Across Borders and Technologies: Advancements in Virtual Teams Research

The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Psychology

Volumn 2, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Kirkman, Bradley L ^a   Gibson, Cristina B ^b   Kim, Kwanghyun ^c  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^c Korea University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Computer mediated communication; Knowledge work; Teams; Virtual teams; Virtuality

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925145424     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199928286.013.0025     Document Type: Chapter

References (237)

1. Ahn, H. J., Lee, H. J., Cho, K., & Park, S. J., (2005). Utilizing knowledge context in virtual collaborative work. Decision Support Sciences, 39, 563-582.
2. Ahuja, M. K., & Galvin, J. E., (2003). Socialization in virtual groups. Journal of Management, 29, 161-185.
3. Aiello, J. R., & Kolb, K. J., (1995). Electronic performance monitoring and social context: Impact on productivity and stress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 339-353.
4. Alge, B. J., Ballinger, G. A., & Green, S. G., (2004). Remote control: Predictors of electronic intensity and secrecy. Personnel Psychology, 57, 377-410.
5. Alge, B. J., Wiethoff, C., & Klein, H. J., (2003). When does the medium matter? Knowledge-building experiences and opportunities in decision making teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 26-37.
6. Anawati, D., & Craig, A., (2006). Behavioral adaptation within cross-cultural virtual teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 49, 44-56.
7. Andersen, T. J., (2005). The performance effect of computer-mediated communication and decentralized strategic decision making. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1059-1067.
8. Andres, H. P., (2002). A comparison of face-to-face and virtual software development teams. Team Performance Management, 8, 39-48.
9. Aubert, B. A., & Kelsey, B. L., (2003). Further understanding of trust and performance in virtual teams. Small Group Research, 34, 575-618.
10. Baba, M. L., Gluesing, J., Ratner, H., & Wagner, K. H., (2004). The contexts of knowing: Natural history of a globally distributed team. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 547-587.
11. Baker, G., (2002). The effects of synchronous collaborative technologies on decision making: A study of virtual teams. Information Resources Management Journal, 15, 79-93.
12. Barkhi, R., (2005). Information exchange and induced cooperation in group decision support systems. Communication Research, 32, 646-678.
13. Baskerville, R., & Nandhakumar, J., (2007). Activating and perpetuating virtual teams: Now that we're mobile, where do we go? IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 50, 17-34.
14. Beal, D. J., Cohen, R. R., Burke, M. J., & McLendon, C. L., (2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 989-1004.
15. Becker-Beck, U., Wintermantel, M., & Borg, A., (2005). Principles in regulating interaction in teams practicing face-to-face communication versus teams practicing computer-mediated communication. Small Group Research, 36, 499-536.
16. Belanger, F., & Watson-Manheim, M. B., (2006). Virtual team and multiple media: Structuring media use to attain strategic goals. Group Decision and Negotiation, 15, 299-321.
17. Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J., (2002). A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group & Organization Management, 27, 14-49.
18. Bhappu, A. D., Griffith, T. L., & Northcraft, G. B., (1997). Media effects and communication bias in diverse groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 199-205.
19. Blackburn, R. S., Furst, S. A., & Rosen, B., (2003). Building a winning virtual team. In C. B. Gibson & S. G. Cohen (Eds.), Virtual teams that work: Creating the conditions for virtual team effectiveness (pp. 95-120). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20. Boh, W. F., Ren, Y., Kiesler, S., & Bussjaeger, R., (2007). Expertise and collaboration in the geographically dispersed organization. Organization Science, 18, 595-612.
21. Bordia, P., DiFonzo, N., & Chang, A., (1999). Rumor as group problem solving: Development patterns in informal computer-mediated groups. Small Group Research, 30, 8-28.
22. Bosch-Sijtsema, P., (2007). The impact of individual expectations and expectation conflict on virtual teams. Group & Organization Management, 32, 358-388.
23. Bouas, K. S., & Arrow, H., (1996). The development of group identity in computer and face-to-face groups with membership change. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 4, 153-178.
24. Bradner, E., Mark, G., & Hertel, T. D., (2005). Team size and technology fit: Participation, awareness, and rapport in distributed teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48, 68-77.
25. Brown, H. G., Poole, M. S., & Rodgers, T. L., (2004). Interpersonal traits, complementarity, and trust in virtual collaboration. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20, 115-137.
26. Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Ramirez, A., Jr., Dunbar, N. E., Kam, K., & Fischer, J., (2002). Testing the interactivity principle: Effects of mediation, propinquity, and verbal and nonverbal modalities in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Communication, 52, 657-677.
