Leveling the organizational playing field - Virtually: A meta-analysis of experimental research assessing the impact of group support system use on member influence behaviors

Communication Research

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 193-234

  Rains, Stephen A ^a  

^a ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer mediated communication; Equalization hypothesis; Group support system; Influence; Teams

Indexed keywords

EID: 16244397392     PISSN: 00936502     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0093650204273763     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. Anderson, W. N., & Hiltz, S. R. (2001). Culturally heterogeneous vs. culturally homogeneous groups in distributed group support systems: Effects on group process and consensus. Retrieved June 24, 2004, from http://www.computer. org/proceedings/cps_dl.htm
2. Anonymous. (1998). To reveal or not to reveal: A theoretical model of anonymous communication. Communication Theory, 8, 381-407.
3. Benbasat, I., & Lim, L. H. (1993). The effects of group, task, context, and technology variables on the usefulness of group support systems: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Small Group Research, 24, 430-462.
4. Briggs, R. O., Nunamaker, J., & Sprague, R. (1998). 1001 unanswered research questions in GSS. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14, 3-22.
5. Burke, K., & Chidambaram, L. (1994). Development in electronically-supported groups: A preliminary longitudinal study of distributed and face-to-face meetings. Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 4, 104-113.
6. Burnstein, E. (1982). Persuasion as argument processing. In J. H. Davis & G. Stocker-Kreichgauer (Eds.), Group decision processes (pp. 381-395). London: Academic Press.
7. Chidambaram, L., & Jones, B. (1993). Impact of communication medium and computer support on group perceptions and performance: A comparison of face-to-face and dispersed meetings. MIS Quarterly, 17, 465-491.
8. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
9. Connolly, T., Routhieaux, R. L., & Schneider, S. K. (1993). On the effectiveness of group brainstorming: Test of one underlying cognitive mechanism. Small Group Research, 24, 490-503.
10. Davey, A., & Olson, D. (1998). Multiple criteria decision making models in group decision support. Group Decision and Negotiation, 7, 55-75.
11. Dennis, A., Aronson, J., Heninger, B., & Walker, E. (1996). A task and time decomposition in electronic brainstorming. Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3, 51-59.
12. Dennis, A. R. (1996). Information exchange and use in group decision making: You can lead a group to information, but you can't make it think. MIS Quarterly, 20, 433-457.
13. Dennis, A. R., Hilmer, K. M., & Taylor, N. J. (1998). Information exchange and use in GSS and verbal group decision making: Effects of minority influence. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14, 61-88.
14. Dennis, A. R., & Valacich, J. S. (1993). Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 531-537.
15. Dennis, A. R., & Wixom, B. H. (2002). Investigating the moderators of the group support systems use with meta-analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 235-257.
16. Dennis, A. R., Wixom, B. H., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2001). Understanding fit and appropriation effects in group support systems via meta-analysis. MIS Quarterly, 25, 169-173.
17. DeSanctis, G., & Gallupe, R. B. (1987). A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Sciences, 33, 589-609.
18. Dubrovsky, V. J., Kiesler, S., & Sethna, B. N. (1991). The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups. Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 119-146.
19. Easton, G., Easton, A., & Belch, M. (2003). An experimental investigation of electronic focus groups. Information & Management, 40, 717-727.
20. Easton, G. K., George, J. F., Nunamaker, J. F., & Pendergast, M. O. (1990). Using two different electronic meeting system tools for the same task: An experimental comparison. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7, 85-100.
21. Easton, A. C., Vogel, D. R., & Nunamaker, J. F. (1992). Interactive versus stand-alone group decision support systems for stakeholder identification and assumption surfacing in small groups. Decision Support Systems, 8, 159-168.
22. El-Shinnawy, M., & Vinze, A. S. (1997). Technology, culture, and persuasiveness: A study of choice-shifts in group settings. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 47, 473-496.
23. El-Shinnawy, M., & Vinze, A. S. (1998). Polarization and persuasive argumentation: A study of decision making in group settings. MIS Quarterly, 22, 165-198.
