The impact of anonymity on perceptions of source credibility and influence in computer-mediated group communication: A test of two competing hypotheses

Communication Research

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 100-125

  Rains, Stephen A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive structuration theory; Anonymity; Anonymous communication; Computer mediated communication; Credibility; Decision making; Electronic meeting system; Group communication; Group support system; Social influence

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845973363     PISSN: 00936502     EISSN: 15523810     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0093650206296084     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
2. Anonymous [Author is C. R. Scott]. (1998). To reveal or not to reveal: A theoretical model of anonymous communication. Communication Theory, 8, 381-407.
3. Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
4. Bonito, J. A. (2002). The analysis of participation in small groups: Methodological and conceptual issues related to interdependence. Small Group Research, 33, 412-438.
5. Cacioppo, J. T., Harkins, S. G., & Petty, R. E. (1981). The nature of attitudes and cognitive responses and their relationship to behavior. In R. E. Petty, T. M. Ostrum, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Cognitive response in persuasion (pp. 31-54). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Campbell, L., & Kashy, D. A. (2002). Estimating actor, partner, and interaction effects for dyadic data using PROC MIXED and HLM: A guided tour. Personal Relationships, 9, 327-342.
7. Clawson, V., & Bostrom, R. (1996). Research-driven facilitation training for computer support environments. Group Decision and Negotiation, 5, 7-29.
8. Connolly, T., Jessup, L. M., & Valacich, J. S. (1990). Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Management Science, 36, 689-703.
9. Dennis, A. R. (1996). Information exchange and use in group decision making: You can lead a group to information, but you can't make it think. MIS Quarterly, 20, 433-457.
10. Dennis, A. R., Hilmer, K. M., & Taylor, N. J. (1997). Information exchange and use in GSS and verbal group decision making: Effects of minority influence. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14, 61-88.
11. Dennis, A. R., Wixom, B. H., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2001). Understanding fit and appropriation effects in group support systems via meta-analysis. MIS Quarterly, 25, 169-173.
12. DeSanctis, G., & Gallupe, R. B. (1987). A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science, 33, 589-609.
13. DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5, 121-147.
14. Dubrovsky, V. J., Kiesler, S., & Sethna, B. N. (1991). The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups. Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 119-146.
15. Eckel, M. W. (1968). The ethics of decision-making. New York: Morehouse-Barlow.
16. El-Shinnawy, M., & Vinze, A. S. (1997). Technology, culture, and persuasiveness: A study of choice-shifts in group settings. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 47, 473-496.
17. Flanagin, A. J., Tiyaamornwong, V., O'Connor, J., & Seibold, D. R. (2002). Computer-mediated group work: The interaction of member sex and anonymity. Communication Research, 29, 66-93.
18. Garlick, R., & Mongeau, P. A. (1992). Majority/minority size and the evaluations of persuasive arguments. Communication Research Reports, 9, 43-53.
19. Garlick, R., & Mongeau, P. A. (1993). Argument quality and group member status as determinants of attitudinal minority influence. Western Journal of Communication, 57, 289-308.
20. George, J. F., Easton, G. K., Nunamaker, J. F., & Northcraft, G. B. (1990). A study of collaborative group work with and without computer-based support. Information Systems Research, 1, 394-415.
21. Gordijn, E. H., De Vries, N. K., & De Dreu, C. K. (2002). Minority influence on focal and related attitudes: Change in size attributions and information processing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1315-1326.
22. Gouran, D. S., Brown, D., & Henry, D. R. (1978). Behavioral correlates of perceptions of quality in decision-making discussion. Communication Monographs, 45, 51-63.
23. Hanke, J. L. (1998). Can technology save you from meeting hell? Presentations, 12, 36-44.
24. Hardy, M. A. (1993). Regression with dummy variables. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25. Hayne, S. C., Pollard, C. E., & Rice, R. E. (2003). Identification of comment authorship in anonymous group support systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20, 301-329.
26. Hayne, S. C., & Rice, R. E. (1997). Attribution accuracy when using anonymity in group support systems. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 47, 429-452.
27. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley.
28. Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communications and persuasion: Psychological studies in opinion change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
29. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55.
30. Huang, W. W., & Wei, K. K. (2000). An empirical investigation of the effects of group support systems (GSS) and task type on group interactions from an influence perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17, 181-206.
31. Johnson, B. T. (1991). Insights about attitudes: Meta-analytic perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 289-299.
32. Kashy, D. A., & Kenny, D. A. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 451-477). New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 233-265). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