27. Campbell, J., & Stasser, G., (2006). The influence of time and task demonstrability on decision making in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Small Group Research, 37, 271-294.
28. Cappel, J. J., & Windsor, J. C., (2000). Ethical decision making: A comparison of computer-supported and face-to-face group. Journal of Business Ethics, 28, 95-107.
29. Carte, T. A., Chidambaram, L., & Becker, A., (2006). Emergent leadership in self-managed virtual teams. Group Decision and Negotiation, 15, 323-343.
30. Chen, M., Liou, Y., Wang, C. W., Fan, Y. W., & Chi, Y. P. J., (2005). TeamSpirit: Design, implementation, and evaluation of a web-based group decision support system. Decision Support Systems, 43, 1186-1202.
31. Chidambaram, L., (1996). Relational development in computer-supported groups. MIS Quarterly, 20, 143-165.
32. Chidambaram, L., & Tung, L. L., (2005). Is out of sight, out of mind? An empirical study of social loafing in technology-supported groups. Information Systems Research, 16, 149-168.
33. Chudoba, K. M., Wynn, E., Lu, M., & Watson-Manheim, M. B., (2005). How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization. Information Systems Journal, 15, 279-306.
34. Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E., (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239-290.
35. Colquitt, J. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., LePine, J. A., & Sheppard, L., (2002). Computer-assisted communication and team decision making performance: The moderating effect of openness to experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 402-410.
36. Connolly, T., Jessup, L. M., & Valacich, J. S., (1990). Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Management Science, 36, 689-703.
37. Coppola, N. W., Hiltz, S. R., & Rotter, N. G., (2004). Building trust in virtual teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 47, 95-104.
38. Cornelius, C., & Boos, M., (2003). Enhancing mutual understanding in synchronous computer-mediated communication by training. Communication Research, 30, 147-177.
39. Cramton, C. D., (2001). The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science, 12, 346-371.
40. Cramton, C. D., & Hinds, P., (2005). Subgroup dynamics in internationally distributed teams: Ethnocentrism or cross-national learning. In B. M. Staw & R. M. Kramer (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 26, pp. 231-263). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
41. Cramton, C. D., & Webber, S. S., (2005). Relationships among geographic dispersion, team processes, and effectiveness in software development work teams. Journal of Business Research, 58, 758-765.
42. Crowston, K., Howison, J., Masango, C., & Eseryel, U. Y., (2007). The role of face-to-face meetings in technology-supported self-organizing distributed teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 50, 185-203.
43. Cummings, J. N., Espinosa, J. A., & Pickering, C. K., (2009). Crossing spatial and temporal boundaries in globally distributed projects: A relational model of coordination delay. Information Systems Research, 20, 420-439.
44. Daily, B. F., & Teich, J. E., (2000). Perceptions of contributions in multi-cultural groups in non-GDSS and GDSS environments. European Journal of Operational Research, 134, 70-83.
45. Daly, B. L., (1993). The influence of face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication channels on collective induction. Accounting, Management, and Information Technology, 3, 1-22.
46. Dennis, A. R., & Garfield, M. J., (2003). The adoption and use of GSS in project teams: Toward more participative processes and outcomes. MIS Quarterly, 27, 289-323.
47. Driskell, J. E., Radtke, P. H., & Salas, E., (2003). Virtual teams: Effects of technological mediation on team performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7, 297-323.
48. Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & Sethna, B., (1991). The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Human Computer Interaction, 6, 119-146.
49. Earley, P. C., & Gibson, C. B., (1998). Taking stock in our progress on individualism-collectivism: 100 years of solidarity and community. Journal of Management, 24, 265-304.
50. Easley, R. F., Devaraj, S., & Crant, J. M., (2003). Relating collaborative technology use to teamwork quality and performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 247-268.
51. El-Shinnawy, M., & Vinze, A. S., (1998). Polarization and persuasive argumentation: A study of decision making in group settings. MIS Quarterly, 22, 165-198.
52. Espinosa, J. A., Cummings, J. N., Wilson, J. M., & Pearce, B. M., (2003). Team boundary issues across multiple global firms. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 157-190.
53. Ferrin, D. L., & Dirks, K. T., (2003). The use of rewards to increase and decrease trust: Mediating processes and differential effects. Organization Science, 14, 18-31.
54. Finholt, T., & Sproull, L. S., (1990). Electronic groups at work. Organization Science, 1, 41-64.
55. Fiol, C. M., & O'Connor, E. J., (2005). Identification in face-to-face, hybrid, and pure virtual teams: Untangling the contradictions. Organization Science, 16, 19-32.
56. Fjermestad, J., (2004). An analysis of communication mode in group support systems research. Decision Support Systems, 37, 239-263.
