Evaluating the risk of failure modes with a hybrid MCDM model under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environments

Computers and Industrial Engineering

Volumn 102, Issue , 2016, Pages 175-185

  Wang, Li En ^a   Liu, Hu Chen ^a,b   Quan, Mei Yun ^a  

^a SHANGHAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

ANP; COPRAS; Failure mode and effect analysis; Healthcare risk analysis; Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; COMPLEX NETWORKS; DECISION MAKING; FUZZY SETS; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUE; COMPLEX PROPORTIONAL ASSESSMENTS; COPRAS; FAILURE MODE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS; INTERVAL-VALUED INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SETS; INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING PROBLEMS;

FAILURE MODES;

EID: 84994791954     PISSN: 03608352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2016.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Atanassov, K.T., Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 20:1 (1986), 87–96.
2. Atanassov, K., Gargov, G., Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 31:3 (1989), 343–349.
3. Bowles, J.B., Peláez, C.E., Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 50:2 (1995), 203–213.
4. Braglia, M., Frosolini, M., Montanari, R., Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 19:5 (2003), 425–443.
5. Chen, T.Y., An interval type-2 fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solutions using a likelihood-based comparison approach for multiple criteria decision analysis. Computers & Industrial Engineering 85 (2015), 57–72.
6. Chen, T.Y., The inclusion-based TOPSIS method with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets for multiple criteria group decision making. Applied Soft Computing 26 (2015), 57–73.
7. Chen, P.S., Wu, M.T., A modified failure mode and effects analysis method for supplier selection problems in the supply chain risk environment: A case study. Computers & Industrial Engineering 66:4 (2013), 634–642.
8. Dağsuyu, C., Göçmen, E., Narlı, M., Kokangül, A., Classical and fuzzy FMEA risk analysis in a sterilization unit. Computers & Industrial Engineering 101 (2016), 286–294.
9. Fouladgar, M.M., Yazdani-Chamzini, A., Lashgari, A., Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., Maintenance strategy selection using AHP and COPRAS under fuzzy environment. International Journal of Strategic Property Management 16:1 (2012), 85–104.
10. Garg, H., A new generalized improved score function of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and applications in expert systems. Applied Soft Computing 38 (2016), 988–999.
11. Geum, Y., Cho, Y., Park, Y., A systematic approach for diagnosing service failure: Service-specific FMEA and grey relational analysis approach. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 54:11–12 (2011), 3126–3142.
12. Hague, R.K., Barker, K., Ramirez-Marquez, J.E., Interval-valued availability framework for supplier selection based on component importance. International Journal of Production Research 53:20 (2015), 6083–6096.
13. Ko, W.C., Exploiting 2-tuple linguistic representational model for constructing HOQ-based failure modes and effects analysis. Computers & Industrial Engineering 64:3 (2013), 858–865.
14. Kouchaksaraei, R.H., Zolfani, S.H., Golabchi, M., Glasshouse locating based on SWARA-COPRAS approach. International Journal of Strategic Property Management 19:2 (2015), 111–122.
15. Li, D.F., Extension principles for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and algebraic operations. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making 10:1 (2010), 45–58.
16. Lijesh, K.P., Muzakkir, S.M., Hirani, H., Failure mode and effect analysis of passive magnetic bearing. Engineering Failure Analysis 62 (2016), 1–20.
17. Liou, J.J.H., Tamošaitienė, J., Zavadskas, E.K., Tzeng, G.-H., New hybrid COPRAS-G MADM Model for improving and selecting suppliers in green supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research 54:1 (2015), 114–134.
18. Liu, H.C., FMEA using uncertainty theories and MCDM methods. 2016, Springer, Singapore.
19. Liu, H.C., Chen, Y.Z., You, J.X., Li, H., Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy digraph and matrix approach. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 27 (2016), 805–816.
20. Liu, H.C., Fan, X.J., Li, P., Chen, Y.Z., Evaluating the risk of failure modes with extended MULTIMOORA method under fuzzy environment. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 34 (2014), 168–177.
21. Liu, H.C., Liu, L., Li, P., Failure mode and effects analysis using intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid weighted Euclidean distance operator. International Journal of Systems Science 45:10 (2014), 2012–2030.
22. Liu, H.C., Liu, L., Liu, N., Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review. Expert Systems with Applications 40:2 (2013), 828–838.
