Testing the interactivity principle: Effects of mediation, propinquity, and verbal and nonverbal modalities in interpersonal interaction

Journal of Communication

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 657-677

  Burgoon, Judee K ^a   Bonito, Joseph A ^b   Ramirez, Artemio Jr ^b   Dunbar, Norah E ^c   Kam, Karadeen ^b   Fischer, Jenna ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH   (United States)

^c CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION;

EID: 0036409347     PISSN: 00219916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/joc/52.3.657     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Argyle, M. (1988). Bodily communication (2nd ed.). London: Methuen.
2. Argyle, M., Salter, V., Nicholson, H., Williams, M., & Burgess, P. (1970). The communication of inferior and superior attitudes by verbal and nonverbal signals. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 230.
3. Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596--612.
4. Barefoot, J. C., & Strickland, L. H. (1982). Conflict and dominance in television-mediated interactions. Human Relations, 7, 559-565.
5. Biocca, F. (1992). Virtual reality technology; A tutorial. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 23-72.
6. Bonito, J., Burgoon, J. K., Bengtsson, B., Ramirez, A., Jr., & Stoner, G. M. (2000). The role of expectations in human-computer interaction. Manuscript submitted for publication.
7. Bonito, J., Burgoon, J. K., Ramirez, A., Jr., & Dunbar, N. E. (2000). Participation and decision-making: The role of interactivity in c̄ommunication processes and outcomes. Manuscript submitted for publication.
8. Bordia, P. (1997). Face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication: A synthesis of the experimental literature. Journal of Business Communication, 34, 99-120.
9. Bugental, D. E. (1974). Interpretation of naturally occurring discrepancies between words and intonation: Modes of inconsistency resolution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 125-133.
10. Buller, D. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1996). Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory, 6, 203-242.
11. Burgoon, J. K. (1985). The relationship of verbal and nonverbal codes. In B. Dervin & M. J. Voight (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences, Vol. 6 (pp. 263-298). Norvood, NJ: Ablex.
12. Burgoon, J. K. (1994). Nonverbal signals. In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 344-390). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
13. Burgoon, J. K., Bengtsson, B., Bonito, J., Ramirez, A., Jr., & Dunbar, N. (1999, January). Designing interfaces to maximize the quality of collaborative work. Proceedings of the Thirty-second Annual Hawaii International Conference on Computer and Systems Sciences, Maui, HI.
14. Burgoon, J. K., Birk, T., & Pfau, M. (1990). Nonverbal behaviors, persuasion, and credibility. Human Communication Research, 17, 140-169.
15. Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J., Bengtsson, B., Ramirez, A., Jr., Dunbar, N. E., & Miczo, N. (1999-2000). Testing the interactivity model: Communication processes, partner assessments, and the quality of collaborative work. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 35-58.
16. Burgoon, J. K., & Hale, J. L. (1987). Validation and measurement of the fundamental themes of relational communication. Communication Monographs, 54, 19-41.
17. Burgoon, J. K., & Hoobler, G. (in press). Nonverbal signals. In M. L. Knapp, J. Daly, & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 240-299). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Burgoon, J. K., Johnson, M. L., & Koch, P. T. (1998). The nature and measurement of interpersonal dominance. Communication Monographs, 65, 309-335.
19. Burgoon, J. K., & Newton, D. A. (1991). Applying a social meaning model to relational messages of conversational involvement: Comparing participant and observer perspectives. Soutbern Communication Journal, 56, 96-113.
20. Burgoon, J. K., Stern, L. A., & Dillman, L. (1995). Interpersonal adaptation: Dyadic interaction patterns. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. Burgoon, J. K., & Walther, J. B. (1990). Nonverbal expectancies and the evaluative consequences of violations. Human Communication Research, 17, 232-265.
22. Cahn, D. D., & Shulman, G. M. (1984). The perceived understanding instrument. Communication Research Reports, 1, 122-125.
23. Chilcoat, Y., & DeWine, S. (1985). Teleconferencing and interpersonal communication perception. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 18, 14-32.
24. Coker, D. A., & Burgoon, J. K. (1987). The nature of conversational involvement and nonverbal encoding patterns. Human Communication Research, 13, 463-494.
25. Culnan, M. J., & Markus, M. L. (1987). Information technologies: Electronic media and intraorganizational communication. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp, 420-444). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, (Vol. 6, pp, 191-233). Greenwich. CT: JAI Press.
27. DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1979). Ambivalence, discrepancy, and deception in nonverbal communication. In R. Rosenthal (Ed.), Skill in nonverbal communication: Individual differences (pp. 204-248). Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager.
28. DePaulo, B. M., Zuckerman, M., & Rosenthal, R. (1980). Detecting deception: Modality effects. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 125-162). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
29. Foppa, K. (1995). On mutual understanding and agreement in dialogues. In I. Marková, C. Graumann, & K. Foppa (Eds.), Mutualities in dialogue (pp. 149-175). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. Fowler, G. B., & Wackerbarth, M. E. (1988). Audio teleconferencing versus face-to-face conferencing: A synthesis of the literature. In S. D. Ferguson & S. Ferguson (Eds.), Organizational communication (2nd ed., pp. 431-451). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
31. Fujimoto, E. K. (1972). The comparative communicative power of verbal and nonverbal symbols (Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus). Dissertation Abstracts International, 32, 7A.
32. Griffith, T. L., & Northcraft, G. B. (1994). Distinguishing between the forest and the trees: Media, features, and methodology in electronic communication research. Organizational Science, 5, 272-285.
33. Hirokawa, R. Y. (1990). The role of communication in group decision-making efficacy: A task contingency perspective. Small Group Research, 21, 190-204.
