Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going

Language Teaching

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 1-50

  Taguchi, Naoko ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920690953     PISSN: 02614448     EISSN: 14753049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0261444814000263     Document Type: Review

References (122)

1. Alcon-Soler, E. (2005). Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context? System 33, 417-435.
2. Alcon-Soler, E. (2007). Fostering EFL learners' awareness of requesting through explicit and implicit consciousness-raising tasks. In Garcia Mayo (ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 221-241.
3. Alcon-Soler, E. (2013). Teachability and bilingual effects on third language knowledge of refusals. Intercultural Pragmatics 9, 511-541.
4. Alcon-Soler, E. & J. Guzman-Pitarch (2013). The effect of instruction on learners' use and negotiation of refusals. In O. Marti-Arnandiz & P. Salazar-Campillo (eds.), Refusals in instructional contexts and beyond. Amsterdam/New York, NY: Rodopi, 41-64.
5. Alcon-Soler, E. A. & A. Martinez-Flor (2008) Investigating pragmatics in foreign language learning, teaching and testing. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
6. Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2013). Developing L2 pragmatics. Language Learning 63 (Suppl. 1), 68-86.
8. Bardovi-Harlig, K. & R. Mahan-Taylor (2003). Teaching pragmatics. Washington DC: Office of English Programs, U.S. Department of State.
9. Belz, J. A. & N. Vyatkina (2005). Learner corpus analysis and the development of L2 pragmatic competence in networked intercultural language study: The case of German modal particles. The Canadian Modern Language Review 62, 17-48.
10. Bialystok, E. (1993). Symbolic representation and attentional control in pragmatic competence. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press, 43-59.
11. Bouton, L. (1994).CanNNSskill in interpreting implicatures inAmerican English be improved through explicit instruction? In L. Bouton & Y. Kachru (eds.), Pragmatics and language learning, Monograph Series 5. Division of English as an International Language, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, 88-109.
12. Candlin, C. (1987). Towards task-based language learning. In C. Candlin & D.Murphy (eds.), Language learning tasks. London: Prentice Hall, 5-22.
13. Cohen, A. D. (2005). Strategies for learning and performing L2 speech acts. Intercultural Pragmatics 2-3, 275-301.
14. Cohen, A. D. (2008). Teaching and assessing L2 pragmatics: What can we expect from learners? Language Teaching 41, 213-235.
15. Cohen, A. D. & N. Ishihara (2013). Pragmatics. In B. Tomlinson (ed.), Applied linguistics and materials development. London/New York: Bloomsbury, 113-126.
16. Cohen, A. D. & E. Tarone (1994). The effects of training on written speech act behavior: Stating and changing an opinion. Minnesota TESOL Journal 12, 39-62.
17. Cunningham, J. & N. Vyatkina (2012).Telecollaboration for professional purposes:Towards developing a formal register in the foreign language classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review 68, 422-450.
18. da Silva, A. J. B. (2003). The effects of instruction on pragmatic development: Teaching polite refusals in English. Second Language Studies 22, 55-106.
19. DeKeyser, R. (2007). Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction.Mahwah, Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 94-113.
20. Di Pietro, R. (1987). Strategic interaction: Learning languages through scenarios. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
21. Ellis, N. & L. Collins (2009). Input and second language acquisition: The roles of frequency, form, and function. Introduction to the special issue. The Modern Language Journal 93, 329-335.
22. Ellis, R. (2004).The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge. Language Learning 4, 227-275.
23. Ellis, R. (2005). Principles of instructed language learning. System 33, 209-224.
24. Eslami, Z. R. (2005). Invitations in Persian and English: Ostensible or genuine? Intercultural Pragmatics 2, 453-480.
25. Eslami, Z. R. & A. Eslami-Rasekh (2008). Enhancing the pragmatic competence of non-native Englishspeaking teacher candidates (NNESTCs) in an EFL context. In E. Alcon-Soler & A. Martinez-Flor (eds.), Investigating pragmatics in foreign language learning, teaching and testing. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters, 178-197.
26. Eslami, Z. R. & C. N. Liu (2013). Learning pragmatics through computer-mediated communication in Taiwan. Iranian Journal of Society, Culture, and Language, 52-73.
27. Eslami-Rasekh, Z., A. Eslami-Rasekh & A. Fatahi (2004). The effect of explicit metapragmatic instruction on the speech act awareness of advanced EFL students. TESL EJ 8(2) A2, 1-12.
28. Felix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2008). Pedagogical intervention and the development of pragmatic competence in learning Spanish as a foreign language. Issues in Applied Linguistics 16, 49-84.
29. Fordyce, K. (2014). The differential effects of explicit and Implicit Instruction on EFL Learners' Use of Epistemic Stance. Applied Linguistics 35, 6-28.
