A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes

Academy of Management Review

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 356-376

  Marks, Michelle A ^a   Mathieu, John E ^a   Zaccaro, Stephen J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035536551     PISSN: 03637425     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/AMR.2001.4845785     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Austin, J. T., & Vancouver, J. B. 1996. Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content. Psychological Bulletin, 120: 338-375.
2. Bales, R. F. 1950. Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Bales, R. F. 1980. SYMLOG case study kit. New York: Free Press.
4. Barry, B., & Stewart, G. L. 1997. Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: The role of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 62-78.
5. Bechhard, R. 1983. Optimizing team building efforts. In W. L. French, V. Bell, Jr., & R. A. Zawacki (Eds.), Organizational development: Theory, research, and practice: 152-157. Piano, TX: Business Publications.
6. Bikson, T. K., Cohen, S. G., & Mankin, D. 1999. Information technology and high performance teams. In E. Sundstrorn & Associates (Eds.), Supporting work team effectiveness: 215-245. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. Blickensderfer, E., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. 1997. Training teams to self-correct: An empirical investigation. Paper presented at the 12th annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, St. Louis.
8. Bowers, C. A., Baker, D. P., & Salas, E. 1994. Measuring the importance of teamwork: The reliability and validity of job/task analysis indices for team-training design. Military Psychology, 6: 205-214.
9. Bowers, C. A., Braun, C. C., & Morgan, B. B., Jr. 1997. Team workload: Its meaning and measurement. In M. T. Brannick, E. Salas, & C. Prince (Eds.), Team performance and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications: 85-108. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Brannick, M. T., Prince, A., Prince, C., & Salas, E. 1992. Team coordination: Measuring an elusive construct. Paper presented at the meeting of the Human Factors Society, Atlanta.
11. Brannick, M. T., Roach, R. M., & Salas, E. 1993. Understanding team performance: A multimethod study. Human Performance, 6: 287-308.
12. Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. 1993. Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46: 823-850.
13. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Tannenbaum, S. I., Salas, E., & Volpe, C. E. 1995. Defining competencies and establishing team training requirements. In R. A. Guzzo, E. Salas, & Associates (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations: 333-380. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. 1997. What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23: 239-290.
15. Dickinson, T. L., & McIntyre, R. M. 1997. A conceptual framework for teamwork measurement. In M. T. Brannick, E. Salas, & C. Prince (Eds.), Team performance and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications: 19-43. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Dwyer, D. J., Fowlkes, J. E., Oser, R. L., Salas, E., & Lane, N. E. 1997. Team performance measurement in distributed environments: The TARGETS methodology. In M. T. Brannick, E. Salas, & C. Prince (Eds.), Team performance and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications: 137-153. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Fleishman, E. A., & Zaccaro, S. J. 1992. Toward a taxonomy of team performance functions. In R. W. Swezey & E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance: 31-56. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
18. Futoran, G. C., Kelly, J. R., & McGrath, J. E. 1989. TEMPO: A time-based system for the analysis of group interaction process. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10: 211-232.
19. Gaddy, C. D., & Wachtel, J. A. 1992. Team skills in nuclear power plant operations. In R. W. Swezey & E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance: 379-396. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
20. George, J. 1990. Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 107-116.
21. Gersick, C. J. G. 1988. Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31: 9-41.
22. Gersick, C. J. G. 1989. Marking time: Predictable transitions in task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 32: 274-309.
23. Gist, M. E., Locke, E. A., & Taylor, M. S. 1987. Organizational behavior: Group structure, process, and effectiveness. Journal of Management, 13: 237-257.
24. Gladstein, D. 1984. Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 499-517.
25. Guzzo, R. A., & Shea, G. P. 1992. Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed), vol. 3: 269-313. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
26. Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G. 1975. Group tasks, group interaction processes, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 8: 45-99. New York: Academic Press.
27. Hackman, J. R., & Oldman, G. R. 1980. Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
28. Hackman, R. 1983. A normative model of work team effectiveness. Technical report No. 2. New Haven, CT: Yale School of Organization and Management.
29. Harrison, R. 1983. When power conflicts trigger team spirit. In W. L. French, V. Bell, Jr., & R. A. Zawacki (Eds.), Organizational development: Theory, research, and practice: 183-191. Plano, TX: Business Publications.
30. Hyatt, D. E., & Ruddy, T. M. 1997. An examination of the relationship between work group characteristics and performance: Once more into the breech. Personnel Psychology, 50: 553-585.
31. Jehn, K. A. 1995. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 256-282.
32. Jentsch, F., Barnett, J., Bowers, C. A., & Salas, E. 1999. Who is flying this plane anyway? What mishaps tell us about crew member role assignment and air crew situational awareness. Human Factors, 41(1): 1-14.
33. Jones, G. R. 1984. Task visibility, free riding, and shirking: Explaining the effect of structure and technology on employee behavior. Academy of Management Review, 9: 684-695.
34. Kelly, J. R., & McGrath, J. E. 1985. Effects of time limits and task types on task performance and interaction of four-person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49: 395-407.