24. Fjermestad, J., & Hiltz, S. R. (1998). An assessment of group support systems experimental research: Methodology and results. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15, 7-149.
25. Fulk, J., & Collins-Jarvis, L. (2001). Wired meetings: Technological mediation of organizational gatherings. In F. Jablin & L. Putnam (Eds.), New handbook of organizational communication (pp. 624-663). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Gallupe, R. B., Bastianutti, L. M., & Cooper, W. H. (1991). Unblocking brainstorms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 137-142.
27. Gallupe, R. B., Dennis, A. R., Cooper, W. H., Valacich, J. S., Bastianutti, L. M., & Nunamaker, J. F. (1992). Electronic brainstorming and group size. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 350-369.
28. Gallupe, R. B., DeSanctis, G., & Dickson, G. W. (1988). Computer-based support for problem-finding: An experimental investigation. MIS Quarterly, 12, 277-296.
29. Gallupe, R. B., & McKeen, J. D. (1990). Enhancing computer-mediated communication: An experimental investigation into the use of a group decision support system for face-to-face versus remote meetings. Information and Management, 18, 1-13.
30. George, J. F., Easton, G. K., Nunamaker, J. F., & Northcraft, G. B. (1990). A study of collaborative group work with and without computer-based support. Information Systems Research, 1, 394-415.
31. Hayne, S. C., & Rice, R. E. (1997). Attribution accuracy when using anonymity in group support systems. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 47, 429-452.
32. Hays, W. L. (1994). Statistics. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.
33. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
34. Hender, J. M., Rodgers, T. L., Dean, D. L., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2001). Improving group creativity: Brainstorming versus non-brainstorming techniques in a GSS environment. Retrieved June 24,2004, from http://www.computer.org/proceedings/cps_dl.htm
35. Hiltz, S. R., Johnson, K., & Turoff, M. (1991). Group decision support: The effects of designated human leaders and statistical feedback in computerized conferences. Journal of Management Information Systems, 8, 81-108.
36. Ho, T. H., & Raman, K. S. (1991). The effect of GDSS and elected leadership on small group meetings. Journal of Management Information Systems, 8, 19-133.
37. Hollingshead, A. B. (1996). Information suppression and status persistence in group decision making: The effects of communication media. Human Communication Research, 23, 193-219.
38. Huang, W., Raman, K. S., & Wei, K. K. (1997). Effects of group support system and task type on social influences in small groups. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 27, 578-587.
39. Huang, W. W., & Wei, K. K. (2000). An empirical investigation of the effects of group support systems (GSS) and task type on group interactions from an influence perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17, 181-206.
40. Huang, W., Wei, K. K., & Tan, B. C. (1999). Compensating effects of GSS on group performance. Information and Management, 35, 195-202.
41. Huang, W. W., Wei, K. K., Watson, R. T., & Tan, B. C. (2002). Supporting virtual team-building in GSS: An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems, 34, 359-367.
42. Hunter, J., & Schmidt, F. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43. Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Jackson, G. B. (1982). Meta-analysis: Cumulating research findings across studies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
44. Hwang, H. G., & Guynes, J. (1994). The effect of group size on group performance in computer-supported decision making. Information and Management, 26, 189-198.
45. Jarvenpaa, S. L., Rao, V. S., & Huber, G. P. (1988). Computer support for meetings of groups working on unstructured problems: A field experiment. MIS Quarterly, 12, 645-666.
46. Jessup, L. M., & Tansik, D. A. (1991). Decision making in an automated environment: The effects of anonymity and proximity with a group decision support system. Decision Sciences, 22, 266-279.
47. Johnson, B. T. (1989). DSTAT: Software for the meta-analytic review of research literatures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48. Karan, V., Kerr, D. S., Murphy, U. S., & Vinze, A. S. (1996). Information technology support for collaborative decision making in auditing: An experimental investigation. Decision Support Systems, 16, 181-194.
49. Kelsey, B. L. (2000). Increasing minority group participation and influence using a group support system. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 17, 63-75.
50. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Some psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologists, 39, 1123-1134.
51. Kwok, R. C., Ma, J., & Vogel, D. R. (2002). Effects of group support systems and content facilitation on knowledge acquisition. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 185-229.
52. Lewis, L. F. (1987). A decision support system for face-to-face groups. Journal of Information Sciences, 13, 211-219.
53. Lim, L. H., Raman, K. S., & Wei, K. K. (1994). Interacting effects of GDSS and leadership. Decision Support Systems, 12, 199-211.
54. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55. Massey, A. P., & Clapper, D. L. (1995). Element finding: The impact of a group support system on a crucial phase of sense making. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11, 149-176.
56. McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
57. McGrath, J. E., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1994). Groups interacting with technology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58. McGuire, T. W., Kiesler, S., & Siegel, J. (1987). Group and computer-mediated discussion effects in risk decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 917-930.
59. McLeod, P. L. (1992). An assessment of the experimental literature on electronic support of group work: Results of a meta-analysis. Human-Computer Interaction, 7, 257-280.
60. McLeod, P. L., & Liker, J. K. (1992). Electronic meeting systems: Evidence from a low structure environment. Information Systems Research, 3, 195-223.
61. Mejias, R., Lazeno, L., Rico, A., Torres, A., Vogel, D., & Shepherd, M. (1996). A cross-cultural comparison of GSS and non-GSS consensus and satisfaction level within and between the U.S. and Mexico. Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3, 408-417.
62. Mejias, R. J., Shepherd, M. M., Vogel, D. R., & Lazaneo, L. (1997). Consensus and perceived satisfaction levels: A cross-cultural comparison of GSS and non-GSS outcomes within and between the United States and Mexico. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13, 137-161.
63. Murthy, U. S., & Kerr, D. S. (2000). Task/technology fit and the effectiveness of group support systems: Evidence in the context of tasks requiring domain specific knowledge. Retrieved June 24, 2004, from http://www. computer.org/proceedings/cps_dl.htm
64. Nunamaker, J. F., Applegate, L. M., & Konsynski, B. R. (1988). Computeraided deliberation: Model management and group decision support. Operations Research, 36, 826-848.
65. Olaniran, B. A. (1996). A model of group satisfaction in computer-mediated communication and face-to-face meetings. Behaviour and Information Technology, 15, 24-36.
66. Postmes, T., & Lea, M. (2000). Social processes and group decision making: Anonymity in group decision support systems. Ergonomics, 43, 1252-1274.
67. Raman, K., Tan, B., & Wei, K. (1993). An empirical study of task type and communication medium in GDSS. Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 4, 161-168.
68. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
69. Reinig, B. A., & Mejias, R. J., (2003). An investigation of the influence of national culture and group support systems on group processes and outcomes. Retrieved June 24, 2004, from http://www.computer.org/proceedings/ cps_dl.htm
70. Reis, S. P., & Duan, N. (1999). Multilevel modeling and its application in counseling psychology research. The Counseling Psychologist, 27, 528-551.
71. Robichaux, B. P., & Cooper, R. B. (1998). GSS participation: A cultural examination. Information & Management, 33, 287-300.
72. Roy, M. C., Gauvin, S., & Limayem, M. (1996). Electronic group brainstorming: The role of feedback on productivity, Small Group Research, 27, 215-247.
73. Samarah, I., Paul, S., Mykytyn, P., & Seetharaman, P. (2003). The collaborative conflict management style and cultural diversity in DGSS supported fuzzy tasks: An experimental investigation. Retrieved June 24, 2004, from http://www.computer.org/proceedings/cps_dl.htm
74. Scott, C. R. (1999a). Communication technology and group communication. In L. R. Frey, D. Gouran, & M. S. Poole (Eds.), The handbook of group communication theory and research (pp. 432-472). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
75. Scott, C. R. (1999b). The impact of physical and discursive anonymity on group members' multiple identifications during computer-supported decision making. Western Journal of Communication, 63, 456-487.
