Input processing

The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 268-281

  VanPatten, Bill ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85064367720     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203808184     Document Type: Chapter

References (85)

1. Allen, L. (2000). Form-meaning connections and the French causative: An experiment in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 69—84.
2. Bates, E. and MacWhinney, B. (1984). Functionalism and the Competition Model. In B. MacWhinney and E. Bates (Eds.), The cross-linguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 3—73). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Benati, A. (2001). A comparative study of the effects of processing instruction and output-based instruction on the acquisition of the Italian future tense. Language Teaching Research, 5, 95—127.
4. Benati, A. (2004). The effects of structured input activities and explicit information on the acquisition ofthe Italian future tense. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 207—225). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
5. Benati, A. (2005). The effects of processing instruction, traditional instruction, and meaning-output instruction on the acquisition of the English past simple tense. Language Teaching Research, 9, 67—93.
6. Benati, A. and Lee, J. F. (2008). Grammar acquisition andprocessing instruction. Bristol, UK: Multingual Matters.
7. Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language (pp. 279—362). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
8. Cadierno, T. (1995). Formal instruction from a processing perspective: An investigation into the Spanish past tense. The Modern Language Journal, 79, 179—93.
9. Carroll, S. (2001). Input and evidence: The raw material of second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
10. Carroll, S. (2004). Commentary: Some general and specific comments on input processing and processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Clahsen, H. and Felser C. (2006). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 3-42.
12. Collentine, J. (1998). Processing instruction and the subjunctive. Hispania, 81, 576-587.
13. Culman, H., Henry, N., and VanPatten, B. (2009). The role of explicit information in processing instruction: An on-line study with German accusative case inflections. Die Unterrichtspraxis.
14. DeKeyser, R., Salaberry, M. R., Robinson, P., and Harrington, M. (2002). What gets processing in processing instruction? A response to Bill VanPatten’s “Update”. Language Learning, 52, 805-823.
15. DeKeyser, R. and Sokalski K. (1996). The differential role of comprehension and production practice. Language Learning, 46, 613-642.
16. Doughty, C. J. (2003). Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In C. J. Doughty and M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256-310). Oxford: Blackwell.
17. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Erlam, R. (2004). Evaluating the effectiveness of structured input and output-based instruction in foreign language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 559-582.
19. Ervin-Tripp, S. M. (1974). Is secondlanguage acquisition reallylike the first?. TESOL Quarterly, 8, 111-127.
20. Faerch, C. and Kasper G. (1986). The role of comprehension in secondlanguage learning. Applied Linguistics,7, 257-274.
21. Farley, A. P. (2001). Authentic processing instruction and the Spanish subjunctive. Hispania, 84, 289-299.
22. Farley, A. P. (2005). Structured input. New York: McGraw-Hill.
23. Fernández, C. (2008). Reexamining the role of explicit information in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 277-305.
24. Frenck-Mestre, C. (2005). Eye-movement recording as a tool for studying syntactic processing in a second language: A review of methodologies and experimental findings. Second Language Research, 21, 175-198.
25. Gass, S. M. (2003). Input and interaction. In C. Doughty and M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 224—255). Oxford: Blackwell.
26. Gass, S. M. and Madden, C. G. (Eds.) (1985). Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
27. Gass, S. M. and Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. (Third Edition). New York: Routledge.
28. Han, Z. and Peverly, S. T. (2007). Input processing: A study of ab initio learners with multilingual backgrounds. International Journal of Multilingualism, 4, 17—37.
29. Harrington, M. (2004). Commentary: Input processing as a theory of processing input. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 79—92). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Hatch, E. (1983). Simplified input. In R. W. Andersen (Ed.), Pidginization and creolization as language acquisition (pp. 64—88). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
31. Henry, N., Culman, H., and VanPatten, B. (2009). More on the effects of explicit information in instructed SLA: A partial replication of and a response to fernandez (2008). Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 559-575.
32. Isabelli, C. (2008). First Noun Principle or L1 transfer principle in SLA? Hispania, 2, 463-476.
33. Keating, G. D. and Farley, A. P. (2008). Processing instruction, meaning-based output instruction, and meaning-based drills: Impacts on classroom L2 acquisition of Spanish object pronouns. Hispania, 91, 631-650.
34. Klein, W. (1986). Second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
36. Lee, J. F. (1987). Morphological factors influencing pronominal reference assignment by learners of Spanish. In T. A. Morgan, J. F. Lee, and B.VanPatten (Eds.), Language and language use: Studies in Spanish (pp. 221-232). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
37. Lee, J. F. (2004). On the generalizability, limits, and potential future directions of processing instruction research. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 311-323). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
38. Lee, J. F. and VanPatten, B. (1995). Making communicative language teaching happen (First Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.
39. Lee, J. F. and VanPatten, B. (2003). Making communicative language teaching happen (Second Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.
40. Long, M. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversations and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4, 126-141.
41. Marinis, T., Roberts, L., Felser, C., and Clahsen, H. (2005). Gaps in second language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 53-78.
42. Montrul, S. (2004). The acquisition of Spanish: Morphosyntactc development in monolingual and bilingual L1 acquisition and adult L2 acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
43. Morgan-Short, K. and Wood Bowden, H. (2006). Processing instruction and meaningful output-based instruction: Effects on second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 31-65.
44. Papadopoulou, D. and Clahsen, H. (2003). Parsing strategies in L1 and L2 sentence processing: A study of relative clause attachment in Greek. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 501-528.
45. Park, E. (2009). Learners’ self-generated noticing of L2 written input: noticed features and processing strategies. Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the Georgetown University Roundtable on Linguistics.
