A comparison of deception behavior in dyad and triadic group decision making in synchronous computer-mediated communication

Small Group Research

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 140-164

  Zhou, Lina ^a,b   Zhang, Dongsong ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

^b University of Marylandw Baltimore County   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer mediated communication; Deception; Decision making; Group size

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644603815     PISSN: 10464964     EISSN: 15528278     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1046496405285125     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Anderson, D. E., DePaulo, B. M., Ansfield, M. E., Tickle, J. J., & Green, E. (1999). Beliefs about cues to deception: Mindless stereotypes or untapped wisdom? Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 23 (1). 67-89.
2. Baker, S. M., & Petty, R. E. (1994). Majority and minority influence: Source-position imbalance as a determinant of message scrutiny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67 (1). 5-19.
3. Buller, D. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1994). Deception: Strategic and nonstrategic communication. In J. A. Daly & J. M. Wiemann (Eds.), Strategic interpersonal communication (pp. 191-223). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Buller, D. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1996). Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory, 6 (3). 203-242.
5. Buller, D. B., Burgoon, J. K., Buslig, A., & Roiger, J. (1996). Testing interpersonal deception theory: The language of interpersonal deception. Communication Theory, 6 (3). 268-288.
6. Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., Ebesu, A. S., & Rockwell, P. (1994). Interpersonal deception V: Accuracy in deception detection. Communication Monographs, 61 (4). 303-325.
7. Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., & Floyd, K. (2001). Does participation affect deception success? A test of the interactivity principle. Human Communication Research, 27 (4). 503-534.
8. Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., Guerrero, L. L., & Feldman, C. M. (1994). Interpersonal deception: VI. Effects of preinteractional and interactional factors on deceiver and observer perceptions of deception success. Communication Studies, 45, 263-280.
9. Burgoon, J. K., Dillman, L., & Stern, L. A. (1993). Adaptation in dyadic interaction: Defining and operationalizing patterns of reciprocity and compensation. Communication Theory, 3 (4). 295-316.
10. Burgoon, J. K., & Dunbar, N. E. (2000). An interactionist perspective on dominancesubmission: Interpersonal dominance as a dynamic, situationally contingent social skill. Communication Monographs, 67 (1). 96-121.
11. Cartwright, D., & Zander, A. (Eds.). (1968). Group dynamics (3rd ed.). Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
12. Dennis, A. R., & Valacich, J. S. (1994). Group, sub-group, and nominal group idea generation: New rules for a new media? Journal of Management, 20 (4). 723-736.
13. Dennis, A. R., Valacich, J. S., & Nunamaker, J. F. (1990). An experimental investigation of small, medium, and large groups in an electronic meeting system environment. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 20 (5). 1049-1057.
14. Dennis, A. R., & Wixom, B. H. (2002). Investigating the moderators of the group support systems use with meta-analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18 (3). 235-257.
15. DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129 (1). 74-112.
16. DeSanctis, G. L., & Gallupe, B. (1987). Afoundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science, 33 (5). 589-609.
17. Ekman, P. (2001). Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage. New York: Norton.
18. Ekman, P., & O'Sullivan, M. (1991). Who can catch a liar? American Psychologist, 46 (9). 913-920.
19. Fjermestad, J., & Hiltz, S. R. (1998/1999). An assessment of group support systems experimental research: Methodology and results. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15 (3). 7-150.
20. Galasinski, D. (2000). The language of deception. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Gallupe, R. B., Dennis, A. R., Cooper, W. H., Valacich, J. S., Bastianutti, L. M., & Nunamaker, J. F. (1992). Electronic brainstorming and group size. Academic Management Journal, 35 (2). 350-369.
22. Grinter, R. E. (2002, November 16-20). Instant messaging in teen life. Paper presented at the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, New Orleans, LA.
23. Hackman, J. R., & Vidmar, N. (1970). Effects of size and task type on group performance and member reactions. Sociomet, 33, 37-54.
24. Handel, M., & Herbsleb, J. D. (2002, November 16-20). I M everywhere: What is chat doing in the workplace? Paper presented at the ACMConference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, New Orleans, LA.
25. Hare, A. P. (1976). Handbook of small group research (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.
26. Hocking, J. E., & Leathers, D. (1980). Nonverbal indicators of deception: A new theoretical perspective. Communication Monographs, 47, 119-131.
27. Hollingshead, A. B. (2000). Truth and lying in computer-mediated groups. In M. A. Neale, E. A.Mannix, & T. Griffith (Eds.), Technology and teams (Vol. 3, pp. 157-173). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
