The impact of group size and social presence on small-group communication: Does computer-mediated communication make a difference?

Small Group Research

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 631-661

  Lowry, Paul Benjamin ^a   Roberts, Tom L ^b   Romano Jr , Nicholas C ^c   Cheney, Paul D ^d   Hightower, Ross T ^d  

^a BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer mediated communication (CMC); Heuristic evaluation (HE); Small group communication; Social presence; Social presence theory (SPT); Virtual teams

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750864935     PISSN: 10464964     EISSN: 15528278     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1046496406294322     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Ackerman, M. S., & McDonald, D. W. (2000). Collaborative support for informal information in collective memory systems. Information Systems Frontiers, 2, 333 - 347.
2. Aiken, M., Krosp, J., Shirani, A., & Martin, J. (1994). Electronic brainstorming in small and large groups. Information & Management, 27 (3). 141 - 149.
3. Andres, H. P. (2006). The impact of communication medium on virtual team group process. Information Resources Management Journal, 19 (2). 1 - 17.
4. Archer, N. P. (1990). A comparison of computer conferences with face-to-face meetings for small group business-decision. Behaviour & Information Technology, 9, 307 - 317.
5. Bandow, D. (2001). Time to create sound teamwork. The Journal for Quality and Participation, 24 (2). 41 - 47.
6. Beaudouin-Lafon, M., & Karsenty, A. (1992, November). Transparency and awareness in a real-time groupware system. Paper presented at the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology UIST'92, Monterey, CA.
7. Biocca, F., Harms, C., & Burgoon, J. K. (2003). Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12, 456 - 480.
8. Bouchard, T., & Hare, M. (1970). Size, performance, and potential in brainstorming groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54 (1). 51 - 55.
9. Brown, R., & Wade, G. (1987). Superordinate goals and intergroup behavior: The effect of role ambiguity and status on intergroup attitudes and task performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17 (2). 131 - 142.
10. Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J., Ramirez, A., Kam, K., Dunbar, N. E., & Fischer, J. (2002). Testing the interactivity principle: Effects of Mediation, Propinquity, and verbal and nonverbal modalities in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Communication, 52 (3). 657 - 677.
11. Burgoon, J. K., Burgoon, M., Broneck, K., Alvaro, E., & Nunamaker, J. F., Jr. (2002, November). Effects of synchronicity and proximity on group communication. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
12. Burgoon, J. K., & Dunbar, N. (2000). An interactionist perspective on dominance-submission: Interpersonal dominance as a dynamic, situationally contingent social skill. Communication Monographs, 67 (1). 96 - 121.
13. Burgoon, J. K., & Walther, J. B. (1990). Nonverbal expectancies and the evaluative consequences of violations. Human Communication Research, 17, 232 - 265.
14. Burke, K., Aytes, K., Chidabaram, L., & Johnson, J. (1999). A study of partially distributed work groups: The impact of media, location, and time on perceptions and performance. Small Group Research, 30, 453 - 490.
15. Burke, K., & Chidambaram, L. (1999). How much bandwidth is enough? A longitudinal examination of media characteristics and group outcomes. MIS Quarterly, 23, 557 - 580.
16. Chidambaram, L., & Tung, L. L. (2005). Is out of sight, out of mind? An empirical study of social loafing in technology-supported groups. Information Systems Research, 16 (2). 149 - 160.
17. Christie, B. (1985). Human factors of information technology in the office. New York: John Wiley.
18. Cogliser, C. C., & Schriesheim, C. A. (2000). Exploring work unit context and leader-member exchange: A multi-level perspective Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 487 - 511.
19. Connolly, T., Jessup, L., & Valacich, J. (1990). Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Management Science, 36, 689 - 703.
20. Daft, R., & Lengel, R. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554 - 571.
21. Daft, R. L., Lengel, R. H., & Trevino, L. K. (1987). Message equivocality, media selection and manager performance: Implications or information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11, 355 - 366.
22. Dansereau, F., Alutto, J., & Yammarino, F. (1984). Theory testing in organizational behavior: The varient approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
23. Dennis, A. R., & Garfield, M. (2003). The adoption and use of GSS in project teams: Toward more participative processes and outcomes. MIS Quarterly, 27, 289 - 323.