30. Fukuya,Y. & A.Martinez-Flor (2008).The interactive effects of pragmatic-eliciting tasks and pragmatics instruction. Foreign Language Annuals 41, 478-500.
31. Fukuya, Y. & Y. Zhang (2002). Effects of recasts on EFL learners' acquisition of pragmalinguistic conventions of request. Second Language Studies 21, 1-47.
32. Fulcher, G. & R. Marquez-Reiter (2003). Task difficulty in speaking tests. Language Testing 20, 321-344.
33. Ghobadi, A. & M. Fahim (2009). The effect of explicit teaching of English 'Thanking formulas' on Iranian EFL intermediate level students at English language institutes. System 37, 526-537.
34. Halenko, N. & C. Jones (2011). Teaching pragmatic awareness of spoken requests to Chinese EAP learners in the UK: Is explicit instruction effective? System 39, 240-250.
35. Holmes, J. & D. Brown (1987). Teachers and students learning about compliments. TESOL Quarterly 21, 523-546.
36. Houck, N. & D. Tatsuki (2011). Pragmatics from research to practice: New directions. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
37. House, J. (1996). Developing pragmatic fluency in English as a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18, 225-252.
38. Ishida,K. (2007).Developing understanding of how the desu/masu and plain forms express one's stance. In D. R. Yoshimi & H. Wang (eds.), Selected papers from the conference on pragmatics in the CJK classroom: The state of the art. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, 181-202.
39. Ishihara, N. & A. D. Cohen (2010). Teaching and learning pragmatics:Where language and culture meet. Harlow, UK: Pearson Longman.
40. Iwai, T. (2013). Using n desu in small talk: JFL learners' pragmatic development. In K. Kondo-Brown, Y. Saito-Abbott, S. Satsutani, M. Tsutsui & A. Wehmeyer (eds.), New perspectives on Japanese language learning, linguistics, and culture. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, National Foreign Language Resource Center, 27-47.
41. Jeon, E. H. & T. Kaya (2006). Effects of L2 instruction on interlanguage pragmatic development. In N. John & L. Ortega (eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 165-211.
42. Johnson, N. & J. deHaan (2013). Strategic Interaction 2.0: Instructed intercultural pragmatics in an EFL context. International Journal of Strategies Information Technology and Application 4, 49-62.
43. Kakegawa, T. (2009). Development of the use of Japanese sentence-final particles through email correspondence. In N. Taguchi (ed.), Pragmatic competence. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, 301-333.
44. Kasper, G. (ed.) (1995). Pragmatics of Chinese as native and target language. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii at Manoa, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
45. Kasper, G. (2001). Classroom research on interlanguage pragmatics. In K. Rose & G. Kasper (eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 33-62.
46. Kasper, G. & C. Roever (2005). Pragmatics in second language learning. In E. Hinkel (ed.), Pragmatics in language teaching and learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 317-328.
47. Kasper, G. & K. Rose (1999). Pragmatics and SLA. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 19, 81-104.
48. Kasper, G. & K. Rose (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
49. Kim, Y. (2012). Task complexity, learning opportunities and Korean EFL learners' question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34, 627-658.
50. Koike, D. A. & L. Pearson (2005). The effect of instruction and feedback in the development of pragmatic competence. System 33, 481-501.
51. Kondo, S. (2008). Effects on pragmatic development through awareness-raising instruction: Refusals by Japanese EFL learners. In E. Alcon-Soler & A.Martinez-Flor (eds.), Investigating pragmatics in foreign language learning, teaching and testing. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters, 153-177.
52. Kubota,M. (1995). Teachability of conversational implicatures to Japanese EFL learners. IRLT Bulletin 9, 35-67.
53. Li,Q. (2012). Effects of instruction on adolescent beginners' acquisition of request modification. TESOL Quarterly 46, 30-55.
54. Li, S. (2012). The effect of input-based practice on pragmatic development in L2 Chinese. Language Learning 62, 403-438.
55. Li, S. (2013). Amount of practice and pragmatic development of request-making in L2 Chinese. In N. Taguchi & J. M. Sykes (eds.), Technology in interlanguage pragmatics research and teaching. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 43-70.
56. Li, X. (2011). Sociolinguistic variation in speech of learners of Chinese as a second language. Language Learning 60, 366-408.
57. Liddicoat, A. & C. Crozet (2001). Acquiring French interactional norms through instruction. In K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 125-144.
58. LoCastro, V. (2003). An introduction to pragmatics: Social action for language teachers. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
59. Louw, K. J., T. M. Derwing & M. L. Abbott (2010). Teaching pragmatics to L2 learners for the workplace: The job interview. The Canadian Modern Language Review 66, 739-758.
60. Lyster, R. (1994). The effect of functional-analytic teaching on aspects of French immersion students' sociolinguistic competence. Applied Linguistics 15, 263-287.
