The impact of individualism - Collectivism, social presence, and group diversity on group decision making under majority influence

Journal of Management Information Systems

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 53-80

  Zhang, Dongsong ^a   Lowry, Paul Benjamin ^b   Zhou, Lina ^c   Fu, Xiaolan ^d  

^a University of Marylandw Baltimore County   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

^d INSTITUTE OF PSYCHOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

CMC; Computer mediated communication; Culture; Group decision making; Group decision systems; Group diversity; Majority influence; Social presence; Virtual teams

Indexed keywords

DATA COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN ENGINEERING; VIRTUAL REALITY;

COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION; GROUP DECISION MAKING; GROUP DIVERSITY;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

EID: 38349101624     PISSN: 07421222     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222230404     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Adler, N.J. International Dimensions of Organizational Behavior, 3d ed. Boston: PWS-Kent, 1997.
2. Alge, B.; Wiethoff, C.; and Klein, H. When does the medium matter? Knowledge-building experiences and opportunities in decision-making teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 1 (2003), 26-37.
3. Anderson, W.N., and Hiltz, S.R. Culturally heterogeneous vs. culturally homogeneous groups in distributed group support systems: Effects on group process and consensus. In R.H. Sprague (ed.), Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, 2001 (available at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/ie15/7255/20032/ 00926211.pdf?arnumber=926211).
4. Baker, S.M., and Petty, R.E. Majority and minority influence: Source-position imbalance as a determinant of message scrutiny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1 (1994), 5-19.
5. Bond, M.H, The Psychology of the Chinese People. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1986.
6. Bond, R., and Smith, P.B. Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch's line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 1 (1996), 111-137.
7. Cramton, C.D. The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science, 12, 3 (2001), 346-371.
8. Daily, B.F., and Steiner, R.L. The influence of group decision support systems on contribution and commitment levels in multicultural and culturally homogeneous decision-making groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 14, 1 (1998), 147-162.
9. Daily, B.F.; Whatley, A.; Ash, S.R.; and Steiner, R.L. The effects of a group decision support system on culturally diverse and culturally homogeneous group decision making. Information and Management, 30, 6 (1996), 281-289.
10. Dennis, A., and Garfield, M. The adoption and use of GSS in project teams: Toward more participative processes and outcomes. MIS Quarterly, 27, 2 (2003), 289-323.
11. Dennis, A., and Valacich, J.S. Electronic brainstorming: Illusions and patterns of productivity. Information Systems Research, 10, 4 (1999), 375-377.
12. Dennis, A.; Hilmer, K.M.; and Taylor, N.J. Information exchange and use in GSS and verbal group decision making: Effects of minority influence. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14, 3 (Winter 1997-98), 61-88.
13. Deutsch, M., and Gerard, H.B. A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 3 (1955), 629-636.
14. Doney, P.M.; Cannon, J.P.; and Mullen, M.R. Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 3 (1998), 601-620.
15. Dubrovsky, V.J.; Kiesler, S.; and Sethna, B.N. The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 2 (1991), 119-146.
16. Earley, P.C. Self or group? Cultural effects of training on self-efficacy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 1 (1994), 89-117.
17. Earley, P.C., and Mosakowski, E. Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transactional team functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1 (2000), 26-49.
18. El-Shinnawy, M., and Vinze, A.S. Technology, culture and persuasiveness: A study of choice-shifts in group settings. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 47, 3 (1997), 473-496.
