Gender and group composition in small task groups using computer-mediated communication

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 209-224

  Savicki, Victor ^a   Kelley, Merle ^b   Lingenfelter, Dawn ^b  

^a WESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; FORMAL LANGUAGES; HUMAN ENGINEERING; PSYCHOLOGY COMPUTING;

COMPUTER MEDIATED COMMUNICATION; GROUP COMPOSITION; GROUP DEVELOPMENT; MESSAGE ANONYMITY;

COMPUTER APPLICATIONS;

EID: 0030168688     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0747-5632(96)00003-9     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Anderson L. R., & Blanchard, P. N. (1982). Sex differences in task and social-emotional behavior. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 3, 109-139.
2. Andrews, P. H. (1992). Sex and gender differences in group communication: Impact on the facilitation process. Small Group Research, 3(1), 74-94.
3. Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4. Carli, L. L. (1989). Gender differences in interaction style and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 565-576.
5. Chronicles. (1994, September 5). Time, 144(10), 20.
6. Clark, R. A. (1993). Men's and women's self-confidence in persuasive, comforting, and justificatory communicative tasks. Sex Roles, 28, 553-567.
7. Dindia, K., & Allen, M. (1992). Sex difference in self-disclosure: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 106-124.
8. Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (1991). Gender and emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 685-710.
9. Harris, D. (1990). Pegasus Mail [Computer software]. Dunedin, New Zealand: Author.
10. Herring, S. C. (1993). Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication. Electronic Journal of Communication, 3(2), 1-17.
11. Herschel, R. T. (1994). The impact of varying gender composition on group brainstorming performance in a GSS environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 10, 209-222.
12. Holmes, J. (1992). Women's talk in public contexts. Discourse and Society, 3, 131-150.
13. Jessup, L. M., & Valacich, J. S. (1993). On the study of group support systems: An introduction to group support system research and development. In L. M. Jessup & J. S. Valacich (Eds.), Group support systems: New perspectives (pp. 3-7). New York: Macmillan.
14. Kiesler, K., Siegal, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.
15. Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1992). Group decision making and communication technology. Special Issue: Group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 96-123.
16. Kormanski, C. (1990). Team building patterns of academic groups. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 15, 206-214.
17. McGrath, J. E., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1993). Putting the 'group' back in group support systems: Some theoretical issues about dynamic processes in groups with technological enhancements. In L. M. Jessup & J. S. Valacich (Eds.), Group support systems: New perspectives (pp. 78-96). New York: Macmillan.
18. Metz, J. M. (1994). Computer-mediated communication: Literature review of a new context. Interpersonal Computing and Technology, 2, 31-49.
19. Mulac, A., Wiemann, J. M., Widenmann, S. J., & Gibson, T. W. (1988). Male/female language differences and effects in same-sex and mixed sex dyads: The gender-linked language effect. Communication Monographs, 55, 315-335.
20. Poole, M. S., & Jackson, M. H. (1993). Communication theory and group systems support. In L. M. Jessup & J. S. Valacich (Eds.), Group support systems: New perspectives (pp. 281-293). New York: Macmillan.
21. Rafaeli, S., & Sudweeks, F. (Coordinators). (1993). ProjectH Codebook. Sydney, Australia: ProjectH Research Group.
22. Shaffer, D. R., Pegalis, L. J., & Cornell, D. P. (1992). Gender and self-disclosure revisited: Personal and contextual variations in self-disclosure to same-sex acquaintances. Journal of Social Psychology, 132, 307-315.
23. Shapiro, N. Z., & Anderson, R. H. (1985). Toward an ethics and etiquette for electronic mail (Report R-3283-NSF/RC). Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
24. Spender, D. (1982). Invisible women: The schooling scandal. London: Writers & Readers Publishing Cooperative Society.
25. Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand. New York: Ballantine Books.
26. Thompsen, P. A. (1994). An episode of flaming: A creative narrative. Etc., 51, 51-72.