. Polonsky Greener Marketing; a Global Perspective on Greening Marketing Practice 2nd ed. 1999 Greenleaf Publishing United Kingdom
8. S.H. Chung, H.I.A. Lee, and W.L. Pearn Analytic network process (ANP) approach for product mix planning in semiconductor fabricator International Journal of Production Economics 96 2005 15 36 (Pubitemid 40135608)
9. K.P. Dey Integrated project evaluation and selection using multiple-attribute decision-making technique International Journal of Production Economics 103 2006 90 103
10. Dou, H.J.M.; 2004. Benchmarking R&D and companies through patent analysis using free databases and special software: a tool to improve innovative thinking. World Patent Information, vol. 26, pp. 297309.
11. F.R. Giudice, and L.G. Risitano A Product Design for the Environment: A Life Cycle Approach 2006 CRC Press USA
12. 2 emissions. International Journal of Production Economics, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.03.005.
13. Heo, Y.; 2001. Methodology for prioritizing DfE STRATEGIES BASED on LCA and AHP. M.S. Thesis. Department of Environmental Engineering, Graduate School of Ajou University, Korea.
14. A. Herrmann, F. Huber, and C. Braunstein Market-driven product and service design: bridging the gap between customer needs, quality management, and customer satisfaction International Journal of Production Economics 66 2000 77 96
15. S.W. Hsiao Concurrent design method for developing a new product International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 29 2002 41 55
16. C.W. Hsu, and A.H. Hu Green supply chain management in the electronic industry International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 5 2 2008 205 216 (Pubitemid 351439774)
17. G. Hu, and B. Bidanda Modelling sustainable product life cycle decision support systems International Journal of Production Economics 122 2009 366 375
18. ISO 14021 Environmental labels and declarations - self declared environmental claims (type II environmental labeling) 1999 International Organisation for Standardisation
19. ISO/TR 14062 Environmental management - integrating environmental aspects into product design and development 2002 International Organisation for Standardisation
20. Karlsson, M.; 2001. Green concurrent engineering: a model for DfE management programs. Doctoral dissertation, Lund University, Sweden.
21. B. Karpak, and I. Topcu Small medium manufacturing enterprises in Turkey: an analytic network process framework for prioritizing factors affecting success Journal of Production Economics 125 2010 60 70
22. A. Kengpol A methodology for group decision support systems: an application in the evaluation of information technology for logistics firms International Journal of Production Economics 101 2006 159 171 (Pubitemid 43003700)
23. A. Kengpol, and C. O'Brien The development of a decision support tool for the selection of advance technology to archive rapid product development International Journal of Production Economics 69 2001 177 191 (Pubitemid 32035377)
24. H. Kobayashi A systematic approach to eco-innovative product design based on life cycle planning Advanced Engineering Informatics 20 2006 113 125
25. Lee, K.M.; Park, P.J.; 2005. Eco Design Best practice of ISO/TR 14062. Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy, Republic of Korea.
26. M. Lindahl Engineering designers' experience of design for environment methods and tools - requirements definitions from an interview study Journal of Cleaner Production 14 5 2006 487 496 (Pubitemid 43107594)
27. C. Mascle, and H.P. Zhao Integrating environmental consciousness in product/process development based on life-cycle thinking International Journal of Production Economics 112 2008 5 17 (Pubitemid 351187911)
28. F.Y. Partovi An analytical model of process choice in the chemical industry International Journal of Production Economics 105 2007 213 227 (Pubitemid 44636208)
29. K.S. Pawar, and H. Driva Performance measurement for product design and development in a manufacturing environment International Journal of Production Economics 6061 1999 60 68
30. PRe' consultants, 1996. The EcoIndicator 95: Manual for Designers. Updated Version, ISBN 90-72130-78-2.
31. Quellal, F.; Schmidt, W.P.; 2003. Integrating environmental aspects into product design and development: the new ISO/TR 14062 - Part 2. Contents and Practical Solutions. In: Proceeding of 2003Gate to EHS: Life Cycle ManagementDesign for Environment, March 17, pp. 17.
32. Ramasesh, R.; Tirupati, D.; Constantin A.V.; in press. Modeling process switching decisions under product life cycle uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.03.011
33. T.L. Saaty Decision Making with Dependence and Feed Back: The Analytics Network Process 1996 RWS Publications USA
34. Sakao, T.; Kaneko K.; Masui, K.; Tsubaki, H.; 2004. Analysis of the characteristics of QFDE and LCA for Ecodesign support. Electronics Goes Green 2004. In: Proceedings of the joint International Congress and Exhibition, Berlin, CD-ROM.
35. nd Report) verifying the applicability by two case studies IEEE 2001 858 863
36. J. Seppälä, and R.P. Hämäläinen On meaning of the distance-to-target weighting method and normalization in life cycle impact assessment International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 6 4 2001 211 218 (Pubitemid 32756335)
37. SETAC Streamlined life-cycle assessment: a final report from the SETAC North America Streamlined 1999 LCA Workgroup, SETAC
38. Sherwin, C.; Evans, S.; 2000. Ecodesign innovation: Is 'Early' Always 'Best'?. In: International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, pp. 112117. (Pubitemid 32394036)
39. G.A. Steven, and J. Burley 3000 Raw ideas=1 commercial success Research Technology Management 3 40 1997 16 27 (Pubitemid 127630921)
40. Tong, L.H.; Cong, H.; Lixiang, S.; 2006. Automatic classification of patent documents for TRIZ users. World Patent Information, vol. 28, pp. 613.
41. M. Weiss, M. Partel, H. Heilmeier, and S. Bringezu Applying distance-to-target weighting methodology to evaluate the environmental performance of bio-based energy, fuels, and materials Resources, Conservation and Recycling 50 2007 260 281 (Pubitemid 46529174)