19. Fiske, A.; Kitayama, S.; Markus, H.R.; and Nisbett, R.E. The cultural matrix of social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, and G. Lindzey (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1998, pp. 915-981.
20. Fjermestad, J. and Hiltz, S.R. An assessment of group support systems experimental research methodology and results. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15, 3 (Winter 1998-99), 7-149.
21. Ford, D.P.; Connelly, C.E.; and Meister, D.B. Information systems research and Hofstede's culture's consequences: An uneasy and incomplete partnership. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50, 1 (2003), 8-25.
22. Fulk, J.; Schmitz, J.; and Steinfield, C. A social influence model of technology use. In J. Fulk, and C. Steinfield (eds.), Organizations and Communication Technology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990, pp. 117-142.
23. Gibson, C.B. Building multicultural teams: Learning to manage homogeneity and heterogeneity. In N.A. Boyacigiller, R.A. Goodman, and M.E. Phillips (eds.), Crossing Cultures: Insights from Master Teachers. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2004 (available at http:// web.gsm.uci.edu/~cgibson/Publication%20files/Articles/ Crossing%20cultures%20chapter.pdf).
24. Gudykunst, W.B., and Ting-Toomey, S. Culture and Interpersonal Communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1998.
25. Gudykunst, W.B.; Matsumoto, Y.; and Ting-Toomey, S. The influence of cultural individualism - collectivism, self construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures. Human Communication Research, 22, 4 (1996), 510-543.
26. Ho, T.; Raman, K.; and Watson, R. Group decision support systems: The cultural factor. In J. DeGross, J.C. Henderson, and B.R. Konsynski (eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information Systems. New York: ACM Press, 1989, pp, 119-129.
27. Hofstede, G. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. Berkshire, UK: McGraw-Hill Europe, 1991.
28. Hofstede, G. Culture's Consequences - Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations, 2d ed. London: Sage, 2001.
29. Hogg, M.A., and Vaughan, G.M. Social Psychology, 3d ed. London: Prentice Hall, 2002.
30. Honold, P. Culture and context: An empirical study for the development of a framework for the elicitation of cultural influence in product usage. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 12, 3-4 (2000), 327-345.
31. Huff, L., and Kelley, L. Levels of organizational trust in individualist versus collectivist societies: A seven-nation study. Organization Science, 14, 1 (2003), 81-90.
32. Jarvenpaa, S.L., and Leidner, D.E. Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Managementlnformation Systems, 14, 4 (Spring 1998), 29-64.
33. Jessup, L.M.; Connolly, T.; and Galegher, J. The effects of anonymity on GDSS group process with an idea-generating task. MIS Quarterly, 14, 3 (1990), 313-321.
34. Kalven, H., and Zeisel, H. The American Jury. Boston: Little, Brown, 1966.
35. Kim, K.; Park, H.; and Suzuki, N. Reward allocations in the United States, Japan and Korea: A comparison of individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 1 (1990), 188-198.
36. Levine, J.M., and Russo, E.M. Majority and minority influence. In C. Hendrick (ed.), Group Processes. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1987, pp. 13-54.
37. Lowry, P.B., and Nunamaker, J.F. Using Internet-based, distributed collaborative writing tools to improve coordination and group awareness in writing teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 46, 4 (2003), 277-297.
38. Lowry, P.B.; Nunamaker, J.F.; Curtis, A.; and Lowry, M.R. The impact of process structure on novice, Internet-based, asynchronous-distributed collaborative writing teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48, 4 (2005), 341-364.
39. Markus, H.R.; Mullally, P.; and Kitayama, S. Selfways: Diversity in modes of cultural participation. In U. Neisser, and D.A. Jopling (eds.), The Conceptual Self in Context: Culture, Experience, Self-understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997, pp. 13-61.
40. Martin, R., and Hewstone, M. Social-influence processes of control and change: Conformity, obedience to authority and innovation. In M.A. Hogg and J. Cooper (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Psychology. London: Sage, 2003, pp. 347-366.