28. Hundley, R., & Anderson, R. (1995). Emerging challenge: Security and safety in cyberspace. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 14 (4). 19-28.
29. Itakura, H. (2001). Conversational dominance and gender: A study of Japanese speakers in first and second language contexts. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
30. Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67-85.
31. Knapp, M. L., & Comadena, M. A. (1979). Telling it like it isn't: A review of theory and research on deceptive communications. Human Communication Research, 5, 270-285.
32. Knapp, M. L., Hart, R. P., & Dennis, H. S. (1974). An exploration of deception as a communication construct. Human Communication Research, 1 (1). 15-29.
33. Loftus, E. F. (1975). Leading questions and the eyewitness report. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 560-572.
34. Maier, N. R. F., & Thurber, J. A. (1968). Accuracy of judgments of deception when an interview is watched, heard, and read. Personnel Psychology, 21, 23-30.
35. Marett, L. K., & George, J. F. (2004). Deception in the case of one sender and multiple receivers. Group Decision and Negotiation, 24 (1). 29-44.
36. Marsden, J. R., & Mathiyalakan, S. (1999). A multisession comparative study of group size and group performance in an electronic meeting system environment. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 29 (2, Part C). 169-185.
37. Masoodian, M., & Apperley, M. (1996, November 24-27). The effect of group size and communication modes in CSCW environments. Paper presented at the Sixth Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, Hamilton, New Zealand.
38. McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
39. Nemeth, C. J. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93 (1). 23-32.
40. Nunamaker, J. F., Dennis, A. R., Valacich, J. S., Vogel, D. R., & George, J. F. (1991). Electronic meeting systems to support group work. Communications of the ACM, 34 (7). 40-61.
41. Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/ dispreferred turn shapes. In J. Heritage & J. M. Atkinson (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57-101). New York: Cambridge University Press.
42. Rice, R. E. (1984). The new media: Communication, research, and technology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
43. Shaw, G. J. (1998, January 6-9). User satisfaction in group support systems research: A metaanalysis of experimental results. Paper presented at the Thirty-First Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kohala Coast, HI.
44. Shaw, M. (1981). Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
45. Shuy, R. W. (1993). Language crimes. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
46. Slater, P. E. (1958). Contrasting correlates of group size. Sociomet, 21, 129-139.
47. Smith, M., Cadiz, J. J., & Burkhalter, B. (2000, December). Conversation trees and threaded chats. Paper presented at the ACMConference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Philadelphia, PA.
48. Tan, B. C. Y., Wei, K.-K., Watson, R. T., Clapper, D. L., & McLean, E. R. (1998). Computermediated communication and majority influence: Assessing the impact in an individualistic and a collectivistic culture. Management Science, 44 (9). 1263-1278.
49. Turner, R. E., Edgley, C., & Olmstead, G. (1975). Information control in conversation: Honesty is not always the best policy. Kansas Journal of Speech, 11 (1). 69-89.
50. Valacich, J. S., Dennis, A. R., & Nunamaker, J. F. (1992). Group size and anonymity effects on computer mediated idea generation. Small Group Research, 2 (1). 49-73.
51. Valacich, J. S., Wheeler, B. C., Mennecke, E., & Wachter, R. (1995). The effects of numerical and logical group size on computer-mediated idea generation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 62 (3). 318-329.
52. Vrij, A. (2000). Detecting lies and deceit: The psychology of lying and the implications for professional practice. New York: John Wiley.
53. Weisband, S. P. (1992). Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 53 (3). 352-380.
54. Whissell, C., Fournier, M., Pelland, R., Weir, D., & Makarec, K. (1986). Adictionary of affect in language: IV. Reliability, validity, and applications. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 62, 875-888.
55. Zajonc, R. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149 (3681). 269-274.
56. Zhou, L., Burgoon, J., & Twitchell, D. (2003, June 2-3). A longitude analysis of language behavior of deception in e-mail. Paper presented at the NSF/NIJ Symposium on Intelligent Security Informatics, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), Tucson, AZ.
57. Zhou, L., Burgoon, J. K., Nunamaker, J. F., & Twitchell, D. (2004). Automated linguistics based cues for detecting deception in text-based asynchronous computer-mediated communication: An empirical investigation. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13 (1). 81-106.
58. Zhou, L., Burgoon, J. K., Zhang, D., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2004). Language dominance in interpersonal deception via computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 20 (3). 381-402.
59. Zhou, L., Twitchell, D., Qin, T., Burgoon, J., & Nunamaker, J. (2003, January 6-9). An exploratory study into deception detection in text-based computer-mediated communication. Paper presented at the Thirty-Sixth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, HI.