Virtuality in human supervisory control: Assessing the effects of psychological and social remoteness

Ergonomics

Volumn 46, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 1215-1232

  Stanton, Neville A ^a   Ashleigh, Melanie J ^b   Roberts, Anthony D ^b   Xu, Francis ^b  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Human supervisory control; Interface design; SCADA; Team working

Indexed keywords

PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; RESEARCH; SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL;

HUMAN SUPERVISORY CONTROL;

ERGONOMICS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; JOB ANALYSIS; MALE; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; RESEARCH; SKILL; SOCIAL ISOLATION; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEAMWORK; VIRTUAL REALITY; WORK;

ADULT; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIAL ISOLATION; SOCIAL SUPPORT; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 0042415245     PISSN: 00140139     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00140130310001593586     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Annett, J. and Stanton, N.A. 2000, Team work - A problem for Ergonomics? Ergonomics, 43, 1045-1051.
2. Bainbridge, L. 1987, Ironies of automation, in: J. Rasmussen, K. Duncan and J. Leplat (eds), New Technology and Human Error (Chichester: Wiley), 276-283.
3. Barnett, B.J. and Wickens, C.D. 1988, Display proximity in multicue information: The benefits of boxes, Human Factors, 30, 15-24.
4. Carletta, J., Anderson, A. H. and Cewan, R. M. 2000, The effects of multimedia communication technology on non-collocated teams: A case study, Ergonomics, 43, 1237-1251.
5. Champoux, J. E. 1991, A multivariate test of the job characteristics theory of work motivation, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12, 431-446.
6. Diehl, M. and Stroebe, W. 1987, Productivity loss in brainstorming groups. Towards the solution of a riddle, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 497-509.
7. Greaney, J. and Macrae, A. W. 1996, 'Diagnosis of fault location using polygon displays', Ergonomics, 39, 400-411.
8. Greaney, J., Logie, R. H., Gilhooly, K. J., Ross, D. G. and Ronald, A. 1996, Aberdeen polygons: Computer displays of physiological profiles for intensive care, Ergonomics, 39, 412-428.
9. Hackman, J. R. and Oldman, G. 1980, Work Redesign (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley).
10. Hogan, E. A. and Martell, D. A. 1987, A confirmatory structural equations analysis of the job characteristics model, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 242-263.
11. Hollnagel, E. 1993, Human Reliability Analysis Context and Control (London: Academic Press).
12. Jacob, R. J. K., Egeth, H. E. and Bevan, W. 1976, The face as a data display, Human Factors, 18, 189-200.
13. Kraut, R. E., Fish, R. S., Root, R. W. and Chalfont, B. L. 1990, Informal communication in organizations: Form, function, and echnology, in: S. Oskamp and S. Spacapan (eds), Peoples Reactions to Technology. In Factories, Offices and Aerospace. The Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology (London: Sage Publications), 145-199.
14. McGrath, J. E. and Hollingshead, A. B. 1994 Groups Interacting with Technology (London: Sage Publications).
15. Munson, R. C. and Horst, R. L. 1986, Evidence for global processing of complex visual display, in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 30th Meeting (Santa Monica: Human Factors Society), 776-780.
16. Norman, D. A. 1990, The 'problem' with automation: Inappropriate feedback and interaction, not 'over automation', in: D.E. Broadbent, A. Baddeley and J.T. Reason (eds), Human Factors in Hazardous Situations (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 137-145.
17. Perrow, C. 1984, Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technology (New York: Basic Books).
18. Praetorius, N. and Duncan, K. D. 1991, Flow representation plant processes for fault diagnosis, Behaviour and Information Technology, 10, 41-52.
19. Rasmussen, J. 1974 The Human Data Processor as a System Component. Bits and Pieces of a Model, Riso-M-1722 (Roskilde, Denmark: Riso National Laboratory).
20. Rasmussen, J. 1986, Information Processing and Human-Machine-Interaction - An Approach to Cognitive Engineering (Amsterdam: North Holland)
21. Reason, J. 1990 Human Error. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
22. Salas, E., Prince, C., Baker, D. P. and Shrestha, L. 1995, Situation awareness in team performance - Implications for measurement and training, Human Factors, 37, 123-136.
23. Sanders, G. S. 1981, Driven by distraction: An integrative review of social facilitation theory and research, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 227-251.
24. Stammers, R. B. and Hallam, J. 1985, Task allocation and the balance of load in the multiman-machine system: Some case studies, Applied Ergonomics, 16, 251-257.
25. Stanton, N. A. and Ashleigh, M. J. 2000, A field study of team working in a new human supervisory control system, Ergonomics, 43, 1190-1209.
26. Stanton, N. A., Ashleigh, M. J., Roberts, A. D. and Xu, F. 2001, Testing Hollnagel's contextual control model: Assessing team behaviour in a human supervisory control task, International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 5, 21-33.
27. Steiner, I. D. 1972 Group Process and Productivity (New York: Academic Press).
28. Valacich, J. S., George, J. F., Nunamaker, J. F. and Vogel, D. R. 1994, Physical proximity effects on computer mediated group idea generation, Small Group Research, 25, 83-104.
29. Vicente, K. J., Christofferesen, K. and Pereklita, A. 1995, Supporting operator problem solving through ecological interface design, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 25, 529-545.
30. Watts, S. and Spears, R. 1999, personal communication.
31. Wellens, A. R. 1993, Group situation awareness and distributed decision making: From military to civilian applications, in J. Castillian Jr. (ed.), Individual and Group Decision Making, Current Issues (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum), 267-283.
32. Woods, D., Wise, J. A. and Hanes, L. 1981, An evaluation of nuclear power plant safety parameter display systems, in: R.C. Sugarman (ed.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society (Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society), 110-114.