41. Martin, R.; Gardikiotis, A.; and Hewstone, M. Levels of consensus and majority and minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 5 (2002), 645-665.
42. Matthews, B. The Chinese value survey: An interpretation of value scales and consideration of some preliminary results. International Education Journal, 1, 2 (2000), 117-126.
43. McCoy, S.; Galletta, D.; and King, W.R. Integrating national culture into IS research: The need for current individual-level measures. Communications of the AIS, 15, 12 (2005), 211-224.
44. Merritt, A. Culture in the cockpit: Do Hofstede's dimensions replicate? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 3 (2002), 283-301.
45. Miranda, S., and Saunders, C. The social construction of meaning: An alternative perspective on information sharing. Information Systems Research, 14, 1 (2003), 87-106.
46. Moscovici, S. Social influence and conformity. In G. Lindzey, and E. Aronson (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology. New York: Random House, 1985, pp. 347-412.
47. Mugny, G., and Perez, J. The Social Psychology of Minority Influence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
48. Myers, M.D., and Tan, F.B. Beyond models of national culture in information systems research. Journal of Global Information Management, 10, 1 (2002), 24-32.
49. Nemeth, C. Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93, l (1986), 23-32.
50. Nemeth, C. Dissent as driving cognition, attitudes and judgments. Social Cognition, 13, 3 (1995), 273-291.
51. Nemeth, C., and Goncalo, J. Influence and persuasion in small groups. In T.C. Brock and M.C. Green (eds.), Persuasion: Psychological Insights and Perspectives. London: Sage, 2005, pp. 171-194.
52. Nemeth, C., and Kwan, J.L. Majority influence, divergent thinking, and detection of correct solutions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 9 (1987), 788-799.
53. Nunamaker, J.F.; Briggs, R.O.; Mittleman, D.; Vogel, D.; and Balthazard, P. Lessons from a dozen years of group support systems research: A discussion of lab and field findings. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13, 3 (Winter 1996-97), 163-207.
54. Nunamaker, J.F.; Dennis, A.; Valacich, J.S.; Vogel, D.; and George, J.F. Electronic meeting systems to support group work. Communications of the ACM, 34, 7 (1991), 40-61.
55. Pinsonneault, A., and Kraemer, K.L. The impact of technological support on groups: An assessment of the empirical research. Decision Support Systems, 5, 2 (1989), 197-216.
56. Poole, M.S.; Seibold, D.R.; and McPhee, R.D. Group decision-making as a structural process. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 71 (1985), 74-102.
57. Rains, S.A. Leveling the organizational playing field - virtually: A meta-analysis of experimental research assessing the impact of group support system use on member influence behaviors. Communication Research, 32, 2 (2005), 193-234.
58. Raman, K.S., and Wei, K.K. The GDSS research project. In R.P. Bostrom, R.T. Watson, and S.T. Kinney (eds.), Computer Augmented Teamwork: A Guided Tour. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1992, pp. 210-220.
59. Riegelsberger, J.; Sasse, M.A.; and McCarthy, J.D. The mechanics of trust: A framework for research and design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62, 3 (2005), 381-422.
60. Roberts, T.L.; Lowry, P.B.; and Sweeney, P.D. An evaluation of the impact of social presence through group size and the use of collaborative software on group member "voice" in face-to-face and computer-mediated task groups. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 49, 2 (2006), 28-43.
61. Salk, J.E., and Brannen, M.Y. National culture, networks, and individual influence in a multinational management team. Academy of Management Journal 43, 2 (2002), 191-202.
62. Samarah, I.; Paul, S.; Mykytyn, P.; and Seetharaman, P. The collaborative conflict management style and cultural diversity in DGSS supported fuzzy tasks: An experimental investigation. In R.H. Sprague (ed.), Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, 2003 (available at http://csd12.computer.org/comp/ proceedings/hicss/2003/1874/01/187410040a.pdf).