76. Scott, C. R., & Easton, A. C. (1996). Examining equality of influence in group decision support system interaction. Small Group Research, 27, 360-382.
77. Shirani, A. I., Tafti, M. H., & Affisco, J. F. (1999). Task and technology fit: A comparison of two technologies for synchronous and asynchronous group communication. Information & Management, 36, 139-150.
78. Sia, C., Tan, B., & Wei, K. (1996, December). Will distributed GSS groups make more extreme decisions? An empirical study. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Information Systems, Cleveland, OH.
79. Sia, C., Tan, B., & Wei, K. (2002). Group polarization and computer-mediated communication: Effects of communication cues, social presence, and anonymity. Information Systems Research, 13, 70-90.
80. Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & McGuire, T. W. (1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 157-187.
81. Silver, S. D., Cohen, B. P., & Crutchfield, J. H. (1994). Status differentiation and information exchange in face-to-face and computer-mediated idea generation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 108-123.
82. Smith, J. Y., & Vanecek, M. (1989). A nonsimultaneous computer conference as a component of group decision support systems. Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 4, 370-377.
83. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32, 1492-1512.
84. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
85. Straus, S. G. (1997). Technology, group process, and group outcomes: Testing the connections in computer-mediated and face-to-face communication. Human-Computer Interaction, 12, 227-266.
86. Tan, B., Raman, K., & Wei, K. (1994). An empirical study of task dimension of group support systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 24, 1054-1060.
87. Tan, B., Wei, K., & Raman, K. (1991). Effects of support and task type on group decision outcomes: A study using SAMM. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 4, 537-546.
88. Tan, B. C., Wei, K. K., & Watson, R. T. (1999). The equalizing impact of a group support system on status differential. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 17, 77-100.
89. Tan, B. C., Wei, K. K., Watson, R. T., Clapper, D. L., & McLean, E. R. (1998). Computer-mediated communication and majority influence: Assessing the impact in an individualistic and collectivistic culture. Management Science, 44, 1263-1278.
90. Tan, B. C., Wei, K. K., Watson, R. T., & Walczuch, R. M. (1998). Reducing status effects with computer-mediated communication: Evidence from two distinct national cultures. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15, 119-141.
91. Valacich, J. S., George, J. F., Nunamaker, J. F., & Vogel, D. R. (1994). Physical proximity effects on computer-mediated group idea generation. Small Group Research, 25, 83-104.
92. Valacich, J. S., Sarker, S., Pratt, J., & Groomer, M. (2002). Computer-mediated and face-to-face groups: Who makes riskier decisions? Retrieved June 24, 2004, from http://www.computer.org/proceedings/cps_dl.htm
93. Valacich, J. S., & Schwenk, C. (1995). Devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiry effects on face-to-face and computer-mediated group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 158-173.
94. Walther, J. B. (1995). Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: Experimental observations over time. Organization Science, 6, 186-203.
95. Walther, J. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19, 50-88.
96. Watson, R. T., DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1988). Using a GDSS to facilitate group consensus: Some intended and unintended consequences. MIS Quarterly, 12, 463-477.
97. Watson, R. T., Ho, T. S., & Raman, K. S. (1994). Culture: A fourth dimension of group support systems. Communications of the ACM, 37, 44-55.
98. Weisband, S. P. (1992). Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53, 352-380.
99. Weisband, S. P., Schneider, S. K., & Connolly, T. (1995). Computer-mediated communication and social information: Status salience and status differences. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1124-1151.
100. Wilson, J., & Jessup, L. M. (1995). A field experiment on GSS anonymity and group member status. Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 4, 212-221.
101. Wood, J. G., & Nosek, J. T. (1994). Discrimination of structure and technology in a group support system: The role of process complexity. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, 3, 187-199.
102. Yellen, R. E., Winniford, M. A., & Sanford, C. C. (1995). Extraversion and introversion in electronically-supported meetings. Information and Management, 28, 63-74.
103. Zigurs, I., Poole, M. S., & DeSanctis, G. L. (1988). A study of influence in computer-mediated group decision making. MIS Quarterly, 12, 625-644.