61. Marquez-Reiter, R. & M. E. Placencia (eds.) (2004). Current trends in the pragmatics of Spanish. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
62. Martinez-Flor, A. & E. Alcon-Soler (2005). Special issue: Pragmatics in instructed language learning. System 33.
63. Martinez-Flor, A. & E. Uso-Juan (2006). A comprehensive pedagogical framework to develop pragmatics in the foreign language classroom: The 6Rs approach. Applied Language Learning 16, 39-64.
64. Martinez-Flor, A. (2006). The effectiveness of explicit and implicit treatments on EFL learners' confidence in recognizing appropriate suggestions. In K. Bardovi-Harlig, C. Felix-Brasdefer & A. S. Omar (eds.), Pragmatics and language learning, vol. 11. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press, 199-225.
65. Martinez-Flor, A. (2008). The effect of an inductive-deductive teaching approach to develop learners' use of request modifiers in the EFL classroom. In E. Alcon-Soler (ed.), Learning how to request in an instructed language learning context. Berlin, Germany: Peter Lang, 191-225.
66. Martinez-Flor, A. & Y. Fukuya (2005). The effects of instruction on learners' production of appropriate and accurate suggestions. System 33, 463-480.
67. Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: An introduction (2nd edn). Oxford: Blackwell.
68. Narita, R. (2012). The effects of pragmatic consciousness-raising activity on the development of pragmatic awareness and use of hearsay evidential markers for learners of Japanese as a foreign language. Journal of Pragmatics 44, 1-29.
69. Nguyen, T. T. M. (2013). Instructional effects on the acquisition of modifers in constructive criticisms by EFL learners. Language Awareness 22, 76-94.
70. Nguyen, T., T. H. Pham & M. H. Pham (2012). The relative effects of explicit and implicit formfocused instruction on the development of L2 pragmatic competence. Journal of Pragmatics 44, 416-434.
71. Pearson, L. (2006). Patterns of development in Spanish L2 pragmatic acquisition: An analysis of novice learners' production of directives. The Modern Language Journal 90, 473-495.
72. Riddiford, N. & A. Joe (2010). Tracking the development of sociopragmatic skills. TESOL Quarterly 44, 195-205.
73. Robinson, P. (2011). Task-based language learning: A review of issues. Language Learning 61, 1-36.
74. Roever, C. (2009). Teaching and testing pragmatics. In M. Long & C. Doughty (eds.), Handbook of language teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 560-577.
75. Roever, C. & T. H. Nguyen (2013). Pragmatics of Vietnamese as native and target language. Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawaii.
76. Rose, K. R. (2005). On the effects of instruction in second language pragmatics. System 33, 385-399.
77. Rose, K. & G. Kasper (2001). Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
78. Rose, K. R. & K. F. Ng (2001). Inductive and deductive teaching of compliments and compliment responses. In K. R.Rose & G.Kasper (eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press, 145-169.
79. Safont, M. P. (2004). An analysis of EAP learners' pragmatic production: A focus on request forms. Iberica 8, 23-39.
80. Sardegna, V. G. & D. Molle (2010). Videoconferencing with strangers: Teaching Japanese EFL students verbal backchannel signals and reactive expressions. Intercultural Pragmatics 7-2, 279-310.
81. Schmidt, R. (1993). Consciousness, learning and interlanguage pragmatics. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 43-57.
82. Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3-32.
83. Shively, R. L. (2010). From the virtual world to the real world: A model of pragmatics instruction for study abroad. Foreign Language Annals 45, 105-137.
84. Shively, R. L. (2011). L2 pragmatic development in study abroad: A longitudinal study of Spanish service encounters. Journal of Pragmatics 43, 1818-1835.
85. Simin, S., Z. Eslami, A. Eslami-Rasekh & S. Ketabi (2014). The effects of explicit teaching of apologies on Persian EFL learners' performance:When e-communication helps. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning 3, 71-84.
86. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
87. Skehan, P. (2003). Task-based instruction. Language Teaching 36, 1-14.
88. Swain, M. (1993). The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren't enough. Canadian Modern Language Review 50, 158-164.
89. Swain, M. & S. Lapkin (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate. Applied Linguistics 16, 370-391.
90. Swain, M. & Y. Watanabe (2013). Languaging: Collaborative dialogue as a source of learning. In C. Chapelle (ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
91. Sykes, J. (2009). Learner request in Spanish: Examining the potential of multiuser virtual environments for L2 pragmatics acquisition. In L. Lomika & G. Lord (eds.),The second generation: Online collaboration and social networking in CALL, 2009 CALICO Monograph. San Marcos: TX, 199-234.
92. Sykes, J. (2013).Multiuser virtual environments: Learner apologies in Spanish. In N. Taguchi & J. Sykes (eds.), Technology in interlanguage pragmatics research and teaching. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 71-100.
