Greenhouse locating based on ANP-COPRAS-G methods - an empirical study based on Iran

International Journal of Strategic Property Management

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 188-200

  Rezaeiniya, Nahid ^a   Zolfani, Sarfaraz Hashemkhani ^b   Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras ^c  

^a Alghadir Institute of Higher Education   (Iran)

^b SHOMAL UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^c VILNIUS GEDIMINAS TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

Analysis network process (ANP); COPRAS G method; Greenhouse locating

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862635631     PISSN: 1648715X     EISSN: 16489179     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3846/1648715X.2012.686459     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Antucheviciene, J., Zakarevicius, A. and Zavadskas, E. K. 2011. Measuring congruence of ranking results applying particular MCDM methods. Informatica, 22(3): 319-338.
2. Ayag, Z. and Ozdemir, R. G. 2009 A hybrid approach to concept selection through fuzzy analytic network process, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 56 1, pp. 368-379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2008.06.011
3. Banias, G., Achillas, C., Vlachokostas, C., Moussiopoulos, N. and Tarsenis, S. 2010 Assessing multiple criteria for the optimal location of a construction and demolition waste management facility, Building and Environment, 45 10, pp. 2317-2326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.04.016
4. Bindu Madhuri, C., Anand Chandulal, J. and Padmaja, M. 2010. Selection of best web site by applying COPRAS-G method. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, 1(2): 138-146.
5. Boran, S., Goztepe, K. and Yavuz, E. 2008. A study on election of personnel based on performance measurement by using analytic network process (ANP). International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 8(4): 333-338.
6. Brauers, W. K. M. and Zavadskas, E. K. 2008. Multi-objective optimization in local theory with a simulation for a department store. Transformations in Business & Economic, 7(3): 163-183.
7. Chatterjee, P., Athawale, V. M. and Chakraborty, S. 2011 Materials selection using complex proportional assessment and evaluation of mixed data methods, Materials & Design, 32 2, pp. 851-860. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2010.07.010
8. Chou, T. Y., Hsu, C. L. and Chen, M. C. 2008 A fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for international tourist hotels location selection, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 27 2, pp. 293-301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2007.07.029
9. Dagdeviren, M. 2010 A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model for personnel selection in manufacturing systems, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 21 4, pp. 451-460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10845-008-0200-7
10. Dagdeviren, M., Yuksel, I. and Kurt, M. 2008 A fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) model to identify faulty behavior risk (FBR) in work system, Safety Science, 46 5, pp. 771-783. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2007.02.002
11. Datta, S., Beriha, G. S., Patnaik, B. and Mahapatra, S. S. 2009. Use of compromise ranking method for supervisor selection: a multi criteria decision making (MCDM) approach. International Journal of Vocational and Technical Education, 1(1): 7-13.
12. Figueira, J., Greco, S. and Ehrgott, M. (Eds) 2005 Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. New York: Springer.
13. Ginevičius, R. and Podvezko, V. 2008 Multi-criteria evaluation of Lithuanian banks from the perspective of their reliability for clients, Journal of Business Economics and Management, 9 4, pp. 257-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1611-1699.2008.9.257-267
14. Gundogdu, C. E. 2011. Selection of facility location under environmental damage priority and using ELECTRE method. Journal of Environmental Biology, 32(2): 221-226.
15. Guneri, A. F., Cengiz, M. and Seker, S. 2009 A fuzzy ANP approach to shipyard location selection, Expert Systems with Applications, 36 4, pp. 7992-7999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.059
16. Hasandokht, M. 2005 Greenhouse management (greenhouse product technologies), 1st Edition. Marzedanesh publication, pp. 31-35. In Persian
17. Hwang, C. L. and Yoon, K. 1981. "Multiple attribute decision making: a state of the art survey". In Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 186, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
18. Jaafarnia, S. and Homaei, M. 2009 Comprehensive and illustrated guide, Greenhouse cultivation of cucumbers and tomatoes, 7th Edition. Iran green agriculture school, pp. 2-10. In Persian
19. Kaya, I. 2011. Multicriteria location selection of wastewater treatment plant by fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Multiple-Valued Logic and Soft Computing, 17(4): 305-320.
20. Kapliński, O. and Tupenaite, L. 2011. Review of the multiple criteria decision making methods, intelligent and biometric systems applied in modern construction economics. Transformations in Business & Economics, 10(1): 166-181.
21. Kapliński, O. and Tamosaitiene, J. 2010 Game theory applications in construction engineering and management, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16 2, pp. 348-363. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/tede.2010.22
22. Kuo, M. S. 2011 Optimal location selection for an international distribution center by using a new hybrid method, Expert Systems with Applications, 38 6, pp. 7208-7221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.002
23. Liang, C. and Li, Q. 2007 Enterprise information system project selection with regard to BOCR, International Journal of Project Management, 26 8, pp. 810-820. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.11.001
24. Mallozzi, L. 2011 Cooperative games in facility location situations with regional fixed costs, Optimization Letters, 5 1, pp. 173-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11590-010-0200-3
25. Medineckiene, M. and Björk, F. 2011 Owner preferences regarding renovation measures-the demonstration of using multi-criteria decision making, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 17 2, pp. 284-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2011.582380