57. Forester, G. L., Thoms, P., & Pinto, J. K., (2007). Importance of goal setting in virtual project teams. Psychological Reports, 100, 270-274.
58. Froehle, C. M., (2006). Service personnel, technology, and their interaction in influencing customer satisfaction. Decision Sciences, 37, 5-38.
59. Fuller, M. A., Hardin, A. M., & Davison, R. M., (2007). Efficacy in technology-mediated distributed teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23, 209-235.
60. Furst, S., Blackburn, R., & Rosen, B., (1999). Virtual team effectiveness: A proposed research agenda. Information Systems Journal, 9, 249-269.
61. Gallupe, R. B., Dennis, A. R., Cooper, W. H., Valacich, J. S., Bastianutti, L. M., & Nunamaker, J. F., (1992). Electronic brainstorming and group size. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 350-369.
62. Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W., (1997). Gender differences in the perception and use of e-mail: An extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS Quarterly, 21, 389-400.
63. Geister, S., Konradt, U., & Hertel, G., (2006). Effects of process feedback on motivation, satisfaction, and performance in virtual teams. Small Group Research, 37, 459-489.
64. Gersick, C. J. G., (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9-41.
65. Gibson, C. B. & Gibbs, J. L., (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 451-495.
66. Gibson, C. B., Porath, C. L., Benson, G. S., & Lawler, E. E., III. (2007). What results when firms implement practices: The differential relationship between specific practices, firm financial performance, customer service, and quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1467-1480.
67. Gonzalez, M. G., Burke, M. J., Santuzzi, A. M., & Bradley, J. C., (2003). The impact of group process variables on the effectiveness of distance collaboration groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 629-648.
68. Graetz, K. A., Boyle, E., Kimble, C., Thompson, P., & Garloch, J., (1998). Information sharing in face-to-face, teleconferencing and electronic chat groups. Small Group Research, 29, 714-743.
69. Griffith, T. L., & Neale, M. A., (2001). Information processing in traditional, hybrid, and virtual teams: From nascent knowledge to transactive memory. In B. M. Staw & R. L. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 23, pp. 379-421). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
70. Griffith, T. L., & Sawyer, J. E., (2006). Supporting technologies and organizational practices for the transfer of knowledge in virtual environments. Group Decision and Negotiation, 15, 407-423.
71. Griffith, T. L., Sawyer, J. E., & Neale, M. A., (2003). Virtualness and knowledge in teams: Managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology. MIS Quarterly, 27, 265-287.
72. Gully, S. M., Incalaterra, K. A., Joshi, A., & Beaubien, J. M., (2002). A meta-analysis of team efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 819-832.
73. Haas, M. R., (2005). Acquiring and applying knowledge in transnational teams: The roles of cosmopolitans and locals. Organization Science, 17, 367-384.
74. Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G., (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 47-101). New York: Academic Press.
75. Hambley, L. A., O'Neill, T. A., & Klein, T. J. B., (2007). Virtual team leadership: The effects of leadership style and communication medium on team interaction styles and outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103, 1-20.
76. Handy, C., (1995). Trust and the virtual organization. Harvard Business Review, 73 (9), 40-48.
77. Hardin, A. M., Fuller, M. A., & Davison, R. M., (2007). I know I can, but can we? Culture and efficacy beliefs in global virtual teams. Small Group Research, 38, 130-155.
78. Hardin, A. M., Fuller, M. A., & Valacich, J. S., (2006). Measuring group efficacy in virtual teams: New questions in an old debate. Small Group Research, 37, 65-85.
79. Harvey, M., Novicevic, M. M., & Garrison, G., (2004). Challenges to staffing global virtual teams. Human Resource Management Review, 14, 275-294.
80. Hedlund, J., Ilgen, D. R., & Hollenbeck, J. R., (1998). Decision accuracy in computer-mediated versus face-to-face decision-making teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 30-47.
81. Heninger, W. G., Dennis, A. R., & Hilmer, K. M., (2006). Individual cognition and dual task interference in group support systems. Information Systems Research, 17, 415-424.
82. Hertel, G., Geister, S., & Konradt, U., (2005). Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15, 69-95.
83. Hiltz, S. R., Johnson, K., & Turoff, M., (1986). Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. Human Communication Research, 13, 225-252.
84. Hinds, P. J., & Bailey, D. E., (2003). Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organization Science, 14, 615-632.
85. Hinds, P. J., & Kiesler, S., (1995). Communication across boundaries: Work, structure, and use of communication technologies in a large organization. Organization Science, 6, 373-393.