24. Dennis, A. R., Heminger, A. R., Nunamaker, J. F., Jr., & Vogel, D. R. (1990). Bringing automated support to large groups: The Burr-Brown experience. Information & Management, 18 (3). 111 - 121.
25. Dennis, A. R., Hilmer, K. M., & Taylor, N. J. (1998). Information exchange and use in GSS and verbal group decision making: Effects of minority influence. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14 (3). 61 - 88.
26. Dennis, A. R., & Kinney, S. (1998). Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality. Information Systems Research, 9, 256 - 274.
27. Dennis, A. R., & Valacich, J. (1993). Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 531 - 537.
28. Dennis, A. R., & Valacich, J. S. (1999). Research note: Electronic brainstorming: Illusions and patterns of productivity. Information Systems Research, 10, 375 - 377.
29. Dennis, A. R., Wixom, B., & Vandenberg, R. (2001). Understanding fit and appropriation effects in group support systems via meta-analysis. MIS Quarterly, 25 (2). 167 - 193.
30. Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497 - 509.
31. Dommel, H.-P., & Garcia-Luna-Aceves, J. J. (2000). A coordination framework and architecture for Internet groupware. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 23, 401 - 427.
32. Dourish, P., & Bellotti, V. (1992, November). Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. Paper presented at the Conference on Computer-supported Cooperative Work, Toronto, Canada.
33. Gallupe, R. B., Cooper, W., & Grisé, M.-L. (1994). Blocking electronic brainstorms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79 (1). 77 - 86.
34. Gallupe, R. B., Dennis, A. R., Cooper, W. H., Valacich, J. S., Bastianutti, L. M., & Nunamaker, J. F., Jr. (1992). Electronic brainstorming and group size. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 350 - 369.
35. Gibb, J. R. (1960). Sociopsychological processes of group instruction. In N. B. Nenry (Ed.), The dynamics of instructional groups (Fifty-ninth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education) (Pt. 2, pp. 115 - 135). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36. Gordon, M. E., Slade, L. A., & Schmitt, N. W. (1986). The "science of the sophomore" revisited: From conjecture to empiricism. Academy of Management Review, 11 (1). 191 - 207.
37. Hackman, J. R., & Kaplan, R. (1974). Interventions into group processes: An approach to improve the effectiveness of groups. Decision Sciences, 5, 459 - 480.
38. Hackman, J. R., & Vidmar, N. (1970). Effects of size and task type of group performance and member reactions. Sociometry, 33 (1). 37 - 54.
39. Haney, C., Banks, W., & Zimbardo, P. (1973). Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison. International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 1, 69 - 97.
40. Hayne, S., & Rice, R. (1997). Attribution accuracy when using anonymity in group support systems. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 47, 429 - 452.
41. Jablin, F. M., & Sussman, L. (1978). An exploration of communication and productivity in real brainstorming groups. Human Communications Research, 4, 329 - 337.
42. James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69 (1). 85 - 98.
43. Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10, 791 - 815.
44. Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42 (1). 58 - 74.
45. Lamm, H., & Trommsdorff, G. (1973). Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming): A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 361 - 388.
46. Latane, B., & Wolf, S. (1981). The social impact of majorities and minorities. Psychological Review, 88, 438 - 453.
47. LePine, J. A., & Dyne, L. V. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 853 - 868.
48. Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319 - 340.
49. Lowry, P. B., & Nunamaker, J. F., Jr. (2003). Using Internet-based, distributed collaborative writing tools to improve coordination and group awareness in writing teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 46 (4). 277 - 297.
50. McGuire, T. W., Kiesler, S., & Siegel, J. (1987). Group and computer-mediated discussion effects in risk decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 917 - 930.
51. McLoed, P., Baron, R., Marti, M., & Yoon, K. (1997). The eyes have it: Minority influence in face-to-face and computer mediated group discussion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 706 - 718.
52. Miranda, S., & Saunders, C. (2003). The social construction of meaning: An alternative perspective on information sharing. Information Systems Research (ISR), 14 (1). 87 - 106.
53. Mosvick, R., & Nelson, R. (1987). We've got to start meeting like this! A guide to successful business meeting management. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
