Information suppression and status persistence in group decision making the effects of communication media

Human Communication Research

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 193-219

  Hollingshead, Andrea B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030362980     PISSN: 03603989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00392.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Berger, J., Cohen, B. P., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1972). Status conceptions and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 37, 241-255.
2. Berger, J., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction: The status organizing process. In J. Berger, M. H. Fisek, R. Z. Norman, & M. Zelditch, Jr. (Eds.), Status characteristics and social interaction: An expectation-states approach (pp. 3-87). New York: Elsevier.
3. Bonito, J. A., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1997). Participation in small groups. Communication Yearbook, 20, 227-261.
4. Clapper, D. L., McLean, E. R., & Watson, R. T. (1991). An experimental investigation of the effect of group decision support on normative influence in small groups. Paper presented at the Twelfth International Conference on Information Systems, New York.
5. Daly, B. (1993). The influence of face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication channels on collective induction. Accounting, Management & Information Technology, 3, 1-22.
6. Dubrovsky, V. J., Kiesler, S., & Sethna, B. N. (1991). The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 119-146.
7. George, J., Easton, G., Nunamaker, J., & Northcraft, G. (1990). A study of collaborative group work with and without computer-based support. Information Systems Research, 1, 394-415.
8. Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (1978). The network nation: Human communication via computers. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
9. Hiltz, S. R., Johnson, K., & Turoff, M. (1986). Experiments in group decision making 1: Communications process and outcome in face-to-face vs. computerized conferences. Human Communication Research, 13, 225-252.
10. Hollingshead, A. B. (in press). The rank order effect in group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
11. Hollingshead, A. B. (1995, October). Communicating knowledge in close relationships. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Experimental Social Psychology, Washington, DC.
12. Hollingshead, A. B., McGrath, J. E., & O'Connor, K. M. (1993). Group task performance and communication technology: A longitudinal study of computer-mediated vs. face-to-face work groups. Small Groups Research, 24, 307-333.
13. Humphreys, P., & Berger, J. (1981). Theoretical consequences of the status characteristics formulation. American Journal of Sociology, 86, 953-983.
14. Janis, I. L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York: Free Press.
15. Kaplan, M. F., & Miller, C. E. (1987). Group decision making and normative versus informational influence: Effects of type of issue and assigned decision rule. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 306-313.
16. Kirchler, E., & Davis, J. H. (1986). The influence of member status differences and task type on group consensus and member position change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 83-91.
17. Laughlin, P. R. (1980). Social combination processes of cooperative, problem-solving groups on verbal intellective tasks. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Progress in social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 127-155). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Laughlin, P. R., & Barley, P. C. (1982). Social combination models, persuasive arguments theory, social comparison theory, and choice shift. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 273-280.
19. McGrath, J. E., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1994). Groups interacting with technology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20. McLeod, P. L. (1992). An assessment of the experimental literature on the electronic support of group work: Results of a meta-analysis. Human Computer Interaction, 7, 257-280.
21. Putnam, L. L., & Stohl, C. (1990). Bona fide groups: A reconceptualization of groups in context. Communication Studies, 41, 248-265.
22. Rice, R. E. (1984). Mediated group communication: Communication, research, and technology. In R. E. Rice (Ed.), The new media (pp. 129-154). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
23. Saunders, C., Robey, D., & Vaverek, K. (1994). The persistence of status differentials in computer conferencing. Human Communication Research, 20, 443-472.
24. Schneider, J., & Cook, K. (1995). Status inconsistency and gender: Combining revisited. Small Group Research, 26, 372-399.
25. Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & McGuire, T. W. (1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 37, 157-187.
26. Silver, S. D., Cohen, B. P., & Crutchfield, J. H. (1994). Status differentiation and information exchange in face-to-face and computer-mediated idea generation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 108-123.
27. Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1994). Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 21, 427-459.
28. Spears, R., Lea, M., & Lee, S. (1990). Deindividuation and group polarization in computer mediated communication. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 121-134.
29. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge: MIT Press.
30. Stasser, G., & Stewart, D. (1992). The discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 426-434.
31. Stasser, G., Stewart, D., & Wittenbaum, G. (1995). Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 244-265.
32. Stasser, G., Taylor, L., & Hanna, C. (1989). Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three- and six-person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 67-78.
33. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467-1478.
34. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1987). Effects of information load and percentages of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 81-93.
35. Straus, S., & McGrath, J. E. (1994). Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 87-97.
36. Walther, J. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19, 50-88.
37. Weisband, S. P., Schneider, S. K., & Connolly, T. (1995). Electronic communication and social information: Status salience and status differences. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1124-1151.
38. Zigurs, I., Poole, M., & DeSanctis, G. (1988). Astudy of influence in computer-mediated group decision making. MIS Quarterly, 12, 625-641.