A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership

Group and Organization Management

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 14-49

  Bell, Bradford S ^a   Kozlowski, Steve W J ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036101496     PISSN: 10596011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1059601102027001003     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. Ancona, D., & Chong, C. (1996). Entrainment: Pace, cycle, and rhythm in organizational behavior. In B. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 19, pp. 251-284). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
2. Bettenhausen, K. (1991). Five years of group research: What we have learned and what needs to be addressed. Journal of Management, 17, 345-381.
3. Bridges, W. ( 1986). Managing organizational transitions. Organizational Dynamics, 15, 24-33.
4. Buono, A. F., Bowditch, J. L., & Lewis, J. W. (1985). When cultures collide: The anatomy of a merger. Human Relations, 38, 477-500.
5. Butler, A. (1973). Project management: A study of organizational conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 16, 84-102.
6. Byme, J., Brandt, R., & Port, O. (1993). The virtual corporation. Business Week, 8, 98-102.
7. Cohen. S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239-290.
8. Daly, B. L. (1993). The influence of face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication channels on collective induction. Accounting, Management, and Information Technologies, 3, 1-22.
9. Davidow, W. H., & Malone. M. S. (1992). The virtual organization. New York: HarperCollins.
10. Davis, S. M., & Lawrence, P. R. (1977). Matrix. Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley.
11. Dennis, A. R., & Valacich, J. S. (1993). Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 531-537.
12. Dess, G., Rasheed, A., McLaughlin, K., & Priem, R. (1995). The new corporate architecture. Academy of Management Executive, 9, 7-20.
13. El-Shinnawy, M., & Vinze, A. S. (1997). Technology, culture, and persuasiveness: A study of choice-shifts in group settings. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 47, 473-496.
14. Farmer, S. M., & Hyatt, C. W. (1994). Effects of task language demands and task complexity on computer-mediated work groups. Small Group Research, 25, 331-366.
15. Fleishman, E. A., Mumford, M. D., Zaccaro, S. J., Levin, K. Y., Korotkin, A. L., & Hein, M. B. (1991). Taxonomic efforts in the description of leader behavior: A synthesis and functional interpretation. Leadership Quarterly, 2(4), 245-287.
16. Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing complex organizations, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
17. Gallupe, R. B., Biastianutti, L., & Cooper, W. H. (1991). Unblocking brainstorms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 137-142.
18. Geber, B. (1995). Virtual teams. Training, 32, 36-40.
19. Gersick, C. J. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9-41.
20. Gersick, C.J.G., & Hackman, J. R. (1990). Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 65-97.
21. Goodman, P. S. (1986). Designing effective work groups. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22. Graen, G. B. (1996). At last, a production system that works and allows everyone to be an insider. Applied Psychology an International Review, 45, 130-135.
23. Graen, G. B., & Wakabayashi, M. (1994). Cross-cultural leadership-making: Bridging American and Japanese diversity for team advantage. In H. C. Triandis, M. D. Dunnette, & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 415-446). New York: Consulting Psychologist Press.
24. Guzzo, R. A., & Shea, G. P. (1992). Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 269-313). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
25. Hackman, J. R., & Walton, R. E. (1986). Leading groups in organizations. In P. S. Goodman & Associates (Eds.), Designing effective work groups. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27. Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. Berkshire, UK: McGraw-Hill.
28. Hollingshead, A. B., McGrath, J. E., & O'Connor, K. M. (1993). Group task performance and communication technology: A longitudinal study of computer-mediated versus face-to-face work groups. Small Group Research, 24, 307-333.
29. Hrebiniak, L. G., & Joyce, W. F. (1984). Implementing strategy. New York: Macmillan.
30. Joyce, W. F. (1986). Matrix organization: A social experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 536-561.
31. Kahai, S. S., Sosik, J. J., & Avolio, B. J. (1997). Effects of leadership style and problem structure on work group process and outcomes in an electronic meeting system environment. Personnel Psychology, 50, 121-146.
32. Komaki, J. L., Zlotnick, S., & Jensen, M. (1986). Development of an operant-based taxonomy and observational index of supervisory behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 260-269.
33. Kozlowski, S.W.J. (1998). Training and developing adaptive teams: Theory, principles, and research. In J. A. Cannon-Bowers & E. Salas (Eds.), Decision making under stress: Implications for training and simulation (pp. 115-153). Washington, DC: APA Books.
34. Kozlowski, S.W.J., Gully, S. M., McHugh, P. P., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1996). A dynamic theory of leadership and team effectiveness: Developmental and task contingent leader roles. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.). Research in personnel and human resource management (Vol. 14, pp. 253-305). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