86. Hirschhorn, L., (1991). Managing in the new team environment: Skills, tools, and methods. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
87. Hollingshead, A. B., (1996). Information suppression and status persistence in group decision making. Human Communication Research, 23, 193-219.
88. Hollingshead, A. B., McGrath, J. E., & O'Connor, K. M., (1993). Group task performance and communication technology: A longitudinal study of computer-mediated versus face-to-face work groups. Small Group Research, 24, 307-333.
89. Huang, A. H., Hung, S. Y., & Yen, D. C., (2007). An exploratory investigation of two internet-based communication modes. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 29, 238-243.
90. Huang, W. W., Wei, K. K., Watson, R. T., & Tan, B. C. Y., (2002). Supporting virtual team-building with a GSS: An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems, 34, 359-367.
91. Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D., (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517-543.
92. Jarman, R., (2005). Why success isn't everything: Case studies of two virtual teams. Group Decision and Negotiation, 14, 333-354.
93. Jarvenpaa, S. L., Knoll, K., & Leidner, D. E., (1998). Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14, 29-64.
94. Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E., (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10, 791-815.
95. Jarvenpaa, S. L., Rao, V. S., & Huber, G. P., (1988). Computer support for meetings of groupsworking on unstructured problems: A field experiment. MIS Quarterly, 12, 645-666.
96. Jarvenpaa, S. L., Shaw, T. R., & Staples, D. S., (2004). Toward contextualized theories of trust: The role of trust in global virtual teams. Information Systems Research, 15, 250-267.
97. Jessup, L. M., & Tansik, D. A., (1991). Decision making in an automated environment: The effects of anonymity and proximity with a group decision support system. Decision Sciences, 22, 266-279.
98. Johnson, S. D., Suriya, C., Yoon, S. W., Berrett, J. V., & La Fleur, J., (2002). Team development and group processes of virtual learning teams. Computers & Education, 39, 379-393.
99. Kahai, S. S., & Cooper, R. B., (2003). Exploring the core concepts of media richness theory: The impact of cue multiplicity and feedback immediacy on decision quality. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20, 263-299.
100. Kanawattanachai, P., & Yoo, Y., (2002). Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11, 187-213.
101. Kanawattanachai, P., & Yoo, Y., (2007). The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team performance over time. MIS Quarterly, 31, 783-808.
102. Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C. Y., & Wei, K. K., (2007). Conflict and performance in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23, 237-274.
103. Kayworth, T., & Leidner, D., (2000). The global virtual manager: A prescription for success. European Management Journal, 18, 183-194.
104. Kirkman, B. L., & Mathieu, J. E., (2005). The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. Journal of Management, 31, 700-718.
105. Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Tesluk, P. E., & Gibson, C. B., (2004). The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance: The moderating role of face-to-face interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 175-192.
106. Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Tesluk, P. E., & Gibson, C. B., (2006). Enhancing the transfer of computer-assisted training proficiency in geographically-distributed teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 706-716.
107. Kock, N., (2004). The psychobiological model: Towards a new theory of computer-mediated communication based on Darwinian evolution. Organization Science, 15, 327-348.
108. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S., (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 333-375). London: Wiley.
109. Krebs, S. A., Hobman, E. V., & Bordia, P., (2006). Virtual teams and group member dissimilarity: Consequences for the development of trust. Small Group Research, 37, 721-741.
110. Lebie, L., Rhoades, J. A., & McGrath, J. E., (1996). Interaction process in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 4, 127-152.
111. Lea, M., & Spears, R., (1992). Paralanguage and social perception in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Organizational Computing, 2, 321-341.
112. Lee, E. J., (2004). Effects of visual representation on social influence in computer-mediated communication: Experimental tests of the social identity model of deindividuation effects. Human Communication Research, 30, 234-259.
113. Lee, E. J., (2005). Effects of the influence agent's sex and self-confidence on informational social influence in computer-mediated communication: Quantitative versus verbal presentation. Communication Research, 32, 29-58.
114. Lee, E. J., (2006). When and how does depersonalization increase conformity to group norms in computer-mediated communication? Communication Research, 33, 423-447.
115. Lee, E. J., (2007a). Effects of gendered language on gender stereotyping in computer-mediated communication: The moderating role of depersonalization and gender-role orientation. Human Communication Research, 33, 515-535.
116. Lee, E. J., (2007b). Deindividuation effects on group polarization in computer-mediated communication: The role of group identification, public-self-awareness, and perceived argument quality. Journal of Communication, 57, 385-403.
117. Lee-Kelley, L., (2006). Locus of control and attitudes to working in virtual teams. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 234-243.