54. Nielsen, J. (1994, April). Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. Paper presented at the Computer Human Interaction, Boston.
55. Nielsen, J., & Molich, R. (1990, April). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. Paper presented at the Computer Human Interaction, Seattle, WA.
56. Nunamaker, J. F., Jr., Dennis, A., Valacich, J., Vogel, D., & George, J. (1991). Electronic meeting systems to support group work. Communications of the ACM, 34 (7). 40 - 61.
57. Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human Computer Interaction (HCI), 15 (2-3). 139 - 179.
58. Orbell, J. M., Dawes, R. M., & van de Kragt, A. J. (1988). Explaining discussion-induced cooperation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 811 - 819.
59. O'Reilly, C. A., & Roberts, K. H. (1977). Task group structure, communication, and effectiveness in three organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 674 - 681.
60. Riegelsberger, J., Sasse, M. A., & McCarthy, J. D. (2005). The mechanics of trust: A framework for research and design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62, 381 - 422.
61. Robert, L., & Dennis, A. R. (2005). The paradox of richness: A cognitive model of media choice. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48 (1). 10 - 21.
62. Roberts, T. L., Cheney, P., & Sweeney, P. (2002). Project characteristics and group communication: An investigation. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 45 (2). 84 - 98.
63. Roberts, T. L., Cheney, P., Sweeney, P., & Hightower, R. (2005). The effects of information technology project complexity on group interaction. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21, 223 - 247.
64. Roberts, T. L., Lowry, P. B., & Sweeney, P. D. (2006). An evaluation of the impact of social presence through group size and the use of collaborative software on group member "voice" in face-to-face and computer-mediated task groups. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 49 (2). 28 - 43.
65. Rodgers, T. L., Dean, D. L., & Nunamaker, J. F., Jr. (2004, January). Increasing inspection efficiency through group support systems. Paper presented at the 37th Hawai'i International Conference on System Sciences, Waikaloa, HI.
66. Rogers, E. M., & Rogers, R. A. (1976). Communication in organizations. New York: Free Press.
67. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley.
68. Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & McGuire, T. (1986). Group processes in computermediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37 (2). 157 - 186.
69. Steiner, I. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
70. Stewart, G. L., & Barrick, M. R. (2000). Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (2). 135 - 148.
71. Tan, B. C. Y., Wei, K.-K., Watson, R. T., Clapper, D. L., & McLean, E. R. (1998). Computermediated communication and majority influence: Assessing the impact in an individualistic and a collectivistic culture. Management Science, 44, 1263 - 1278.
72. Tushman, M. (1979). Work characteristics and subunit communication structure: A contingency analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24 (1). 82 - 98.
73. Valacich, J. S., & Dennis, A. R. (1994). A mathematical model of performance of computermediated groups during idea generation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11 (1). 59 - 72.
74. Valacich, J. S., Dennis, A. R., & Nunamaker, J. F., Jr. (1992). Group size and anonymity effects on computer-mediated idea generation. Small Group Research, 23 (1). 49 - 73.
75. Valacich, J. S., George, J. F., Nunamaker, J., & Vogel, D. R. (1994). Physical proximity effects on computer-mediated group idea generation. Small Group Research, 25 (1). 83 - 104.
76. Valacich, J. S., Wheeler, B., Mennecke, B., & Wachter, R. (1995). The effects of numerical and logical size on computer-mediated idea generation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 318 - 329.
77. Wegner, D. M., Erber, R., & Raymond, P. (1991). Transactive memory in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 923 - 929.
78. Weisband, S. (2002). Chapter 13: Maintaining awareness in distributed team collaboration: Implications for leadership and performance. In S. Kiesler (Ed.), Distributed work (pp. 311 - 333). Boston: MIT Press.
79. Yammarino, F. (1998). Multivariate aspects of the varient/WABA approach: A discussion and leadership illustration. Leadership Quarterly, 9, 203 - 227.
80. Yoo, Y., & Alavi, M. (2001). Media and group cohesion: Relative influences on social presence, task participation, and group consensus. MIS Quarterly, 25, 371 - 390.
81. Zigurs, I., & Buckland, B. (1998). A theory of task-technology fit and group support systems effectiveness. MIS Quarterly, 22, 313 - 334.