93. Sykes, J. & A. D. Cohen (2006). Dancing with words: Strategies for learning pragmatics in Spanish. Retrieved 27 December 2011, from Regents of the University of Minnesota: www.carla. umn.edu/speechacts/sp-pragmatics/home.html
94. Taguchi, N. (2007). Task difficulty in oral speech act production. Applied Linguistics 28, 113-115.
95. Taguchi, N. (ed.) (2009). Pragmatic competence in Japanese as a second language. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
96. Taguchi, N. (2010). Longitudinal studies in interlanguage pragmatics. In A. Trosborg (ed.), Handbook of pragmatics vol.7: Pragmatics across languages and cultures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 333-361.
97. Taguchi, N. (2011). Teaching pragmatics: Trends and issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31, 289-310.
98. Taguchi, N. & J. M. Sykes (eds.) (2013). Technology in interlanguage pragmatics research and teaching. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
99. Takahashi, S. (2001). The role of input enhancement in developing pragmatic competence. In K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 177-199.
100. Takahashi, S. (2005). Noticing in task performance and learning outcomes: A qualitative analysis of instructional effects in interlanguage pragmatics. System 33, 437-461.
101. Takahashi, S. (2010a). Assessing learnability in second language pragmatics. In A. Trosborg (ed.), Handbook of pragmatics (vol.7). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 391-421.
102. Takahashi, S. (2010b). The effect of pragmatic instruction on speech act performance. In Martinez-Flor, A. & E. Uso-Juan (eds.), Speech act performance: Theoretical, empirical and methodological issues. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 127-144.
103. Takimoto, M. (2006). The effects of explicit feedback on the development of pragmatic proficiency. Language Teaching Research 10, 393-417.
104. Takimoto, M. (2007). The effects of referential oriented activity in the structured input task on the development of learners' pragmatic proficiency. New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics 13, 46-60.
105. Takimoto, M. (2009). The effects of input-based tasks on the development of learners' pragmatic proficiency. Applied Linguistics 30, 1-25.
106. Takimoto, M. (2012a). Assessing the effects of identical task repetition and task type repetition on learners' recognition and production of second language request downgraders. Intercultural Pragmatics 9, 71-96.
107. Takimoto,M. (2012b). Metapragmatic discussion in interlanguage pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics 44, 1240-1253.
108. Tan, K. H. & A. Farashaiyan (2012). The effectiveness of teaching formulaic politeness strategies in making request to undergraduates in an ESL classroom. Asian Social Science 8, 189-196.
109. Tateyama, Y. (2001). Explicit and implicit teaching of pragmatic routines. In K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 200-222.
110. Tateyama, Y. (2007). The effects of instruction on pragmatic awareness. In K. Bradford-Watts (ed.), JALT 2006 Conference Proceedings. Tokyo: JALT, 1189-1200. Available online at http://jalt-publications.org/archive/proceedings/2006/E128.pdf.
111. Tateyama, Y. (2009). Requesting in Japanese: The effect of instruction on JFL learners' pragmatic competence. In N. Taguchi (ed.), Pragmatic competence. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, 129-166.
112. Taylor, G. (2002). Teaching gambits: The effect of instruction and task variation on the use of conversation strategies by intermediate Spanish students. Foreign Language Annals 35, 171-189.
113. Uso-Juan, E. (2013). Effects of metapragmatic instruction on EFL learners' production of refusals. In O. Marti-Arnandiz & P. Salazar-Campillo (eds.), Refusals in instructional contexts and beyond. Amsterdam/New York, NY: Rodopi, 65-100.
114. Utashiro, T. & G.Kawai (2009). Blended learning for Japanese reactive tokens: Effects of computer-led, instructor-led, and peer-based instruction. In N. Taguchi (ed.), Pragmatic competence. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, 275-299.
115. van Compernolle, R. A. (2011). Developing second language sociopragmatic knowledge through concept-based instruction: A microgenetic case study. Journal of Pragmatics 43, 3267-3283.
116. VanPatten, B. (2012). Input processing. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (eds.), Routledge handbook of SLA. NY: Routledge, 268-281.
117. Vygotsky, Lev S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
118. Willis, D. & J. Willis (eds.) (2007). Doing task-based teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.
119. Winke, P. & C. Teng (2010). Using task-based pragmatics tutorials while studying abroad in China. Intercultural Pragmatics 7-2, 363-399.
120. Wishnoff, J. R. (2000). Hedging your bets: L2 learners' acquisition of pragmatic devices in academic writing and computer-mediated discourse. Second Language Studies 19, 127-157. www.hawaii.edu/sls/sls/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Wishnoff.pdf
121. Wolfson, N. (1989). Perspectives: Sociolinguistics and TESOL. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
122. Yoshimi, D. R. (2001). Explicit instruction and JFL learners' use of interactional discourse makers. In K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 223-244.