118. Leenders, R. T., van Engelen, J., & Kratzer, J., (2003). Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: A social network perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20, 69-92.
119. Li, S. S., (2007). Computer-mediated communication and group decision making: A functional perspective. Small Group Research, 38, 593-614.
120. Lind, M. R., (1999). The gender impact of temporary virtual work groups. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 42, 276-285.
121. Lowry, P. B., Roberts, T. L., Romano, N. C., Jr., Cheney, P. D., & Hightower, R. T., (2006). The impact of group size and social presence on small-group communication: Does computer-mediated communication make a difference? Small Group Research, 37, 631-661.
122. Lurey, J. S., & Raisinghani, M. S., (2001). An empirical study of best practices in virtual teams. Information & Management, 38, 523-544.
123. Majchrzak, A., Malhotra, A., & John, R., (2005). Perceived individual collaboration know-how development through information technology enabled contextualization: Evidence from distributed teams. Information Systems Research, 16, 9-27.
124. Majchrzak, A., Rice, R. E., Malhotra, A., King, N., & Ba, S., (2000). Technology adaptation: The case of a computer-supported inter organizational virtual team. MIS Quarterly, 24, 569-600.
125. Malhotra, A., Majchrzak, A., Carman, R., & Lott, V., (2001). Radical innovation without collocation: A case study at Boeing-Rocketdyne. MIS Quarterly, 25, 229-249.
126. Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J., (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356-376.
127. Martins, L. L., Gilson, L. L., & Maynard, M. T., (2004). Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 805-835.
128. Massey, A. P., Montoya-Weiss, M. M., & Hung, Y. T., (2003). Because time matters: Temporal coordination in global virtual project teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 129-155.
129. Mathieu, J. E., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. L., (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34, 410-476.
130. May, A., & Carter, C., (2001). A case study of virtual teams working in the European automotive industry. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 27, 171-186.
131. Maznevski, M. L., & Chudoba, K. M., (2000). Bridging space over time: Global virtual-team dynamics and effectiveness. Organization Science, 11, 473-492.
132. McDonough, E. F., III., Kahn, K. B., & Barczak, G., (2001). An investigation of the use of global, virtual, and colocated new product development teams. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18, 110-120.
133. McGrath, J. E., (1984). Groups, interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
134. McLeod, P., Baron, R., Marti, M., & Yoon, K., (1997). The eyes have it: Minority influence in face-to-face and computer-mediated group discussion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 706-718.
135. Mejias, R. J., (2007). The interaction of process losses, process gains, and meeting satisfaction within technology-supported environments. Small Group Research, 38, 156-194.
136. Metiu, A., (2006). Owning the code: Status closure in distributed groups. Organization Science, 17, 418-435.
137. Montoya-Weiss, M. M. Massey, A. P., & Song, M., (2001). Getting it together: Temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1251-1262.
138. Morris, S. A., Marshall, T. E., & Rainer, R. K., Jr. (2002). Impact of user satisfaction and trust on virtual team members. Information Resources Management Journal, 15, 22-30.
139. Mortensen, M., & Hinds, P. J., (2001). Conflict and shared identity in geographically distributed teams. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12, 212-238.
140. Munkvold, B. E., & Zigurs, I., (2007). Process and technology challenges in swift-starting virtual teams. Information & Management, 44, 287-299.
141. Murthy, U. S., & Kerr, D. S., (2002). Decision making performance of interacting groups: An experimental investigation of the effects of task type and communication mode. Information & Management, 40, 351-360.
142. Murthy, U. S., & Kerr, D. S., (2004). Comparing audit team effectiveness via alternative modes of computer-mediated communication. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23, 141-152.
143. Nemiro, J. E., (2002). The creative process in virtual teams. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 69-83.
144. Nowak, K. L., (2003). Sex categorization in computer mediated communication (CMC): Exploring the utopian promise. Media Psychology, 5, 83-103.
145. Ocker, R. J., (2005). Influences on creativity in asynchronous virtual teams: A qualitative analysis of experimental teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48, 22-39.
146. Ocker, R. J., (2007). A balancing act: The interplay of status effects on dominance in virtual teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 50, 204-218.
147. O'Hara-Devereaux, M., & Johansen, B., (1994). Global work: Bridging distance, culture, and time. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
148. O'Leary, M. B., & Cummings, J. N., (2007). The spatial, temporal, and configurational characteristics of geographic dispersion in teams. MIS Quarterly, 31, 433-452.
149. Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M., (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3-72.
150. Palomares, N. A., (2004). Gender schematicity, gender identity salience, and gender-linked language use. Human Communication Research, 30, 556-588.