34. Jensen, C., Farnham, S. D., Drucker, S. M. & Kollock, P. (2000, April). The effect of communication modality on cooperation in online environments. Proceedings of CHI 2000 (pp. 470-477), The Hague, Netherlands.
35. Kemp, N.J., Rutter, D. R., Dewey, M. E., Harding, A. G., & Stephenson, G. M. (1984). Visual communication and impression formation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 133-145.
36. Krauss, R. M., & Fussell, S. R. (1990). Mutual knowledge and communication effectiveness. In J. Galegher, R. Kraut, & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork (pp. 111-145). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Krauss, R. M., Fussell, S. R., & Chen, Y. (1995). Coordination of perspective in dialogue: Intrapersonal and interpersonal processes. In I. Marková, C. Graumann, & K. Foppa (Eds.), Mutualities in dialogue (pp. 124-145). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38. Laughlin, P. R. (1999). Collective induction: Twelve postulates. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 80, 50-69.
39. McCròskey, J. C., Hamilton. P. R., & Weiner, A. N. (1974). The effect of interaction behavior on source credibility, homophily, and interpersonal attraction. Human Comunication Research, 1, 42-52.
40. McCroskey, J. C., & McCain, T. A. (1974). The measurement of interpersonal attraction. Speech Monographs, 41, 261-266.
41. McCroskey, J. C., & Young, T. J. (1981). Ethos and credibility: The construct and its measurement after three decades. Central States Speech Journal, 32, 24-34.
42. McGrath, J. E., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1994). Groups interacting with technology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43. McGuire, W. J. (1985). Attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 233-346). New York: Random House.
44. Meader, D. (1995). Supporting distributed, design discussions: A study of video effects on engagement and critical discussion in desktop, multimedia conferencing. Unpublished dissertation, University of Michigan.
45. Mehrabian, A. (1981). Silent messages: Implicit communication of emotions and attitudes (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
46. Montes, G. M. (1992). Is interaction the message? The effect of democratizing and non-democratizing interaction in videoconferencing small groups on social presence and quality of outcome. In U. E. Gattike (Ed.), Technology-mediated communication (pp. 187-223). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.
47. Moon, Y., & Nass, C. (1996). How "real" are computer personalities? Psychological responses to personality types in human-computer interaction. Communication Research, 23, 651-674.
48. Nohria, N., & Eccles, R. G. (1992). Networks in organizations: Structure, form and action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
49. O'Hara-Devereaux, M., & Johansen, R. (1994). Globalwork: Bridging distance, culture, and time. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
50. O'Keefe, D. J. (1990). Persuasion: Theory and research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
51. Palmer, M. T. (1995). Interpersonal communication and virtual reality: Mediating interpersonal relationships. In F. Biocca & M. Levy (Eds.), Communication in the age of virtual reality (pp. 277-299). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Pavitt, C. (1993). Does communication matter in social influence during small group discussion? Five positions. Communication Studies, 44, 216-227.
53. Pavitt, C., & Curtis, E. (1994). Small group discussion: A theoretical approach (2nd ed), Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
54. Poole, M. S., & DeSanctis, G. (1992). Microlevel structuration in computcr-supported group decision making. Human Communication Research, 19. 5-49.
55. Poole, M. S., Holmes, M., Watson, R., & DeSanctis, G. (1993). Group decision support systems and group communication: A comparison of decision making in computer-supported and nonsupported groups. Communication Research, 20, 176-213.
56. Poster, M. (1990). The mode of information: Poststructuralism and social context. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
57. Rafaeli, S. (1988). Interactivity: From new media to communication. Sage Annual Review of Communication Research, 16, 110-134.
58. Ramirez, A., Jr., & Burgoon, J. K. (2001, November). The effect of interactivity on predicted outcome values I: The role of richness and mediation in initial interactions. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Atlanta, GA.
59. Rutter, D. (1987). Communicating by telephone. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
60. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley.
61. Stiff, J. B., Kim, H. J., & Ramesh, C. N. (1989, May). Truth-biases and aroused suspicion in relational deception. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Communication Association, San Francisco, CA.
62. Stoner, G. M. (2001). Decision-making via mediated communication: Effects of mediation, mode, and time pressure on communication processes, social judgments, and task performance. Unpublished thesis, University of Arizona.
63. Storms, M. D. (1973). Videotape and the attribution process: Reversing actors' and observers' points of view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 165-175.
64. Street, R. L., Mulac, A., & Wiemann, J. M. (1988). Speech evaluation differences as a function of perspective (participant versus observer) and presentational medium. Human Communication Research, 14, 333-363.
65. Stromer-Galley, J. (2000). On-line interaction and why candidates avoid it. Journal of Communication, 50(4), 111-132.
66. Walther, J. B. (1994). Anticipated ongoing interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 20, 473-501.
67. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43.
68. Walther, J. B. (1997). Group and interpersonal effects in international computer-mediated collaboration. Human Communication Research, 23, 342-369.
69. Walther, J. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19, 50-88.
70. Walther, J. B., Slovacek, C. L., & Tidwell, L. C. (2001). Is a picture worth a thousand words? Photographic images in long-term and short-term computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 28, 105-134.
71. Watson, R., DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1988). Using a GDSS to facilitate group consensus: Some intended and unintended consequences. MIS Quarterly, 12, 463-478.
72. Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
73. Weisband, S. P., Schneider, S. K., & Connolly, T. (1993). In G. deMichelis, C. Simone, & K. Schmidt (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 265-279). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.