Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach

Computers and Industrial Engineering

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 171-190

  Karsak, E ^a   Sozer, Sevin ^a   Alptekin, S ^a  

^a GALATASARAY UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Analytic network process; Dependence; House of quality; Quality function deployment; Zero one goal programming

Indexed keywords

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; PRODUCT DESIGN; QUALITY CONTROL;

QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT (QFD);

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 0037209876     PISSN: 03608352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0360-8352(02)00191-2     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Akao, Y (1997). QFD: Past, present, and future. Proceedings of the International Symposium on QFD'97, Linköping.
2. Armacost R.L., Componation P.J., Mullens M.A., Swart W.W. An AHP framework for prioritizing customer requirements in QFD: An industrialized housing application. IIE Transactions. 26:(4):1994;72-79.
3. Badri M.A. Combining the analytic hierarchy process and goal programming for global facility location-allocation problem. International Journal of Production Economics. 62:1999;237-248.
4. Chan L.K., Kao H.P., Ng A., Wu M.L. Rating the importance of customer needs in quality function deployment by fuzzy and entropy methods. International Journal of Production Research. 37:(11):1999;2499-2518.
5. Cohen L. Quality function deployment: How to make QFD work for you. 1995;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
6. El-Gayar O.F., Leung P.S. A multiple criteria decision making framework for regional aquaculture development. European Journal of Operational Research. 133:2001;462-482.
7. Griffin A., Hauser J.R. The voice of customer. Marketing Science. 12:(1):1993;1-27.
8. Hauser J.R., Clausing D. The house of quality. Harvard Business Review. 66:1988;63-73.
9. Khoo L.P., Ho N.C. Framework of a fuzzy quality function deployment system. International Journal of Production Research. 34:(2):1996;299-311.
10. Kogure M., Akao Y. Quality function deployment and company wide quality control in Japan: A strategy for assuring that quality is built into products. Quality Progress. 1983;25-29.
11. Lee J.W., Kim S.H. Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection. Computers and Operations Research. 27:2000;367-382.
12. Lu M., Madu C.N., Kuei C., Winokur D. Integrating QFD, AHP, and benchmarking in strategic marketing. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing. 9:(1):1994;41-50.
13. Park T., Kim K. Determination of an optimal set of design requirements using house of quality. Journal of Operations Management. 16:1998;569-581.
14. Prasad B. Review of QFD and related deployment techniques. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. 17:(3):1998;221-234.
15. Saaty T.L. New York. New York. 1980;McGraw-Hill, New York.
16. Saaty T.L. Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process. 1996;RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.
17. Saaty T.L., Takizawa M. Dependence and independence: From linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks. European Journal of Operational Research. 26:1986;229-237.
18. Saaty T.L., Vargas L.G. Diagnosis with dependent symptoms: Bayes theorem and the analytic hierarchy process. Operations Research. 46:(4):1998;491-502.
19. Schniederjans M.J. Goal programming: Methodology and applications. 1995;Kluwer, Norwell.
20. Schniederjans M.J., Garvin T. Using the analytic hierarchy process and multi-objective programming for the selection of cost drivers in activity-based costing. European Journal of Operational Research. 100:1997;72-80.
21. Shillito M.L. Advanced QFD -- Linking technology to market and company needs. 1994;Wiley, New York.
22. Wasserman G.S. On how to prioritize design requirements during the QFD planning process. IIE Transactions. 25:(3):1993;59-65.