151. Panteli, N., & Davison, R. M., (2005). The role of subgroups in the communication patterns of global virtual teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48, 191-200.
152. Paul, D. L., & McDaniel, R. R., Jr. (2004). A field study of the effect of interpersonal trust on virtual collaborative relationship performance. MIS Quarterly, 28, 183-227.
153. Paul, S., Samarah, I. M., Seetharaman, P., & Mykytyn, P. P., Jr. (2005). An empirical investigation of collaborative conflict management style in group support system-based global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21, 185-222.
154. Paul, S., Seetharaman, P., Samarah, I., & Mykytyn, P. P., (2004). Impact of heterogeneity and collaborative conflict management style on the performance of synchronous global virtual teams. Information & Management, 41, 303-321.
155. Pauleen, D. J., (2004). An inductively derived model leader-initiated relationship building with virtual team members. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20, 227-256.
156. Pauleen, D. J., & Yoong, P., (2001). Facilitating virtual team relationships via Internet and conventional communication channels. Internet Research, 11, 190-202.
157. Pena, J., Walther, J. B., & Hancock, J. T., (2007). Effects of geographic distribution on dominance perceptions in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 34, 313-331.
158. Pensendorfer, E. M., & Koeszegi, S. T., (2006). Hot versus cool behavioural styles in electronic negotiations: The impact of communication mode. Group Decision & Negotiations, 15, 141-155.
159. Piccoli, G., & Ives, B., (2003). Trust and the unintended effects of behavior control in virtual teams. MIS Quarterly, 27, 365-395.
160. Polzer, J. T., Crisp, C. B., Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Kim, J. W., (2006). Extending the faultline model to geographically dispersed teams: How collocated subgroups can impair group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 679-692.
161. Poole, M. S., Holmes, M., & DeSanctis, G., (1991). Conflict management in a computer-supported meeting environment. Management Science, 37, 926-953.
162. Potter, R. E., & Balthazard, P. A., (2002). Understanding human interaction and performance in the virtual team. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 4, 1-23.
163. Qureshi, S., Liu, M., & Vogel, D., (2006). The effects of electronic collaboration in distributed project management. Group Decision and Negotiation, 15, 55-75.
164. Rafaeli, S., & Ravid, G., (2003). Information sharing as enabler for the virtual team: An experimental approach to assessing the role of electronic mail in disintermediation. Information Systems Journal, 13, 191-206.
165. Rains, S. A., (2005). Leveling the organizational playing field-virtually: A meta-analysis of experimental research assessing the impact of group support system use on member influence behaviors. Communication Research, 32, 193-234.
166. Rains, S. A., (2007). The impact of anonymity on perceptions of source credibility and influence in computer-mediated group communication: A test of two competing hypotheses. Communication Research, 34, 100-125.
167. Rasters, G., Vissers, G., & Dankbaar, B., (2002). An inside look: Rich communication through lean media in a virtual research team. Small Group Research, 33, 718-754.
168. Ratcheva, V., & Vyakarnam, S., (2001). Exploring team formation processes in virtual partnerships. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 12, 512-523.
169. Reid, D. J., & Reid, F. J. M., (2005). Online focus groups: An in-depth comparison of computer-mediated and conventional focus group discussions. International Journal of Market Research, 47, 131-162.
170. Reinig, B. A., & Mejias, R. J., (2004). The effects of national culture and anonymity on flaming and criticalness in GSS-supported discussions. Small Group Research, 35, 698-723.
171. Roch, S. G., & Ayman, R., (2005). Group decision making and perceived decision success: The role of communication medium. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 9, 15-31.
172. Rutkowski, A. F., Saunders, C., Vogel, D., & van Genuchten, M., (2007). "Is it already 4 a.m. in your time zone?" Focus immersion and temporal disassociation in virtual teams. Small Group Research, 38, 98-129.
173. Saphiere, D. M. H., (1996). Productive behaviors of global business teams. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20, 227-259.
174. Sarker, S., Sarker, S., Nicholson, D. B., & Joshi, K. D., (2005). Knowledge transfer in virtual systems development teams: An exploratory study of four key enablers. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48, 201-218.
175. Sarker, S., Valacich, J. S., & Sarker, S., (2003). Virtual team trust: Instrument development and validation in an IS educational environment. Information Resources Management Journal, 16, 35-55.
176. Sassenberg, K., & Boos, M., (2003). Attitude change in computer-mediated communication: Effects of anonymity and category norms. Group Process & Intergroup Relations, 6, 405-422.
177. Saunders, C. S., & Ahuja, M. K., (2006). Are all distributed teams the same? Differentiating between temporary and ongoing distributed teams. Small Group Research, 37, 662-700.
