Media effects and communication bias in diverse groups

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Volumn 70, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 199-205

  Bhappu, Anita D ^a   Griffith, Terri L ^b   Northcraft, Gregory B ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031169731     PISSN: 07495978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1997.2704     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Anson R., Bostrom R., Wynne V. An experiment assessing group support system and facilitator effects on meeting outcomes. Management Science. 41:1995;189-208.
2. Benbasat I., Lim L. The effects of group, task, context, and technology variables on the usefulness of group support systems: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Small Group Research. 24:1993;430-462.
3. Connolly T., Jessup L. M., Valacich J. S. Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Management Science. 36:1990;689-703.
4. DeSanctis G., Gallupe R. B. A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science. 33:1987;589-609.
5. Dubrovsky V. J., Kiesler S., Sethna B. N. The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups. Human-Computer Interaction. 6:1991;119-146.
6. Frances S. J. Sex differences in nonverbal behavior. Sex Roles. 5:1979;519-535.
7. Frieze I. H., Ramsey S. J. Nonverbal maintenance of traditional sex roles. Journal of Social Issues. 32:1976;133-141.
8. Henley N. M. Body politics: Power, sex, and nonverbal communication. 1977;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
9. James K., Greenberg J. In-group salience, intergroup comparison, and individual performance and self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 15:1989;604-616.
10. Jessup L. M., Tansik D. A. Decision making in an automated environment: The effects of anonymity and proximity with a group decision support system. Decision Sciences. 22:1991;266-279.
11. Jessup L. M., Valacich J. S. Group support systems: New perspectives. 1993;Macmillan, New York.
12. Konrad A. M., Gutek B. A. Theory and research on group composition: application to the status of women and ethnic minorities. Interpersonal Processes. 1987;Sage, Newbury Park.
13. Kraemer R., Birenbaum M. Language attitudes and social group memberships. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 17:1993;437-449.
14. Lawler E. E., Mohrman S. A., Ledford G. E. Employee involvement and total quality management: Practices and results in Fortune 1000 companies. 1992;Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
15. Lee Y., Ottati V. Determinants of in-group and out-group perceptions of heterogeneity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 24:1993;298-318.
16. Mackie D. M., Gastardo-Conaco M. C., Skelly J. J. Knowledge of the advocated position and the processing of in-group and out-group persuasive messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 18:1992;145-151.
17. McGrath J. E., Hollingshead A. B. Groups interacting with technology: Ideas, evidence, issues, and an agenda. 1994;Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
18. Mugny G., Sanchez-Mazas M., Roux P., Perez J. A. Independence and interdependence of group judgments: Xenophobia and minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology. 21:1991;213-223.
19. Northcraft G. B., Polzer J. T., Neale M. A., Kramer R. Diversity, social identity, and performance: Emergent social dynamics in cross-functional teams. Jackson S., Ruderman M. Diversity in work teams: Research paradigms for a changing workplace. 1995;69-96 APA Publications.
20. Poole M. S., Holmes M., Watson R., DeSanctis G. Group decision support systems and group communication. Communication Research. 20:1993;176-213.
21. Salancik G. R. Commitment and the control of organizational behavior and belief. Staw B., Salancik G. New Directions in Organizational Behavior. 1977;St. Clair Press, Chicago.
22. S. K. Schneider, 1989, Communication dilemmas: The effects of social categorization on communication networks, U.C.L.A.
23. Siegel J., Dubrovsky V., Kiesler S., McGuire T. Group process in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 37:1986;157-187.
24. Sproull L., Kiesler S. Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science. 32:1986;1492-1512.
25. Tajfel H. Social categorization, social identity, and social comparison. Tajfel H. Differentiation between social groups. 1978;Academic Press, London.
26. van Knippenberg D., van Knippenberg A. Social categorization, focus of attention and judgments of group opinions. British Journal of Social Psychology. 33:1994;477-489.
27. Work and workers in the 21st century. 1987;Hudson Institute, New York.