An analytic network process approach to operationalization of five forces model

Applied Mathematical Modelling

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1783-1795

  Lee, Hakyeon ^a   Kim, Moon Soo ^b   Park, Yongtae ^c  

^a Seoul National University of Science and Technology   (South Korea)

^b Hankuk University of Foreign Studies   (South Korea)

^c Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Analytic network process; Five forces model; Industry analysis; Strategic framework

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; COMPLEX NETWORK MODELS; FIVE FORCES MODEL; NETWORK MODELS; STRATEGIC FRAMEWORKS; STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT; WEB PORTAL;

COMPETITION; INDUSTRY;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS;

EID: 84855697327     PISSN: 0307904X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2011.09.012     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Porter M.E. How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. 1979, 57:137-145.
2. Hax, Wilde D. The Delta model - discovering new sources of profitability in a networked economy. Eur. Manage. J. 2001, 19:379-391.
3. Grundy T. Rethinking and reinventing Michael Porter's five forces model. Strategic Change 2006, 15:213-229.
4. Rugman A.M., Verbeke A. Six cases of corporate strategic responses to environmental regulation. Eur. Manage. J. 2000, 18:377-385.
5. Teece D.J., Pisano G. The dynamic capabilities of forms: an introduction. Technology, Organization and Competitiveness: Respective on Industrial and Corporate Change 1998, Oxford University Press, Oxford. G. Dosi, D.J. Teece, J. Chytry (Eds.).
6. Teece D.J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Manage. J. 1997, 18:509-533.
7. Saaty T.L. Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process 1996, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.
8. Farahani R.Z., SteadieSeifi M., Asgari N. Multiple criteria facility location problems: a survey. Appl. Math. Model. 2010, 34:1689-1709.
9. Lee H., Seol H., Sung N., Hong Y.S., Park Y. An analytic network process approach to measuring design change impacts in modular products. J. Eng. Des. 2009, 21:75-91.
10. Lee H., Lee S., Park Y. Selection of technology acquisition mode using the analytic network process. Math. Comput. Model. 2009, 49:1274-1282.
11. Partovi F.Y. An analytic model to quantify strategic service vision. Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manag. 2001, 12:476-499.
12. Leung L.C., Lam K.C., Cao D. Implementing the balanced scorecard using the analytic hierarchy process and the analytic network process. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2006, 57:682-691.
13. Yüksel I., Daĝdeviren M. Using the fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) for balanced scorecard (BSC): a case study for a manufacturing firm. Expert Syst. Appl. 2010, 37:1270-1278.
14. Chen F.H., Hsu T.S., Tzeng G.H. Balanced scorecard approach to establish a performance evaluation and relationship model for hot spring hotels based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DEMATEL and ANP. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2011, 30:908-932.
15. Asan U., Soyer A. Identifying strategic management concepts: an analytic network process approach. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2009, 56:600-615.
16. Yüksel I., Daĝdeviren M. Using the analytic network process (ANP) in a SWOT analysis: a case study for a textile firm. Inform. Sci. 2007, 177:3364-3382.
17. Porter M.E. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors 1980, The Free Press (Macmillan), New York.
18. Hill C.W.L., Jones G.R. Strategic Management: An Integrated Approach 2004, Houghton, Mifflin, Boston.
19. Saaty T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process 1980, McGraw-Hill, New York.
20. Saaty T.L. Principia Mathematica Decernendi: Mathematical Principles of Decision Making 2009, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.
21. Gencer, Gürpinara D. Analytic network process in supplier selection: a case study in an electronic firm. Appl. Math. Model. 2007, 31:2475-2486.
22. Saaty T.L. Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision Making with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks 2005, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh. third ed.
23. Saaty T.L., özdemir M. The Encyclicon; A Dictionary of Applications of Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback based on the Analytic Network Process 2005, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.
24. Heskett J.L., Sasser W.E., Hart C.W.L. Service Breakthrough: Changing the Rules of the Game 1990, The Free Press, New York.
25. Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P. The balanced scorecard - measures that drive performance. Harvard Bus. Rev. 1992, 70:71-79.
26. Chen J.C.H., Chong P., Chen Y.S. Decision criteria consolidation: a theoretical foundation of pareto principle to porter's competitive forces. J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer. 2001, 11:1-14.