Sex categorization in Computer Mediated Communication (CMC): Exploring the utopian promise

Media Psychology

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 83-103

  Nowak, Kristine L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037208152     PISSN: 15213269     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0501_4     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Adrianson, L., & Hjelmquist, E. (1991). Group processes in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. Behavior & Information Technology, 10, 281-296.
2. Ambady, N., Hallahan, M., & Rosenthal, R. (1995). On judging and being judged accurately in zero-acquaintance situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 518-529.
3. Ashmore, R. D., & Del Boca, F. K. (1979). Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory: Toward a cognitive-social psychological conceptualization. Sex Roles, 5, 219-248.
4. Balsamo, A. (1995). Forms of technological embodiment: Reading the body in contemporary culture. In M. Featherstone & R. Burrows (Eds.), Cyberspace/Cyberbodies/Cyberpunk; Cultures of technological embodiment (pp. 215-237). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
5. Bargh, J., & Pietromonaco, P. (1982). Automatic information processing and social perception: The influence of trait information presented outside of conscious awareness or impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 437-449.
6. Berger, C., & Calabrese, R. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1, 99-112.
7. Bodenhausen, G., & Macrae, C. N. (1998). Stereotype activation and inhibition. In J. R. Wyer (Ed.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. XI, pp. 1-52). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
8. Burgoon, J., & Hale, J. (1987). Validation and measurement of the fundamental themes of relational communication. Communication Monographs, 54, 19-41.
9. Burke, K., & Chidambaram, L. (1995). Developmental differences between distributed and face-to-face groups in electronically supported meeting environments: An exploratory investigation. Group Decision and Negotiation, 4, 213-233.
10. Chesebro, J., & Bonsall, D. (1989). Computer-mediated communication: Human relationships in a computerized world. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.
11. Clark, N. (1995). Rear-view mirrorshades: The recursive generation of the cyber-body. In M. Featherstone & R. Burrows (Eds.), Cyberspace/Cyberbodies/Cyberpunk; Cultures of technological embodiment. (pp. 113-133). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
12. Coates, J. (1993). Women, men and language: A sociolinguistic account of gender differences in language (2nd ed.). London & New York: Longman.
13. Coker, D., & Burgoon, J. (1987). The nature of conversational involvement and non-verbal encoding patterns. Human Communication Research, 13, 463-494.
14. Collins-Jarvis, L. (1995, October). Explaining gender group discrimination in computer-mediated communication: A social identity approach. Paper presented at The Organization for the Study of Communication, Language and Gender, Minneapolis, MN.
15. Collot, M., & Belmore, N. (1996). Electronic language: A new variety of English. In S. C. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross cultural perspectives (pp. 13-28). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
16. Condon, S. L., & Cech, C. G. (1996). Functional comparisons of face-to-face and computer-mediated decision making interactions. In S. C. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross cultural perspectives (pp. 65-80). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
17. Cronkhite, G., & Liska, J. (1976). A critique of factor analytic approaches to the study of credibility. Communication Monographs, 43, 91-108.
18. Daly, N., Bench, J., & Chappell, H. (1996). Interpersonal impressions, gender stereotypes and visual speech. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15, 468-479.
19. December, J. (1993, July 8). Characteristics of oral culture in discourse on the net. Paper presented at the Penn State Conference on Rhetoric and Composition, University Park, PA.
20. Dietrich, D. (1997). (Re)-fashioning the techno-erotic woman: Gender and textuality in the cybercultural matrix. In S. Jones (Ed.), Virtual culture: Identity and communication in cybersociety (pp. 169-184). London: Sage Publications.
21. Ditton, T., & Lombard, M. (1999, May). Presence and social judgment change. Paper presented at the International Communication Association, San Francisco, CA.
22. Fiske, S., & Neuberg, S. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). Ontario, Canada: Academic Press, Inc.
23. Gilbert, D. T., & Hixon, J. G. (1991). The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of Stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 509-517.
24. Hamilton, D., & Sherman, J. (1994). Stereotypes. In J. Robert, S. Wyer, & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 3-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
25. Herring, S. (1994, June 27). Gender differences in computer-mediated communication: Bringing familiar baggage to the new frontier. Paper presented at the American Library Association, Miami, FL.