35. Kerlinger, F. N. 1986. Foundations of behavioral research. Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
36. Kozlowski, S. W. J., Gully, S. M., Nason, E. R., & Smith, E. M. 1999. Developing adaptive teams: A theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of work performance: Implications for staffing, personnel actions, and development: 240-292. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
37. Latane, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. 1979. Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37: 822-832.
38. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. 1990. Progress in small group research. Annual review of psychology, 41: 585-634.
39. Lindsley, D. H., Brass, D. J., & Thomas, J. B. 1994. Efficacy-performance spirals: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 20: 645-678.
40. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. 1990. A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
41. Mathieu, J. E., & Button, S. B. 1992. An examination of the relative impact of normative information and self-efficacy on personal goals and performance over time. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22: 1758-1775.
42. McGrath, J. E. 1984a. Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
43. McGrath, J. E. 1984b. Studying groups at work: Ten critical needs for theory and practice. In P. Goodman (Ed.), Designing effective work groups: 362-391. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
44. McGrath, J. E. 1991. Time, interaction, and performance (TIP): A theory of groups. Small Group Research, 22: 147-174.
45. McGrath, J. E. 1993. Introduction: The JEMCO workshop - description of a longitudinal study. Small Group Research, 24: 285-306.
46. Meyer, A. D. 1982. Adapting to environmental jolts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27: 515-537.
47. Mullen, B., & Copper, C. 1994. The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 115: 210-227.
48. Nieva, V. F., Fleishman, E. A., & Rieck, A. M. 1978. Team dimensions: Their identity, their measurement, and their relationships. Technical report. Washington, DC: ARRO.
49. O'Leary-Kelly, A. M., Martocchio, J. J., & Frink, D. D. 1994. A review of the influence of group goals on group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 1285-1301.
50. Pace, R. C. 1990. Personalized and depersonalized conflict in small group discussions. Small Group Research, 21: 79-96.
51. Patten, T. H., Jr. 1981. Organizational development through teambuilding. New York: Wiley.
52. Prince, C., & Salas, E. 1993. Training research for teamwork in the military aircrew. In E. L. Wiener, B. G. Kanki, & R. L. Helmreich (Eds.), Cockpit research management: 337-366. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
53. Prussia, G. E., & Kinicki, A. J. 1996. A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social-cognitive theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81: 187-198.
54. Saavedra, R., Early, P. C., & van dyne, L. 1993. Complex interdependence in task performing groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: 61-72.
55. Simons, T. L., Pellad, L. H., & Smith, K. A. 1999. Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 662-673.
56. Simons, T. L., & Peterson, R. S. 2000. Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 102-111.
57. Smolek, J., Hoffman, D., & Moran, L. 1999. Organizing teams for success. In E. Sundstrom (Ed.), Supporting work team effectiveness: 24-62. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
58. Steiner, I. D. 1972. Group processes and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
59. Stevens, M. J., & Campion, M. A. 1994. The knowledge, skill, and ability requirements for teamwork: Implications for human resource management. Journal of Management, 20: 503-530.
60. Stout, R. J., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Milanovich, D. M. 1999. Planning, shared mental models, and coordinated performance: An empirical link is established. Human Factors, 41(1): 61-71.
61. Sundstrom, E. 1999. The challenges of supporting work team effectiveness. In E. Sundstrom & Associates (Eds.), Supporting work team effectiveness: 3-23. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
62. Tesluk, P., & Mathieu, J. E. 1999. Overcoming roadblocks to effectiveness: Incorporating management of performance barriers into models of work group effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84: 200-217.
63. Tesluk, P., Mathieu, J. E., Zaccaro, S. J., & Marks, M. A. 1997. Task and aggregation issues in the analysis and assessment of team performance. In M. T. Brannick, E. Salas, & C. Prince (Eds.), Team performance and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications: 197-224. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
64. Tjosvold, D. 1985. Implications of controversy research for management. Journal of Management, 11: 21-37.
65. Tuckman, B. W. 1965. Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63: 384-389.
66. Van de Vliert, E., Euwema, M. C., & Huismans, S. E. 1995. Managing conflict with a subordinate or superior: Effectiveness of conglomerated behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80: 271-281.
67. Weingart, L. R. 1997. How did they do that? The ways and means of studying group process. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19: 189-239.
68. Weldon, E. 1998. Strategy formation in empowered work groups. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, San Diego.
69. Weldon, E., Jehn, K. A., & Pradhan, P. 1991. Processes that mediate the relationship between a group goal and improved group performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61: 555-569.
70. Williams, K. J., & Alliger, G. M. 1994. Role stressors, mood spillover, and perceptions of work-family conflict in employed parents. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 837-868.
71. Zaheer, S., Albert, S., & Zaheer, A. 1999. Time scales and organizational theory. Academy of Management Review, 24: 725-741.
72. Zalesny, M. D., Salas, E., & Prince, C. 1995. Conceptual and measurement issues in coordination: Implications for team behavior and performance. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 13: 81-115.