Group decision making and perceived decision success: The role of communication medium

Group Dynamics

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 15-31

  Roch, Sylvia G ^a   Ayman, Roya ^b  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GROUP DYNAMICS; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; PERCEPTION; PREDICTION; PROBLEM SOLVING; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TEAMWORK;

EID: 15444374752     PISSN: 10892699     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1089-2699.9.1.15     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Baltes, B. B., Dickson, M. W., Sherman, M. P., Bauer, C. C., & LaGanke, J. S. (2002). Computer-mediated communication and group decision making: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87, 156-179.
2. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
3. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correction analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Dipboye, R. L. (1990). Laboratory vs. field research in industrial and organizational psychology. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 1-34). Oxford, England: Wiley.
6. Einhorn, H. J., Hogarth, R. M., & Klempner, E. (1977). Quality of group judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 158-172.
7. Goldstein, I. L. (1995). Foreword. In R. A. Guzzo, E. Salas, & Associates (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision-making in organizations (pp. xi-xiv). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8. Gully, S. M., Joshi, A., Incalcaterra, K. A., & Beaubien, J. M. (2002). A meta-analysis of team efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 819-832.
9. Guzzo, R. A., & Shea, G. P. (1992). Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 269-313). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
10. Guzzo, R. A., Yost, P. R., Campbell, R. J., & Shea, G. P. (1993). Potency in groups: Articulating a construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 87-106.
11. Harlow, H., & Harlow, M. (1962). Social deprivation in monkeys. Scientific American, 207, 136-146.
12. Hedlund, J., Ilgen, D. R., & Hollenbeck, J. R. (1998). Decision accuracy in computer-mediated versus face to face decision-making teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 30-47.
13. Hinds, P. J., & Weisband, S. P. (2003). Knowledge sharing and shared understanding in virtual teams. In C. B. Gibson & S. G. Cohen (Eds.), Virtual teams that work (pp. 21-36). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. Hollingshead, A. B. (1996a). Information suppression and status persistence in group decision making: The effects of communication media. Human Communication Research, 23, 193-219.
15. Hollingshead, A. B. (1996b). The rank-order effect in group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Making, 68, 181-193.
16. Hollingshead, A. B., & McGrath, J. E. (1995). Computer-assisted groups: A critical review of the empirical research. In R. A. Guzzo, E. Salas, & Associates (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision-making in organizations (pp. 46-78). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. Howard, A. (1995). The changing nature of work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18. Ilgen, D. R., & Pulakos, E. D. (Eds.). (1999). The changing nature of performance: Implications for staffing, motivation, and development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19. James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98.
20. Klein, K. J., Bliese, P. D., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Dansereau, F., Gavin, M., Griffin, M. A., et al. (2000). Multilevel analytical techniques. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21. Lee, C., Tinsley, C., & Bobko, P. (2002). An investigation of the antecedents and consequences of group level confidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1628-1652.
22. Lester, S. W., Meglino, B. M., & Korsgaard, M. A. (2002). The antecedents and consequences of group potency: A longitudinal investigation of newly formed work groups. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 352-368.
23. Libby, R., Trotman, K. T., & Zimmer, I. (1987). Member variation, recognition of expertise, and group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 81-87.
24. Littlepage, G. E., & Silbiger, H. (1992). Recognition of expertise in decision-making groups: Effects of group size and participation patterns. Small Group Research, 23, 344-355.
25. McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups, interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26. Mook, D. G. (1983). In defense of external invalidity. American Psychologist, 38, 379-387.
27. Nemiroff, P. M., & Pasmore, W. A. (1975). Lost at Sea: A consensus-seeking task. In J. W. Pfeiffer & J. E. Jones (Eds.), The 1975 annual handbook for group facilitators (pp. 28-34). San Diego, CA: Pfeiffer.
28. Paese, P. W., & Sniezek, J. A. (1991). Influences on the appropriateness of confidence in judgment: Practice, effort, information, and decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48, 100-130.
29. Peterson, D. K., & Pitz, G. F. (1988). Confidence, uncertainty, and the use of information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 85-92.
30. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown Communications.
31. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
32. Ryback, D. (1967). Confidence and accuracy as a function of experience in judgment making in the absence of systematic feedback. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 34, 331-334.
33. Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & McGuire, T. W. (1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 157-187.
34. Smith, J., & Vanecek, M. (1988). Computer conferencing and task-oriented decisions: Implications for group decision support. Information and Management, 14, 123-132.
35. Sniezek, J. A., & Henry, R. A. (1989). Accuracy and confidence in group judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 1-28.
36. Sniezek, J. A., & Henry, R. A. (1990). Revision, weighting, and commitment in consensus group judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 45, 66-84.
37. Sniezek, J. A., Paese, P. W., & Switzer, F. S., III. (1990). The effect of choosing on confidence and choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46, 264-282.
38. Straus, S. G., & McGrath, J. E. (1994). Does medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 87-97.
39. Turner, M. E., & Pratkanis, A. R. (1998). Twenty-five years of groupthink theory and research: Lessons from the evaluation of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73, 105-115.