26. Hert, P. (1997). Social dynamics of an on-line scholarly debate. The Information Society, 13, 329-360.
27. Infante, D., Rancer, A., & Womack, D. (1997). Building communication theory (3rd ed.). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, Inc.
28. Key, M. R. (1975). Male / female language. Metuchen, NJ: The Scarecrow Press, Inc.
29. Lafferty, J. C., & Eady, P. M. (1974). The desert survival problem. Plymouth, MI: Experimental Learning Methods.
30. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things; What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
31. Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1992). Paralanguage and social perception in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Organizational Computing, 2, 321-341.
32. Lipton, M. (1996). Forgetting the body: Cybersex and identity. In L. Strate, R. Jacobson, & S. Gibson (Eds.), Communication and Cyberspace: Social interaction in an electronic environment. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
33. Matheson, K. (1991). Social cues in computer-mediated negotiations: Gender makes a difference. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 137-145.
34. McCroskey, J. (1966). Scales for the measurement of ethos. Speech Monographs, 33, 65-72.
35. McCroskey, J. (1971). Ethos, credibility, and communication in the real world. North Carolina Journal of Speech, 4, 24-31.
36. McCroskey, J., Hamilton, P., & Weiner, A. (1974). The effect of interaction behavior on source credibility, homophily, and interpersonal attraction. Human Communication Research, 1, 42-52.
37. Mehrabian, A. (1967). Orientation and behaviors and nonverbal attitude communication. Journal of Communication, 17, 324-332.
38. Nowak, K. (2001, May). Defining and differentiating copresence, social presence and presence as transportation. Paper presented at the Presence 2001 Conference, Philadelphia, PA.
39. Nowak, K., & Anderson, T. (1999, May). Communicating emotions in CMC: In search of a sufficiency threshold. Paper presented at the International Communication Association, San Francisco, CA.
40. O'Keefe, D. J. (1990). Persuasion theory and research (Vol. 2). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41. Palmer, M. (1995). Interpersonal communication and virtual reality: Mediating interpersonal relationships. In F. Biocca & M. Levy (Eds.), Communication in the Age of Virtual Reality (pp. 277-299). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
42. Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (2000). The formation of group norms in computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research, 26, 341-371.
43. Rice, R., & Love, G. (1987). Electronic emotion; socioemotional content in a computer-mediated communication network. Communication Research, 14, 85-108.
44. Rice, R., & Tyler, J. (1995). Individual and organizational influences on voice mail use and evaluation. Behavior and Information Technology, 14, 329-341.
45. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London.: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
46. Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & McGuier, T. (1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 157-187.
47. Skitka, L., & Maslach, C. (1996). Gender as schematic category: A role construct approach. Social Behavior and Personality, 24, 53-74.
48. Spender, D. (1996). Nattering on the net: Women, power and Cyberspace. Melbourne, Australia: Spinifex Press.
49. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32(11), 1492-1512.
50. Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (1996). Gender, control, and interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 193-220.
51. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
52. Turoff, M. (1991). Computer-mediated communication requirements for group support. Journal of Organizational Computing, 1, 85-113.
53. Walther, J. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52-90.
54. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43.
55. Waskul, D., & Douglass, M. (1997). Cyberself: The emergence of self in on-line chat. The Information Society, 13, 375-397.
56. Watson, N. (1997). Why we argue about virtual community: A case study of the phish.net fan community. In S. Jones (Ed.), Virtual culture: Identity and communication in cybersociety (pp. 102-132). London: Sage Publications.
57. Werry, C. C. (1996). Linguistic and interactional features of internet relay chat. In S. C. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross cultural perspectives (pp. 47-64). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
58. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (1991). Doing gender. In J. Lorber & S. A. Farrell (Eds.), The social construction of gender (pp. 13-37). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
59. Witmer, D., & Katzman, S. (1997). On-line smiles: Does gender make a difference in the use of graphic accents? Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 2. Retrieved October 18, 2002, from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol2/issue4/index.html.
60. Wolfinger, N., & Rabow, J. (1997). The different voices of gender: Social recognition. Crisp, 2, 50-65.
61. Yates, S. (1997). Gender, identity and CMC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13, 281-290.