178. Savicki, V., Kelley, M., & Lingenfelter, D., (1996). Gender and group composition in small task groups using computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 12, 209-224.
179. Schiller, S. Z., & Mandviwalla, M., (2007). Virtual team research: An analysis of theory use and a framework for theory appropriation. Small Group Research, 38, 12-59.
180. Schmidt, J. B., Montoya-Weiss, M. M., & Massey, A. P., (2001). New product development decision-making effectiveness: Comparing individuals, face-to-face teams, and virtual teams. Decision Sciences, 32, 575-600.
181. Shachaf, P., & Hara, N., (2007). Behavioral complexity theory of media selection: A proposed theory for global virtual teams. Journal of Information Science, 33, 63-75.
182. Sharifi, S., & Pawar, K. S., (2002). Virtually co-located product design teams: Sharing teaming experiences after the event? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22, 656-679.
183. Shepherd, M. M., Briggs, R. O., Reinig, B. A., Yen, J., & Nunamaker, J. F., Jr. (1996). Invoking social comparison to improve electronic brainstorming: Beyond anonymity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12, 155-170.
184. Shim, J. P., Warkentin, M., Courtney, J. F., Power, D. J., Sharda, R., & Carlsson, C., (2002). Past, present, and future of decision support technology. Decision Support Systems, 33, 111-126.
185. Shin, Y., (2004). A person-environment fit model for virtual organizations. Journal of Management, 30, 725-743.
186. Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & McGuire, T., (1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 157-187.
187. Simon, A. F., (2006). Computer-mediated communication: Task performance and satisfaction. The Journal of Social Psychology, 146, 349-379.
188. Sivunen, A., (2006). Strengthening identification with the team in virtual teams: The leaders' perspective. Group Decision and Negotiation, 15, 345-366.
189. Sole, D., & Edmondson, A., (2002). Situated knowledge and learning in dispersed team. British Journal of Management, 13, 17-34.
190. Sosik, J. J., Avolio, B. J., & Kahai, S. S., (1998). Inspiring group creativity: Comparing anonymous and identified electronic brainstorming. Small Group Research, 29, 3-31.
191. Spears, R., Lea, M., & Lee, S., (1990). De-individuation and group polarization in computer-mediated communication. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 121-134.
192. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S., (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32, 1492-1512.
193. Stanko, T. L., & Gibson, C. B., (2009). The role of cultural elements in virtual teams. In R. S. Bhagat & R. M. Steers (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of culture, organization, and work (pp. 272-304). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
194. Stanton, N. A., Ashleigh, M. J., Roberts, A. D., & Xu, F., (2003). Virtuality in human supervisory control: Assessing the effects of psychological and social remoteness. Ergonomics, 46, 1215-1232.
195. Staples, D. S., & Webster, J., (2007). Exploring traditional and virtual team members' "best practices": A social cognitive theory perspective. Small Group Research, 38, 60-97.
196. Staples, D. S., & Zhao, L., (2006). The effects of cultural diversity in virtual teams versus face-to-face teams. Group Decision and Negotiation, 15, 389-406.
197. Stewart, K. J., & Gosain, S., (2006). The impact of ideology on effectiveness in open source software development teams. MIS Quarterly, 30, 291-314.
198. Straus, S. G., (1996). Getting a clue: The effects of communication media and information distribution on participation and performance in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Small Group Research, 27, 115-142.
199. Straus, S. G., & McGrath, J. E., (1994). Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 87-97.
200. Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., Jochems, W. M. G., & Broers, N. J., (2004). The effect of functional roles on group efficiency: Using multilevel modeling and content analysis to investigate computer-supported collaboration in small groups. Small Group Research, 35, 195-229.
201. Suchan, J., & Hayzak, G., (2001). The communication characteristics of virtual teams: A case study. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 44, 174-186.
202. Swigger, K., Alpaslan, F., Brazile, R., & Monticino, M., (2004). Effects of culture on computer-supported international collaborations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 60, 365-380.
203. Tan, B. C. Y., Wei, K., Huang, W. W., & Ng, G. N., (2000). A dialogue technique to enhance electronic communication in virtual teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 43, 153-165.
204. Tan, B. C. Y., Wei, K., Watson, R. T., Clapper, D. L., & McLean, E. R., (1998). Computer-mediated communication and majority influence: Assessing the impact in an individualistic and collectivistic culture. Management Science, 44, 1263-1278.
205. Tanis, M., & Postmes, T., (2003). Social cues and impression formation in CMC. Journal of Communication, 53, 676-693.
206. Thompson, L. F., & Coovert, M. D., (2002). Stepping up to the challenge: A critical examination of face-to-face and computer-mediated team decision making. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 52-64.