23. Liu, H.C., You, J.X., Lin, Q.L., Li, H., Risk assessment in system FMEA combining fuzzy weighted average with fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 28:7 (2014), 701–714.
24. Liu, H.C., You, J.X., Shan, M.M., Shao, L.N., Failure mode and effects analysis using intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid TOPSIS approach. Soft Computing 19:4 (2015), 1085–1098.
25. Liu, H.C., You, J.X., You, X.Y., Evaluating the risk of healthcare failure modes using interval 2-tuple hybrid weighted distance measure. Computers & Industrial Engineering 78 (2014), 249–258.
26. Mulliner, E., Malys, N., Maliene, V., Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability. Omega 59 (2016), 146–156.
27. Nguyen, H., A new interval-valued knowledge measure for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and application in decision making. Expert Systems with Applications 56 (2016), 143–155.
28. Qi, X., Liang, C., Zhang, J., Generalized cross-entropy based group decision making with unknown expert and attribute weights under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Computers & Industrial Engineering 79 (2015), 52–64.
29. Rabbani, A., Zamani, M., Yazdani-Chamzini, A., Zavadskas, E.K., Proposing a new integrated model based on sustainability balanced scorecard (SBSC) and MCDM approaches by using linguistic variables for the performance evaluation of oil producing companies. Expert Systems with Applications 41:16 (2014), 7316–7327.
30. Saaty, T.L., Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process. 1996, RWS publications, Pittsburgh.
31. Safari, H., Faraji, Z., Majidian, S., Identifying and evaluating enterprise architecture risks using FMEA and fuzzy VIKOR. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 27:2 (2016), 475–486.
32. Singh, D., Dar, B.A., Kim, D.S., KKT optimality conditions in interval valued multiobjective programming with generalized differentiable functions. European Journal of Operational Research 254:1 (2016), 29–39.
33. Song, W., Ming, X., Wu, Z., Zhu, B., A rough TOPSIS approach for failure mode and effects analysis in uncertain environments. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 30:4 (2014), 473–486.
34. Stamatis, D.H., Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution. 2003, ASQ Quality Press, New York.
35. Uygun, Ö., Kaçamak, H., Kahraman, Ü.A., An integrated DEMATEL and fuzzy ANP techniques for evaluation and selection of outsourcing provider for a telecommunication company. Computers & Industrial Engineering 86 (2015), 137–146.
36. Wan, S.P., Xu, G.L., Wang, F., Dong, J.Y., A new method for Atanassov's interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy MAGDM with incomplete attribute weight information. Information Sciences 316 (2015), 329–347.
37. Wang, W., Xiong, J., Xie, M., A study of interval analysis for cold-standby system reliability optimization under parameter uncertainty. Computers & Industrial Engineering 97 (2016), 93–100.
38. Xu, Z.S., An overview of methods for determining OWA weights. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 20:8 (2005), 843–865.
39. Xu, Z.S., Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 15:6 (2007), 1179–1187.
40. Xu, Z.S., Methods for aggregating interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to decision making. Control Decision 22:2 (2007), 215–219.
41. Xu, Z.S., Chen, J., Approach to group decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic judgment matrices. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice 27:4 (2007), 126–133.
42. Xu, X., Zhang, Z., Xu, D., Chen, Y., Interval-valued evidence updating with reliability and sensitivity analysis for fault diagnosis. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems 9:3 (2016), 396–415.
43. Xue, Y.X., You, J.X., Lai, X.D., Liu, H.C., An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy MABAC approach for material selection with incomplete weight information. Applied Soft Computing 38 (2016), 703–713.
44. Zavadskas, E., Kaklauskas, A., Sarka, V., The new method of multicriteria complex proportional assessment of projects. Technological and Economic Development of Economy 1:3 (1994), 131–139.
45. Zhang, E., Chen, Q., Multi-objective reliability redundancy allocation in an interval environment using particle swarm optimization. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 145 (2016), 83–92.
46. Zhang, X.L., Xu, Z.S., Soft computing based on maximizing consensus and fuzzy TOPSIS approach to interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making. Applied Soft Computing 26 (2015), 42–56.
47. Zhao, H., You, J.X., Liu, H.C., Failure mode and effect analysis using MULTIMOORA method with continuous weighted entropy under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Soft Computing, 2016, 10.1007/s00500-016-2118-x.