34. Kenny, D. A., Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., Livi, S., & Kashy, D. A. (2002). The statistical analysis of data from small groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 126-137.
35. Kerr, N. L. (2002). When is a minority a minority? Active versus passive minority advocacy and social influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 471-484.
36. Lim, L. H., Raman, K. S., & Wei, K. K. (1994). Interacting effects of GDSS and leadership. Decision Support Systems, 12, 199-211.
37. Limon, M. S., & Boster, F. J. (2001). The impact of varying argument quality and minority size on influencing the majority and perceptions of the minority. Communication Quarterly, 49, 350-366.
38. Massey, A. P., & Clapper, D. L. (1995). Element finding: The impact of a group support system on a crucial phase of sense making. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11, 149-176.
39. McCroskey, J. C. (1966). Scales for the measurement of ethos. Speech Monographs, 33, 65-72.
40. McCroskey, J. C., & Teven, J. J. (1999). Goodwill: A re-examination of the construct and its measurement. Communication Monographs, 66, 90-103.
41. McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
42. McLeod, P. L. (1997). A comprehensive model of anonymity in computer-mediated group decision making. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 223-234). Retrieved June 24, 2004, from http://aisel.isworld.org/subject-by-publication.asp?Subject-ID= 128
43. Mejias, R., Lazeno, L., Rico, A., Torres, A., Vogel, D., & Shepherd, M. (1996). A cross-cultural comparison of GSS and non-GSS consensus and satisfaction level within and between the U.S. and Mexico. Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3, 408-417.
44. Nunamaker, J. F., Briggs, R. O., Mittleman, D. D., Vogel, D. R., & Balthazard, P. A. (1996). Lessons from a dozen years of group support systems research: A discussion of lab and field findings. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13, 163-207.
45. Petty, R. E., Ostrom, T. M., & Brock, T. C. (1981). Cognitive responses in persuasion. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46. Pinsonneault, A., & Heppel, N. (1997). Anonymity in group support systems research: A new conceptualization, measure, and contingency framework. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14, 89-108.
47. Poole, M. S., & DeSanctis, G. (1990). Understanding the use of group decision support systems: The theory of adaptive structuration. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 173-193). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
48. Postmes, T., & Lea, M. (2000). Social processes and group decision making: Anonymity in group decision support systems. Ergonomics, 43, 1252-1274.
49. Rains, S. A. (2005). Leveling the organizational playing field-virtually: A meta-analysis of experimental research assessing the impact of group support system use on member influence behaviors. Communication Research, 32, 193-234.
50. Reinig, B. A. (2003). Toward an understanding of satisfaction with the process and outcomes of teamwork. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 65-84.
51. Reinig, B. A., & Mejias, R. J., (2003). An investigation of the influence of national culture and group support systems on group processes and outcomes. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Retrieved June 24, 2004, from www.computer.org/proceedings/ cps_dl.htm
52. Romano, N. C., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2001). Meeting analysis: Findings from research and practice. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Retrieved March 1, 2005, from www.computer.org/proceedings/cps_dl.htm
53. Sauer, P. J. (2004, May). Escape from meeting hell. Inc. Magazine, 26, 70-78, 112-112.
54. Scott, C. R. (1999a). Communication technology and group communication. In L. R. Frey, D. Gouran, & M. S. Poole (Eds.), The handbook of group communication theory and research (pp. 432-472). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55. Scott, C. R. (1999b). The impact of physical and discursive anonymity on group members' multiple identifications during computer-mediated decision making. Western Journal of Communication, 63, 456-487.
56. Scott, C. R., Quinn, L., Timmerman, C. E., & Garrett, D. (1998). Ironic uses of group communication technology: Evidence from meeting transcripts and interviews with group decision support system users. Communication Quarterly, 46, 353-374.
57. Scott, C. R., Sage, D. M., Timmerman, C. E., & Quinn, L. (1997, May). When the virtual honeymoon is virtually over: Declining benefits associated with repeated usage of a computerized group decision support system. Paper presented at the International Communication Association's annual conference, Montreal, Canada.
58. Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & McGuire, T. W. (1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 157-187.
59. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
60. Tan, B., Raman, K., & Wei, K. (1994). An empirical study of task dimension of group support systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 24, 1054-1060.
61. Valacich, J. S., Dennis, A. R., & Nunamaker, J. F. (1992). Group size and anonymity effects on computermediated idea generation. Small Group Research, 23, 49-73.
62. Valacich, J. S., Jessup, L. M., Dennis, A. R., & Nunamaker, J. F. (1992). A conceptual framework of anonymity in group support systems. Group Decision and Negotiations, 1, 219-241.
63. Valacich, J. S., & Schwenk, C. (1995). Devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiry effects on face-to-face and computer-mediated group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 158-173.
64. Yellen, R. E., Winniford, M. A., & Sanford, C. C. (1995). Extraversion and introversion in electronicallysupported meetings. Information and Management, 28, 63-74.