35. Kozlowski, S.W.J., Gully, S. M., Nason, E. R., & Smith, E. M. (1999). Developing adaptive teams: A theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of work and performance: Implications for staffing, personnel actions, and development (SIOP Frontiers Series). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36. Kozlowski, S.W.J., Gully, S. M., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1996). Team leadership and development: Theory, principles, and guidelines for training leaders and teams. In M. Beyerlein, D. Johnson, & S. Beyerlein (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams: Team leadership (Vol. 3, pp. 251-289). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
37. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585-634.
38. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1998). Small groups. In D. T. Gilbert & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 4th ed., pp. 4150-4169). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
39. Lipnack, J., & Stamps, J. (1997). Virtual teams: Reaching across space, time, and organizations with technology. New York: John Wiley.
40. Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P. (1987). Leading workers to lead themselves: The external leadership of self-managing work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 106-128.
41. McGrath, J. E. (1962). Leadership behavior: Some requirements for leadership training. Washington, DC: U.S. Civil Service Commission.
42. McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
43. McGrath, J. E. (1991). Time, interaction, and performance (TIP): A theory of groups. Small Group Research, 22, 147-174.
44. Merrick, N. (1996). Remote control. People Management. 2, 40-41.
45. Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1989). Newcomers and oldtimers in groups. In P. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (2nd ed., pp. 143-186). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46. Moreland, R. L., Levine, J. M., & Wingert, M. L. (1996). Creating the ideal group: Composition effects at work. In E. H. Witte & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior: Small group processes and interpersonal relations. Understanding group behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 11-35). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47. Ostroff, C., & Kozlowski. S.W.J. (1992). Organizational socialization as a learning process: The role of information acquisition. Personnel Psychology, 45, 849-874.
48. Pape, W. R. (1997). Group insurance: Virtual teams can quickly gather the knowledge of even far-flung staff. Inc., 19, 29.
49. Reeser, C. (1969). Some potential human problems of the project organization. Academy of Management Journal, 12, 459-467.
50. Rizzo, J. R., House, R. J., & Lirtzman, S. I. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 150-163.
51. Roby, T. B. (1961). The executive function in small groups. In L. Petrullo & B. M. Bass (Eds.), Leadership and interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.
52. Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & McGuire, T. W. (1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 157-187.
53. Smith, E. M.. Ford, J. K., & Kozlowski, S.W.J. (1997). Building adaptive expertise: Implications for training design. In M. A. Quinones & A. Ehrenstein (Eds.), Training for a rapidly changing workplace: Applications of psychological research (pp. 89-118). Washington, DC: APA Books.
54. Sosik, J. J., Avolio, B. J., & Kahai, S. S. (1998). Inspiring group creativity: Comparing anonymous and identified electronic brainstorming. Small Group Research, 29, 3-31.
55. Sosik, J. J., Avolio, B. J., Kahai, S. S., & Jung, D. I. (1998). Computer-supported work group potency and effectiveness: The role of transformational leadership, anonymity, and task interdependence. Computers in Human Behavior, 14, 491-511.
56. Straus, S. G., & McGrath, J. E. (1994). Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology. 79, 87-97.
57. Sundstrom, E., de Meuse, K. P., & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45, 120-133.
58. Tesluk, P., Mathieu, J. E., Zaccaro, S. J., & Marks, M. (1997). Task and aggregation issues in the analysis and assessment of team performance. In M. T. Brannick, E. Salas, & C. Prince (Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement (pp. 197-224). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
59. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action, New York: McGraw-Hill.
60. Townsend, A. M., DeMarie, S. M., & Hendrickson, A. R. (1996). Are you ready for virtual teams? HR Magazine, 41, 122-126.
61. Townsend, A.M., DeMarie, S. M., & Hendrickson, A. R. (1998). Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future. Academy of Management Executive, 12, 17-29.
62. Valacich, J. S., Dennis, A. R., & Connolly, T. (1994). Idea generation in computer-based groups: A new ending to an old story. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 448-467.
63. Van de Ven, A. H., Delbecq, A. L., & Koenig, R. (1976). Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. American Sociological Review, 41, 322-328.
64. Weisband, S. P. (1992). Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53, 352-380.
65. Zaccaro, S. J., & Burke, C. S. (1998). Team versus crew leadership: Differences and similarities. In R. J. Klimoski (Chair), When is a work team a crew-and does it matter? Symposium conducted at the 13th annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Dallas. TX.