46. Pritchett, B. L. (1992). Grammatical competence and parsing performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47. Qin, J. (2008). The effect of processing instruction and dictogloss tasks on acquisition of the English passive voice. Language Teaching Research, 12, 61-82.
48. Salaberry, M. R. (1997). The role of input and output practice in second language acquisition. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 422-451.
49. Sanz, C. and Morgan-Short, K. (2004). Positive evidence vs. explicit rule presentation and explicit negative feedback: A computer assisted study. Language Learning, 54, 35-78.
50. Sanz, C. and VanPatten, B. (1998). On input processing, processing instruction, and the nature of replication tasks: A response to Salaberry. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 54, 263-273.
51. Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in secondlanguage learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
52. Serratrice, L. (2007). Cross-linguistic influence in the interpretation of anaphoric and cataphoric pronouns in English-Italian bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(3), 225-238.
53. Sharwood Smith, M. (1986). Comprehension versus acquisition: Two ways of processing input. Applied Linguistics, 7, 239—274.
54. Slobin, D. I. (1966). Grammatical transformations and sentence interpretation in childhood and adulthood. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 219—227.
55. Sorace, A. and Filiaci, F. (2006). Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22(3), 339-368.
56. Toth, P. D. (2000). The interaction of instruction and learner-internal factors in the acquisition of L2 morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 169-208.
57. Truscott, J. (2004). The effectiveness of grammar instruction: Analysis of a meta-analysis. English Teaching and Learning, 28, 17-29.
58. Truscott, J. and Sharwood Smith, M. (2004). Acquisition by processing: A modular perspective on language development. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 1-20.
59. Uludag, O. and VanPatten, B. (forthcoming). The comparative effects of processing instruction and dictogloss on the acquisition of the English passive by speakers of Turkish. International Review of Applied Linguistics.
60. VanPatten, B. (1984a). Processing strategies and morpheme acquisition. In F. R. Eckman, L. H. Bell, and D. Nelson (Eds.), Universals of second language acquisition (pp. 88-98). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
61. VanPatten, B. (1984b). Learners’ comprehension of clitic pronouns: More evidence foraword order strategy. Hispanic Linguistics,1, 57-67.
62. VanPatten, B. (1993). Grammar instruction for the acquisition-rich classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 26, 433-450.
63. VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
64. VanPatten, B. (2002). Processing the content of input processing and processing instruction: A response to DeKeyser, Salaberry, Robinson, and Harrington. Language Learning, 52, 825-831.
65. VanPatten, B. (Ed.) (2004). Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
66. VanPatten, B. (2007). Input processing in adult second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten and J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 115-135). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
67. VanPatten, B. (2008). Processing matters. In T. Piske and M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Input Matters (pp. 47-61). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
68. VanPatten, B. (2009a.) Stubborn syntax. Plenary paper delivered at the annual meeting ofthe Georgetown University Roundtable on Linguistics.
69. VanPatten, B. (2009b). Processing matters in input enhancement. In. T. Piske and M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Input matters (pp. 47-61). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
70. VanPatten, B. (2009c). Formal intervention and the development of proficiency: The role of explicit information. In A. Benati (Ed.), Issues in attaining second language proficiency (pp. 169-188). London: Continuum.
71. VanPatten, B. (2011). Stubborn syntax: How it resists explicit teaching andlearning. In C. Sanz and R. Leow (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2009 Georgetown University Roundtable on Linguistics. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
72. VanPatten, B. and Cadierno, T. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225-243.
73. VanPatten, B. Farmer, J. L., and Clardy, C. L. (2009). Processing instruction and meaning-based output instruction: A response to Keating and Farley (2008). Hispania, 92, 116-126.
74. VanPatten, B. and Fernández, C. (2004). The long-term effects of processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 273-289). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
75. VanPatten, B. and Houston, T. (1998). Contextual effects in processing L2 input sentences. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 2, 53-70.
76. VanPatten, B., Inclezan, D., Salazar, H., and Farley, A. P. (2009). Processing instruction and dictogloss: A study on word order and object pronouns in Spanish. Foreign Language Annals, 42, 558-576.
77. VanPatten, B. and Jegerski, J. (2011). L2 processing and parsing: The issues. In B. VanPatten and J. Jegerski (Eds.), Second language processing and parsing (pp. 3-23). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
78. VanPatten, B. and Keating, G. D. (2007). The hidden problem of second language acquisition: Learners’ processing of morpho-syntax during comprehension. Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the American Association of Teachers of Spanish and Portuguese, San Diego.
79. VanPatten B. and Leeser, M. J. (2006). Theoretical and research considerations underlying classroom practice: The fundamental role of input. In R. Salaberry and B. Lafford (Eds.), The art of teaching Spanish: Second language acquisition from research to praxis (pp. 55—77). Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.
80. VanPatten, B. and Oikkenon, S. (1996). Explanation versus structured input in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 495—510.
81. VanPatten, B. and Sanz, C. (1995). From input to output: Processing instruction and communicative tasks. In F. R. Eckman, D. Highland, P. W. Lee, J. Milcham, and R. Ruthkowski Weber (Eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 169—85). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
82. VanPatten, B. and Uludag, O. (2011). Transfer of training and processing instruction: From input to output. System, 39, 44—53.
83. VanPatten, B. and Wong, W. (2004). Processing instruction and the French causative: Another replication. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 97—118). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
84. Wong, W. (2004). The nature of processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 33—63). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
85. Wong, W. (2005). Input enhancement: From theory and research to classroom practice. New York: McGraw-Hill.