63. Setlock, L.D.; Fussell, S.R.; and Neuwirth, C. Taking it out of context: Collaborating within and across cultures in face-to-face settings and via instant messaging. In J. Herbsleb, and G. Olson (eds.), Proceedings of ACM Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'04). New York: ACM Press, 2004, pp. 604-613.
64. Shackleton, V.J., and Ali, A.H. Work-related values of managers: A test of the Hofstede model. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 1 (1990), 109-118.
65. Sia, C.-L.; Tan, B.C.Y.; and Wei, K.K. Group polarization and computer-mediated communication: Effects of communication cues, social presence, and anonymity. Information Systems Research, 13, 1 (2002), 70-90.
66. Souren, P.; Priya, S.; Imad, S.; and Mykytyn, P. Impact of heterogeneity and collaborative conflict management style on the performance of synchronous global virtual teams. Information and Management, 41, 3 (2004), 303-321.
67. Sproull, L., and Kiesler, S. Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32, 11 (1986), 1492-1512.
68. Steensma, H.K.; Marino, L.; and Dickson, P.H. The influence of national culture on the formation of technology alliances by entrepreneurial firms. Academy of Management Journal 43, 5 (2000), 951-973.
69. Straub, D.; Loch, K.; Evaristo, R.; Karahanna, E.; and Srite, M. Toward a theory-based measurement of culture. Journal of Global Information Management, 10, 1 (2002), 13-23.
70. Straus, S.G., and McGrath, J.E. Does the medium matter: The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 1 (1994), 87-97.
71. Swigger, K.; Alpaslan, F.; Brazile, R.; and Monticino, M. Effects of culture on computer-supported international collaborations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 60, 3 (2004), 365-380.
72. Tajfel, H., and Turner, J.C. The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In S. Worchel and L.W. Austin (eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1986, pp. 7-24.
73. Tan, B.C.Y.; Watson, R.T.; Wei, K.K.; Raman, K.S.; and Kerola, P.K. National culture and group support systems: Examining the situation where some people are more equal than others. In J.F. Nunamaker and R.H. Sprague (eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1993, pp. 132-141 (available at http:// ieeexplore.ieee.org/ie12/449/7026/00284175.pdf?arnumber=284175).
74. Tan, B.C.Y.; Wei, K.K.; Watson, R.T.; Clapper, D.L.; and McLean, E.R. Computer-mediated communication and majority influence: Assessing the impact in an individualistic and a collectivistic culture. Management Science, 44, 9 (1998), 1263-1278.
75. Triandis, H.C. The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 3 (1989), 506-520.
76. Triandis, H.C.; Bontempo, R.; Betancourt, H.; Bond, M.; Leung, K.; Brenes, A.; Georgas, J.; Hui, C.; Marin, G.; Setiadi, B.; Sinha, J.; Verman, J.; Spangenberg, J.; Tonzard, H.; and de Montmollin, G. The measurement of the etic aspects of individualism and collectivism across cultures. Australian Journal of Psychology, 38, 3 (1986), 257-267.
77. Tung, L.L., and Quaddus, M.A. Cultural differences explaining the differences in results in GSS: Implications for the next decade. Decision Support Systems, 33, 2 (2002), 177-199.
78. Usunier, J.C. International and Cross-Cultural Management Research. London: Sage, 1998.
79. Valacich, J.; Dennis, A.; and Nunamaker, J.F. Group size and anonymity effects on computer-mediated idea generation. Small Group Research, 23, 1 (1992), 49-73.
80. Vreede, G., de; Jones, N., & Mgaya, B.J. Exploring the application and acceptance of group support systems in Africa. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15, 3 (Winter 1998-99), 197-234.
81. Vogel, D.; Davison, R.; and Shroff, R. Sociocultural learning: A perspective on GSS-enabled global education. Communications of the AIS, 7, 9 (2001), 1-41.
82. Walsham, G. Cross-cultural software production and use: A structurational analysis. MIS Quarterly, 26, 4 (2002), 359-380.
83. Warkentin, M., and Beranek, P.M. Training to improve virtual team communication. Information Systems Journal, 9, 4 (1999), 271-289.
84. Watson, R.; Ho, T.; and Raman, K. Culture: A fourth dimension of group support systems. Communications of the ACM, 37, 10 (1994), 44-55.
85. Watson, W.E.; Kumar, K.; and Michaelsen, L.K. Cultural diversity's impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 3 (1993), 590-602.