207. Thompson, L. F., & Coovert, M. D., (2003). Teamwork online: The effects of computer conferencing on perceived confusion, satisfaction, and post-discussion accuracy. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7, 135-151.
208. Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B., (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28, 317-348.
209. Timmerman, C. E., & Scott, C. R., (2006). Virtually working: Communicative and structural predictors of media use and key outcomes in virtual work teams. Communication Monographs, 73, 108-136.
210. Tuckman, B. W., (1965). Development sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399.
211. Valacich, J. S., Dennis, A. R., & Connolly, T., (1994). Idea generation in computer-based groups: A new ending to an old story. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 448-467.
212. Valacich, J. S., Dennis, A. R., & Nunamaker, J. F., Jr. (1992). Group size and anonymity effects on computer-mediated idea generation. Small Group Research, 23, 49-73.
213. Valacich, J. S., George, J. F., Nunamaker, J. F., Jr., & Vogel, D. R., (1994). Physical proximity effects on computer-mediated group idea generation. Small Group Research, 25, 83-104.
214. Valacich, J. S., & Schwenk, C., (1995). Devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiry effects on face-to-face and computer mediated group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 158-173.
215. Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W. H., Segers, M., & Kirschner, P. A., (2006). Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments: Team learning beliefs and behaviors. Small Group Research, 37, 490-521.
216. Walther, J. B., (1994). Anticipated ongoing interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 20, 473-501.
217. Walther, J. B., (1995). Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: Experimental observations over time. Organization Science, 6, 186-203.
218. Walther, J. B., (1997). Group and interpersonal effects in international computer-mediated collaboration. Human Communication Research, 23, 342-369.
219. Walther, J. B., & Bazarova, N. N., (2007). Misattribution in virtual groups: The effects of member distribution on self-serving bias and partner blame. Human Communication Research, 33, 1-26.
220. Walther, J. B., & Bunz, U., (2005). The rules of virtual groups: Trust, liking, and performance in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Communication, 55, 828-846.
221. Walther, J. B., & Burgoon, J. K., (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19, 50-88.
222. Walther, J. B., Slovacek, C. L., & Tidwell, L. C., (2001). Is a picture worth a thousand words? Photographic images in long-term and short-term computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 28, 105-134.
223. Warkentin, M. E., & Beranek, P. M., (1999). Training to improve virtual team communication. Information Systems Journal, 9, 271-289.
224. Warkentin, M. E., Sayeed, L., & Hightower, R., (1997). Virtual teams versus face-to-face teams: An exploratory study of a web-based conference system. Decision Sciences, 28, 975-996.
225. Watson, R. T., DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S., (1988). Using a GDSS to facilitate group consensus: Some intended and unintended consequences. MIS Quarterly, 12, 463-480.
226. Watson-Manheim, M. B., & Belanger, F., (2007). Communication media repertoires: Dealing with the multiplicity of media choices. MIS Quarterly, 31, 267-293.
227. Weisband, S. P., (1992). Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53, 352-380.
228. Weisband, S. P., & Atwater, L., (1999). Evaluating self and others in electronic and face-to-face groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 632-639.
229. Weisband, S. P., Schneider, S. K., & Connolly, T., (1995). Computer-mediated communication and social information: Status salience and status differences. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1124-1151.
230. Workman, M., (2005). Virtual team culture and the amplification of team boundary permeability on performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 16, 435-458.
231. Workman, M., Kahnweiler, W., & Bommer, W., (2003). The effects of cognitive style and media richness on commitment to telework and virtual teams. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 199-219.
232. Yoo, Y., & Kanawattanachai, P., (2001). Developments of transactive memory systems and collective mind in virtual teams. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9, 187-208.
233. Zack, M. H., & McKenney, J. L., (1995). Social context and interaction in ongoing computer-supported management groups. Organization Science, 6, 394-422.
234. Zhang, D., Lowry, B. J., Zhou, L., & Fu, X., (2007). The impact of individualism-collectivism, social presence, and group diversity on group decision making under majority influence. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23, 53-80.
235. Zhou, L., & Zhang, D., (2006). A comparison of deception behavior in dyad and triadic group decision making in synchronous computer mediated communication. Small Group Research, 37, 140-164.
236. Zhou, L., & Zhang, D., (2007). Typing or messaging? Modality effect on deception detection in computer-mediated communication. Decision Support Systems, 44, 188-201.
237. Zigurs, I., Poole, M. S., & DeSanctis, G. L., (1988). A study of influence in computer-mediated group decision making. MIS Quarterly, 12, 625-644.