26. Mollahoseini, H. and Seylsepur, M. 2008 Greenhouse production management, 1st Edition. Sarva publication. In Persian
27. Önüt, S., Kara, S. and Tugba, E. 2008 A hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach to machine tool selection, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 19 4, pp. 443-453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10845-008-0095-3
28. Önüt, S. and Soner, S. 2008 Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment, Waste Management, 28 9, pp. 1552-1559. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.05.019
29. Önüt, S., Efendigil, T. and Kara, S. S. 2010 A combined fuzzy MCDM approach for selecting shopping center site: an example from Istanbul, Turkey, Expert Systems with Applications, 37 3, pp. 1973-1980. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.06.080
30. Ozcan, T., Çelebi, N. and Esnaf Ş. 2011 Comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision making methodologies and implementation of a ware-house location selection problem, Expert Systems with Applications, 38 8, pp. 9773-9779. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.022
31. Peldschus, F., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. and Tamosaitiene, J. 2010. Sustainable assessment of construction site by applying game theory. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 21(3): 223-237.
32. Podvezko, V. 2011. The comparative analysis of MCDA methods SAW and COPRAS. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 22(2): 134-146.
33. nd IEEE international conference on emergency management and management sciences (ICEMMS), Beijing 2011, pp. 547-550.
34. Saaty, T. L. 1996. Decision making with dependence and feedback the analytic network process, Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.
35. Saaty, T. L. and Takizawa, M. 1986 Dependence and independence: from linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks, European Journal of Operational Research, 26 2, pp. 229-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(86)90184-0
36. Saaty, T. L. 1999 Fundamentals of the analytic network process, ISAHP, 12-14 August, 1999, Kobe, pp. 348-379.
37. Saaty, T. L. 2001. Making with dependence and feedback, 2nd Edition, Pittsburg: RWS Publication.
38. Saaty, T. L. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process, New York: McGraw-Hill.
39. Saaty, T. L. and Vargas, L. G. 2006. Decision making with the analytic network process, Springer.
40. Saaty, T. L. 2005. Theory and applications of the analytic network process: decision making with benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks, Pittsburg: RWS Publications.
41. Tamosaitiene, J., Bartkiene, L. and Vilutiene, T. 2010 The new development trend of operational research in civil engineering and sustainable development as a result of collaboration between German-Lithuanian-Polish scientific triangle, Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11 2, pp. 316-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2010.16
42. Tupenaite, L., Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A., Turskis, Z. and Seniut, M. 2010 Multiple criteria assessment of alternatives for built and human environment renovation, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 16 2, pp. 257-266. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2010.30
43. Turskis, Z. and Zavadskas, E. K. 2010 A new fuzzy additive ratio assessment method (ARAS-F). Case study: the analysis of fuzzy multiple criteria in order to select the logistic centers location, Transport, 25 4, pp. 423-432. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/transport.2010.52
44. Uzsilaityte, L. and Martinaitis, V. 2010 Search for optimal solution of public building renovation in terms of life cycle, Journal of Environment Engineering and Landscape Management, 18 2, pp. 102-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/jeelm.2010.12
45. Vahidnia, M. H., Alesheikh, A. A. and Alimohammadi, A. 2009 Hospital site selection using fuzzy AHP and its derivatives, Journal of Environmental Management, 90 10, pp. 3048-3056. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.04.010
46. Weber, P. and Chapman, D. 2011 Location intelligence: an innovative approach to business location decision-making, Transactions in GIS, 15 3, pp. 309-328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9671.2011.01253.x
47. Yazgan, H. R. 2010 Selection of dispatching rules with fuzzy ANP approach, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 52 5-8, pp. 651-667. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2739-7
48. Zavadskas, E. K. and Turskis, Z. 2011 Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 17 2, pp. 397-427. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2011.593291
49. Zavadskas, E. K. and Kaklauskas, A. 1996 Determination of an efficient contractor by using the new method of multi criteria assessment. In: Langford, D. A. and Retik, A. (eds.), International symposium for "The organization and management of construction". Shaping theory and practice. Vol. 2: Managing the construction project and managing risk. CIB W 65; London, Weinheim, New York, Tokyo, Melbourne, Madras. London: E and FN SPON, pp. 94-104.
50. Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A., Peldschus, F. and Turskis, Z. 2007. Multi-attribute assessment of road design solutions by using the COPRAS method. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 2(4): 195-203.
51. Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A., Turskis, Z. and Tamosaitiene, J. 2008 Selection of the effective dwelling house walls by applying attributes values determined at intervals, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 14 2, pp. 85-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1392-3730.2008.14.3
52. Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A., Turskis, Z. and Tamosaitiene, J. 2009. Multi-attribute decision-making model by applying grey numbers. Informatica, 20(2): 305-320.
53. Zavadskas, E. K., Ustinovichius, L. and Stasiulionis, A. 2004 Multicriteria valuation of commercial construction projects for investment purposes, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 10 2, pp. 151-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13923730.2004.9636299
54. Zopounidis, C. and Doumpos, M. 2002 Multi-criteria decision aid in financial decision making: methodologies and literature review, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 11 4-5, pp. 167-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mcda.333